Showing posts with label legality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legality. Show all posts

Top Ranked Masters Degree in Environmental Law from the Vermont Law School

Vermont Law School is offering an Masters in Environmental Law. Understanding environmental legislation, enforcement and law-making is imperative. This degree is ideal for those who are seeking to make an organization more economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable. Through this degree you can learn the skills that improve efficiency and ensure environmental, human, and employee health in your organization. The degree opens the doors to careers in nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and private industry.

The program is entirely online and can be completed in as little as 18 months. Vermont Law School has been ranked #1 in environmental law by US News and World Report 16 times since the ranking began in 1991.

“After studying environmental law and policy at VLS, I’m at the center of a triangle that includes business, science, and law and where energy is at the core. This is a unique place to be, and I’m doing some meaningful work in energy policy because of it. I love where I am in my career.”

— Keith Dennis, Class of ‘05, Lead Energy Project, US Dept. of Energy

For more information click here.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Supreme Court to Review the EPA's Right to Limit GHGs
Comprehensive Summary of US Green Legislation
New Tool Tracks State Energy Legislation Across the US
Video - Advanced Energy Legislation (AEL) Tracker
Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
Republicans Undermined Climate Legislation
The US is Bound by Law to Honor Climate Treaty
4 Principles for Climate and Energy Legislation
US Green Legislation
Green Marketing Legislation
The Passage of Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green IT Investment, Regulation and Legislation
Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
E-Learning Course on the Legal Frameworks and the Environment
The Lacey Act Combats Illegal Logging
Review of Five Socially Minded Legal Forms

BP Accused of Corporate Recklessness Including Willful Misconduct, Gross Neglect and Making False Statements

A recent US Justice Department court filing, accuses British Petroleum (BP) of gross neglect, as well as making false and misleading comments. The accusations stem from BP's handling of the 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon that spilled 5 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico and killed 11 workers.

The Justice Department alleges false statements and misrepresentation over BP's assertion that the Gulf Coast's natural resources are making a "robust recovery" from its massive 2010 oil spill.

The legal papers filed by the US Justice Department charge that BP is guilty of falsehoods in the $7.8 billion settlement with thousands of Gulf Coast residents and businesses harmed by the spill.

The government’s 37-page objection to BP’s legal claims say the corporate giant is guilty of a “culture of corporate recklessness” that led to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

The challenge seeks to hold BP responsible for a wide array of environmental impacts including dying deep-sea corals, dead dolphins, sick fish and marsh oil. They also allege that BP is ignoring the long-term neurological damage to clean-up workers and other Gulf residents who were exposed to the toxic dispersant Corexit.

In another separate filing, Alabama also accuses the oil company of misrepresentation and argues that BP committed 'willful misconduct' by attempting a risky 'top kill' method to stop the 2010 spill, when it knew that method would fail.

Both the federal government and the state of Alabama are pursuing civil cases. The federal government is also pursuing an ongoing criminal investigation against BP that is expect to begin next year.

BP's TV commercials whitewash what is really going on in the wake of their unprecedented oil spill in the Gulf. It is blatantly dishonest to suggest that everything is back to normal.

The Alabama filing notes that BP misrepresented the flow rate indicating that it was 5,000 bpd (barrels per day), even though they new is was significantly higher.

The court challenge could force BP to pay billions of dollars in fines for the worst offshore oil spill in US history. At the very least it is a warning to all who would cause destruction to the environment.

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
BP's Corporate Irresponsibility
Responsibility for the Costs of the Gulf Oil Spill
The Costs of Offshore Drilling
Managing the Massive Gulf Oil Spill
Offshore Oil is an Avoidable Tragedy
Two More Reasons to Move Beyond Fossil Fuels
The End of Oil and the Next Energy Economy
Reigning in Irresponsible Oil Giants Chevron and Exxon Mobil
The Business of Climate Change Deception
Peak Oil
The Economic Calamity of Peak Oil
Planning a Future Without Oil
Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
Koch Industries Destroys the Environment & Funds Climate Denial
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence

Review of Five Socially Minded Legal Forms for Companies

There are a host of different legal options and requirements for companies who wish to be socially engaged. As reviewed in a May 25 Forbes article, here is a summary of five legal forms available to socially-minded companies. They include Benefit Corporations, California's Flexible Purpose Corporations, Maryland Benefit LLC, L3Cs and B Corporations:

1. Benefit Corporations

This is a new class of corporation, pioneered by the Berwyn, Pa-based nonprofit B Lab. B Lab is a nonprofit organization dedicated to using the power of business to solve social and environmental problems. It is already law in seven states most recently Illinois and Louisiana. This legislation mandates that companies and their boards take into account public benefits that impact society and the environment when making decisions. These companies also have to issue an annual third party audit report that addresses their social and environmental goals. The goal is to give companies legal protection to take certain steps that benefit their non-financial objectives, even if it’s not so good for the bottom line. It is also reassuring to shareholders who are looking for greater corporate responsibility from the companies they invest in.

For more information on Benefit Corporations click here.  

2. California's Flexible Purpose Corporations

This was passed into law in California last October. Flexible Purpose Corporations also allows for Benefit Corporations. Flexible Purpose Corporations, unlike the Benefit variety, don’t have to meet general public benefits. Instead, they can specify at least one “special purpose”–addressing environmental sustainability, for example, or building a park. So the social focus is a lot more narrowly defined than it is with Benefit Corporations. Ultimately, the Flexible Purpose is designed for larger, more traditional companies that want to consider matters other than the financial bottom line, but aren’t “mission driven at their core,” according to Heather Van Dusen, a senior associate at B Lab.

For more information about Flexible Purpose Corporations click here.  

3. Maryland Benefit LLC

 In addition to allowing for Benefit Corporations, Maryland also permits companies to do the same thing but as a Limited Liability Company. That way, businesses already registered as LLCs don’t have to convert over to a corporate structure. The designation was created by legislation signed on May 19 by Gov. Martin O’Malley. The new law protects benefit LLCs from lawsuits by their members if they make decisions that put the environment, community, or social causes over making a profit. It is aimed at firms that want to make social activism part of their corporate mission.

For more information about Maryland Benefit LLC click here.  

4. L3Cs

They’re low-profit limited liability companies with a charitable or educational purpose. There are about 600 such companies in nine states. Proponents created L3Cs to be entities that can be treated as Program Related Investments (PRIs) by foundations. By law, foundations have to direct 5% of their assets to charitable purposes every year. They can do that through PRIs, as long as the organization they’re investing in has a charitable or educational purpose and doesn’t include making a profit as a significant goal. Plus, for-profit investors can put money into an L3C and, as a result, companies potentially can attract considerably more funding. Foundations have been slow to adopt PRIs. But, with new rulings from the IRS, that could change soon.

For more information about L3Cs click here.

5. B Corporations

This isn’t a corporate structure, even though that word is in the name. It’s a certification from B Lab, which rates triple-bottom-line companies. (Think of Fair Trade USA, which certifies Fair Trade companies). Started in 2007, there are now 530 such businesses. Ratings cover five areas–society, environment, employees and so on–with 130 to 180 factors depending on company size and industry. Businesses have to score over 80 out of a total of 200 points. There also are unannounced audits of about 10% of all certified companies every year.

For more information about B Corporations click here.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in ...Carbon Pollution Protection
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
Republicans Undermined Climate Legislation
The US is Bound by Law to Honor Climate Treaty
Climate Science and Policy Implications (Video)
4 Principles for Climate and Energy Legislation
Legislation Through Reconciliation
US Green LegislationGreen Marketing Legislation
The Passage of Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
State Green Jobs Initiatives Need Federal Legislation
Chinese Green Legislation, Part 2
Chinese Green Legislation, Part 1
European Green Legislation Part 1
European Green Legislation Part 2
Europe's Legislation for Greener Cars
Green IT Investment, Regulation and Legislation
Investors and Global Sustainability
Mexico Passes Climate Change Law
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
Ontario's Green Energy Act is Leading the Way
Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
E-Learning Course on the Legal Frameworks and the Environment
The Lacey Act Combats Illegal Logging