Showing posts with label adaptation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adaptation. Show all posts

Event - Green California Summit & Expo

The 8th annual Green California Summit & Expo will be held in Sacramento on April 8-9, 2014 at the Sacramento Convention Center. The Green Market Oracle is proud to once again be an Outreach Partner for this important event. See details of how our readers can receive a special 20 percent discount at the bottom of the page.

The advisory board for the Summit is composed of leaders from government and the private sector and is chaired by CalEPA Secretary, Matt Rodriquez, Government Operations Secretary Marybel Batjers and Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency Secretary Anna Caballero.

The conference includes an Expo with more than 100 companies offering green products and services, concurrent sessions addressing energy, water, transportation and other vital topics and a Leadership Awards reception.

Pre-Summit seminars on April 7 will address Prop 39 and recent changes to the state’s green building and energy codes. Keynote speakers will include Anne Simpson, Senior Portfolio Manager and Director of Global Governance for CalPERS.

Readers of The Green Market Oracle can receive a 20 percent discount on the education program by entering "Oracle" in the discount field when registering online. Keynotes and exhibit hall are free.

For information and to register, click here or call Cindy Dangberg at 626-577-5700.

Related Articles
The California Drought is a Global Warning
Drought Impacts California's Wine and Beer Industries
Record Breaking Drought in California at Odds with Fracking
Fracking Operations Shutdown in California due to drought
Climate Change Induced Wildfires Burn Out of Control in Southern California
Graphics: The Drought in California
Video - California Drought and Folson Lake
Video - Southern California's Firenadoes are Spawned by Climate Change
California is Among Cleantech Leaders

Event - International Conference on Environmental Pollution and Remediation

The 3rd International Conference on Environmental Pollution and Remediation (ICEPR) will take place Monday July 15 to Wednesday Jul 17, 2013, in Toronto, Ontario. The International Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (International ASET Inc.) is proud to present the 3rd International ICEPR.

ICEPR is a series of international conferences held yearly. These conferences focus on all aspects of Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology. After successfully holding the second ICEPR in Montreal (Canada), International ASET Inc. will be hosting this conference in Toronto this year.

The aim of ICEPR'13 is to bring together the Canadian and International community working in the field of environmental sciences, engineering, and technology, and to foster an environment conducive to present advances in this field.

This conference will also provide a golden opportunity to develop new collaborations and gather world experts on the different topics including pollution detection, environmental remediation, and pollution prevention.

Through the 3rd conference a great opportunity to share knowledge and expertise will be created taking advantage from the synergy of the 1st and 2nd conference. The ICEPR'13 program will include invited keynote talks, oral presentation sessions, and poster sessions.

For more information or to register click here.

Related Articles
Relationship Between Warming Over Land and in the Sea
Comprehensive Review of the Science on Anthropogenic Climate Change
Climate Change is Already Killing 400,000 People Annually
Key Findings of the Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-5)
UNEP Warning: We are on The Brink of a Climate Catastrophe
Strong Body of Evidence for a Changing Climate
More Scientific Support for Anthropogenic Climate Change
The Fifth Global Environmental Outlook Report
A New Study Indicates We Are Reaching a Tipping Points
Environmental Tipping Points
New NASA Video Graphically Illustrates that the Earth is Warming

Event - National Adaptation Forum: Action today for a Better Tomorrow.

The National Adaptation Forum (NAF), subtitled "Action Today for a Better Tomorrow," will take place on April 2-4, 2013 in Denver, CO. NAF is the first of its kind national convening on climate change adaptation presenting state-of-the art and science adaptation practice. It combines professional development training, individual presentation, peer networking, and working group innovation opportunities, in order to create the most productive event possible in three days!

This professional development event affords attendees the opportunity to learn more about how to make their work climate smart, share what they have learned with others, and develop a stronger network to be climate savvy in all that they do.

THE FORUM IS SOLD OUT! Therefore they are not able to accept additional registrations at this time, however they can add your name to the waitlist. As cancellations are received, they will be able to accommodate additional attendees. Click below for information on the waitlist.

For more Information click here.

