Showing posts with label chemicals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chemicals. Show all posts

Tackling the Problem of Plastic Waste on World Oceans Day

June 8 is World Oceans Day an opportunity to reflect on the importance of our oceans as well as solutions to the numerous threats they face. In 2017 the action focus is plastic pollution. Our oceans are indispensable to life of Earth and fate of humanity is intimately tied to their well-being. Our oceans are hotter and more acidic and they are increasingly unable to serve as carbon sinks. Coral reefs are dying and entire aquatic ecosystems are being destroyed. Norwegian billionaire and ocean advocate Kjell Inge Røkke aptly summarized situation when he said, "the oceans are also under greater pressure than ever before from overfishing, coastal pollution, habitat destruction, climate change and ocean acidification, and one of the most pressing challenges of all, plasticization of the ocean. The need for knowledge and solutions is pressing."

Many of these issues are intertwined. For example global warming appears to be contributing to an alarming decline in the amount of dissolved oxygen in the world's ocean. Low ocean oxygen is part of a feedback loop which sees microorganisms produce the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide. These effects could lead to ocean dead zones that are deadly for a number of marine organisms. It could even lead to a complete breakdown of aquatic food chains. These are some of the findings in a large research synthesis conducted by oceanographer Sunke Schmidtko and two colleagues from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel, Germany. The research was published in the journal Nature.

Market growth

Plastic (celluloid) was invented by John Wesley Hyatt in 1869, however it was the invention and mass manufacturing of cheap oil based plastic in the 1960s that has led our current crisis. In 1965 we were producing about 15 million tons of plastic each year we now produce more than 300 million tons every year.

The plastic market has averaged 5 percent growth per year since 2000 primarily in packaging. Between 2000 and 2015, plastic used in packaging grew from 17 percent of market share to 25 percent. Plastic is now a $427 billion industry in the US alone. It employs nearly one million American workers and it is the third largest US manufacturing industry. Estimates indicate that if the trend continues by 2050 there will be more plastic in the ocean, by weight, than fish.

Existential threat

Yayat Supriatna, an urban planning scholar who has advised the Indonesian government said, "People don’t understand how dangerous plastic can be." Plastic is toxic and can be deadly. It is estimated that one million seabirds and 100,000 marine mammals and sea turtles become entrapped in plastic or ingest it and die each year. Plastic is already killing millions of creatures and there is mounting evidence to suggest that plastic may be an existential threat to our species.

Plastic has become ubiquitous because it is cheap, lightweight, strong and durable. Its cheapness is due to the fact that we found a way to make it with oil. Its strength and durability are what makes it so dangerous. Plastic bottles in the ocean will not break down for 4 centuries and even then it lives eternally on as "poisonous confetti".

In 2016 a couple of sperm whales washed up on shores of Germany having starved to death due to a belly full of plastic. This is a redux of a whale found dead in the waters off the Greek isle of Mykonos in 2011. Whales are just one of many creatures that are threatened by plastic waste.

As quoted in a PRI investigative piece, oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer, the man who coined the term "gyres" said, plastic pollution, "makes global warming look like child’s play". He suggests that plastic may even threaten the survival of some species including humans.

He explained the pervasive nature of the threat by saying, "We’re all infected with plastic...Molecules from some kid’s plastic bottle, dropped into the ocean in Asia, are winding up in the food Americans eat." This, Ebbesmeyer said could interfere with reproduction in a number of studies including humans.

There has been a marked decline in sperm counts which some have attributed to plastic pollution. This includes the carcinogenic synthetic estrogen imitators contained in Bisphenol A (BPA). Almost everybody has traces of BPA in their bodies. Research suggests that exposure to plastics can even impact the fertility of subsequent generations. Biological scientist, Frederick vom Saal, told Mother Jones magazine, "A poison kills you. A chemical like BPA reprograms your cells and ends up causing a disease in your grandchild that kills him."

Sizable problem

The scope of the problem is mind boggling. There are massive, swirling patches of plastic in our oceans. Some of the gyres hold around 400,000 plastic particles per square kilometre.

We continue to add 8 million tons of plastic to the oceans every year. There are 5.2 trillion bits of plastic in the sea. The problem is growing so fast that in the not too distant future plastic could soon cover half the planet’s surface. In some places there is six times more plastic in the water than plankton. The problem is growing so fast that in the not too distant future plastic could soon cover half the planet’s surface. In some places there is six times more plastic in the water than plankton.

Americans throw out more than 45,000 plastic bottles per minute or 2.5 million plastic bottles per hour. Globally people use roughly one million plastic bags per minute.

Plastic is now everywhere on the planet. Researchers from Australia’s University of Tasmania and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds found 18 tonnes of plastic garbage (239 items per square metre) scattered across a small South Pacific island 5,000 kilometers from the nearest human occupation.

The threats associated with plastics are significant. University of Tasmania researcher Jennifer Lavers said plastic in the oceans could be as great a threat as climate change. "You put carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or plastic in the oceans and both will stick around," she told New Scientist.

According to an aerial survey by inventor Boyan Slat the problem of plastic pollution in our oceans is worse than we thought. The survey of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, collected over 1,000 large pieces of garbage in under 2 hours.

Government action

France has announced that it is banning all plastic bags, plastic utensils, cups, and dishes by 2020. At the end of 2015, US President Barack Obama signed a bill requiring that American manufacturers end the use of microbeads in products by July 1, 2017 and end the sale of products containing microbeads in by July 1, 2018. In June 2016 Canada's federal government decision added plastic microbeads to the Schedule 1 list of toxic substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), enabling the government to regulate and ultimately ban the substance.

