Showing posts with label Carbon Trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carbon Trading. Show all posts

Video - German Climate Scientist Argues the Merits of a Carbon Tax in Australia

European Parliament Revives Hopes for Cap-and-Trade

After a failed attempt in April, the European Parliament succeeded in passing a measure early in July to address the low price of the EU’s emissions trading system. Emissions prices in the $72 billion cap-and-trade program had lost more than 70 percent in the past four years. The low price of Europe’s carbon market is attributable to the prolonged recession of 2008 and the glut of permits that cut the price to as low as about 2.75 euros a ton.

Europe's carbon markets are essential to the continent's strategy to reduce GHGs and combat climate change. Cap-and-trade systems gradually make polluting more expensive thereby using market forces to drive the adoption of greener technologies and the reduction in carbon emissions.

Some of those who voted no in April changed their minds due to an amendment ensuring that the intervention was a one time deal and by a planned study of the dangers of businesses leaving the EU to avoid the higher permit price.

The final vote was close at 344 to 311 (with 46 abstentions). The news had a positive impact on the value of carbon credits, rising 9 percent (4.70 euros, or $6.13, per ton).

Prices are being buoyed by delaying the auctioning of some carbon allowances. The measure passed despite the concerns of Poland, the Czech Republic and others. These nations are worried about the schemes impact on coal fired energy and other industries. Others did not want to see interference in the market system. At the end most realized that something had to be done to "stop the bleeding" as Connie Hedegaard, the European Union’s commissioner for climate action put it.

Hurdles remain if the cap-and-trade scheme is to move forward, this includes the positions of national governments like Germany which will be voting in elections on September 22. Peter Liese, a German Christian Democrat member of the Parliament, said,“It’ll go very fast after the German elections.”

In the longer term we will also need to see higher carbon credit prices if the program is to be effective. However, the EU's action in July is a good start towards renewing the continent's emissions trading scheme.

As a model emulated around the world, the success of the EU's carbon trading system is crucial.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon
Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review
RGGI is Increasing Renewables while Reducing GHGs and Spurring Economic Growth
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
Video - What are the benefits of a carbon price?
Video - How does carbon pricing work?
Video - A Price on Carbon in 5 Easy Steps
Video - The Cost of Carbon
Climate Change Caucus in Washington Breeds Hope for Legislation on Emissions Reduction Perhaps Even Cap and Trade
California's Cap-and-Trade Leadership
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
Small Business Can Save US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade
Green Capitalism

World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon

Many believe that putting a price on carbon is the best way to combat climate change. Now the chorus of those calling for just that has been joined by World Bank President Jim Yong Kim. He recently urged the world’s environmental ministers to implement a five-point plan that includes putting a price on carbon dioxide emissions, improving agricultural practices and ending fossil fuel subsidies.

Kim urged more countries to roll out price mechanisms either through a tax on carbon, indirect taxation, regulation or creation of a carbon market. Kim made the remarks to 30 of the world's environment ministers gathered in Berlin for informal talks on a new global climate deal to take effect in 2020.

The European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme is struggling with low prices and may require action from EU policymakers. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said the EU should take action on a plan to postpone the supply of permits.

Conversely, the Easter Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is doing much better than their European counterparts.  California’s recent carbon auction fared well and the addition of five Canadian provinces has rejuvenated the Western Climate Initiative (WCI). The five Canadian provinces replace six US states (New Mexico, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Montana and Utah) that abandoned the WCI making it the biggest North American carbon trading market by value.

Overall the North America carbon trading market doubled in 2012 with the inauguration of carbon markets in California and Quebec.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
European Parliament Revives Cap-and-Trade
Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review
RGGI is Increasing Renewables while Reducing GHGs and Spurring Economic Growth
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
Video - What are the benefits of a carbon price?
Video - How does carbon pricing work?
Video - A Price on Carbon in 5 Easy Steps
Video - The Cost of Carbon
Climate Change Caucus in Washington Breeds Hope for Legislation on Emissions Reduction Perhaps Even Cap and Trade
California's Cap-and-Trade Leadership
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
Small Business Can Save US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade

Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review

Carbon trading is increasing around the world as levels of atmospheric carbon are about to move past the 400 parts per million threshold. The European Union has been operating the world’s biggest emissions market since 2005. In North America there is the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) and the Western Climate Initiative (WCI). According to Thomson Reuters Point Carbon the North America carbon trading market doubled in 2012 with the inauguration of carbon markets in California and Quebec. In 2012, the volume of permits and credits traded was estimated to be 179 million tons, valued at $782 million.

Although six US states (New Mexico, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Montana and Utah) abandoned the WCI, five Canadian provinces joined California to form the biggest North American carbon trading market by value. In 2012 the WCI distributed 24 million metric tons of allowances in California and Quebec. As well as pursuing participating in the WCI, California has been actively creating its own cap and trade program.

Emissions markets did not appear to be have been significantly impacted by global economic woes. In 2012, they traded at volumes 19 percent higher than in 2010, although the value was up only 4 percent. Approximately 8 Gt CO2e were traded in compliance markets, compared to 7 Gt in 2010.

 "The Critical Decade: Global Action Building on Climate Change" presents an overview of progress in international action on climate change since August 2012. The report also reviews carbon pricing and emissions trading schemes around the world.

The number of countries pricing carbon is increasing, with four new schemes starting so far this year. Emissions trading schemes are now operating in 35 countries and 13 states, provinces and cities. One of the countries that adopted a carbon trading scheme in 2012 is South Korea. While New Zealand started emissions trading in 2009 and Australia is scheduled to come online with their own scheme in 2015.

These 48 schemes, together with the 7 Chinese schemes, are expected to involve 880 million people and about 20 percent of global emissions.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
European Parliament Revives Cap-and-Trade
World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon
RGGI is Increasing Renewables while Reducing GHGs and Spurring Economic Growth
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
Video - What are the benefits of a carbon price?
Video - How does carbon pricing work?
Video - A Price on Carbon in 5 Easy Steps
Video - The Cost of Carbon
Climate Change Caucus in Washington Breeds Hope for Legislation on Emissions Reduction Perhaps Even Cap and Trade
California's Cap-and-Trade Leadership
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade
Green Capitalism

Video - How does carbon pricing work?



how a carbon price can reduce carbon pollution and move towards a clean energy future. This animation explains how a carbon price can reduce carbon pollution and move towards a clean energy future. For more information, go to www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au

Related Posts
World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon
Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review
RGGI is Increasing Renewables while Reducing GHGs and Spurring Economic Growth
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
Video - What are the benefits of a carbon price?
Video - A Price on Carbon in 5 Easy Steps
Video - The Cost of Carbon

Video - A Price on Carbon in 5 Easy Steps

Video - The Cost of Carbon

RGGI is Increasing Renewables while Reducing GHGs and Spurring Economic Growth

According to a report released on March 26th, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) has spurred the growth of renewable energy, reduced greenhouse gases (GHGs) and helped to grow the economy in the US Northeast. Between 2000 and 2010, the economies of the ten Northeast states grew twice as fast per capita as other states while per capita carbon dioxide emissions declined 25 percent faster.

These are the findings of a report released by Environment America. The report titled "A Double Success: Tackling Global Warming While Growing the Economy with an Improved Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative," shows that it is possible to increase renewable energy, lower GHGs and grow the economy at all at the same time.

“By promoting clean energy and energy efficiency programs, RGGI helps keep energy dollars in our local economy while reducing the risk of climate change-related costs,” said Pat Stanton, senior vice president for policy and advocacy at the Conservation Services Group (CSG), a large energy services company. “In the last five years, RGGI has helped to spur CSG’s growth. We have added over 450 new employees and improved the efficiency, comfort, and affordability of thousands of New England homes.”

Recent analyses also indicate that RGGI has produced a $1.6 billion economic boost to the region through 2011 and that strengthening RGGI could produce an additional $8 billion in economic benefits.

“By using RGGI to accelerate investments in energy efficiency, the Northeast states have made RGGI into a winner for businesses and consumers in the Northeast,” stated the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships’ public policy director Jim O’Reilly. “This report shows that RGGI will continue to be a critical tool for states to manage their energy use and maintain our competitive advantage as we emerge from the economic downturn.”