Related Articles
Video - A Brief History of Anthropogenic Climate Change
Climate Change is Already Killing 400000 People Annually
Comprehensive Review of Climate Change Science
10 Charts on Climate Change
Global Solutions to Climate Change (Video)
Making Climate Change an Issue
The Staggering Costs of Ignoring Climate Change
Study Quantifies the Costs of Climate Change 
Study Shows that Climate Change is Killing Forests

Environmental Success Stories: Mercury, SLCPs and Many More

The overwhelming number of environmental calamities we face overshadows environmental success stories and this undermines efforts to build support for ecological action. People concerned about the state of the environment understandably spend a lot of time talking about unresolved issues. Sadly, there is much to talk about, from soaring temperatures and extreme weather, to rising oceans and climbing levels of GHGs. Around the world, we are witnessing urban landscapes choked by smog and forests that are steadily being depleted. While these are undeniably critical issues, we must not forget that despite the scope of environmental problems, solutions are possible nonetheless.

In addition to highlighting the obstacles, we must underscore environmental victories. Realizing that solutions are possible energizes people to act on other pressing issues.

The extent of ecological degradation makes it easy to succumb to fatalistic despair. However, this type of paralysis prevents us from addressing the threats arrayed against us. When confronted with seemingly intractable problems, people will often choose to ignore an issue rather than venture to hope for change. This is called escape-avoidance-learning. In this paradigm, people learn to avoid unpleasant or stressful situations.

To get people involved in meaningful change, we must first muster the hope to believe that there is a way out. The unwavering reliance on the hard facts espoused by some environmentalists can be counterproductive. Such an approach ignores the monumental victories of the past.We need to stress our accomplishments if for no other reason than to show that we can triumph over adversity. While our efforts must be informed by science, this only works if people can see a way to manage the horrors of a world ravaged by climate change.

People need to understand that solutions are possible. Although we have seen significant reason to despair, we have also seen some meaningful successes. The courts as well as governments at the federal, state and municipal levels have demonstrated their ability to act on a wide variety of fronts ranging from acid rain to waste recycling.

While many environmental success stories date back decades, we have also seen some major triumphs in the last year. In 2012, there was global agreement on a binding treaty restricting mercury emissions, and in 2013, we are seeing the fruition of an important international effort to reduce short lived climate pollutants (SLCPs).

Here is a summary of some of the greatest environmental achievements in U.S. history.


Asbestos


It has been known for almost a century that asbestos can be deadly. Asbestos is actually six mined substances that were widely used in manufacturing due to their durability and heat resistance. However, asbestos particles break away and are easily inhaled into the lungs, where they can lead to fatal diseases including lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Lawsuits in the 1970s resulted in billions of dollars in litigation losses. Now, much of the world enforces strict regulations on the use of asbestos.


Acid Rain


Nitric and sulfuric acids are the byproducts of coal-fired power plants and other fossil-fuel combustion. When combined with water and oxygen, these acids fall to Earth in rain. High acidity levels caused widespread damage to lakes, forests, and soils.

In 1990, President George H.W. Bush signed amendments to the Clean Air Act which puts limits on air pollution. These amendments not only reduced pollution, they did it faster and at a lower cost than expected.


DDT


For decades, DDT was a widely used insecticide that contaminated the air, soil and waterways. The poisoning of the living Earth’s ecosystems with DDT fueled the 60′s environmental movement and in the early 1970′s, the insecticide was banned in the U.S.


Open-Air Nuclear Tests


In the period from 1945 to 1963, the U.S. and the USSR conducted 434 open-air nuclear bomb tests. To curtail the nuclear fallout from these explosions, the major world powers entered into arms-control negotiations that led to the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty. This led to an early nuclear arms-control agreement between the U.S., U.S.S.R. and the U.K.

In 1966, the UN General Assembly adopted the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which bans all nuclear explosions in all environments.


Endangered Species


In 1974, the U.S. Endangered Species Act entered into service and began protecting a number of species. With the help of protections from this Act, gray wolves, bald eagles, grizzly bears, and the brown pelican are amongst the animals that have fought their way off the endangered list.


Habitat Preservation


The U.S. established the world’s first national park, Yellowstone, in 1872. Other countries like Australia, Canada and New Zealand soon followed America’s lead. In 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt created the country’s first national wildlife refuge. The wildlife refuge system is now the world’s largest, comprising more than 150 million acres of protected lands.

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which tracks the world’s progress on preserving natural habitats, there are more than 100,000 protected areas worldwide, covering one-eighth of the Earth’s land mass.


Toxic Waste


Even after toxic waste disposal in landfills was prohibited, there were numerous hazardous waste sites that continued to pose a serious danger. The disease and death caused by toxic sites like Love Canal spawned a law in 1980 that set up a Superfund to clean up these toxic waste dumps.

The 2001, Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants was part of a global attempt to stop toxic dumping. The treaty was ratified by 172 countries and targets dangerous pesticides and industrial chemicals.

One of the best illustrations of cleaning up toxic waste sites can be found in the town of Hialeah near Miami in Dade County. This toxic dump site accepted pesticides, paints and solvents as part of what grew into a square-mile mountain of garbage. The EPA cleaned up the site and converted it into a lake for wading birds, complete with walking trails and lookout centers.


Waste Recycling


Industrialization and mass-production made it easy to produce things cheaply, One of the consequences was a massive increase in waste and the problem was exacerbated by modern landfills. In the 1960s and ’70s, recycling grew in popularity and cities eventually began offering recycling pickups. Now recycling is commonplace and comprises a wide assortment of material including steel, aluminum, glass, plastic, and paper.


Leaded gasoline


Tetraethyl lead used to be an ingredient in gasoline and while it was good for combustion engines it is harmful to living things. The Environmental Protection Agency started phasing out leaded gas in 1974 and in 1980, the federal appeals court ruled that the EPA could set standards.

The elimination of lead in gasoline has decreased the incidence of related hypertension, nervous system damage and adverse developmental impacts in children.


Ozone


In the 1970s, scientists began to make the connection between chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and the breakdown of the ozone layer. By 1985, a clear link was established between CFCs and the ozone hole,

As a result of these observations, all 197 members of the United Nations (UN) came together to sign the Montreal Protocol which provided legally binding standards restricting CFCs. This treaty stopped the use of CFCs and scientists believe that ozone will return to pre-1980s levels by 2070. According to Kofi Annan, the former secretary general of the United Nations, the Montreal Protocol is “perhaps the single most successful international agreement to date.”


Water Pollution


The Cuyahoga River, in northeastern Ohio, was one of the most polluted rivers in the world. It came under international scrutiny when it repeatedly caught fire culminating in an infamous 1968 blaze that galvanized support for cleanup efforts. This led to the landmark Clean Water Act.

The Clean Water Act was passed by Congress In 1972. It protects the health of America’s waters, including lakes, rivers, and coastal areas. The Act has two fundamental national goals: to eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the nation’s waters, and to achieve water quality levels that are fishable and swimmable.

A few decades ago only one-third of the nation’s waters were safe for fishing and swimming. Wetland losses were estimated at about 460,000 acres per year. Agricultural runoff resulted in the erosion of 2.25 billion tons of soil and the deposit of large amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen into many waters.

Today, two-thirds of U.S. waters are safe for fishing and swimming, the loss of wetlands is only 70,000-90,000 acres, the amount of soil loss to agricultural runoff has been cut by a billion tons annually and the phosphorus and nitrate levels are down.


Air Pollution


President Richard Nixon, signed the Air Quality Act in 1967. This became a federal law that protected air quality and reduced air pollution. In 1970, Congress passed what is now called the Clean Air Act.

The purpose of the Clean Air Act is to protect people’s health and welfare. According to the EPA, in 2010 alone, the Clean Air Act is estimated to have saved over 160,000 lives; avoided more than 100,000 hospital visits; and prevented millions of people from getting sick. The Clean Air Act also positively impacts the American economy through enhanced productivity.


Mercury Emissions


Mercury emissions are a known threat to human health. After protracted negotiations that spanned almost half a decade, more than 140 countries recently signed on to the world’s first legally binding international agreement to control mercury emissions. The treaty sets mercury reduction targets on a range of products, processes and industries. The agreement also provides clear guidelines for industry.

The agreement puts in place rules that limit mercury emissions from power plants and industrial boilers as well as certain kinds of smelters. The new agreement bans the production, export and import of a range of mercury-containing products. The treaty phases out mercury-laden products, like batteries and thermometers as well as certain types of fluorescent lamps, soaps and cosmetics. The agreement also establishes rules for direct mining of mercury and addresses safe storage of mercury waste.

Nations that have small-scale gold mining operations, (a leading cause of mercury contamination) will be required to draw up national plans to limit mercury emissions. This agreement is expected to reduce cases of neurological and behavioral disorders, and other health problems linked to mercury, as well as the contamination of soils and rivers caused by man-made emissions of the metal.

The treaty will be signed at a special meeting in Japan this October and it will come into force in 2020. In the interim, Japan, Norway and Switzerland have pledged funds to fast-track action.


SLCPs


Short-lived climate pollutants are the low hanging fruit of greenhouse gas emissions. Cutting short lived climate pollutants (SLCP) can go a long way to preserve human health and keep global temperatures below critical thresholds (2°C above pre-industrial levels). SLCPs include black carbon, tropospheric ozone, methane, and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). They are collectively known as short-lived climate pollutants because they remain in the air to warm the Earth for only a few days to a decade and a half.

A World Bank report indicates that cutting SLCPs can reduce the rate of global warming in half. Preventing SLCPs emissions can save 2.5 million lives per year, and it can increase crop yields and food security.

Durwood Zaelke, President of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development was quoted as saying: “Reducing short-lived climate pollutants provides the fast mitigation that the world needs to save millions of lives and avoid the worst of the predicted climate impacts,”

Zaelke also said “in the near-term, aggressively addressing short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon, methane, tropospheric ozone, and HFCs can provide rapid climate, health, and food security benefits, particularly in the critical vulnerable regions that are already suffering some of the worst impacts of climate change.”

Black carbon on its own may be responsible for half of the warming in the Arctic. According to a UNEP study, eradicating SLCPs with existing technologies could cut the rate of global warming in the Arctic by two-thirds. However, without immediate and substantial mitigation efforts, the polar ice will keep melting and sea levels will keep rising. The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme indicates that sea levels could rise 5 feet within the next century. Perhaps most alarming is the fact that ongoing Arctic warming could release huge quantities of methane from the ocean floor, which could lead to runaway climate change.
“Reducing emissions of these short-lived climate forcers is critical for protecting the world’s vulnerable peoples and vulnerable ecosystems. When we talk about sustainable development, this is precisely what we mean. These measures reduce climate change, save lives, provide access to clean energy, and improve food security all at once,” said Zaelke.
In 2012, an important initiative was launched in Washington DC to address SLCPs. The Climate and Clean Air Coalition to Reduce SLCPs is one of the most important developments to combat climate change in over a decade. The coalition is focused on fast-action climate mitigation which has the potential to significantly reduce climate pollution.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton launched the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, which brings together governments, the private sector and key organizations around the world to work toward reducing short-lived climate pollutants,
“The Coalition may be the single most important development for climate protection in the past ten years. It focuses on fast-action climate mitigation that can be done today with existing technologies by willing partners. It has the potential not only to reduce a major part of climate pollution, but to build the momentum and confidence we need to successfully manage carbon dioxide from energy production, which is essential for keeping the Planet’s long term temperature increase to an acceptable level,” Zaelke said.
Charter members of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition include three developing nations (Mexico, Ghana, and Bangladesh) and three developed countries (Sweden, US, and Canada), along with the United Nations Environment Programme. Late in 2012, the European Union, Norway, Japan, Nigeria, Colombia, and the World Bank announced that they have joined the Coalition to reduce SLCPs. Many other countries are also poised to join shortly.

Initial funding for the Coalition has been provided by the U.S., Canada. Sweden and Norway. The World Bank noted the need for urgent action to reduce SLCPs and announced that they have $12 billion in their portfolio that can contribute to the Coalition’s goals.

On April 24th 2012, six initiatives aimed at accelerating and scaling-up action against the short-lived pollutants were approved by the Ministers meeting in Stockholm.
Rachel Kyte, World Bank Vice President for Sustainable Development said:
“This is the most important decade for action on climate change, But with a global treaty that will speed the curbing of carbon dioxide many years off, the climate and clean air coalition puts a practical new deal on the table – one that helps slow global warming while reducing the soot and smog that is damaging food crops and health worldwide, undermining growth and development.”