Oceans are not being protected as they should. Taking a page from the oil industry the US the plastics industry lobbyists have been successful petitioned government in an effort to minimize regulatory oversight.

The patchwork of laws and agreements, along with uneven enforcement are problematic. We also must deal with the difficult issue of waters outside national jurisdictions. We need more protections, more science and more transparency.

Business

The problem of plastic waste is a business problem that must be solved by business innovation. Western multinationals like Proctor & Gamble and Unilever, Nestle and Coca-Cola produce much of the world's plastic waste. However, thus far too little is being done to address the problem. "The corporations may offer a bit of charity here and there," Yayat says. "But they don’t really help. They’ll say the environment is the government’s responsibility."

There are powerful incentives driving corporate action. The sustainable plastic market was estimated to have reached $142.42 billion in 2015. In a Triple Pundit article about the new plastic economy Leon Kaye makes the point that the business community needs to drive a transition in the plastics industry.

"There is a large consensus that the plastics economy needs a fundamental rethink and redesign," said Rob Opsomer, the New Plastics Economy Lead with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, "and that the New Plastics Economy sets an economically and environmentally attractive direction to make that happen."

The single-use plastics industry contributes anywhere from $80 billion to $120 billion in material value losses annually. Further, as referenced above plastic polutes natural environment. This and other environmental problems associated with single-use plastic cost the global economy at least $40 billion a year.

Innovation

There are a number of innovations from the corporate sector that may help. In 2012 Italian company Bio-on unveiled a bioplastics polymer that is 100 percent biodegradable in water and soil. S.C. Johnson & Son Inc. launched an initiative to help build the infrastructure to eventually make Ziploc packaging bags widely recyclable via curbside recycling programs. Ford has replaced plastic car parts with parts made from carbon dioxide. Craft brewery is now making its six pack holders with an edible and biodegradable alternative made of barley and wheat remnants from the brewing process.

In April of this year, the BBC's Helen Briggs reported on a caterpillar that eats plastic.  Researchers at Cambridge University have discovered a plastic eating moth larvae (Galleria mellonella) that breaks down plastic's chemical bonds. It is hoped that researchers may be able to identify microbes in the caterpillar that could be used to dispose of plastic waste in an environmentally friendly fashion. The research was published in the journal, Current Biology.

Alternatives

We know that plastic is very useful, what we need is an alternative to oil based plastics that are not so environmentally harmful. This is especially important in light of the fact that only 14 percent of plastic is currently being recycled. So in addition to doing a much better job of recycling we need to make biodegradable plastics that do not use oil.

A Trucost sustainability focused life cycle report says that plastics cost $139 billion each year. However, it also suggests that plastic alternatives may be worse for the environment. The American Chemistry Council (ACC) funded report is titled, "Plastics and Sustainability: A Valuation of Environmental Benefits, Costs, and Opportunities for Continuous Improvement." The report drew on natural capital assessments and found the environmental cost of using plastics in consumer goods and packaging to be almost 4 times less than existing alternatives (glass, tin, aluminum and paper). In terms of dollar amounts, the report says that non-plastic alternatives comes with environmental costs of $533 billion annually compared to $139 billion with plastics.

However, there are other potentially viable alternatives. One renewable possibility includes hemp and other fast-growing plants containing cellulose. Companies including IBM, Ford and Dell are working to develop viable alternatives to plastics for use in products and packaging. IBM researchers said they have found a way to create cheaper, biodegradable plastic from plants. This follows a plastics recycling process IBM researchers announced last year.

We also need to be wary of false solutions. For example so called compostable plastics are not quite as helpful as it would seem. As explained by Danny Clark, "compostable plastics don’t breakdown and convert into compost or result in nutrient rich soil as the process and name would lead one to believe." Rather than put carbon into the soil, compostable plastics add CO2 (the most abundant greenhouse gas) to the atmosphere.

Circular economy

If it could be made to be viable the circular economy offers the most hope of reducing plastic waste.  The European Commission announced its Circular Economy Action Plan, which is working towards closing the loop on plastics. At a recent World Economic Forum (WEF)in Davos, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation launched the "New Plastics Economy initiative" with the report, "The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics."

As reported by Environmental Leader, this plastics initiative is designed to increase recycling and reuse as well as increase the use of bioplastics. This initiative enjoys the support of some major companies including Amcor, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Dow Chemical and Mars. The launch followed a report that pointed to $3.5 billion in potential environmental savings.

As reported by Thomas Schueneman, new prizes are inspiring innovation. On May 18th 2017, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation announced a $2 million plastics innovation prize in partnership with the Prince of Wales’s International Sustainability Unit. This initiative includes support from more than 40 organizations, including Core Partners Amcor, Coca-Cola, Danone, Mars, Novamont, PepsiCo, Unilever and Veolia. The two part $1 million Circular Design Challenge invites applicants to rethink how we can get products to people without generating plastic waste.

"Working towards circularity in the way we make, use, and distribute plastic packaging will revolutionize the scale of the human footprint on our planet," said Wendy Schmidt, who has already funded two major XPrize competitions focused on oceans. "The value of keeping materials in the economy is massive compared to the losses we suffer when plastic leaks into the very living systems we depend upon for our survival. The New Plastics Economy Prize is a call for creative design and technical innovation at a critical time."

