Showing posts with label climate finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate finance. Show all posts

The End is Near for Dirty Energy: Fossil Fuels are Being Abandoned by Investors, Insurers and Banks

“I’m done with fossil fuels. They’re done. They’re just done. We’re starting to see divestment all over the world.” - CNBC’s Jim Cramer

The fact that investors, insurance companies and banks are abandoning the fossil fuel industry is a clear sign that coal, oil and gas are in the final stage of their energy dominance. Those who refuse to come to terms with this fundamental reality will by punished financially and in the court of public opinion.

Jim Cramer is a stock market pundit and he sees the writing on the wall. "I’m done with fossil fuels. They’re done. They’re just done. We’re starting to see divestment all over the world,"  Cramer said on CNBC.  He also said the industry is in the "death knell phase" comparing them to the tobacco industry before its collapse. "You’re seeing divestiture by a lot of different funds. It’s going to be a parade."

According to the Guardian, a report at the end of last year concluded that coal-fired power stations were, "on the way to becoming uninsurable". At least 35 insurers have begun pulling out of coal investments. The number of insurers withdrawing coverage for new fossil fuel projects has more than doubled over the last year.

Fossil fuels are not only imperiling life on the planet they are also bad investments. Despite one of the most bullish stock runs in decades, the share prices of many major oil companies are falling short of expectations.  Even if they were providing stellar returns it is hard for investors to justify supporting an industry that augurs death. 

"I think we’re at the point in the global warming story where anyone with an eye to history might want to ask, 'Do I really want to be trying to profit off the wreckage of the planet?'" said environmentalist and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben. "Also, considering how badly the fossil fuel sector is underperforming the economy, politicians might want to ask themselves, 'Do I really want my constituents to think I’m this bad at managing my money?'"

According to a 2019 study published in Nature Energy, the energy return on investment (EROI) for fossil fuels is not what many believe. While a ratio of 25:1 is a commonly sited EROI for fossil fuels, this study suggests it is closer to 6:1 putting them in line with renewable energy. As the study's co-author told Bloomberg "The transition from fossil fuels to renewables actually might not be as bad as people thought," he said.

By 2016 it was becoming clear that divestment was a serious and growing movement. This became irrefutable when in 2017 the world's largest equity investor, Norges Bank Investment Management ("NBIM"), Norway's $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund, announced that it was selling its $35 billion stake in oil and natural gas stocks. As of 2020 most investors now accept that fossil fuels are terminal.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset management firm, has recently announced that it is launching new investment products that screen fossil fuels. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink used his most recent annual letter to warn of a "significant reallocation of capital". With more than $7 trillion in assets under management, this represents a seismic shift in the investment world. Goldman Sachs announced it wouldn’t fund drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and they have signaled that they intend to decrease their financing of of new coal-fired power projects and diversify away from the fossil fuels.

Riksbank, Sweden's central bank has sold off bonds from parts of Canada and Australia due to concerns about fossil fuels. Reuters reported that Riksbank Deputy Governor Martin Floden said the bank would no longer invest in assets from issuers with a large climate footprint, even if the yields were high. "As a result of the new investment policy, we sold our holdings of bonds issued by Alberta in the spring. For the same reason, we have recently sold our holdings in bonds issued by the Australian states of Queensland and Western Australia," Floden said.

It looks as though 2020 will be they year that the shift away from fossil fuels goes mainstream. The European Investment Bank (EIB), the EU’s lending arm said as of the beginning of this year they will no longer finance fossil fuel projects. In 2017 The World Bank pledged to stop funding oil and gas projects beyond 2019. As reported by Reuters Matthew Green, a total of 130 banks worth $47 trillion are moving away from fossil fuels. This includes Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, and Barclays, all of which have adopted UN backed climate policies that would shift them away from fossil fuels to align them with the 2015 Paris Agreement. Other banks to join the "Principles for Responsible Banking" initiative included Danske Bank, ABN Amro, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, Lloyds Banking Group and Societe Generale, according to a statement.

The fossil fuel industry is indeed dying, but unless they end quickly they may still take us all with them.

Related 
Ending Fossil Fuels is Necessary but it Won't be Easy
The Fossil Fuel Industry is Dying
Corruption in Washington: The Money Trail Leads to the Fossil Fuel IndustryRepublicans are the Leading Purveyors of the Fossil Fuel Industry's Climate Denial
Climate Action Must Include Efforts to End Fossil Fuels
Tackling Climate Change by Riding the Fossil Fuel Industry into the Ground
Market Forces are Killing the Fossil Fuel Industry
Oil is a Bad Investment
Curbing Fossil Fuels
The Risks Associated with Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
The Fossil Fuel Industry has Reason to be Nervous
Fossil Fuel Divestment and Stranded Assets
Infographic - Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets

Islamic Banks and Renewable Energy in MENA

Islamic banking involves activity that is consistent with the principles of sharia law. Sharia prohibits the fixed or floating payment or acceptance of specific interest or fees for loans of money. It is also prohibited to invest in businesses that provide goods or services considered contrary to Islamic principles. Many Islamic banks were formed in the late 20th century. Now Islamic banks are are increasingly looking to support renewable energy including hydropower, solar and wind energy. Finance is a crucially important component of building a green infrastructure and this is especially true in the context of economic difficulty and political volatility we are seeing in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

As reported in an article titled “Tapping the Renewable Energy Market,” Islamic lending institutions that create financial mechanisms will benefit the growth of renewable energy. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) solar power projects are driving major new investment. With projects like Abu Dhabi’s Masdar City and the German-led Desertec Industrial Initiative (DII) it is expected that the region will be able to export energy throughout the region and into Europe. The Shams Power Co. alone is partnering in a $600 million investment to build one of the world’s largest concentrated solar power (CSP) projects.