White House Announces New Rules on Soot


On Friday December 14th, 2012, the White House stood up to industry and announced its plans to significantly tighten air pollution limits on soot from exhaust pipes and smokestacks. The EPA sent the final rule to the White House Office of Management and Budget on December 4th where it was quickly reviewed and approved.

The December announcement sets a new annual air quality standard for soot — also known as fine particulate matter or “PM2.5″ — at 12 micrograms per cubic meter. That’s significantly tighter than the standard of 15 that the agency had established during the Clinton administration. This is expected to prevent heart attacks, strokes, asthma and other respiratory problems.

According to EPA research, “long-term PM2.5 exposures may [also] be linked to cancer and to harmful developmental and reproductive effects, such as infant mortality and low birth weight.” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that preventing these health problems could save $5 billion a year.

These efforts are being driven by strong public support. Over one million Americans have expressed their strong support for clean air. Private industry is also innovating novel ways of reducing SLCPs. For example in 2010, GM developed a replacement for HFCs.

Although efforts to engage SLCPs are laudable, carbon dioxide still accounts for half of all global warming. Therefore it is important to understand that efforts to reduce SLCPs do not take the place of reducing other GHGs, particuarly carbon. As NASA’s Drew Shindell writes:
“We are concerned about the effect of methane and black carbon primarily because they are exacerbating the threats posed by carbon dioxide…If we eliminated emissions of methane and black carbon, but did nothing about carbon dioxide we would have delayed but not significantly reduce long-term threats posed by climate change. In contrast, if we eliminated carbon dioxide emissions but did nothing about methane and black carbon emissions, threats posed by long-term climate change would be markedly reduced.”
And as Stanford’s Ken Caldeira concludes, we cannot choose SLCPs over GHGs
“…there is no scientific basis on which to decide which impacts of climate change are most important, and we can only conclude that both controls are worthwhile.”
Zaelke concludes:
“To win the climate war, we need to cut both the short-lived climate pollutants and long-lived carbon dioxide, the most damaging gas. Fortunately, we’re gaining allies quickly in the second front of the fight against black carbon, methane, and HFCs. A victory on this front will build the confidence we need to win the war.”
While far more needs to be done to manage climate change, it is important to take stock of what has already been achieved, if for no other reason than to inspire more people to advocate for the Earth.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Posts
Crafting a Positive Environmental Narrative
Pessimism is Impeding Environmental Advocacy
Video - Narratives on Carbon Pollution: Are Individuals to Blame for Carbon Pollution?
Building Support for Action on Climate Change Before We Reach Tipping Points
Why We Need to Reach American Climate Change Deniers
A Thanksgiving Infused with Environmental Gratitude
Is There More to the Mayan Prophecy than Meets the Eye?How Morality Can Win the War on Climate Change
An Environmentalist and a Buddhist Monk Discuss Human Behavior
Sacred Economics: Exploring the Myth of Separation (Video)
The Religious Psychology of Green
Green Ethics
Green Ethics and Trade
Earth Conscious People in History

Climate Change Highlighted at the WEF in Davos (2013)

As we emerge from a global recession, climate change is once again on the global agenda. During the week of January 21 -25, many of those present for the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos Switzerland, acknowledged that climate change has very significant economic ramifications. Both President Barack Obama and UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon highlighted climate change as a top priority in Davos.

"There was mostly silence on climate change for the last two years at Davos," said Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense "But that has changed. The US drought, especially, has grabbed people's attention here in Davos because that has had a real effect on prices."

"The US has to be among the leaders in this global discussion, so it is a positive development," Andrew Liveris, CEO of Dow Chemical, said of Obama's inauguration speech, in which he made climate change a priority for his second term.

At the Davos summit, UN chief Ban Ki-moon indicated that he was also encouraged by Mr Obama's speech, while warning that climate change was approaching "much, much faster than one would expect".

Former Mexican president Felipe Calderon warned of "a climate crisis with potentially devastating impacts on the global economy".

Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, made the point by saying: "Unless we take action on climate change, future generations will be roasted, toasted, fried and grilled."

However, the scope of the response from politicians and businesses is nowhere near what it needs to be if we are to stave off the worst impacts of climate change. The United Nations sponsored climate talks have agreed on a mandate to draw up a climate change plan by 2015 but it will only come into force in 2020.

While renewable energy continues to grow, the rapid growth in shale gas has hampered the growth of renewables. According to a WEF study, the world will need to invest $700 billion each year to curb fossil fuel use. The International Energy Agency warned that current trends indicate the world will burn around 1.2 billion more tonnes of coal per year by 2017 than it does today

Although more businesses are getting involved with sustainability, they require a clear regulatory framework from governments if they are to effectively plan for the future. As yet, this regulatory framework is not forthcoming.

And an analysis by Ecofys for Greenpeace, presented at Davos, found that just 14 carbon-intensive projects worldwide are set to increase global CO2 emissions by 20 per cent, or 6 gigatonnes. They range from coal expansion in Asia to the tar sands of Canada.

Addressing a packed plenary, Lagarde made the case for tackling the environment. Climate change she said, is “The biggest economic challenge of the 21st century… Make no mistake: without concerted action, the very future of our planet is in peril.”

Despite the slow pace of progress, it is heartening that world leaders are once again talking about the importance of acting to protect our environment from human activity.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
New Support for the Interconnectedness of the Economy and the Environement
WEF Global Risks Report 2013
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Greentech and Renewables Help the Economy and Create Jobs
Historic Opportunities in the Green Economy
Corporate Sustainability is Driving Green the Green Economy
Launching of the New Global Green Economy
The False Choice Between the Economy and the Environment
British Government to Lead the Green Economy
The Growth of London's Green Economy
Republican Governors See Value in Green
California's Government Partnerships are Driving the Green Economy
State of Green Business Report 2012
The Circular Economy (Video)
A Resource-Based Economy (Video)
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
Building Gateways to the Green Economy
Action on Climate Change

Pakistan's Sustainable Development Strategy

As announced at the Rio+20 summit, Pakistan has a new national sustainable development strategy (NSDS) that will see the creation of a knowledge management system that is based on science, technology and innovation. As reported by SciDev, the knowledge management system will support key economic, environmental and social goals through academic research and foster solution-driven innovation for policy, information gathering, and technology development.

Pakistan's climate change response objectives include disaster risk reduction and management; vulnerability mapping; community-based adaptation; sustainable land management and building climate resilient infrastructure.

Like many countries around the world Pakistan has been devastated by natural disasters like floods and cyclones that will only increase in a world ravaged by global warming. Many areas of the country are vulnerable to natural disasters including floods along the Indus river is high, and droughts from Baluchistan to the Thar desert.

"Pakistan is at the apex of climate vulnerability in Asia," Ali Tauqeer Sheikh, chief executive officer of the non-government organisation, Leadership for Environment and Development, said.

"Most of Pakistan’s landmass is vulnerable to extreme events and they will need investments in adaptive capacity," Anjum Assad Amin, member of Pakistan’s National Disaster Management Authority, said. "There is an inescapable linkage between climate impacts and sustaining future development in the country," the strategy document notes.

Pakistan’s economic growth has slumped to 2.6 per cent in the past three years and the country is beset by large inefficiencies in the agriculture, energy and water sectors, putting stress on natural resources.

The strategy will encourage growth while respecting UN millennium development goals and the proposed sustainable development goals. It is expected to attract support from the private sector.

The estimated cost of adapting to future climate impacts is US$14 billion each year

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Islamic Banks and Renewable Energy in MENA
Pakistan and the Ongoing Climate Treaty Deadlock
Floods in Pakistan is one of the Most Important Stories of 2010
McKibben Attributes Extreme Weather Events to Climate Change
Rio+20 Corporate Sustainability Forum ...
The World “Connects the Dots” Between Extreme Weather and Climate Change
Solutions to Diminishing Ground Water
Fossil Fuel Calamities and Deadly Weather
Extreme Weather and the Costs of Climate ...
Science and Pernicious Ignorance of Climate Change Denial
World Habitat Day 2010
Earth Day Special: Green Blueprint
The 10 Greatest Social Entrepreneurs of All Time