Showing posts with label old energy economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label old energy economy. Show all posts

Obama Striving to Put an End to Oil Subsidies

President Obama's proposed 2013 budget seeks to end "unfair' oil subsidies. As evidenced by his State of the Union addresses in 2009, 2010,, 2011, and 2012, the President has repeatedly tried to put an end to oil subsidies.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner makes the point that unfair allocation of subsidies mean that some industries like oil and gas get a huge tax break while others do not.

"Right now, companies in some industries pay two or three times the effective tax rates as companies in other industries. For example, the effective tax rate on an investment in buildings or other structures by a manufacturing company might be twice as high as the rate that applies to an oil or gas company. These subsidies distort choices about where companies should invest, and they distort the allocation of capital."

The subsidies offered to the oil and gas industries are a fundamentally important issue for renewable sources of energy that are striving for grid parity. As the President said to students at the University of Miami, “It’s time to end taxpayer giveaways to an industry that has never been more profitable, double down on clean-energy industries that have never been more promising.”

For information on the environmental elements of the Obama budget click here.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
President Obama's 2013 Budget Seeks to Increase EV Tax Credits
Obama's 2013 Budget Seeks to Make Renewable Tax Credits Permanent
President Obama's 2013 Environmental Budget
The End of Oil and the Next Energy Economy
Obama's Call for an End to Oil Subsidies and Big Oil's Suggestion
Independence Day 2011: Declaration of Freedom from Fossil Fuels
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Environmental Politics: Obama Versus the Republicans
Sustainable Growth Excludes Fossil
Leadnow's Declaration For Change
Reigning in Irresponsible Oil Giants

Resistance to Cuts at Environment Canada

On July 5, nearly 50 civil society organizations sent a letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper decrying the cuts to Environment Canada and outlining serious concerns about the impacts of the cuts.

As reported in rabble.ca, the letter was endorsed by labour, environmental, social justice, women's and First Nations organizations, including the Council of Canadians, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources, International Institute of Concern for Public Health, Keepers of the Athabasca Watershed Council, Métis Women's Circle, Mining Watch Canada, National Council of Women of Canada, National Network on Environments and Women's Health, Polaris Institute, Public Service Alliance of Canada, and Sierra Club Canada.
In the letter, statements were made by Maude Barlow (national chairperson of the Council of Canadians), Oliver M. Brandes (co-director of the University of Victoria's POLIS Project on Ecological Governance), David Suzuki (emeritus professor of zoology, University of British Columbia), Bob Sandford (chair of the Canadian Partnership Initiative in support of the United Nations Water for Life Decade), Ralph Pentland (acting chairman of the Canadian Water Issues Council) and Randy Christensen (lawyer with Ecojustice).

The largest amount of job cuts was in Climate Change and Clean Air. The number of full time equivalents (FTEs) were reduced by nearly half, a reduction of 422 FTEs for 2011-2012 with another 100 FTEs slated for elimination in 2012-2013. The goal of the program is to ensure that "threats to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are minimized." The programming is "critical to protect the health of Canadians and the environment from the harmful effects of air pollutants and the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions." The program activity is responsible for regulating air pollutants and controlling greenhouse gas emissions.

Budget cuts are reducing services and this has dire implications for the issue of water. Conservation, protection and enforcement of Canada's water will suffer due to the Conservative budget. Conservatives are slashing budgets at a time when Canada needs a national water strategy to replace the badly outdated Federal Water Policy which is more than 30 years old.

According to Environment Canada's 2011-2012 Report on Plans and Priorities, 34 Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) will be cut from the program activity of Water Resources this year (2011-2012) and another 20 FTE positions will be eliminated next year (2012-2013). The program addresses the impacts that economic growth, climate change and other factors have on water sources. The program focuses on water sustainability and provides scientific information and advice to decision-makers. This area also supports the implementation of the Canada Water Act, the 1987 Federal Water Policy, Canadian Environmental Protect Act, Fisheries Act and International Boundary Waters Treaty Act.