People making a difference

Norwegian billionaire Kjell Inge Røkke has made a fortune from shipping and offshore drilling. He is building the largest and heaviest yacht in the world. What makes this ship exceptional is the fact that it can extract up to five tons of plastic from the ocean every day. Norway's World Wildlife Fund (WWF), will manage the ship which will also be a floating scientific lab for 60 scientists and 40 crew. The ship called Research Expedition Vessel (REV) is scheduled to be completed in 2020 has a number of ecological features that will minimize its footprint. This includes an energy recovery rudder system, medium speed engines, a direct drive diesel-electric propulsion system with battery package, an exhaust cleaning system, ballast water treatment system, low noise, WWF FSC certified woods, and lighting from LEDs.

Related
Plastic Waste in Our Oceans: Problems and Solutions
Green Plastics Report
Infographic - Plastic and the 5 Ocean Gyres 
Video: The Perils of Plastic Waste
The Mass Extinction of Our Oceans May have Already Begun
Chemical Regulation Including Plastics that is Good for Business and the Environment
Plastics and the Greener Cell Phones
PepsiCo Canada's 100% Recycled EcoGreen Bottle Breakthrough
Ford's Flower Powered Green Plastic Replacement
Best Green Automotive Innovations Include Replacements for Plastics
Recycling is a Business Imperative
Water Scarcity and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
Assessing the Value of Our Oceans

Plastic Waste in Our Oceans: Problems and Solutions

The sheer volume of plastic and other trash that is floating in our oceans made the hunt for Malaysia Airlines flight 370 far more difficult. The search for the missing airliner has been a harrowing affair. After weeks of sifting through ocean refuse, the armada of ships combing the Indian ocean now claim to be zeroing in on pings that may be emanating from the missing airliner's black boxes. However, this search was hampered by the tons of garbage that are strewn across our oceans.

__________________________________________________________________________________

One of the unexpected corollaries of the search for Malaysia Airlines flight 370 has been the increase in public awareness about the tons of garbage that litter our oceans. In the first few weeks after the March 8 disappearance of the passenger jet, searchers scoured huge swaths of the Indian Ocean, and found nothing but garbage. In the process of looking for wreckage from the plane, we received almost daily reports of possible debris from satellite images. These finds turned out to be nothing more than floating piles of trash.

The five ocean gyres


There are five massive garbage gyres, one is located in the Indian Ocean, two in the Pacific Ocean and another two in the Atlantic Ocean. Garbage gyres come together as the trash gets caught in circular ocean currents. This causes stray garbage to move until they collide and merge with one another.
University of New South Whales Researcher Erik Van Sebille has suggested there may be a sixth garbage patch forming in the Arctic Circle in the Barents Sea.

Plastic debris


These garbage gyres are made up of everything from appliances to cargo containers, but they are composed mostly of plastic including around 3.5 million tons of beverage bottles and grocery bags. Plastic constitutes 90 percent of all trash floating in the world’s oceans. The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) estimated that in 2006, every square mile of ocean hosted 46,000 pieces of floating plastic.

Van Sebille said each of these gyres, “contains so much plastic that if you were to drag a net through these areas you would pull up more plastic than biomass.”

Plastic waste in the oceans poses a serious environmental problem. UV rays from the sun and salt from the sea water cause the plastic to break down, which releases chemicals into the water that then enter the food system according to the Scripps Institute at the University of California San Diego.

Plastic poses some unique problems for ocean ecosystems. Some plastics decompose within a year of entering the water, leaching to potentially toxic chemicals such as bisphenol A, PCBs, and derivatives of polystyrene.

Unlike organic debris, plastic does not biodegrade. The plastic in these debris fields will last for hundreds of years. Over time, plastic in the oceans disintegrates into ever smaller pieces while remaining a polymer. This process continues down to the molecular level and concentrates in the upper water column. Plastic pollution in the form of small particles (diameter less than 5 mm) is called “microplastics.”

Wildlife impacts and the food chain


According to UNEP, at least 267 species worldwide are impacted by plastic debris in the oceans. As the plastic disintegrates, it ultimately becomes small enough to be ingested by a wide range of life forms. Plastics are deadly to a number of species including marine birds and sea turtles. Various investigations including research by Charles Moore found that in some places the overall concentration of plastics was seven times greater than the concentration of zooplankton. Plastics enter the food chain when ingested by aquatic organisms and the impacts go all the way up the chain to humans.

Researchers have discovered that floating debris can also absorb organic pollutants from seawater, including PCBs, DDT, and PAHs. When consumed, plastic has both toxic effects and disruptive impacts on the endocrine system.

Source of debris


It is crudely estimated that 80 percent of the garbage comes from land-based sources and 20 percent is from ships. According to a 2011 EPA report titled, Marine Debris in the North Pacific:
“The primary source of marine debris is the improper waste disposal or management of trash and manufacturing products, including plastics (e.g., littering, illegal dumping) … Debris is generated on land at marinas, ports, rivers, harbors, docks, and storm drains. Debris is generated at sea from fishing vessels, stationary platforms and cargo ships.”
Much of the land-based sources of ocean waste originates from the great rivers from around the world

Size of debris fields


According to some media reports, ocean borne garbage is up to “twice the size of the continental United States”. Although these estimates are hardly precise, they range from 700,000 square kilometres (270,000 sq mi) to more than 15,000,000 square kilometres (5,800,000 sq mi).

Investigations, raising awareness and cleanup efforts


There are a wide range of innovative efforts to raise awareness about ocean garbage and cleanup these debris fields. In 2008, a sailing voyage called the “Junk Raft” sought to raise awareness with a three month voyage across the Pacific. Also in 2008, Richard Sundance Owen formed the Environmental Cleanup Coalition (ECC) a collaborative effort to address the issue of North Pacific pollution. They work on developing methods to safely remove plastic and persistent organic pollutants from the oceans.

