Showing posts with label emission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emission. Show all posts

US Proposals to Cut Methane and Other Pollutants

As an extension of his Climate Action Plan President Obama through the EPA has announced a series of proposals that will reduce methane and other harmful emissions. While there are there are already some voluntary programs to reduce methane emissions, the EPA has proposed new regulations that will significantly reduce methane in the oil and gas sector as well as in landfills.

In June of this year the EPA announced that it was preparing plans to limit methane. On August 18, 2015, the EPA publishes more details of the new rules. The standards are intended for the oil and gas sector. They are designed to reduce methane, VOCs and other toxic air pollutants. Under the proposed regulations the oil and gas industry would have to cut methane emission by 40 to 45 percent from 2012 levels by 2025.

The new standards would reduce methane emissions by between 340,000 and 400,000 short tons. This is equivalent to reducing 7.7 to 9 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. According to EPA estimates the net climate benefits will be worth between $120 and $150 million. In addition to methane the new rule will eliminate as much as 180,000 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

To achieve these goals the new EPA rules require the oil and gas industry to find and repair leaks, capture gas leaking from fracking wells, as well as limit emissions from pumps and other equipment. Several studies have shown that due to leakages, natural gas has a higher emissions profile than coal.

The new standards also address airborne toxins, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. Under the plan as much as 2,500 tons of these toxic emissions will be eliminated.

On August 14, 2015 the EPA issued two other proposals that are intended to reduce methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills which are the third largest source of anthropogenic methane. As part of the proposals landfills would have to reduce methane emissions by almost one third. 

Landfills generate around 18 percent of methane emissions which is the equivalent to 100 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution.

The proposed rules are expected to reduce methane emissions by an estimated 487,000 tons a year which is equivalent to reducing 12.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.

The EPA estimates the climate benefits of the combined proposals at nearly $750 million in 2025 or nearly $14 for every dollar spent to comply. Combined costs of the proposed rules are estimated at $55 million in 2025.

Related
EPA Announces Plans to Regulate Methane
Video - Methane is a Potent Greenhouse Gas
Video - Methane is the Ticking Time Bomb Beneath the Ice
Radiative Forcing: Carbon Dioxide and Methane
Natural Gas (Methane) is Not Clean Energy
A Primer on Greenhouse Gases
Video - Massive Costs Associated with Arctic Methane
Video - Unlocking Methane in the Permafrost is a Global Warming Time Bomb
The Dramatic Implications of Melting Arctic Sea Ice
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Video - Arctic Warming: Risks for Methane Emissions

Video - The Most Important Carbon Numbers on Earth are 530, 840 and 310


This video shows a very simplistic way of understanding that we can only add so much more carbon to our atmosphere before we reach catastrophic temperature increases. While most are familiar with levels of atmospheric carbon this is not the most important number. The most important carbon numbers relate to the amount of carbon we have added to date, the total amount that we can add to avoid runaway climate change and the difference between the two which is our carbon budget.

310

Simply put, we cannot afford to add more than 310 gigatons of carbon emissions into the atmosphere if we are to keep global temperature below the internationally agreed upon upper temperature limit of two degrees Celsius.

530 and 840

We have already emitted 530 of carbon, and according to the IPCC's latest report we can only add a total of 840 gigatons of carbons to stay with the 2 degree C limit. This leaves us with a carbon budget of 310 gigatons.

Related Articles
US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

White Paper - The Logistics, Carbon and Business Data Book

The Logistics, Carbon and Business Data Book: Fall 2013 Sustainability Trends provides sustainability executives, decision-makers, and research teams a collection of charts presenting logistics, sustainability and sustainable business-driven data. The goal of this 31 page white paper is to gather together the essential information and metrics about sustainable business for corporate teams.

Environmental Leader assembles the data and research in this summary report for executives and corporate sustainability teams to utilize in their planning and decision making. A collection of 19 charts covering the important metrics in the specific areas of Sustainable Strategy, Green Fleets, Sustainable Energy, and Energy & Carbon Management.

Click here to register to download the White Paper.

Related Articles
The Green (Low Carbon) Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling & China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters

Due in large part to reduced coal use and warmer winters, the US is producing less carbon emissions than they have in almost two decades. The combination of warmer winters, significantly less electricity from coal, and reduced gasoline consumption reduced carbon emissions to their lowest level in almost two decades.