Substance and waste management is another area of concern. A total of 279 FTEs will be reduced from Substance and Waste Management. The goal of the program is ensure that "threats to Canadians and impacts on the environment posed by harmful substances and waste are reduced." The program activity "assesses environmental threats posed by harmful substances and other substances of concern in terms of their fate and effects, and develops and implements prevention, reduction, elimination and management measures to deal with these substances." This area is linked to water quality and ecosystem/habitat conservation and protection.

A significant number of FTEs were eliminated from Weather and Environmental Services: 146 FTEs were cut from Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians and 56 FTEs were cut from Weather and Environmental Services for Targeted Users. These significant cuts were not noted in last year's Plans and Priorities.

The mission of the program activity Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians includes ensuring "Canadians, communities and policy-makers understand the potential health and safety risks from the changing climate and air quality conditions." Programming also manages short- and long-term risks including air quality or climate change.

The letter concludes by saying, "Overall these cuts present a significant threat to water protection and healthy ecosystems in Canada. We are calling on the federal government to cancel the cuts and invest in our country's freshwater heritage."

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Canadian Conservatives Slash Environmental Assessment
Canadian Conservatives Slash NRC Budget
Canada on Track to be a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canadian Federal Provincial Energy Conference on Resource Exploitation
Federal Provincial Energy Conference Sponsored by Big Oil
American Protests Against the Tar Sands Oil Pipeline
Canadian Conservatives Dirty Priorities
Canadian Conservatives Disregard for Canada's Environment
Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
The State of Canada's Environment
Video: The Alberta Tar Sands Dirty Oil
Even the Axis of Evil is Investing in Renewables
Lack of Canadian Co-ordination in Efforts to Reduce GHGs
Canadian Global Warming Denial from the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
Canadians Support Efforts to Combat Climate Change
Canadian Government at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
Canadian Conservative Government Rejects Kyoto
Canada's Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
World Urges Canada to Do More to Manage Climate Change
Obama's Visit to Canada
Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
A Made in Canada Sustainable World Order

Conservatives Cut Budgets and Slash Jobs at Environment Canada

In addition to cuts at the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the NRC the Conservatives are also taking the axe to Environment Canada. Over $200 million is being cut from Environment Canada's budget which is resulting in the loss of services and jobs. Amongst the people being let go are those involved in climate change research and those responsible for contaminated sites. These cuts will result in the elimination of 1211 jobs (full-time equivalents) over the next three years. The 50 employees cut in June, include people working in the areas of water and atmospheric science.

Environment Canada is the leading organization related to the country's environmental agenda. They are charged with  a number of responsibilities including environmental protection and natural heritage conservation. They also provide meteorological information and science that informs the nation's regulations and legislation.

Environment Canada collaborates on initiatives that are intended to protect the health of Canadians and the well being of the planet. They work to collect and share knowledge, and to develop, implement and enforce policies to prevent future environmental issues.

Environment Canada's Reports on Plans and Priorities from 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 reveals some deep cuts amounting to a reduction of more than $222 million from last year's total planned spending.

Some of the biggest cuts were in the program activities of climate change, clean air, substance and waste management, weather, environmental services and water resource protections. The programs that were cut this year include, the Clean Air Agenda and the Air Quality Health Index. The programs that will be cut next year include Species at Risk. Over the next few years cuts are expected to Biodiversity and the Chemicals Management Plan.

The Chemicals Management Program is managed jointly between Environment Canada and Health Canada. It ensures "timely action on key threats to health and the environment" and is responsible for "risk assessment, risk management, monitoring and surveillance, as well as research on chemicals which may be harmful to human health or the environment." The Chemicals Management Plan was intended to proactively reduce future costs associated with water treatment, clean-up of contaminated sites, and treating illnesses like cancer that are related to chemical exposure.

Funding was also reduced for the Action Plan on Clean Water and the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan. Last March, former Environment Minister Jim Prentice said the Action Plan on Clean Water was a priority. However, the government is going back on its word to provide clean water, just as it reneged on its commitment to improve environmental assessment.

Cuts to the Action Plan on Clean Water includes facets of the Oceans Action Plan, the Plan of Action for Drinking Water in First Nations Communities, clean-up funding for water bodies, wastewater regulations and water science. These cuts undermine Canada's ability to fulfill their legal obligation on the right to water.

Without consulting the public the federal government has cut programs that will have critical impacts on current as well as future generations.

With cuts to Environment Canada, the NRC, and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, it is clear that Harper's Conservatives want to emasculate all the instruments of power that could undermine their bid to disregard the environment and make Canada a dirty energy superpower.

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Conservatives Cut Budgets and Slash Jobs at Environment Canada
Canadian Conservatives Slash Environmental Assessment
Canadian Conservatives Slash NRC Budget
Canada on Track to be a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canadian Federal Provincial Energy Conference on Resource Exploitation
Federal Provincial Energy Conference Sponsored by Big Oil
American Protests Against the Tar Sands Oil Pipeline
Canadian Conservatives Dirty Priorities
Canadian Conservatives Disregard for Canada's Environment
Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
The State of Canada's Environment
Video: The Alberta Tar Sands Dirty Oil
Even the Axis of Evil is Investing in Renewables
Lack of Canadian Co-ordination in Efforts to Reduce GHGs
Canadian Global Warming Denial from the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
Canadians Support Efforts to Combat Climate Change
Canadian Government at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
Canadian Conservative Government Rejects Kyoto
Canada's Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
World Urges Canada to Do More to Manage Climate Change
Obama's Visit to Canada
Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
A Made in Canada Sustainable World Order

Federal Provincial Energy Conference Sponsored by Big Oil

Earlier this week a coalition of environmental groups revealed that the Canadian Federal Provincial Energy Conference is being sponsored by several energy companies.

Eleven companies and associations are spending an unprecedented $180,000 to pay for nearly a third of the $600,000 price tag. The sponsorship is an attempt by the petroleum industry to influence people who will be making crucial decisions about Canada's energy future. The sponsors have access to key individuals and they are given a high profile on the website for the conference.


Here is a breakdown of the money provided by Corporate sponsors:


  • $30,000: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.




  • $20,000: The Oil Sands Developers Group, Nexen, TransCanada, Cenovus Energy.




  • $10,000: Devon, Canadian Electricity Association, Shell, Encana Natural Gas, Enbridge, Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, Canadian Petroleum Products Institute.

    Referring to the conference, Sierrra Club Executive Director John Bennett said,
    "We have the big oil picking up the tab. Is the Alberta government so broke that it has to do this? It smells bad and sends the wrong message to Canadians."
    Graham Saul from the Climate Action Network said:
    "This money gives them huge access. It looks like the government ministers are in the pockets of the oil industry."
    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.




  • Related Posts
    Ontario Urged to Stay with Green Energy Act
    Canadian Federal Provincial Energy Conference on Resource Exploitation
    Canadian Conservatives Dirty PrioritiesCanada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
    WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
    The State of Canada's Environment
    Video: The Alberta Tar Sands Dirty Oil
    Canadian Conservatives Disregard for Canada's Environment
    Lack of Canadian Co-ordination in Efforts to Reduce GHGs
    Canadian Global Warming Denial from the Frontier Centre for Public Policy
    Canadians Support Efforts to Combat Climate Change
    Canadian Government at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
    Canadian Conservative Government Rejects Kyoto
    Canada's Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
    World Urges Canada to Do More to Manage Climate Change
    Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
    Obama's Visit to Canada
    Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
    The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
    A Made in Canada Sustainable World Order

    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats

    The Kochs' are waging a multi-faceted propaganda war against President Obama and Democratic candidates. The big guns in the Kochs' arsenal include Koch Industries, a network of proxy organizations, popular media, the Tea Party and Republican candidates.

    Through organizations like the Cato Institute, the Meratus Center, and Americans for Prosperity the Kochs' they have waged proxy wars against President Obama and the Democrats. Many of these organizations fabricate data which are quoted by candidates and faux media like Rush Limbaugh.

    Limbaugh often cites papers created by Koch fronts and an officer at Americans for Prosperity, Walter Williams, often guest-hosts for Limbaugh. Fox News also has ties to the Kochs' proxy organizations. Phil Kerpen, the vice-president for policy at Americans for Prosperity, is a contributor to the Fox News Web site.

    Through their proxys, Koch industries has been undermining the President. A recent poll found that fifty-five per cent of Americans felt that Obama is a socialist and this is only one of the many lies that the Koch's proxys helped to promote.

    The Tea Party is a very important addition to the Koch stable because it gives the Koch's the grassroots support they have been seeking for decades.

    Many Republican candidates are recipients of Koch funding, and many are predicting that the Kochs' efforts will succeed in helping to elect Republican candidates in the 2010 midterm elections.

    However, corporate influence is not foolproof, sometimes common sense triumphs over massive spending. In California despite massive funding from big oil, Proposition 23, which would have rolled back California's environmental progress, is likely to be defeated. Democrat Jerry Brown also looks like he will defeat Meg Whitman and be the next governor of California, even though Whitman set a record for spending the most private money on a political campaign.

    Although the Koch brothers may have developed a potent arsenal in their war against progress, as we are seeing in California, not every election can be bought.


    Related Posts
    The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermines Cap-and-Trade
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Kochs' Mercatus Center and Environmental Deregulation
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermines Cap-and-Trade

    Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is an astroturf front group started by oil billioniare David Koch and Richard Fink. AFP rallies and misinformation campaigns were pivotal in undermining cap-and-trade.

    Because cap-and-trade makes corporations pay for the pollution they produce, Koch Industries is vehemently opposed to the any legislation including the measure.

    Misinformation is the primary means used by the AFP to discredit the Democrat's legislative agenda. AFP has held at least eighty events targeting cap-and-trade legislation. Speakers for the group deliberately misled people into believing that even “back-yard barbecues and kitchen stoves“ would be taxed. The truth is the measure would only apply to large companies, neither small businesses nor private citizens would be directly subject to the energy tax.

    AFP was also involved in the attacks that successfully brought down Obama’s “green jobs” czar, Van Jones. Like a wolf in sheeps clothing, the AFP went to Copenhagen last year and protested outside the UN conference on climate change. They mislead people into believing that their group was a champion of ordinary workers who would be hurt by environmentalists.

    The AFP is part of the reason why we did not see energy and climate legislation in the last two years, it is also part of the reason why cap-and-trade is very unpopular. By staging protests, Americans for Prosperity have dissuaded Republicans who might otherwise have worked constructively with Obama.

    The Kochs' dirty oil money funds Americans for Prosperity, which in turn fuels Republican obstructionism in Congress.


    Related Posts
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Kochs' Mercatus Center and Environmental Deregulation
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots

    In 1990, the Kochs created a citizen group that called acid rain and other environmental problems “myths.” Despite being called Citizens for the Environment, the group had no citizen membership. The group was actually an offshoot of the Koch created Citizens for a Sound Economy.

    In 1993, Citizens for a Sound Economy successfully defeated Clinton’s proposed B.T.U. tax on energy. During the 2000 election campaign, Koch Industries spent some nine hundred thousand dollars to support the candidacies of George W. Bush and other Republicans. In 2004, Citizens for a Sound Economy was accused of illegitimately supporting Bush’s reelection.

    Citizens for a Sound Economy also supported the 2005 energy bill, which Hillary Clinton dubbed the Dick Cheney Lobbyist Energy Bill. It provided enormous subsidies and tax breaks for energy companies.

    Citizens for a Sound Economy demonstrates that long before their success with the Tea Party, the Kochs were looking to create a grassroots movement. The Kochs have no interest in American citizens beyond putting them to work for their oil agenda.