In 2009, Project Kaisei launched a cleanup study that included two vessels that set out to research and assess the feasibility of commercial scale collection and recycling of ocean borne garbage.

Another 2009 investigation titled the SEAPLEX expedition, involved a 19 day ocean journey by a group of researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. They spent 19 days studying the distribution of plastic in the gyre which resulted in the most rigorous study to date.

In 2012, Dutch Aerospace Engineering student Boyan Slat unveiled a concept for removing large amounts of marine debris. He subsequently formed an organization called The Ocean Cleanup. This approach is not only cost effective, it is potentially profitable. His idea involves an anchored network of booms that world work like a giant funnel. Propelled by the ocean’s surface currents, debris would drift into specially designed arms and collection platforms where it would be separated from plankton and recycled. Slat’s calculations suggest that using his methods, 7.25 million tons of plastic can be removed from garbage gyres in as little as five years.

South Korean designer Sung Jin Cho has conceived of another innovative approach to removing plastic waste from water. His concept is known as the Seawer Skyscraper. This massive yet portable, self-supported solar-hydro power station, generates electricity using seawater while removing plastic waste. The Seawer filters ocean water and removes plastics and other particles which are recycled in an onboard plant. The purified seawater is stored in a large sedimentation tank at the bottom of the structure before it is released back into the ocean.

Despite these creative approaches to removing debris from the world’s oceans, they will not be able to reach the majority of plastic which have accumulated on the ocean floor.

Of the more than 200 billion pounds of plastic the world produces each year, about 10 percent ends up in the ocean. Much of which (approximately 70 percent) sinks to the bottom and harms life on the ocean floor.

In the North Sea alone, Dutch scientists have counted around 110 pieces of litter for every square kilometre of the seabed. This amounts to a staggering 600,000 tonnes in the North Sea alone. This garbage can smother the sea bottom and kill the marine life.

While efforts to clean up the plastics are laudable, they are not a definitive solution. Plastics break down into smaller polymers and suspend underneath the surface or on the ocean floor making them hard to see and difficult to clean up.

Plastic waste comes from almost every country in the world which makes ocean garbage an international problem requiring international solutions. While we can dispose of our waste more responsibly, the problem extends far beyond waste management. With Around 100 million tonnes of plastic products being produced each year, we need to find solutions at the source.

We need to find alternatives to conventional plastics that are biodegradable and do not contain harmful chemicals.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Articles
Green Plastics Report
Video: The Perils of Plastic Waste
Chemical Regulation Including Plastics that is Good for Business and the Environment
Plastics and the Greener Cell Phones
Scary Halloween Consumer Statistics Including Plastic
PepsiCo Canada's 100% Recycled EcoGreen Bottle Breakthrough
PUMA's Sustainable Packaging Innovation
Ford's Flower Powered Green Plastic Replacement
Best Green Automotive Innovations Include Replacements for Plastics
Recycling is a Business Imperative
Recycling In America: More Than Just A Feel Good Experience
House Made of Plastic Bottles
Video: Plastic Bottle Greenhouse

Event - Ecochem: Global Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

The Ecochem Global Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Event will take place at the Congress Center Basel, Switzerland, 11-13 November 2014 Apply here if you are interested in becoming a speaker. A vision for the future of the chemical industry. The world's most influential industry and government leaders, scientists and innovators from across the chemical industry and value chains, sharing new visions for the sustainable design, production and use of chemicals.

Overview

3 Days, 8 streamed sessions, 180+ confirmed speakers, 2000+ attendees, 50+ exhibitors, new knowledge, new relationships, new business ideas.

A Changing Industry

The chemicals market is changing. Fast. Society wants all the benefits that the chemical industry provides with none of the negative health and environmental problems and consumers increasingly demand products and processes that are more sustainable.

New Knowledge, New Relationships, New Ideas

Understanding the challenges and opportunities which are rapidly emerging requires new thinking, new ways of working together throughout value chains and across disciplines, new products and technologies and new ways to remove barriers. The Ecochem Exhibition and Conference will provide an independent, scientifically-supported platform to accelerate innovation, research, commercialisation and market uptake in the design, production and use of efficient, effective, safe and more environmentally benign chemical products and processes.

Engage with World-Changing Thought Leaders

Market leaders including Dow, BASF, Clariant, Evonik, DuPont, Nestle, Nike, Volkswagen, P&G, Novartis and L’Oreal will share insight, breakthrough research, and disruptive new concepts and technologies – all designed to inspire and equip the leaders of tomorrow with the critical strategic and technical knowledge, contacts and skills needed to reinvent businesses and economies.

Build Shared Vision

Be part of Ecochem to think differently, build a shared vision, leverage new technologies, implement new ideas and discover unexpected partnerships, cross-sector deals and transformational plans that contribute to the collective benefit of people, the planet and profits.

Please note that earlybird registrations will open on or by March 15th 2014.

Click here to find out more and subscribe to receive event updates, information and industry news. Companies Calling for Chemical Regulation http://www.thegreenmarketoracle.com/2013/12/companies-calling-for-chemical.html

Related Articles
Video - Green Chemistry and the Business of Providing Consumers with Safer Sustainable Materials
Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Greener Solvents on the Increase in Developed Countries
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Companies Calling for Chemical Regulation

While some companies actively resist government regulation, others are welcoming it. A group of responsible consumer product companies is pushing for chemical safety reform legislation to better protect the public from toxins that are commonly found in consumer products.

