Showing posts with label far right agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label far right agenda. Show all posts

The Koch Brother’s Ties to GOP Presidential Candidates

Oil billionaires David and Charles Koch use their oil wealth to misinform Americans and influence the GOP. The Koch brothers have spent $55 million to fund climate denial front groups, their agenda includes efforts to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Koch Industries has given generously to conservative politicians throughout the country at both the federal and state level and many Republicans including GOP presidential candidates are known to have ties to the brothers.

The Kochs use Republicans to resist climate and energy legislation and protect their oil interests. One of the reasons Americans are so ill informed about climate change is due to the barrage of misinformation from the Koch brothers’ network of front groups. The Koch brother are directly or indirectly involved with a variety of organizations that actively work to misinform lawmakers and the American public.

The Koch brothers have a long history of influence peddling through front groups like Americans for Prosperity (AFP), which had a role in the formation of the Tea Party. Many Republican presidential hopefuls have been in attendance at AFP events like the annual Defending the American Dream Summit. These Summits focus on issues like reversing environmental protections, preventing new environmental laws and promoting policies that benefit big oil.

At the October 5, 2007 Summit, the GOP Presidential candidates who attended included John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson. The speakers that day included Herman Cain and AFP founder David Koch. At the 2009 Summit on October 3, in Washington, DC, speakers Newt Gingrich and Michele Bachmann voiced their opposition to proposed energy legislation. For the 2012 election cycle, the AFP foundation is planning to spend $200 million to influence the electoral outcome.

The Koch brothers also support conservative think tanks such as the Cato Institute, and the Heritage Foundation. It should come as no surprise that the 2011 Republican Foreign policy debate was sponsored by the Heritage Foundation.

This climate denying duo has developed a large network of alliances within the Republican Party, including some of the leading contenders for President. Herman Cain, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and Rick Santorum have all been shown to have close ties with the Kochs.

Herman Cain

Although Herman Cain has recently withdrawn from the presidential race, he has close ties with the Koch Brothers and the AFP. Cain has been a featured speaker at AFP events for years. In 2005 and 2006, Cain was the public face of AFP’s “Prosperity Expansion Project.”

“I know the Koch brothers,” Cain told CNN host John King. “The Koch brothers helped to start an organization called Americans for Prosperity, and I did some speaking when they were starting that organization. I’m very proud of the relationship I have with the Koch brothers. I have also attended some of their seminars and have found them very informative.”

Cain’s campaign manager Mark Block and a number of aides have worked for Americans for Prosperity, or the AFP. Cain’s “9-9-9″ plan to rewrite the nation’s tax code was devised by Rich Lowrie who served on an AFP advisory board. Cain’s spokeswoman Ellen Carmichael, who left the campaign, was an AFP coordinator in Louisiana. His campaign’s outside law firm also represents the AFP and at least six other current and former paid employees and consultants for Cain’s campaign have worked for AFP in various capacities.

Cain continues to work with the group. On November 4, Cain spoke at the annual AFP’s “Defending the American Dream” summit.

Mitt Romney

In the last presidential election, David and his wife each gave the maximum $2,300 donation to Romney’s campaign. According to a leaked campaign memo, the Koch brothers are “the financial engine of the tea party.” To secure support from the Kochs and other conservatives, Romney has switched his position and embraced climate denial.

The memo also says that Romney was scheduled to meet with David Koch on Aug. 28 at his home in Southampton, N.Y., where Koch held a major event for Romney in 2010. Ironically, extreme weather (Hurricane Irene), a corollary of climate change, prevented them from meeting. The two last met in January 2011 in Manhattan at the Links Club.

Koch endorsed Romney in 2008, and was one of Romney’s first major campaign fundraisers for the 2012 elections. Romney also spoke at the Defending the American Dream Summit on November 4, 2011.

Michele Bachmann

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) may have been the Koch’s top pick for the 2012 presidential race. The Kochs have been providing financial support for her political run for President since she announced her candidacy.

In late May, KochPAC donated $10,000 in one day to Bachmann-linked committees ($5,000 to her 2012 congressional re-election committee and $5,000 to her political action committee, MICHELE PAC). According to federal campaign records, the committee has given $25,000 to the Minnesota congresswoman since 2006, excluding the May donation.

Rick Perry

Rick Perry’s contempt of environmental policies and protections make him an ideal Koch brother’s candidate. Perry has repeatedly met with the conservative billionaires. In the middle of the special legislative session in June, 2011, Perry flew to Vail, Colorado, on a donor’s private airplane to a Koch Brothers summit. Governor Perry is known to have received $76,000 in contributions from the Koch network in the last gubernational election. In 2010, KochPAC gave $50,000 to Texans for Rick Perry.

Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum has a history of KochPAC financial support. Between 1999 and 2005, federal records show, Santorum election committees received $16,000 from the committee.