According to a report titled "U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2012" release on October 21, 2013 by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), US carbon dioxide emissions generated from energy consumption and production fell 3.8 percent in 2012 to 5,290 million metric tons, reaching their lowest level since 1994. The annual energy-related emissions in the US were 5,498 million metric tons in 2011. Although the US economy grew by 2.8 percent in 2012, energy intensity (Btu per dollar of GDP) fell by 5.1 percent.

A total of 50 percent of the emissions decline were attributable to reductions in the residential sector. This is in large part due to a reduction in heating due to a warmer than usual first quarter. By the end of March 2013, the EIA report indicates that the cumulative heating degree days were about 19 percent below the 10-year normal and 22 percent below 2011.

The EIA report found that emissions are at their lowest level since 1994 and over 12 percent below the recent 2007 peak. After 1990, only the recession year of 2009 saw a larger percentage emissions decrease than 2012.

Overall there appears to be a clear trend towards reductions in energy-related emissions. In five of the past seven years energy related emissions have and dropped despite a small population increase of 0.7 percent increase in population in 2012.

Another EIA report published in May states that CO2 emissions from energy between 2000 and 2010 declined in 32 states and rose in 18. While Texas had the greatest absolute decline (58.8 million metric tons) representing an 8.3 percent reduction in emissions, the state still led the US in CO2 emissions from energy with 663 million metric tons in 2010. Almost 50 percent of the emissions from Texas emissions are attributable to fossil fuels.

It is noteworthy that while reducing energy generated by coal was predictably a key factor,  warmer winters have also played a significant role in helping to decrease CO2 emissions in the US. This may suggest that there is a tiny upside to global warming in an otherwise perilous trend towards a world ravaged by climate change.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon

In an interview for the Climate Reality Project's Cost of Carbon event on October 22, World Bank President Jim Yong Kim explained the Bank's increasing focus on sustainability. Dr. Jim Yong Kim is the 12th president of the World Bank Group, he is also a champion of efforts to combat climate change.

When asked why is the World Bank is so involved in the climate crisis, Dr Kim responded that while he thought he was well informed about the latest science, when he assumed his position at the Bank he was shocked to discover just how perilous our current trajectory is.

He framed his response in terms of his sons and the terrible impact it will have on them. He envisioned them asking him why he did not do more to avert the impending climate catastrophe.

He then asked the question, "are we doing everything we possibly could be doing?" His answer was that while the Bank is doing a great deal, so much more could be done to address the climate crisis.

He went on to talk about solutions, proposing two large scale solutions and three areas we can focus on in the interim.

Large scale solutions

1. Price carbon
2. Remove subsidies for fossil fuels

He stated that these two large scale solutions are central facets of a dual strategy to solve the climate crisis but conceded that they are politically difficult. He said that the US, China and the EU must agree on establishing a price on carbon and removing fossil fuel subsidies. In the meantime we must work on energy, urbanization and agriculture.

Three areas of focus

1. Energy: Encouraging sustainable and renewable energy sources
2. Urbanization: Smarter, greener cities
3. Agriculture: Climate smart agriculture

He went on to explain the need for long term financing for such things as renewable energy to ensure greater access to sustainable energy

In terms of the World Bank itself he believes that it is important to "set clear targets and holding ourselves accountable."

Al Gore who was also present during the interview said to Dr Kim, "your leadership is a breath of fresh air." Gore asked, what are the prospects for getting world leaders up to speed and embracing a global view? Dr. Kim replied that he is optimistic. In his meetings with the Chinese and the Europeans he sees a sense of urgency and according to Kim, President Obama sees combating climate change as a legacy issue.

He concluded by talking about how the widespread adoption of cell phones is a good model for the dissemination of renewable energy. He also said that there are great job opportunities associated with carbon pricing, removing fossil fuel subsidies, renewables, smarter cities and better agricultural practices.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

Courses - Carbon Professional Path (CPP)

Carbon Professional Path (CPP) will take place on Tuesday Oct 22 to Wednesday Oct 23, 2013, Toronto, Ontario. The Carbon Professional Path is a groundbreaking program that will prepare you in obtaining a CSA Greenhouse Gas Inventory Qualifier; a globally recognized certification. The certification demonstrates your competence to quantify, assess and report GHG emissions and HRCarbon is the only global provider of a pre-CSA GHG Inventory Quantifier exam program. This learning event is organized by HR Carbon.