This coalition was started by Seventh Generation along with the American Sustainable Business Council. Other members of the group include Annie's, and Stonyfield Farm. These companies are behind safer products and chemicals for decades. they are also leaders in transparency and accountability. A reform bill for the anemic 37 year old Toxic Chemical Safety Act, has been languishing in the Senate for months.

Even the American Chemistry Council advocates reform. However, a number of powerful and very wealthy companies have controlled the debate in Washington and stymied any hope of reform.

There has been increasing coverage of the toxins contained in home products like shampoo. When given a choice people will choose what is healthier for themselves and their children. While it is clear that there will be opposition from some quarters, those who do not support the coalition for healthier consumer products will have to publicly declare their opposition and then the public can decide who has their best interest at heart. 

The coalition have signed a declaration that states:

Current chemical regulation is outdated and inadequate. Now is the time to change it. As business leaders we urge Congress to pass chemical safety reform legislation that protects all families from toxic chemicals, and incentivizes the production of cleaner and safer chemicals and products.

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was passed in 1976, and unlike other major environmental laws, has never been updated. As it currently stands, TSCA is a broken law. As a result, tens of thousands of potentially harmful chemicals continue to be used in the marketplace since the 1970’s without proper testing and without disclosure by the companies that produce them.

We believe this has to change.

As companies and business leaders we’re asking Congress to pass comprehensive and effective chemical safety reform legislation now. Chemical policy reform must protect the most vulnerable among us, and require public access to information regarding the safety of chemicals. Reform must respect the rights of states to protect their residents when the federal government fails to do so, and require the Environmental Protection Agency to take fast action on the most harmful chemicals. Right now the Chemical Safety Improvement Act does NOT meet these criteria. Guided by good science, legislation can drive business innovation and success and protect public health.

Parents and families should not have to worry about harmful chemicals in our everyday products. That’s why we’re working together to encourage Congress to pass chemical safety reform now.

This is good for business and for our economy.
Here is a list of 45 companies that are part of the coalition and have signed the petition for chemical reform:

  1. EO/EveryOne
  2. Think Local First of Washtenaw County
  3. Financial Alternatives Law Office of Dona Marie Hippert
  4. EPP-LCA.org
  5. Naturepedic
  6. Living Calmness
  7. EcoPlum
  8. THE ADDED EDGE
  9. South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce
  10. Quest
  11. Seven Oaks Ranch, Inc.
  12. Miriam D Weber
  13. Management resources
  14. Preciva
  15. Simply Rustic
  16. LaunchBox
  17. Sympatico Clothing
  18. Kenoza Type, Inc.
  19. On Demand Ventures, Inc.
  20. KKI
  21. Total Balance Health & Fitness
  22. Rune's Furniture Co.
  23. CEO Pipe Organs/Golden Ponds Farm
  24. High Flight Arts and Letters
  25. BitJazz Inc.
  26. Affordable Portable Housing
  27. Babee Talk
  28. Social Venture Network
  29. SeaYu Enterprises
  30. Ameson
  31. Suntegrity Dharma Merchant Services
  32. The Specialty Sleep Association (SSA)
  33. Badger
  34. Just in Time Direction
  35. GILASI by InnerGlow, Inc.
  36. BARRETT INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY INC
  37. Keys
  38. Think Dirty Inc.
  39. KM Designs!
  40. Badger
  41. BioEconomy Partners
  42. Whole Dogz, Inc
  43. Los Jardines Institute (The Gardens Institute)
  44. Sustainable Island Products
  45. Bluegrass Academic Tutoring
To sign the petition click here.

If your company supports this effort email your logo to Kathleen Hutton: khutton@asbcouncil.org

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Video - Green Chemistry and the Business of Providing Consumers with Safer Sustainable Materials Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Greener Solvents on the Increase in Developed CountriesChemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Course - Introduction to Environmental Chemistry

Two Day Workshop or 16 Hours Online. To protect human health and the environment, understanding the occurrence of different chemicals and their potential transformations, transport, and fate based on various physical and chemical processes in the environment is paramount. This course is designed as a general introduction to environmental chemistry. This two-day course provides participants with an introduction to chemistry principles and the release, transport, and fate, as well as sampling, analysis, and cleanup of contaminants of concern in soil and groundwater. This course is designed for environmental professionals who require a basic knowledge of environmental chemistry in their work.

This course will focus on a survey of selected chemical industries or processes that release hazardous and non-hazardous chemicals into the environment; fate and transport of chemicals in environmental media; data collection, presentation, and interpretation.

Course Content

Chemical Foundations
Chemistry Basics
Stoichiometry
Chemical Reactions
Chemical Bonding
Chemical Equilibrium
Supplemental Information
Acids & Bases
Aqueous Equilibria
Transition Metals
Organic Chemistry
Environmental Chemistry

Course Objectives

Students that complete this course will be able to: List key chemicals and modes of release associated with selected industries; Describe the chemical, soil, water, and geological properties which govern the fate and transport of chemicals in environmental media; List chemical parameter changes associated with aerobic and anaerobic degradation; and Describe procedures and practices commonly used to ensure the quality of analytical data.

Who Should Attend

Federal, State, and Local Regulators
Industrial Compliance Managers and Consultants
Project Managers
Environmental Scientists and Engineers

Cost

Online Course Fee - $395.00

For more information click here.

Related Articles
Video - Green Chemistry and the Business of Providing Consumers with Safer Sustainable Materials
Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Greener Solvents on the Increase in Developed Countries
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Video - Green Chemistry and the Business of Providing Consumers with Safer Sustainable Materials



Green chemistry is growing in prominence in response to environmental concerns associated with traditional chemistry. Nowhere is this impact being felt more than in the area of finding replacements for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). This video offers the latest science on the way forward using green chemistry's ability to create innovative, healthy and sustainable products. It specifically shows how companies can grab market share by responding to growing consumer interest in safer, sustainable materials.

In February 2013, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme issued a joint report that identifies EDCs as a 'global threat' to public health. The report presents extensive scientific evidence linking EDCs to a range of diseases and disabilities, including some of the world's major public health epidemics: diabetes, obesity, heart disease and hormonally-related cancers such as breast cancer and prostate cancer. These findings indicate that the burden of many of these diseases may be reduced by taking preventative action to reduce exposures.

In 1996, Dr. Myers co-authored the international bestselling book "Our Stolen Future" and started shaping the field of EDC research. Today, almost 20 years later, many of the open questions with regard to EDCs' effects have been answered and new challenges have emerged.

In this video, Dr. Myers provided an overview of the main scientific discoveries, discussed why regulatory risk assessment of chemicals has missed EDC effects.

Related Articles
Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Greener Solvents on the Increase in Developed CountriesChemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Greener Solvents on the Increase in Developed Countries

In developed countries solvent use is declining while demand for greener solvents in increasing. This trend is attributable to environmental and regulatory pressures, along with concerns about toxicity to humans.

Solvents are found in paints and coatings which together account for 40 percent of solvent use. Other places where solvents can be found include adhesives, inks, pharmaceuticals, chemical processing, metal and dry cleaning solutions and agriculture.

Solvents are one of the most comprehensively regulated classes of chemicals, and tend to be regulated collectively as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). VOC’s are air pollutants that contribute to low-level photochemical smog. VOCs also react with nitrogen oxides to produce ground level ozone that can damage lungs crops and natural vegetation. Solvents are also implicated in high-level ozone depletion and global warming. They are often highly flammable and can have direct health impacts by absorption through the skin.

A new IHS Chemical global market research report titled, Opportunities for Greener Solvents concludes that traditional solvent use is decreasing while lower VOC solvents are on the increase. One of the more interesting findings in the 427-page report, is that the demand for traditional solvents continues to increase in the developing world.

The report indicates that the global consumption of solvents was approximately 28 million metric tons (MMT) in 2012. Europe consumed nearly 6 MMT of solvents in 2012 and North America consumed 5 MMT last year, followed by Asia (excluding China and Japan) which consumed 4 MMT. Japan consumed 2 MMT of solvents. Solvent demand is expected to remain flat or decrease in the U.S. and E.U. due to more environmental regulations. European passage of the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) legislation in 2007, has been instrumental in decreasing solvent use.

China accounted for almost a third of the global demand (9 MMT) of solvents. The demand for solvents in China is expected to increase approximately 5 percent to 6 percent per year during the next few years. Some of this increase can be attributed to off-shoring of solvent intensive industrial processes to China (eg coating of wood furniture and the assembly of shoes using solvent-borne adhesives).

Solvents that are less hazardous to humans and to the environment are part of the green chemistry movement. However, problems remain with these more environmentally benign solvents. They are either higher cost, or less effective, or both. The perfect replacement has yet to be found.

One promising green solvents currently being researched, are ionic liquids, which have essentially no vapor pressure, so there is no dissipation to the environment.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Event - 2013 Sustainable Chemistry Summit

The 2013 Sustainable Chemistry Summit, will take place on June 5-7, 2013 in Montreal, Quebec. This event is presented by GreenCentre Canada, it will map the journey of green chemistry technologies from lab to market.

Following the path of innovation, the Summit will start with sessions on the genesis of discoveries, unfold along each step of the journey toward commercialization, and culminate with a look at real-life examples of technologies that have made it.

The Sustainable Chemistry Summit will connect you, educate you and inspire you– leaving you with the tools you need to chart your own course from lab to market.

For innovators in green chemistry, being new and small make it difficult to raise the capital you need to get to get to the top. Enter the VC community – financiers ready and willing to take the journey with you by providing start-up costs and seed funding for promising new green chemistry ventures.

To get to the top, join us at the Summit. At Summit 2013 you will be presenting to: Rho Canada Ventures, Braemar Energy Ventures, EnerTech Capital, Chrysalix Energy Venture Capital, Pangaea Ventures Ltd., Trellis Capital Corporation …and stay tuned, this list is growing!

For more information or to register click here.

Related Articles
Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Green Chemistry Bridging the Divide by Seetha Kammula

Green chemistry is an increasingly important player in global efforts to find more sustainable ways to minimize our impacts on the Earth. Green chemistry is the branch of chemistry concerned with developing processes and products to reduce or eliminate hazardous substances. One of the goals of green chemistry is to prevent pollution at its source, as opposed to dealing with pollution after it has occurred.

Here is a short essay on green chemistry written by Seetha Kammula in 2011. She is one of the founding partners of Simply Sustain LLC, has over 25 years of experience first at Royal Dutch Shell, and later at Basell, a Shell BASF Joint Venture. At Basell she was Senior VP Strategic Marketing, Innovation & Asset Management and a member of the Board of Directors of Indelpro (Mexico). At Shell she was Strategy Director (Houston), Director of Technology (Belgium)- both for Epoxy Resins, and Research Scientist (Amsterdam). She received a BS degree from Osmania University, India, a PhD degree in Organic Chemistry from Auburn University, and did post-doctorate research at Princeton University.

Today, the word “chemicals” is very divisive. Those inside the “fence” (producers and chemists) see themselves as responsible people who work hard to make lives better, healthier and more comfortable. Amongst many outside the fence, the chemicals raises fear, anxiety and suspicion. The question is : will green chemistry bridge this divide and pave the way for sustainable growth?