    Related Posts
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Kochs' Mercatus Center and Environmental Deregulation
    The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermine Cap-and-Trade
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    The Kochs' Mercatus Center and Environmental Deregulation

    In the mid-eighties, the Koch family foundations provided millions of dollars to George Mason University to set up a conservative think tank. Now known as the Mercatus Center, it fights environmental regulation, opposes clean energy legislation, and resists effort to curb industrial pollution.

    Koch foundations have contributed more than thirty million dollars to George Mason University and $1,442,000 has been given directly to the Mercatus Center.

    The Mercatus Center is ground zero for deregulation policy in Washington. Much of their energy is devoted to environmental deregulation and their primary weapon is misinformation. They have also worked to undermine the Obama Presidency. Shortly after the stimulus bill was passed, the Mercatus Center released a report falsely claiming that stimulus funds had been directed disproportionately toward Democratic districts. Although the author was eventually forced to recant, the damage was done.

    The link between Mercantus and the Kochs is irrefutable. The founder of the Mercatus Center is Richard Fink, he is currently executive vice president of Koch Industries and the head of Koch Industries' lobbying operation in Washington. Fink also retains a seat on the board of directors at the Mercantus Center.

    Although the Mercatus Center promotes itself as “the world’s premier university source for market-oriented ideas—bridging the gap between academic ideas and real-world problems,” it is actually a conservative propaganda machine that serves the Kochs' corporate interests.


    Related Posts
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermine Cap-and-Trade
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    The Kochs' Cato Institute's Climate Denial

    The Cato institute is a libertarian think tank that creates and disseminates propaganda designed to undermine environmental legislation and regulation.

    David and Charles Koch, the owners of Koch Industries, provided the funds to launch the Cato Institute. According to the Center for Public Integrity, between 1986 and 1993 the Koch family gave eleven million dollars to the institute.

    When President Obama, described the science on global warming as “beyond dispute,” the Cato Institute took out a full-page ad in the Times to refute the President's statement. Cato’s scholars have consistently criticized attempts to stop global warming as expensive, ineffective, and unnecessary.

    Cato scholars not only deny the science behind climate change they were active promoters of the Climategate scandal. One Cato scholar gave more than twenty media interviews on the alleged scandal. Although the scientists were cleared by five independent inquiries, the Cato institute has managed to cause many Americans to doubt their veracity.

    Discrediting the scientific consensus on global warming is an important part of the Cato Institutes strategy of misinformation.


    Related Posts
    The Kochs' Mercatus Center's and Environmental Deregulation
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Undermine Cap-and-Trade
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    Koch Industries War with the EPA

    Koch Industries has been at war with the EPA for decades. Rather than accept the EPA's science based approach to managing climate change, Koch funds organizations that fabricate their own facts and publish propaganda papers that pose as credible academic information. Armed with a blatent disregard for the facts, Koch industries is fighting the EPA on initiatives ranging from efforts to reduce surface Ozone, to the classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen.

    Some truly absurd statements have come out of the Koch created think tank known as the Mercantus Center. In response to the EPA move to reduce surface ozone in 1997, Susan Dudley, a senior official at the Mercatus Center, argued that smog actually benefits humans because it reduces the incidence of skin cancer.

    Koch Industries is taking on the EPA and they are mustering all the support they can buy to divest the agency of their regulatory powers.

    Rather than pursue legislation that could force Koch Industries into line with the facts or protect the EPA from the Kochs' assaults, many members of the House and the Senate seem to share the Koch agenda.

    Last June, forty-seven of the Senate's 100 senators voted to permanently strip the EPA of its power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Some legislators are planning another attempt at passing legislation that would suspend the EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases.

    A good illustration of the scope of Koch Industries influence involves their resistance to the EPA's attempt to classify formaldehyde as a “known carcinogen.” Koch Industries has been lobbying to prevent this from happening. It is no coincidence that the company produces formaldehyde in great quantities.

