There is a plethora of information on climate science available online, however, it is often difficult to determine the accuracy of the claims being made. The Climate Feedback tool known as the Hypothesis annotation platform relies on a community of scientists who provide commentaries on the scientific accuracy of online content. So far there are 40 scientists who are providing these commentaries.
The resource has provided scientific feedback on a number of climate related articles in well known publications (eg Wall Street Journal, The Guardian and The Hill). These critiques even include the Pope's recent environmental encyclical.
The scientists that conducted these critiques hail from prestigious institutions like MIT, the University of New South Wales Climate Change Research Centre, Germany’s Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Harvard, the US National Snow and Ice Data Center, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The tool assesses both the science of anthropogenic warming and claims made by skeptics. No doubt skeptics will abuse this tool with the intent of undermining the credibility of climate journalism. Nonetheless, it is a great resource to assess the veracity of the statements made by climate journalists.
Click here to access the tool.
_________________________________________
Make sure to see the article titled, "Comprehensive Green School Information and Resources." It contains links to over 300 articles covering everything you need to know about sustainable academics, student eco-initiatives, green school buildings, and college rankings as well as a wide range of related information and resources.
0 comments:
Post a Comment