If you Google green chemistry you will find concepts from many sources: the 12 principles of Green Chemistry by the American Chemical Society, Bio-mimicry, The Natural Step, Biotechnology, Genetic engineering, Cradle-to-Cradle etc. At the heart of what they all advocate are a handful of principles: reduce waste and energy, use safer solvents, catalysts and renewable starting materials and avoid the production, use and release of toxins and chemicals that persist in nature. How is this movement going?

Patents and innovations in Green Chemistry are on the increase from academia and companies along the chemicals value chain. The bulk of these reports fall under the category of improving manufacturing efficiency such as reducing use of energy and water, release of hazardous waste and costs. Here are a few representative examples of what we have seen. Merck has made strides reducing waste, increasing process efficiency, and implementing bio-catalysis (doing more with less). Amyris, a biotechnology company, is developing ways to make chemicals from biomass (such as sugar cane) using microbial engineering and thereby avoiding use of non-renewable starting materials. Along similar lines, Dow and BASF jointly commercialized a manufacturing process to make an industrial chemical that reduced water use by 70-80%, and energy use by 35%.

While these stories excite industry insiders, they rarely make it to the front pages of the NYT or WSJ. Even if they were published, they do very little for a vast majority of outsiders such as consumers, media and activists who want products that are free of controversial chemicals such as, BPA (in epoxy can coatings), Phthalates or PVC (found in blood and IV bags), Brominated Flame Retardants (home-interior products) to name a few. They have powerful backers e.g. Mega retailers such as Wal-Mart and Institutions such as Kaiser Permanente who have significant buying power. While safer alternatives have been under development and were available for more than a decade, large-scale adoption has been slow because of initial higher costs.

Secondly, it requires many changes in all parts of long and global supply chains. Take the example of Eden Organic Foods who found a BPA-free coating that worked for some foods such as beans but not for high acidity tomato sauce. Switching to different coating types for different food types means smaller market size per coating type, a disincentive for developers. Secondly, if the supply chains have to deal with multiple chemical coatings, they will need to change their machine settings and or move to newer machines, requiring capital investment. Making these changes takes a long time, costs more and requires that everyone in the value chain agrees and is able to make these changes.

Another important area in Green Chemistry is the replacement of pesticides/chemicals of concern in agriculture. Promising work is going on in Biopesticides derived from plant or microbial “pesticides” to substitute certain chemicals of concern. Small companies such as Maronne Bio Innovations and AgraQuest inCaliforniaand large companies such as Bayer, BASF, Syngenta and Monsanto have products in this area. DuPont launched a new insect repellent based on active ingredient from the catmint plant claimed to have the same efficacy as DEET. Dow Agrosciences’ Spinosad insecticide is derived from fermenting natural soil organisms. However, in many cases large-scale adoption is likely to be slow due to issues of economy of scale. Unlike traditional “broad-spectrum” products that work against a number of pests, biopesticides tend to be specific and work at one or two pests at a time. The market size per product will be smaller which in turn means higher cost per pound. Not every one will switch to higher cost products unless they are forced to do so.

Such large-scale change needs federal-level regulation, but it is not clear at this stage how, and if, regulations will be implemented. Congress indicated an interest in updating the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which has not changed since 1976, but it has failed to do so. Environmental advocacy and consumer groups, state and local politicians who have grown increasingly frustrated with the slow pace have pushed for increased use of state laws. One report shows that there are currently over 1,000 state and local laws and regulations on the books and each of these laws is unique in one or more respects. This situation will only hamper large-scale progress.

Going back to the question of whether green chemistry will bring society and science closer, we believe it has the potential to do so. Innovations backed by sound policies and regulations will speed up large-scale adoption, even though initially costs may go up. Experience has shown that costs will come down over time. But greening chemistry alone will not be enough. Industry needs to share in real time the pros and cons of the greener choices and not just promote the positives. People inside the fence need to include and engage folks outside the fence by explaining complex and evolving scientific information in a language that is understandable to the average citizen. Those outside the fence need to understand the difficulties of the folks inside the fence, and ultimately, learn to trust them. Open communications and dialogue will be essential for sustainable growth.

Related Articles
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment

The ubiquity of chemicals and our growing environmental awareness are helping to usher a new era in chemistry. Chemicals are part of modern life, yet we are increasingly aware that even tiny quantities of toxins can have harmful health effects including asthma, neuro-developmental disorders, and certain cancers. Chemicals are also being connected with a variety of distinctively modern diseases and disorders including obesity, diabetes, autism, and ADD.

According to a 2006  report (pdf) by the Center for Occupational and Environmental Health at the University of California, Berkeley, the US produces or imports 42 billion pounds of chemicals every day, 90% of which are created using oil. Moreover, it says, “Global chemical production is expected to double every 25 years for the foreseeable future.”

According to a recent biomonitoring survey by the  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the average American has trace amounts of over two hundred environmental chemicals, including arsenic, cadmium and pesticides.

The Chemical industry employs almost a million people in the US, making it an important economic force. However, the chemically derived, non-biodegradable products commonly known as plastic, makes up nearly 12% of American trash, 27 million tons of plastic ended up in landfills in 2005 and only 6 percent was recycled.

Plastics are not only destructive to the environment, they are harmful to human health. Modern plastics employ chemicals like bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, both of which are thought to disrupt the endocrine system, leading to developmental problems. Some 6 billion lb. (2.7 billion kg) of the BPA are produced globally each year. The CDC has found BPA in the urine of 93% of surveyed Americans over the age of 6. To better understand the health effects, the EPA has launched a new investigation into BPA.