The ties between the Kochs and the Republican presidential hopefuls are troubling to say the least. The Kochs are hedging their bets and spreading their influence and wherever Koch influence is to be found, environmental abuse is sure to follow.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Posts
A Reintroduction to the Climate Denying Duo Known as the Koch Brothers
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
Koch Industries Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
The Anti-Environment Crusades of ExxonMobil and Koch Industries
Reigning in Irresponsible Oil Giants Chevron and Exxon Mobil
The Kochs' Tea Party Republicans
The Kochs' Cato Institute's Climate Denial
Koch Industries War with the EPA
Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
The Kochs' Spending on Political Influence
Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
The Kochs' Mercatus Center
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermines Cap-and-Trade
The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
The Kochs' Climate Science Denial
Koch Industries War on Industry Oversight and Environmental Regulation
Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
Video: Koch Brothers Climate Denial Machine

Koch Industries War with the EPA

Koch Industries has been at war with the EPA for decades. Rather than accept the EPA's science based approach to managing climate change, Koch funds organizations that fabricate their own facts and publish propaganda papers that pose as credible academic information. Armed with a blatent disregard for the facts, Koch industries is fighting the EPA on initiatives ranging from efforts to reduce surface Ozone, to the classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen.

Some truly absurd statements have come out of the Koch created think tank known as the Mercantus Center. In response to the EPA move to reduce surface ozone in 1997, Susan Dudley, a senior official at the Mercatus Center, argued that smog actually benefits humans because it reduces the incidence of skin cancer.

Koch Industries is taking on the EPA and they are mustering all the support they can buy to divest the agency of their regulatory powers.

Rather than pursue legislation that could force Koch Industries into line with the facts or protect the EPA from the Kochs' assaults, many members of the House and the Senate seem to share the Koch agenda.

Last June, forty-seven of the Senate's 100 senators voted to permanently strip the EPA of its power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Some legislators are planning another attempt at passing legislation that would suspend the EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases.

A good illustration of the scope of Koch Industries influence involves their resistance to the EPA's attempt to classify formaldehyde as a “known carcinogen.” Koch Industries has been lobbying to prevent this from happening. It is no coincidence that the company produces formaldehyde in great quantities.

The ownership of Koch Industries is not deterred by the experimental evidence indicating that formaldehyde causes cancer. When you are the owner of one of the world's most powerful corporations you wield tremendous power and you have access to the levers of power.

David Koch, the owner of Koch Industries, disagrees with the science on formaldehyde, and this is a point which he argues from his position on the National Cancer Advisory Board.


Related Posts
The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
The Koch Created Mercatus Center's Push for Deregulation
The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
Koch Spending on Political Influence
Kochs' Climate Science Denial
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
California's Proposition 23
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right

Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion

Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion



The Tea Party has already had a powerful impact on the forthcoming midterm elections, however, many are asking questions about the competence of Tea Party candidates.

Jobs are a predictable indicator of electoral outcomes, but the Republicans inclusion of Tea Party candidates, with radical conservative agendas, may test this theory.

The Tea Party movement is putting pressure on Republican leaders to significantly cut spending and taxes, to repeal health care legislation and financial regulations passed this year, and to phase out Social Security and Medicare in favor of personal savings accounts.

Will the Tea Party's radical conservatism succeed? Will misinformation campaigns paid for with corporate cash be enough to cause Americans to confuse political gridlock with advancing the national interest? Will anger cause Americans to overlook the questionable intellects of Tea Party Candidates?

In Delaware, the nomination of tea-party-backed Christine O'Donnell, has clearly helped her opponent, Democrat Chris Coons. Coons has said he supports efforts to control greenhouse gases blamed for climate change. O'Donnell, who worked with Sarah Palin's people, is using scare tactics claiming that a vote for her opponent will cost the average Delaware family up to $10,000. There is no basis for this statement, even O'Donnell was not able to explain how she came up with that number, however, her campaign does make use of reports from the conservative propaganda machine known as the Heritage Foundation.

The O'Donnell campaign has offered some unbelievable soundbites. Christine O'Donnell's now infamous statement, "I am not a witch, I am you" was eclipsed by a classic moment that epitomizes the worst of this new slate of Tea Pary Republicans. On October 19, Christine O'Donnell seemed incredulous when she was told that the separation of church and state was in the Constitution.

O'Donnell, who badly trails Coons, is leading many Republicans to believe that the nomination of O'Donnell, has given away Delaware. Had she not won the nomination, Rep. Michael Castle (R), Delaware would likely have been a Republican win.

Kentucky is a Republican held state where many are also asking questions about the GOP nominee Rand Paul, another tea party candidate.

Of the eight nationally known Tea Party supported candidates, pollsters now say only a few have a chance of winning. But Tea Partiers are involved in at least 35 races across the country.

The Tea Party may end up hurting Republicans more than helping. Polls suggest that in the Senate, the hurt may outweigh the help. O'Donnel is not the only The Tea Party candidate whose questionable grasp of the issues, are undermining Republican chances. In Nevada, for example, Sharon Angle, has improved the odds that Senator Harry Reid, the leader of the Democratic majority, hangs onto his seat.

Americans are angry, but are they so mad that they will vote for a slate of incompetents? We will have to wait until November 2, 2010 to find out if protest votes are enough to carry either the House or the Senate.


Related Posts
Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
Koch's Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
Video Linking the Koch Brothers and the Tea Party
The Kochs War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
Koch Spending on Political Influence
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Climate Change is a Security Issue
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
Democrats' Chances in the 2010 Midterms
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
California's Proposition 23
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
What is Wrong with the Right
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
Palin is No Friend of Green
The New International System: The Role of Government