This two day course will provide the following two sustainability courses:
• Corporate Carbon Management
• CSA Examination Review

The CSA certification will provide the recipient with the backing of an international organization, prove their legitimacy as a carbon professional and give recipients a major competitive advantage in the emerging climate change sector.

The HR Carbon team has over 25 years experience in corporate carbon strategies within North America, Europe and Africa. While based in Toronto, Canada we have offices in the U.S. and U.K. and work with local and global partners (for profit, not-for-profit, academic and government agencies).

For more information about HR Carbon and on other upcoming events click here.

For more information on CPP click here.



Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

CDP Global 500 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index 2013

CDP Global 500 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index 2013
Sector Company Disclosure
score
Performance Consecutive
years in the
CDLI
Consumer Discretionary BMW 100A3

Daimler 100A2

Royal Philips 100A-3

General Motors 100A-1

Honda Motor 99A2

Volkswagen 99A1

Home Depot99A-2

Nissan Motor 99A1

Las Vegas Sands98A- 1

TJX Companies 98 B 2

News Corporation97 A- 4
Consumer Staples Nestlé 100A4
  Colgate Palmolive 99 B 1
  Reckitt Benckiser 99B 1
  Diageo 98 A 2
  Philip Morris International 97 B 1
Energy Spectra Energy 98 A 2

Repsol98B 2

Chevron 97 A- 1

Hess 97 B 5
Financials BNY Mellon 100A1
  Bank of America 98 A 1
  Goldman Sachs 98 A 2
  Marsh & McLennan 98B 1
  Simon Property Group98B 1
  HSBC 97 A 1
HCP 97 A- 1
  Allianz 97 B 3
Healthcare Bayer 99 A- 6

GlaxoSmithKline 98 A 1

Johnson & Johnson 98 A- 1

United Health Group 98 B 1

Sanofi97 A- 1
Industrials Eaton 100 A- 1
  UPS 99 A- 3
  Raytheon 98 A 1
  Deutsche Post 98 B 4
  Union Pacific 98 B 1
  Schneider Electric97 A 1
  EADS 97 B 1
Information Technology Cisco Systems 100A5

Hewlett-Packard 99A1

Samsung 99A1

SAP 98 A 1

Adobe Systems 97 A 1

EMC 97 A 1
Materials BASF 100 A- 6
  Air Prodcuts & Chemicals 99 B 3
  Ecolab 98 A 1
  Kumba Iron Ore 98 B 1
  Praxair 98 6 1
  Vale 98 B 1
  POSCO 97 B 2
Telecommunication Services Swisscom 97 A 1
UtilitiesGas Natural SDG 100A2
  Iberdrola 99 B 2
  Exelon 98 A 2
  Endesa98 B 1
  National Grid 98 B 1
  Centrica 97 B 6
Source: CDP

Related Posts
The CDP's 2013 Top Fourteen US Companies (Disclosure and Performance)
CDP Studies: Growth of Sustainability and Profitability
CDP Global Climate Change Leaders 2013: Top 12 Companies According to Both CPLI and CDLI
CDP Global 500 Climate Performance Leadership Index 2013

CDP Global 500 Climate Performance Leadership Index 2013

CDP Global 500 Climate Performance Leadership Index 2013
Sector Company Performance Disclosure
score
Consecutive
years in the
CPLI
Consumer Discretionary BMW A1004

Daimler A1001

Royal Philips A1001

Honda Motor A991

Nissan Motor A991

Volkswagen A991

British Sky Broadcasting A 95 1

H&M Hennes & Mauritz A 83 1
Consumer Staples Nestlé A1002
  Diageo A 98 2
  L'Oreal A 93 1
  Anheuser Busch InBev A 85 1
  Unilever A 82 2
Energy Spectra Energy A 98 1