BPA is not the only industrial chemical in common use that may alter the normal functioning of the endocrine system. Phthalates and flame retardants like polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) have been linked to reduced sperm counts and feminization in animal studies.

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976, has failed in its mandate to regulate the chemical industry. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been able to restrict very few chemicals and it lacks the power to ban dangerous carcinogens like asbestos. The vast majority of the chemicals in use in the US have unknown human health effects as the EPA has only tested about 200 of the 83,000 chemicals in the TSCA inventory.

Under the current system, chemicals are deemed safe until the EPA can prove that they are dangerous. To be considered dangerous, the EPA must conduct tests which can take years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Congress is considering new legislation to regulate the nation’s chemicals. The Safe Chemicals Act, proposed by Representative Bobby Rush (D-IL) and Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) would dramatically strengthen the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) ability to regulate chemicals and make industry responsible for demonstrating the safety of existing and new chemicals.

As a matter of social and self interest, the business community shares the view that chemicals need to be regulated. On April 15, the American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC) proclaimed their support for the new legislation.

Jeffrey Hollender, Co-Founder, Seventh Generation and ASBC member said, “we support updating TSCA because it is vital for protecting the health of people and the planet. It will have important benefits for us as a downstream user of chemicals through greater information and innovation. As a consumer products company, this will restore consumer trust in our industry.”

The most immediate way to reduce the global plastic impact is to simply use less of it, but for those chemicals deemed vital, there is a promising solution to the modern world’s dependence on chemicals. The new field of green chemistry designs chemicals through processes that reduce or eliminate the use and generation of hazardous substances, leave no dangerous residue and use less energy.

At this year’s annual meeting of the American Chemical Society, more than 1,600 of 12,000 presentations were dedicated to sustainability and this number will increase dramatically when the TSCA is replaced by more functional legislation later this year.

The TSCA has provided little incentive for U.S. manufacturers to invest in green chemistry technologies, but the proposed legislation directs the EPA to create a green chemistry research grant program and establish a network of research centers to help find safer alternatives to dangerous chemicals.

Although there are concerns about evaluating safety and closing loopholes for new chemicals, there is good reason to be optimistic about the passage of a chemical reform bill. The business community is working alongside government to push its passage. “Today’s astute business leaders are concerned about the health and business impacts that could arise if the products they use or sell contain toxic chemicals. A strong Safe Chemicals Act can help create a more competitive, innovative, and economically sustainable economy in the US,” said David Levine, co-founder of the American Sustainable Business Council.

The public is increasingly demanding greater accountability, irresponsible businesses that poison people and the planet risk more than legal sanctions, they risk their reputational capital and retribution through direct actions.

With the backing of the business community and the general public, it looks as though there is enough support to bring America’s unregulated use of toxins to an end. Due to a confluence of regulations, litigation, and competitive pressures, green chemistry is no longer just part of the mission of a forward looking company, it is soon to be enshrined in American law.
There’ll be a day in the future when all chemistry is going to be green,” says John Warner, director of the Warner Babcock Institute for Green Chemistry. “In that world we’d never need regulation again.”
Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Articles
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Workshop on Chemistry for a Sustainable Future (Event)

The RSC sponsored International Workshop on Chemistry for a Sustainable Future will take place on December 10, 2012, starting at 14:00 and concluding on 12 December 12, 2012 at 17:00. It will take place at the Malaviya National Institute of Technology in Jaipur, India. This event will deal with the environment, sustainability and energy, it also coincides with the Celebration of Successful Completion of 10 years of Green Chemistry Networking in India.

One of the founders of Green Chemistry, Professor John Warner and world leaders in Green Chemistry like Professor James Clark , Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence at University of York will be part of this celebration. Green Chemistry Centre in York UK and its affiliates, the Bio-renewables Development Centre and the company Starbon Technologies are also presenting an exhibition at the Workshop covering green chemistry research, education, outreach and commercialization.

The workshop will bring together exceptional researchers for an outstanding programme that will provide many networking opportunities. Networking among the participants will also be a key component of the Workshop. There will be significant opportunities for attendees to share their ideas with the world leaders.

For more information click here

Related Articles
Chemical Regulation that is Good for Business and the Environment
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
The University of Oregon's Interdisciplinary MBA and Green Chemistry
GE is Helping Nestle with Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry is part of an Integrative Approach to Eco-Innovation
Green Product Design Network

Koch Industries Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial

Koch Industries is the second largest privately held company in America and as revealed by Greenpeace they are guilty of crimes against the environment as well as being a leading supporter of climate denial groups.

Koch industries has a dismal environmental record and to add insult to injury, they are pouring almost $50 million dollars per year into climate denial misinformation.

Koch Industries is a conglomerate of more than twenty companies with $100 billion in annual sales, operations in nearly 60 countries, and 70,000 employees. Their diversified holdings are a virtual top ten list of the most environmentally destructive sectors of the economy, they include petroleum refining, fuel pipelines, coal supply and trading, oil and gas exploration, chemicals and polymers, fertilizer production, ranching and forestry products and cattle.

In addition, Koch Industries has held multiple leases on Alberta's polluting tar sands as well as pipelines that carry tar sands crude from Canada into Minnesota and Wisconsin where Koch's Flint Hill Resources owns oil refineries.

Koch Industries work to delay policies and regulation aimed at stopping global warming. As revealed by Greenpeace's successful campaign against Trader Joe's, the public will no longer countenance environmentally insensitive businesses. Koch Industries' ownership of Lycra and Stainmaster carpets are just two of their holdings that are vulnerable to social action.
_______________________________