Reducing global warming causing emissions is crucial to preempt an increase in the number of floods to affect the Northeast. These floods impact 1.5 million people in the Northeast living in coastal flood zones. The report indicates that the costs of these floods could reach $212 billion in storm-related economic losses by mid-century.

“In the wake of Winter Storm Nemo, Hurricane Sandy and Hurricane Irene, the Northeast must double-down on its commitment to lead the nation in reducing the pollution that’s warming the planet and changing our climate,” said Rob Sargent, energy program director for Environment America. Sargent went on to say “There’s no time to waste in tackling the climate challenge and it’s got to start right here and right now. The success that these states are having in limiting pollution, promoting energy efficiency and shifting to renewables should give us the confidence that they can continue to show the nation and the world that it can be done.”

In February, nine of the ten states involved in RGGI announced a new agreement to make deeper cuts in power plant carbon emissions that would lead to a 20 percent reduction over the next decade.

The report urged further action including:

  • New Jersey should rejoin the RGGI program, and lead the way in preventing increasingly severe storms and rising sea levels while bolstering the state’s economy.
  • Northeast states should adopt limits on global warming pollution that go beyond the electricity sector to include transportation and heating fuels.
  • Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut and Massachusetts must implement their laws with binding targets for reducing global warming pollution.
  • More states should take action to limit emissions, and joining RGGI would be a great step forward.
  • The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should move forward on limiting global warming pollution from new and existing power plants in all states.

These efforts will not only help to stave off climate change, they will also help provide a healthier environment .

“Reducing emissions from power plants has a direct positive impact on the health of our communities, translating into less asthma, less respiratory disease and less allergies,” said Gary Cohen, president of Health Care Without Harm, which works with the health care industry to promote sustainable practices. “Addressing climate change through RGGI and similar policies will help protect our families from climate-related diseases and other health impacts of extreme weather events.”

“Strengthening programs such as RGGI is a win-win for the Northeast,” said Sargent. “We can reduce the impacts of global warming while powering our clean energy economy.”

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review
World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
California's Cap-and-Trade Leadership
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions

Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business

Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade

South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation

South Korea has passed legislation that will see the introduction of a greenhouse gas emissions trading program in which companies will buy or sell rights to emit carbon dioxide. Although the legislation had bipartisan support working out the details may be difficult.

As reported in The Korea Herald, on May 2, the National Assembly passed the legislation on cap-and-trade with near unanimity. Of the 151 lawmakers who participated in the ballot, 148 voted for the bill. The legislation envisions a national carbon exchange to launch in January 2015.

It is projected to cover around 60 percent of the country’s carbon pollution by imposing limits on facilities that produce more than 25,000 tons of CO2 a year. About 450 facilities are likely to become subject to it. Penalties on non-compliers are set at three times the prevailing market price of carbon or a maximum of 100,000 won ($87) per ton.

Ninety-five percent of the permits will be given away for free in the first few years, with some export-oriented industries receiving a full 100 percent. Each permit represents a ton of carbon emissions.


“Korea has rolled out many projects on green growth so far, but the carbon emissions trading scheme is the most important of all and the one that will propel the ongoing efforts to a new level,” said Yang Soo-gil, chairman of the Presidential Committee on Green Growth.

South Korea, Asia's fourth largest economy, aims to reduce carbon emissions by 30 percent from projected levels by 2020. Korea is the world’s eighth-largest emitter of carbon pollution based on 2009 figures from the International Energy Agency. The country’s greenhouse-gas emissions jumped to about 640 million metric tons in 2011 from 350 million metric tons in 1990, making it the fastest-growing emissions source among 34 nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

“We anticipate a major shift in the country’s overall energy policies to follow in a near future to steer the domestic economy toward a low-carbon green economy,” Kim Sang-goo, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said.

Impacted industries are expected to resist the legislation once the details are ironed out.
The local business community had opposed the plan from its inception, saying that it would put Korean firms at a disadvantage in the global market because their competitors in bigger economies and bigger polluters ― namely the US, Japan and China ― are not subject to such a cap.

Although the law stipulates that 95 percent or more of the permits may be given for free, there will likely be resistance from industries that would like to see an even higher ratio.  


Already there is disagreement within various branches of the government. The Ministry of Knowledge Economy (formerly the commerce ministry) is at odds with the Environmental Ministry. The Ministry of Knowledge plans to run a pilot carbon trading program in June, despite strong opposition from the Environmental Ministry, which has been running a similar program since 2010. 


© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part1 (Video)
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part2 (Video)
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia
Korea's Green Growth
Korea's Green Growth (Video)
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia
Global Carbon Market will Grow in 2012 then Decline
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
Small Business Can Save US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business
Green Capitalism
Korean (Hyundai & Kia) Greener Cars
The Kochs' Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade
Even North Korea is Investing in Renewables

Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs

The Midterm gubernatorial elections of 2010 have important implications for regional market based mechanisms of greenhouse gas reductions. Although these programs spur innovation in the clean energy economy and create green jobs, some Republican governors have already indicated that they are planning to withdraw from these agreements.

The three major carbon trading programs in the US are the
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) and the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord (Midwestern Accord).

RGGI is a carbon trading program that involves Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont, it went into effect in 2008. There is one observer state (Pennsylvania), and four Canadian provinces are also observers (Québec, New Brunswick and Ontario).

RGGI is a successful regional initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. RGGI is implementing a cap and trade system for CO2 emissions from power plants in the member states. Emission permit auctioning began in September 2008, and the first three-year compliance period began on January 1, 2009. Proceeds will be used to promote energy conservation and renewable energy. The system affects fossil fuel power plants with 25 MW or greater generating capacity. Since 2008, the program has generated more than $700 million for renewable energy and efficiency programs.

The governor races for states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) have mostly gone to the Democrats. Although the Democrats won seven of the ten states involved in RGGI program (Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, and Vermont), they lost Maine. New Jersey did not have a gubernatorial election this year, but the current Rebuplican governor (Chris Christie) supports RGGI.

Lincoln D. Chafee is Rhode Island's new Governor, he is a Republican turned independent and he has a long track record of environmental accomplishments. Sheila Dormody, president of the Environment Council of Rhode Island said, “we will have a good environmental leader in the new governor.”

WCI, is a regional cap-and-trade compact between California, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, Oregon, Montana, Arizona (although Arizona rescinded its partnership agreement on February 5, 2010), and four Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec). WCI was established in 2007 and scheduled to go into effect in 2012.

The observers are Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Nevada, Wyoming, the province of Saskatchewan and the Mexican states of Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, Sonora and Tamaulipas.

WCI is an initiative to combat climate change caused by global warming, independent of their national governments. WCI is a collaboration of independent jurisdictions working together to identify, evaluate, and implement policies to tackle climate change at a regional level. This is a comprehensive effort to reduce greenhouse gas pollution, spur investment in clean-energy technologies that create green jobs and reduce dependence on imported oil.

The governor races in Western Climate Initiative states are roughly split with 3 of 5 races going to Republican governors. While California and Oregon have voted for a Democrat in the statehouse, Republicans won in New Mexico, Utah, and Arizona.

The newly elected Republican governors in Arizona and Utah have already began working to end their state's involvement with the carbon trading program.

The Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord (Midwestern Accord) is a regional agreement by six governors of states in the US Midwest and the Premier of one Canadian province to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change.

Signatories to the Accord are the US states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Kansas, and the Canadian Province of Manitoba. Observers of the Accord are Indiana, Ohio, and South Dakota, as well as the Canadian Province of Ontario.

The Midwestern Accord was signed on November 15, 2007. In June 2009, the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord Advisory Group finalized its draft.

The Midwestern Accord establishes greenhouse gas reduction targets and develops a market-based and multi-sector cap-and-trade mechanism to help achieve those reduction targets. It includes a system to enable tracking, management, and crediting for entities that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Midwest accord also develops and implements additional steps as needed to achieve the reduction targets, such as a low-carbon fuel standards, regional incentives and funding mechanisms.

In the 2010 midterms, Minnesota, went to a democratic governor, while Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan and Wisconsin all went to Republican governors.

Judging by the number of Republican governors, RGGI looks as though it will survive, while the participation of all the member states in the proposed Western Climate Initiative is in doubt. It can be expected that the Midwest Accord will suffer now that Midwestern governors are predominantly Republican.

Despite the influx of Republican governors, these trading agreements are crucial to preserve any hope of eventually implementing a federal carbon trading program.


Related Posts
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right