BG Group A 89 1
Financials BNY Mellon A1001
  Bank of America A 98 4
  Goldman Sachs A 98 1
  HSBC A 97 1
  Firstrand Limited A 96 1
  Morgan Stanley A 96 1
  Wells Fargo A 96 2
AXA Group A 94 3
  TD Bank A 94 1
  Ace A 93 2
  BNP Paribas A 93 1
  Barclays A 92 1
  Swiss Re A 92 1
  Deutsche Bank A 91 2
  Munich Re A 91 1
  National Australia Bank A 91 4
  Westpac Banking A 91 4
  Assicurazioni Generali A 87 1
Healthcare GlaxoSmithKline A 98 1
Industrials Raytheon A 98 1
  Schneider Electric A 97 3
  CSX A 95 1
  Komatsu A 95 1
  Lockheed Martin A 91 3
Information Technology Cisco Systems A1001

Hewlett-Packard A991

Samsung A991

SAP A 98 1

Adobe Systems A 97 1

EMC A 97 1

Microsoft A 96 1

Infosys A 92 1

Tata Consultancy Services A 89 1
Materials Ecolab A 98 1
  Anglo American A 96 2
  E.I. du Pont de Nemours A 96 1
Telecommunication Services Swisscom A 97 1

Telenor Group A 95 1

BT Group A 93 1
UtilitiesGas Natural SDG A1002
  Exelon A 98 2
Source: CDP

Related Posts
The CDP's 2013 Top Fourteen US Companies (Disclosure and Performance)
CDP Studies: Growth of Sustainability and Profitability
CDP Global Climate Change Leaders 2013: Top 12 Companies According to Both CPLI and CDLI
CDP Global 500 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index 2013

CDP Global Climate Change Leaders 2013: Top 12 Companies According to Both CPLI and CDLI

CDP Global Climate Change Leaders 2013: Top 12 Companies According to Both CPLI and CDLI


Top 12 companies according to both CPLI and CDLI
Sector Company Performance Disclosure
score
Consecutive
years in the
CPLI
Consumer DiscretionaryBMW A1004
Consumer DiscretionaryDaimlerA1001
Consumer DiscretionaryPhilips ElectronicsA1001
Consumer UtilitiesNestléA1002
Financials BNY Mellon A1001
Information TechnologyCisco SystemsA1001
UtilitiesGas Natural SDG A1002
Consumer Discretionary Honda Motor A991
Consumer Discretionary Nissan Motor A991
Consumer Discretionary Volkswagen A991
Information Technology Hewlett-Packard A991
Information Technology Samsung A991


Related Posts
The CDP's 2013 Top Fourteen US Companies (Disclosure and Performance)
CDP Studies: Growth of Sustainability and Profitability
CDP Global 500 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index 2013
CDP Global 500 Climate Performance Leadership Index 2013

The CDP's 2013 Top Fourteen US Companies (Disclosure and Performance)

The CDP's 2013 Top Fourteen US Companies (Disclosure and Performance)

Company Name
Sector
Disclosure Score
Performance Band
BNY Mellon
Financial Services
100
A
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Information Technology
100
A
Entergy Corporation
Utilities
100
A
Autodesk, Inc.
Information Technology
99
A
Northrop Grumman Corp
Industrials
99
A
NYSE Euronext
Financial Services
99
A
Hewlett-Packard
Information Technology
99
A
Bank of America
Financial Services
98
A
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Consumer Discretionary
98
A
Ecolab Inc.
Materials
98
A
Exelon Corporation
Utilities
98
A
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Financial Services
98
A
Raytheon Company
Industrials
98
A
Spectra Energy Corp
Energy
98
A

Source: CDP 2013

Overview of Scoring

Climate Disclosure: A high climate disclosure score would indicate a comprehensive response. High reflect a company's clear consideration of business-specific risks and potential opportunities related to climate change and good internal data management practices for understanding GHG emissions. However, the disclosure score does not reflect a company’s actions on climate change mitigation.

Performance Band: Each company with a climate disclosure score above 50 are assigned a letter from A to E based the positive actions that the company has demonstrated through their CDP response. These include actions to promote climate change mitigation, adaptation and transparency.

Related Posts
CDP Studies: Growth of Sustainability and Profitability
CDP Global Climate Change Leaders 2013: Top 12 Companies According to Both CPLI and CDLI
CDP Global 500 Climate Disclosure Leadership Index 2013
CDP Global 500 Climate Performance Leadership Index 2013