    The ownership of Koch Industries is not deterred by the experimental evidence indicating that formaldehyde causes cancer. When you are the owner of one of the world's most powerful corporations you wield tremendous power and you have access to the levers of power.

    David Koch, the owner of Koch Industries, disagrees with the science on formaldehyde, and this is a point which he argues from his position on the National Cancer Advisory Board.


    Related Posts
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Koch Created Mercatus Center's Push for Deregulation
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War

    A US Supreme Court ruling earlier this year is making it easier for large corporations like Koch Industries to influence political outcomes. The ruling is known as the Citizens United case, it struck down laws prohibiting direct corporate spending on campaigns.

    Brothers David and Charles Koch are amongst the wealthiest men in America and they are also the owners of Koch Industries America's second largest corporation.

    For decades the Kochs’ political network has been executing their ideological war against America, but until recently they have been operating under the radar. Koch industries directly funds Republican candidates across the country, but thanks to the Supreme Court ruling, the Koch brothers now have a covert means of channeling unlimited political influence.

    President Obama has issued warnings about the dangers of the Supreme Court ruling. At a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser, in Austin, the President even mentioned a Koch founded and funded organization by the name of Americans for Prosperity. Despite denials from Koch Industries, Americans for Prosperity has been instrumental in the rise of the Tea Party.

    The President said that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling had made it even easier for big companies to hide behind “groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity.”

    Obama said, “They don’t have to say who, exactly, Americans for Prosperity are. You don’t know if it’s a foreign-controlled corporation”—or even, he added, “a big oil company.”


    Related Posts
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    The Kochs' War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Koch Created Mercatus Center's Push for Deregulation
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    Kochs' Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    California's Proposition 23
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    The New International System: The Role of Government
    What is Wrong with the Right

    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party

    Video Linking the Kochs' and the Tea Party



    Koch Industries has tried to distance itself from the Tea Party, but despite the company's denials there is considerable evidence linking the two.

    In a carefully worded statement, Rich Fink, executive vice president of Koch Industries, said, “We have not provided funding to the tea party organizations which are being organized throughout the country and, until recently, we had never been approached by a tea party group for funding.‪ ‪We have publicly supported Americans for Prosperity Foundation since 1984 and Americans for Prosperity since 2004. We have never considered these institutions to be tea party organizations. Whether or not they are considered to be tea party organizations will not affect our support of them. We believe the tea party movement is a response to the growing frustration of many Americans to government overspending. We share these concerns and encourage citizens to express their opinions in a respectful and civil manner.”

    However, information from a variety of sources indicate that there is a strong association between Koch Industries and the Tea Party. One of the most damning pieces of evidence comes from a new Internet documentary, [Astro]Turf Wars. The documentary includes a speech by David Koch, the owner of Koch Industries, delivered at a gathering of Americans for Prosperity, a group which he and his brother Charles founded. During the meeting, organizers proudly recognized a number of tea party activists.

    Koch Industries directly contributes to the campaigns of Tea Party Republicans and through organizations like Americans for Prosperity, they also train Tea Party activists. It should come as no surprise that the same people who lie about climate change also lie about their links to the Tea Party.


    Related Posts
    Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
    The Kochs' Citizens for a Sound Economy Feigned Grassroots
    The Koch Brothers and the Cato Institute's Climate Denial
    The Koch Created Mercatus Center's Push for Deregulation
    The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
    Koch Industries War with the EPA
    Koch's Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
    Koch Spending on Political Influence
    Kochs' Climate Science Denial
    The Kochs War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
    Koch Industries' Environmental Crimes
    Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
    Supreme Court and the Koch Brothers Clandestine War
    The Koch Brothers' No Climate Tax Pledge
    Koch Destroys the Environment and Funds Climate Denial
    Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
    California's Proposition 23
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
    Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    What is Wrong with the Right
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    The Business of Climate Change Deception
    Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
    Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
    Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
    Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
    Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
    Palin is No Friend of Green
    The New International System: The Role of Government