Sustainable water projects are also garnering interest from Islamic banks. One bank in particular diverted part of its real estate holdings into trade finance which led to the first Shari’ah-compliant water-focused investment strategy.

Through the UK-based Islamic investment bank Gatehouse Bank Plc people can now invest in sustainable-oriented companies that offer technology, products and services throughout the water industry. Ocean water desalination is another area which offers tremendous potential for growth. Saudi Arabia is planning to convert all of its seawater desalination plants to renewable energy by 2019. This could attract more than half a trillion dollars in private sector investment over the next five years.

Recently, Islamic banking saw the release of a green financial certificates for the financing of climate change investments and renewable energy projects. The Climate Bonds Initiative, the Clean Energy Business Council of MENA, and the Gulf Bond and Sukuk Association launched the Green Sukuk Working Group to help market and develop the best practices to promote the issuance of green financial certificates.

There is good evidence to indicate that renewable energy investments are successful ventures for Islamic banks. Between 2004 and 2007, Islamic Financier, Bahrain-based Arcapita Bank made significant gains by investing in wind power, reportedly making it one of the most profitable investments in the firms history.

Islamic banking focused on cleantech like renewable energy could significantly contribute to regional sustainability and help to generate significant returns for investors.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Global Green Investors Guide
Pakistan's Sustainable Development Strategy
Africa a Renewable Energy Superpower?
Africa Industrialization Day: Leapfrogging with Sustainable Energy
WWF is Conserving Nature and Combating Poverty in Namibia
East Africa Can Learn from Iceland's Geothermal Energy Industry
South Africa and the Rise of Renewable Energy on the Continent
Lesotho's Renewable Energy Projects One of the Largest in Africa
Arab Spring Fueling the World's Most Ambitious Solar Project in North Africa
Arab Spring and the Environment in North Africa
Norway a Model of Sustainability for the Arab World
House Made of Plastic Bottles in Nigeria
Sun Powered Entrepreneurship in Ghana

The G20 and the Transition to a Greener Economy

The G20 has a pivotal role to play in support of the development of a more sustainable economy. This entails sustainable green growth powered by clean technologies and respect for nature's biodiversity.

Already some international efforts are underway. The World Bank, in partnership with organizations including UNEP, will be assisting developing countries with national, green accounts. But there are still major obstacles that need to be overcome, not the least of which is subsidies for the oil industries and certain fisheries. Subsidies use tax dollars that cause global warming and depletion of dwindling fish stocks.

Global subsidies that contribute to climate change total up to $800 billion and over $27 billion goes to fishing subsidies.We need to do more than address the contradictions inherent in existing economic models, public policy and private sector investments must be aligned in ways that meet the short-term recovery challenges with a longer-term vision of opportunity.

A year ago in London, G-20 leaders articulated a vision of an “inclusive, sustainable and green recovery.” By acting in concert and working cooperatively, the G20 can play a central role in making the transition to a low carbon economy.


Related Posts

Greenpeace's G20 Checklist

Greenpeace International was hoping that the G20 leaders meeting in Seoul would honor the promises they made a year ago on climate action and begin cutting fossil fuel subsidies and helping the world to ramp-up the green economy.

In a recent statement, Patricia Lerner, Greenpeace International Senior Political Adviser said, 'This G20 (meeting) is supposed to give a strong signal of support for the upcoming climate talks in Cancun (Mexico), but instead we understand there are moves afoot to backtrack on commitments made a year ago."

Greenpeace issued a G20 checklist that including honouring their promises on climate, closing the gap between industrialised country emission reduction commitments and what the climate science demands. Leaders must also create the financial and regulatory conditions that incentivise a green economy, and agree on the indicators and reporting mechanisms needed to monitor progress.

Another key issue committed to by G20 leaders in Pittsburgh last year and reported on in Toronto earlier this year was the phase-out of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. A Greenpeace report, written by the Global Subsidies Initiative, reveals a lack of transparency around fossil fuel subsidies. The review recommends that the focus should be on a much wider range of issues than merely revenue maximization.

Greenpeace also called on G20 leaders to invest in climate finance, switch to clean energy and stop deforestation. 'These governments have a choice: They can lead the world to a clean energy future, safe from the ravages of climate change' or they can continue to subsidise the oil industry and accept the human and economic consequences of dangerous climate change,' Lerner said.


Related Posts
The G20 and the Transition to a Greener Economy
The G20 and the Green Economy
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Spain Renews its Commitment to Clean Energy at the G20
UN Hopeful about G20 Climate Finance
Video on Green Growth - Korea's Key to a Better Future
Korea's Green Growth and the New Expanison Paradigm
UN Chief Asks G20 to Focus on a Sustainable Recovery
G20 Summit in Toronto Ends with Little Action on Climate Change
G20 Must Cooperate for a Sustainable Recovery
G20 and Central Bank Governors Joint Communique
G20 Disagreements and Global Economic Reforms
Program and Plans for G8 and G20 Summits in Canada
UN Climate Change Initiatives Post Toronto
G20 Security Concerns Force Cancellation of Sustainable Supply Chain Event
G20 Protestors Dilute Green Message
Canadians Disappointed with Conservative's Lack of leadership at the Toronto G20 Summit
The G20 and the Developing World Disagree on Proposed Climate Change Protocols
Competing National Priorities
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Local Business Promotes Green Agenda for G20 in Pittsburgh
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
Global Warming Exposes Resources but Arctic Meeting Leaves Some Out in the Cold
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets