Showing posts with label reduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reduction. Show all posts

California's Cap-and-Trade Program is Alive and Well

This is the eighth installment in a series of posts on California's climate leadership. These posts address a wide range of related topics including economic benefits and renewable energy.

With unprecedented bipartisan support, California lawmakers have voted to extend the state's cap-and-trade program. This carbon pricing program is key to meeting California's ambitious carbon reduction targets. The plan puts a statewide cap on greenhouse gas emissions and allows companies to buy and sell pollution credits.

The Golden State has been a cap-and-trade leader for years and it has a current market value of $8 billion. Negotiations are ongoing to include Mexico in the joint market. Two Canadian provinces are part of California's carbon pricing scheme. Quebec is already part of the deal and Ontario is linking with the market this year.  B.C. already has a successful carbon pricing plan and even the oil producing province of Alberta has signed on to a carbon pricing initiative.  The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, (RGGI) is composed of nine north east states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont). The agreement caps and reduce CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel power plants that generate 25MW of power or more.

Using markets to combat pollution has proven effective. The argument for pricing carbon is compelling indeed some have argued that it may be the best way to reduce emissions. The president of the World Bank advocates putting a price on carbon and such pricing schemes are already widespread in countries around the world including Europe, China, Japan, South Korea, and Canada

California has passed a raft of increasingly stringent emissions reduction legislation. Although detractors have tried to suggest the state's cap-and-trade program is in serious trouble, the evidence shows that California's carbon trading scheme is a success story. As reported by Greenbiz, the most recent data (July 2017) indicates that California is only 3 percent away from its 2020 goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels as required by AB 32.  The article also makes the point that these reductions have been, "easier and cheaper than expected."

What is even more striking is that these emissions reductions have occurred alongside laudable economic growth.  This is further evidence of the decoupling emissions and growth.

At the 13 previous California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) auctions, allowances have sold out at or above the floor price. However, at the last two auctions, demand was not strong enough for CARB to sell allowances at the price floor ($12.73 per ton).

This is because companies are not buying permits. Companies are not buying permits because they do not have to. As explained in the Greenbiz article, "they already held enough to account for their current emissions, or they expect to be able to make emission reduction for less than the cost of an additional permit."

Contrary to the assertion of detractors this does not prove that the scheme is failing, it may however suggest that California's climate and energy policies (ie performance standards) are working. 

Despite some legal risks associated with court challenges the future of carbon trading looks bright in California. Gov. Brown has vowed to extend the program beyond 2020 and CARB has released a proposal extending the program to 2050. CARB’s new proposed regulation offers a stronger mechanism to correct for situations where supply exceeds demand. It does this by diverting unsold allowances to a reserve which provides downward pressure on allowances prices should cost pressures begin to emerge.

As reviewed in the Greenbiz article, "CARB’s cap-and-trade design has been fundamentally sound from the start, and only continues improving." For more information on California's cap-and-trade plan click here.

Related
US States Show Carbon Pricing Works
Low Oil Prices and Climate Action (carbon pricing and subsidies)
Why a Carbon Tax May be the Best Way to Reduce CO2 (Video)
Put a Price on Carbon
RGGI States' Third Consecutive Year of GHG Declines
Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading a Global Review
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business

G19 Leaves Trump Behind and Moves Forward on Climate Action

A recent G20 summit communiqué out of Hamburg Germany acknowledged the abdication of Trump but emphasized the global commitment to responsible climate action. Historically the G20 has made unanimous declarations but Trump's decision to quit the Paris Climate Agreement resulted in a break with this tradition. Despite the isolation of the US, the world's leading economic powers indicated that they remain serious about climate action. The summit was marked by riots and Trump was singled out as the preferred target of the protestors.

Trump was characteristically awkward at the summit and he appeared to have difficulty following the discussion at times. At one point Trump had to be diverted from his day-dreaming to turn around and pose for the cameras. Trump's only contribution was an initiative to help other countries burn fossil fuels more cleanly. This is rather ironic as the Paris Agreement seeks to end the burning of hydrocarbons.

Trump's decision to quit the Paris Climate Agreement met with widespread resistance. The entire world (except Syria) has embraced the need for climate action and this includes most Americans. Although Trump claims to be a champion of economic growth his decision is being resisted by corporate America and other levels of government.  Led by California, US states and cities have vowed to counteract the Trump administration's inaction. While Trump's climate denial is unpopular at home it is openly reviled abroad.

World leaders

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tried to educate Trump on the relationship between climate action and economic growth. Trudeau also pointed to the efforts of Canada's provinces, municipalities, and businesses in the absence of federal leadership on climate change during the Conservative rule of Stephen Harper.

"The fact that the G20 stayed strong and committed, even with the United States stepping aside, is a strong indication that the global community in general is committed and united," Trudeau told reporters. "I think that we can look at the global community holding together so strongly on the topic of climate change is a credit to the G20."

Both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the UK's Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May said they were "dismayed" by Trump's decision to withdraw from the climate deal.

"Like other world leaders here, I am dismayed at the U.S. decision to pull out of the Paris agreement and I have urged President Trump to rejoin the Paris agreement," May said.

Merkel said she regretted the fact that the US had abandoned the climate consensus. However, she added that she is, "grateful that every other head of state and government acknowledges that the Paris Agreement is irreversible."

Although there is a broad consensus to act on climate change Trump's withdrawal has caused Turkey to consider reevaluating its participation.

Social inequality

Despite attempts by advocates, social issues failed to gain traction at the summit. This is unfortunate because there is an intimate relationship between social inequality and the election of populist leaders like Trump. Social issues must be taken into account if we are to safeguard our democracies against future political travesties.

Despite the efforts of Oxfam's Jörn Kalinski, social inequality was all but ignored. "[I]nequality is destroying social cohesion. People who feel left behind get frustrated and run into the arms of right-wing populists. And that is a threat to democracy," Kalinski told DW.

Russia

The meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin went as planned. The two despots denied Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and agreed to work together. Although it did not make the headlines, cooperation between these pleonectic leaders could augur an environmental and climate disaster.

The end game may be the lifting of sanctions. Putin needs Exxon's cooperation to extract oil from beneath the ocean floor of the Russian Arctic. There is a half a trillion dollars of fossil fuels up for grabs and the climate consequences are catastrophic. If it goes through the "deal" would unleash a massive carbon bomb at a time when we desperately need to reduce emissions by moving away from fossil fuels.

Conclusion

Trump's decision to quit Paris is counterproductive and may not serve his political agenda.  Although he may have support from the minority of Americans that make up his base, his policies, particularly those related to climate action are at odds with the global consensus and reality itself.

"Trump has lost another collision between fantasy and reality. No other global leader shares his fantasy that climate change is a hoax," said Tom Burke, chairman of E3G, a London-based think tank on energy and environmental issues. "Other governments, cities, businesses, entrepreneurs, and communities, including many in his own country, will carry on with the serious business of tackling the greatest strategic threat to our prosperity."

No one did a better job of reviewing Trump's failure at the G20 summit than the award-winning political editor Chris Uhlmann. As reported in the Guardian, Uhlmann said Trump is a man with, "no desire and no capacity to lead the world". The centrist Australian reporter described Trump as "isolated and friendless" at the G20. "He was an uneasy, lonely, awkward figure at this gathering and you got the strong sense that some of the leaders are trying to find the best way to work around him," Uhlmann said.

He went on to say that Trump isolated the US, confused and alienated its allies and ultimately diminished America. Uhlmann concluded that Trump's policies are contributing to the "decline of the United States". He also described the American demagogue as "the biggest threat to the values of the west".

Uhlmann said Trump was obsessed with "burnishing his celebrity" and had "diminished" his own nation to the benefit of Russia and China.

In his final assessment of Trump's malfeasance Uhlmann said he is, "a man who barks out bile in 140 characters, who wastes his precious days as president at war with the west’s institutions like the judiciary, independent government agencies and the free press."

After only five months of Trump's rule, his presidency is proving to be an unmitigated disaster. Trump is more than a disgrace, he is a clear and present danger both domestically and abroad. The sooner his presidency comes to an end the safer the world will be.

Related
Corporate America Rejects Trump's Climate Ignorance
Business Leaders Advocate for Sustainability and Refute Trump
Trump Casts a Dark Shadow Over COP22
Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force
Business and the Paris Climate Agreement
The Earth Day Signing Ceremony for the Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables

Obama Administration's Oil and Gas Initiatives

In their final year, the Obama administration has moved forward with some important actions to curtail extraction and reduce pollution from the oil and gas industry. Fossil fuels are responsible for the vast majority of greenhouse gases and deadly air pollution.

To help address these concerns President Obama has previously a raft of fossil fuel related actions. This includes, the Clean Power Plan, stopping the KXL, cuting Shell's Arctic drilling in half and halting the building of the Dakota Access pipeline.  In 2016 President Obama went even further and banned offshore Arctic oil drilling, changed the methane rules for the fossil fuel industry and canceled gas leases on Native lands.

Obama's initiatives are designed to protect the health of Americans, combat climate change, and decrease risks to ecosystems. In the context of a hostile and obstructionist Republican controlled Congress Obama has done what he could to advance climate action. Unsurprisingly, these actions have been vociferously opposed by the fossil fuel industry and their GOP minions in the House and the Senate.

The fossil fuel industry has used its considerable clout to challenge Obama's efforts. A recent Senate report, explained, "state officials, trade associations, front groups, and industry-funded scientists participating in the challenge actually represent the interests of the fossil fuel industry."

Moratorium on Arctic drilling

In 2015 Obama pledged leadership in Alaska and Just ahead of leaving office Obama found a creative way to deliver. Obama's actions ensure that there will be no oil drilling in the Alaskan Arctic until at least 2022. The move kills any hope of extracting fossil fuels from the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. The move also stymies new drilling in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (New England to the Chesapeake Bay). This means that the Gulf of Mexico is the only place in the US where new offshore extraction will be permitted for the foreseeable future. Obama's action was part of a joint announcement that included Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's decision to prevent new drilling operations in the Canadian Arctic.

In a statement published by the Washington Post, President Obama said: "These actions, and Canada’s parallel actions, protect a sensitive and unique ecosystem that is unlike any other region on earth. They reflect the scientific assessment that, even with the high safety standards that both our countries have put in place, the risks of an oil spill in this region are significant and our ability to clean up from a spill in the region’s harsh conditions is limited...By contrast, it would take decades to fully develop the production infrastructure necessary for any large-scale oil and gas leasing production in the region – at a time when we need to continue to move decisively away from fossil fuels."

While the amount of water being protected is unprecedented, it should not be surprising as it makes both environmental and economic sense. The decision bodes well for animals that make up the Arctic's fragile ecosystem, this includes the bowhead whale, fin whale, Pacific walrus and polar bear. It will also protect what the White House has called biodiversity "hotspots" critical to fisheries.

Obama used Section 12-A of a 1953 law called "Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act" to prevent the sale of new offshore drilling and mining rights. The real genius of invoking this law is that it will take years for the next president to reverse the decision.

These moves bode well for the future of tourism, fishing and other less harmful forms of economic development in the Arctic. According to the White House, the president has protected 125 million acres in the region in the last two years.

Conservation groups hailed the decision. League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski called it "an incredible holiday gift," saying that "an oil spill in these pristine waters would be devastating to the wildlife and people who live in the region."

Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, called it "a historic victory in our fight to save our Arctic and Atlantic waters, marine life, coastal communities and all they support." Carter Roberts, president and chief executive of the World Wildlife Fund, applauded what he called "a bold decision” that “signals some places are just too important not to protect."

New methane rules

Also in November the Obama administration released the final version of a new oil and gas rule for public and Native lands. Federal lands generate 11 percent of US natural gas production and 5 percent of domestic oil production. The new regulations are intended to capture flared natural gas and so-called "fugitive" emissions of methane from drilling operations. Large amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas are emitted during drilling and fracking operations.

The Interior Department and its Bureau of Land Management, which will implement the rule, says the move will reduce methane emissions by 175,000 to 180,000 tons annually. This translates to enough gas to serve the needs of 6.2 million American homes each year.

"We are proving that we can cut harmful methane emissions that contribute to climate change while putting in place standards that make good economic sense for the nation," said Interior department secretary Sally Jewell in a statement. "Not only will we save more natural gas to power our nation, but we will modernize decades-old standards to keep pace with industry and to ensure a fair return to the American taxpayers for use of a valuable resource that belongs to all of us."

The new rules are part of the president’s goal of reducing US methane emissions from the oil and gas sector 40 to 45 percent below 2012 levels by 2025.

"Natural gas is a valuable American resource, but when wasted into the air it causes dangerous pollution," Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, said in a statement. "Reducing the amount of gas that oil and gas operators release will conserve an important domestic resource, improve air quality, lower asthma attacks, and slow climate change."

Leases canceled on Native lands

In November, Obama administration cancels oil and gas leases on Blackfeet tribe’s sacred grounds

"This is the right action to take on behalf of current and future generations,” Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said on the department’s Web site. She said it would protect the region’s “rich cultural and natural resources and recognizes the irreparable impacts that oil and gas development would have on them."

Another Washington Post article quotes Harry Barnes, chairman of the Blackfeet Nation Tribal Business Council as follows:

"A lot of our creation stories emanate from this area. It’s a significant area, it always has been for thousands of years...While we’re not opposed to oil and gas exploration, we are opposed to oil and gas exploration in that area." Barnes called the settlement, a "victory for not only the Blackfeet people, but for all of America. It’s such a beautiful area. It’s Mother Earth, and it needs to be enjoyed by everybody."

Related
EPA's Carbon Limits for Power Plants
The US Environmental Protection Agency and Fracking
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Taking Stock of President Obama's Environmental Efforts in His First Term
President Obama Climate Action Plan (Full Document)
Obama Striving to Put an End to Oil Subsidies
Environmental Politics: Obama Versus the GOP

Event - COP 22 and IRENA Renewable Energy Side Events

COP 22 will take place November 7-18, 2016 in Marrakech, Morocco. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), established in 1994, aims to stabilize the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a level that prevents "dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system".

The Framework’s Conference of Parties (COP) was created and put in place in order to structure the efforts of the Parties to the Convention as they address climate change. The COP meets annually to review and assess the implementation of the UNFCCC and any other legal instruments the body adopts with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fighting climate change.

At this year’s COP, COP22, IRENA will host several side events related to advancing the deployment of renewable energy. Details of the side events can be found on the renewable energy track website.

Related
Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force
President Obama Outmaneuvers Deniers to Protect the Paris Climate Deal
US China and Others to Ratify Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides
Everything You Need to Know About COP21 (Video)

Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force

The world's first global initiative to reign in climate change has come into effect. On October 5, 2016, less than a year after the Paris Climate Agreement was signed at COP21, a critical threshold was passed. With the ratification of more than 62 countries, the pact will formally enter into force on November 4, 2016.

Many thought we would not be able to secure a deal in Paris at the end of last year. Then detractors doubted that enough countries would ratify it. The naysayers have been proven wrong.

This historic agreement is designed to combat climate change through drastic emissions reduction pledges known as the INDCs. To bring this carbon cutting global agreement into force 55 countries representing 55 percent of global emissions had to formally join.  The US, China and the EU have all signed onto the deal.

President Obama welcomed this historic step in our global efforts to combat climate change saying:

"If we follow through on the commitments this agreement embodies, history will judge it as a turning point for our planet." The President also said that the deal will contribute to a wave of opportunties. "[The pact will] unleash high-tech low carbon investment and innovation at a scale we have never seen before. So this gives us the best possible shot to save the one planet we've got."

See the President's full remarks in the video below:



Related
President Obama Outmaneuvers Deniers to Protect the Paris Climate Deal
US China and Others to Ratify Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement

US China and Others to Sign the Paris Climate Agreement on Earth Day Suggesting an Early Start to Implementation

The US and China, the world's leading carbon emitters have agreed to sign the historic Paris Climate Agreement at a signing ceremony on Earth Day. The signing of the agreement on Friday April 22nd at UN headquarters is more than just a symbolic gesture.

Of the 196 countries on-board at COP21 in Paris last December, as many as 155 other nations, including India, are expected to sign the agreement on Earth Day.

The signing by the US and China is crucial as they account for 38 percent of global emissions. This sends a powerful message that will be heard around the world. This is but the latest cooperative climate statement by these two nations.  In November, 2014 the US and China launched their joint efforts to limit carbon emissions and then they followed this up with more climate cooperation in September, 2015.

To make the agreement operational 55 percent or 55 countries will need to sign the agreement.This would mean that the agreement would come into effect far sooner than the 2020 target date floated prior to COP21. The final Paris agreement does not make mention of the 2020 implementation date. Early implementation will increase the political pressure to increase carbon reduction targets in 2018.

More ambitious targets are necessary given that current INDCs will increase global temperatures to 2.7C (the upper threshold limit set in the Paris agreement is between 1.5C and 2C). We need to see emissions peak by 2020 if we are to be able to keep temperatures from breaching 2C of warming above pre-industrial times.

As reported by the Guardian, Eliza Northrop, an analyst at the World Resources Institute, said there was growing momentum behind an early approval of the agreement.
"It’s likely it could come into effect in 2017. It could even happen this year," she said.
Related
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Canadian Leadership at COP21
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides

Agreement on a Pan-Canadian Carbon Pricing Scheme

It looks as though Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberals are moving forward with a national carbon pricing scheme albeit adapted to regional circumstances. On Thursday March 3, 2016, Trudeau announced that the federal government along with all ten provinces have agreed to a "comprehensive and ambitious plan" to put a price on carbon.

Carbon pricing (which includes both cap and trade and a carbon tax) leverages the market to disincentivize emissions intensive activities by making them more expensive while incentivizing low carbon technologies. In effect carbon pricing integrates the true cost of carbon which is currently not reflected in the market. Carbon pricing is the best way to help governments reduce emissions while minimizing economic impacts.

There are some compelling arguments that have been made in support of carbon pricing. In April 2015, 65 researchers in Canada published a report that indicated putting a price on carbon is key to reducing emissions in the country. With oil prices so low this may be the best time to put a price on carbon. Although carbon pricing was rejected by the previous Conservative government under Stephen Harper, it was part of the Liberal's raft of campaign promises.

Canada's new Prime Minister has said that he will respect the unique circumstances of each province and this appears to be the caveat that secured the support of detractors like Saskatchewan's Brad Wall. "There will be different approaches but pricing carbon is part of the solution that this country and all of its premiers will put forward," Trudeau told a news conference.

There are predictable detractors like David McLaughlin former President and CEO of the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy and a Conservative Chief of Staff. In a Globe and Mail article McLauglin indicated that carbon pricing, particularly as it is being proposed in Canada, "is the least effective way to reduce emissions."

Canadians support climate action and carbon pricing. A poll published in January 2015, when Harper's Conservatives where still in power, found that the majority of Canadians said that Canada "should do more" to combat climate change. A total of 69 percent of those surveyed said that they favored a carbon reduction incentive and 59 percent said that they supported "increasing taxes on those activities and products that generate more emissions." While 78 percent supported, "lowering taxes on those activities and products that produce lower emissions," only 44 percent supported “introducing a national carbon tax that would be phased in over time.”

As reported by the CBC an Angus Reid Institute poll at the end of 2015, a solid majority of Canadians see climate change as a serious threat and want to see emissions reductions even if it increases their annual energy costs. The poll indicates that Canadians prefer a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax.

Although the previous Conservative government claimed that carbon pricing would kill jobs in October last year Desmog reported on a Clean Energy Canada study that indicated action on carbon pricing could create a million jobs in the province of BC alone.

To further refute the claims of the Harper Conservatives, all around the world countries are adopting carbon pricing and the economic hit promised by detractors has not materialized. Carbon pricing has the support of the president of the World Bank and the World Economic Forum, it is already being implemented in Europe, China, South Korea and Mexico

In the US California and other states are showing the carbon pricing works, this includes the RGGI and there are already working carbon pricing schemes in Canada, BC has a carbon tax, Ontario and Quebec have a cap and trade system. Most recently the new provincial government in Alberta has come onside with a carbon levy.

Although the introduction of carbon pricing in Canada may appear to be a major step forward for climate action, there are concerns that the greening of Canada will be financed through the construction of new crude oil pipelines. This would be an oxymoron.

Trudeau and the provinces will meet again in six months to deal with the specifics of the plan.

Related
A Compelling Argument for Carbon Pricing
Video - How does carbon pricing work?
Why we Should Put a Price on Carbon
Why a Carbon Tax May be the Best Way to Reduce CO2 (Video)
Video - The Cost of Carbon
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
Green Capitalism

Justice Scalia's Death Bodes Well for the Clean Power Plan

The EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP), the centerpiece of the Obama administration's climate efforts was stayed by the US Supreme Court on February 9, however the death of Conservative justice Antonin Scalia just a few days later breathes new life into the plan.

In total 27 states, the coal industry, and the Republican party want to stop the EPA's efforts to reign in emissions from US power plants. Their efforts to undermine the plan are at odds with American opinions. Polls show that the majority of Americans support the CPP even in states that oppose it.

The unprecedented Supreme Court ruling ignored the merits of the plan which includes health, cost and climate benefits. The implementation of the plan are now on hold until the D.C. Circuit Court reviews the legality of the case. The same court denied a request for a stay of the CPP. For the CPP to be killed by the courts the challengers will have to prove irreparable-harm and such claims are almost impossible to prove.

The EPA and President Obama remains confident that we will see the plan proceed after the hearing scheduled for June. As Obama explained:
"I've heard people say, 'The Supreme Court struck down the clean power plant rule.’ That's not true, so don’t despair people. This is a legal decision that says, 'Hold on until we review the legality.' We are very firm in terms of the legal footing here."
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy made a statement in which she said that the ruling “is not going to slow us down.”

However, even the most optimistic environmentalists are disappointed by the Supreme Court's actions. At the very least it provides a legal basis for states to refuse to move forward on the implementation of the plan. At its worst it is a major blow to the COP21 climate agreement reached in December of last year in Paris.

As everyone knows global emissions reductions are contingent on US leadership. President Obama was instrumental in getting countries like China, India and Brazil to sign-on to the Paris deal. The failure of the US to substantially reduce its emissions represents a major impediment to global climate action. It significantly increases the likelihood that the world will not ramp up emissions reductions to keep temperatures from rising beyond the 1.5 to 2 degree Celsius upper threshold limit.

The CPP would reduce emissions from US power plants by one third by 2030. If it is not implemented the US will not be able to meet its pledge to cut its carbon emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The legal case against the CPP is premised on the fifth and tenth amendments to the US Constitution (confiscation of private property and states' rights). The rebuttal to these claims is that coal will continue to be part of the power mix and the US Supreme Court's ruling that the EPA has the right to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. Regulators already have the authority to monitor toxic releases as they cross state boundaries.

Even without the CPP there is still hope for emissions reduction from the US energy sector as renewables and gas are replacing coal for economic reasons. Other sectors are also decreasing emissions. The next president could rewrite the CPP, reform fossil fuel leasing programs, and regulate methane. However the stay on the CPP makes an already difficult battle that much more arduous.

The Supreme Court's stay of the CPP speaks to the power of the ideological conservative judicial activists on the Supreme Court. The 5-4 decision had conservative and moderate justices ruling that a “stay” was appropriate while the more liberal judges dissented from the majority decision.

The stay indicated that a majority of the justices foresee a reasonably high likelihood that they would ultimately strike down Obama’s plan. Now that Scalia is gone, getting a majority of justices to strike down the CPP is very unlikely. The D.C. Circuit panel composed of a majority of Democratic appointees will almost certainly uphold the regulations in June.

Although Republican legislators can be counted on to continue their politically motivated campaign of obstructionism, even if they refuse to support a replacement to Scalia it is very unlikely the Supreme Court justices who oppose the CPP will get the support they need to kill the plan.

The Conservative majority in the Supreme Court has died along with Justice Scalia. This turn of events is critical because climate change cannot be stayed by the courts. As the EPA explained in a statement:
"We’re disappointed the rule has been stayed, but you can’t stay climate change and you can’t stay climate action."

air, clean, emissions, reduction, climate action, United States, U.S., Obama Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, pollution,

Related
Clean Power Plan Facing Lawsuits Despite Raft of Benefits
President Obama Introduces and Explains the Clean Power Plan (Video)
The Health Benefits of Combating Climate Change and the Clean Power Plan
Family Health and the Clean Power Plan (Videos)The Clean Power Plan for the Health of Latinos: Congresswomen Sánchez Testimonmy to the EPA
Republicans at Odds with Americans on Climate Change and the Clean Power Plan
Clean Power Plan: Business Opportunities and Economic Benefits
Hundreds of US Companies and Investors Support the Clean Power Plan
Historic Clean Power Plan Includes Three New Additions
The EPA's Efforts to Reign in Climate Pollution from New Power Plants and the Supreme Court
Coal vs EPA: The Benefits of the Clean Power Plan Far Outweigh Costs
The EPA's Clean Power Plan and US Energy Efficiency
Video - The EPA's Clean Power Plan
Infographic - Obama's Clean Power Plan Explained
US GHGs and the EPA's Clean Power Plan (Infographic)
Congresswoman Linda Sanchez in Support of the Clean Power Plan
Support for the EPA's Clean Power Plan

Obama Proposes Oil Tax and Clean Energy Infrastructure Investments

President Obama has recently proposed an oil tax and a clean energy infrastructure investment plan that would create a “more integrated, sophisticated and sustainable transportation sector." The proposal is part of a budget request that calls for annual spending of $32 billion and it will be paid for with a $10 a barrel oil tax. The ten year 320 billion is designed to finance a 21st century clean energy infrastructure in the US. This includes annual spending of $20 billion for national transportation initiatives, $10 billion in for cities and states and $2.4 billion for green vehicle research.


The President's proposal is in addition to his successful push to raise fuel-efficiency standards for cars and trucks, green energy subsidies and the clean power plan that will reign in carbon pollution from power plants. He has also succeeded in pushing through a global climate deal in Paris.

This proposal would reduce emissions from the transportation sector which is responsible for almost a third of US carbon emissions. Transportation sector investments include among other things, high speed rail. There are also investments in what is known as the Transportation Income Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) stimulus program. TIGER awards grants for transportation projects with "measurable economic and environmental benefits.” Another $10 billion a year would go to local, regional and state governments to invest in green infrastructure and more livable cities. The Climate Smart Fund would reward states that make greener choices with existing federal dollars, as well as competitive grant programs to promote region-wide planning, more livable cities, and infrastructure projects with greater resilience to climate impacts.

In addition to the tax on oil and clean infrastructure investments, the Obama administration is also creating private sector incentives for low carbon technologies. Together these cleantech investments will not only enable the US to transition away from fossil fuels they will create jobs and grow the economy.

Despite the fact that Obama's plan would supply jobs, drive the economy and advance climate action, Republicans can be counted on to kill the proposal. While environmental groups lauded the fact that Obama is standing up to big oil and putting a price on carbon pollution. Conservatives,well known for their opposition to climate action, say that they are concerned that gas prices could increase by as much as 25 cents a gallon.

"President Obama's proposed $10 per barrel tax on oil is dead on arrival in the House," Majority Whip Steve Scales (R-La.) said in a statement. "The House will kill this absurd proposal."

The oil industry, which has seen declining profits is also pushing back against the plan spinning the proposal as a jobs killing tax grab that will hurt consumers.

"The White House thinks Americans are not paying enough for gasoline, so they have proposed a new tax that could raise the cost of gasoline by 25 cents a gallon, harm consumers that are enjoying low energy prices, destroy American jobs and reverse America’s emergence as a global energy leader," American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard said in a statement.

The White House does not deny that the President's clean transportation proposal would increase fossil-fuel prices, however they said that this would create "a clear incentive for private-sector innovation to reduce our reliance on oil and invest in clean-energy technologies that will power our future."

There is little chance that Republicans will turn on their petrochemical puppet master. However, a future administration and legislators with more common sense will eventually get behind the initiative.

Related Posts
Low Oil Prices and Climate Action (carbon pricing and subsidies)
Market Based Approaches to Combating Climate Change
China Carbon Pricing and US Climate Cooperation
 Market Based Green Growth
 US States Show Carbon Pricing Works
 Corporate Actions Buoy US Carbon Pricing
 A Compelling Argument for Carbon Pricing
 We Can Reduce Emissions and Tackle Climate Change
Curbing Fossil Fuels - Carbon Pricing and an End to Subsidies (WEF Summaries)
The Prospects for Putting a Price on Carbon
RGGI States' Third Consecutive Year of GHG Declines
The Merits of Carbon Pricing in B.C.
Video - Why a Carbon Tax May be the Best Way to Reduce CO2
All I Want is a Price on Carbon
Hansen on How the GOP Could Support a Carbon Tax
World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon
California's Cap-and-Trade Leadership
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
Mexico Passes Climate Change Law
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions

COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables

The Paris climate deal erases any doubt that fossil fuels will be replaced by renewable energy. Even before the start of COP21, the world had already begun to accept that the end of fossil fuels and the dawn of a low carbon economy powered by renewables. We now have the political will, investment dollars and technological innovation required to drive the transition from fossil fuels to renewables.

In an interview taped for CBS' Face the Nation, John Kerry called the climate pact "a breakaway agreement" that will change how countries make decisions and "spur massive investment." We have already seen how reduced demand and increased supply have resulted in a glut of oil pushing prices to around $36 a barrel. Oil prices have not been this low in more than five years.

A Forbes article titled, Oil Matters Less than Wall Street Thinks, suggests that oil has not hit bottom and prices will continue to slide, "in the long term, oil can go a lot lower...the demand side trends all point lower." As the article indicates, "oil is fading into history." We are already seeing clear evidence of this trend. In 1980, energy (mostly fossil fuel) stocks were responsible for almost 29 percent of the S&P 500, now they make up less than 9 percent of the total market value of the index.

Fossil Fuels on the decline

Post COP21, we can expect to see far more radical disruptions in the fossil fuel industry. Concerns about the risks associated with fossil fuels are driving the shift away from fossil fuels. Specifically, the fear of stranded assets related to unburnable carbon. These concerns are reviewed in a 2013 report titled Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets from Carbon Tracker and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at London School of Economics. The report indicates that between 60 to 80 percent of coal, oil and gas reserves of publicly listed companies are “unburnable” if we are to keep the planet from warming less than 2° Celsius. We currently have five times more fossil fuels that can be safely burned to stay within the 2C upper threshold limit.

Now that the COP 21 agreement has reduced the upper threshold limit to 1.5C, even more fossil fuels will need to stay in the ground. As reported in Climate Change News, scientists confirm that the 1.5C warming limit means that fossil fuels must be phased-out by 2030. 350.org’s Do the Math campaign says we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide and stay below 2°C of warming — anything more than that risks catastrophe for life on earth. We have 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide in fossil fuels.

A new report suggests that there are trillions of dollars of fossil fuel investments that are at risk of becoming worthless. In the article Global Warmings Terrifying New Math, Bill McKibben quotes John Fullerton, a former managing director at JP Morgan who now runs the Capital Institute, as saying that there are about $20 trillion in fossil fuel assets that are at risk.

Even big oil is coming to terms with the risks associated with their core business activities. ExxonMobil recently published a “Carbon Asset Risk” report in which it acknowledged that climate change will drive down the valuation of its oil reserves. The report shows how market forces and climate regulation will make some of its carbon reserves unburnable.

Concerns about stranded assets used to be an issue of interest to environmentalists, economists and savvy investors. Now the term is informing both private and public policy decisions. Fossil fuel assets will encounter serious headwinds once pollution controls are partnered with carbon pricing schemes. Social and political movements will also contribute to the stranding of fossil fuel assets. This includes growing fossil fuel divestment, environmental advocacy and public protest.

Investors cannot ignore the risks associated with high carbon holdings. Led by organizations like Ceres, investors are becoming increasingly mindful of the dangers associated with traditional carbon laden investments.

As Jonathan Koomey PhD explained in a 2014 blog post: "[O]nce markets realize there’s an arbitrage opportunity, they relentlessly chip away at it until it is eliminated. And the stranded fossil asset arbitrage opportunity is one that’s worth many trillions of dollars. So the pressure will continue to build, and soon the disclosures will result in attention paid to this asset risk that simply hasn’t been present before. That attention will become a flood very rapidly. It’s the beginning of the end of the fossil-fuel economy, but the big players just don’t realize it yet (or if they realize it, they’re not admitting it)."

A report, Stranded Carbon Assets (PDF), from Generation Foundation, thinks that the process of transitioning away from fossil fuels will be much quicker than some expect. "The inevitable transition to a low-carbon economy will revolutionize financial markets at an unprecedented magnitude...investors who equate the transition with drawn-out, incremental change do so at their own peril as the stranding of carbon assets may occur at unforeseen rates and at an unpredictable scale." The fall in the costs of renewable energy will also continue to leverage market forces in a way that shifts investment dollars into clean energy, effectively stranding fossil fuel assets.

Growth of renewables

Renewable energy is already experiencing tremendous growth and the Paris climate deal will accelerate that growth exponentially. As reported by Scientific American, studies show that, "switching to an entirely renewable energy system would save money and lives."

Rich and poor nations alike agree that renewables are a cost-competitive source of energy. They are not only good for the climate, they are good for the economy and they provide good jobs. The combination of new policies, new regulations, new investments, new technologies and new partnerships will grow renewable energy at an ever accelerating rate.

Driven in part by the growth of renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions are already declining in 2015. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is among those who have provided evidence that the shift towards renewables is happening now. Their annual World Energy Outlook for 2015 report states, “There are unmistakable signs that the much needed global energy transition is under way,” with “60 cents of every dollar invested in new power plants to 2040 [to be] spent on renewable energy technologies.”

The IEA says that between 2015 and 2040, global investments in renewable energy will total $7 trillion, representing 60 percent of all power plant investment. In 2013, renewables contributed only 12 percent of global energy to power generation; however, by 2040 they will supply at least 24 percent.

Contrary to the facetious rhetoric from big oil, renewable energy is powering the growth of the developing world. This includes places like Brazil, China, India, Afghanistan, Albania, the Caribbean, and Costa Rica. The IEA says that the developing world alone will spend $2.7 trillion on renewable-based power plants between 2015 and 2040.

Over the past three decades, renewable sources of energy have been growing at a prodigious rate. In the last three decades, solar power has been doubling every two years while the costs have been falling (75 percent in the last five years). At the current rate, solar will be able to effectively supply all of our energy needs in less than 2 decades.

Solar is seeing tremendous growth in places like Germany, Spain, Portugal, Australia, and the U.S. Wind is seeing tremendous growth in places like Brazil, China, South Africa and the U.S. Growth is also expected with other clean energy sources like biomass, thermal, tidal, and waste-breakdown energy.

A Grist article by Michael Klare titled, Renewables poised to surge after Paris Agreement, says that "2015 can be viewed as the year in which the epochal transition from one set of fuels to another took off, with renewables making such significant strides that, for the first time in centuries, the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel era has come into sight."

A number of initiatives have been launched at or around COP21 that are not only good for the climate, they represent good business practices.

Indian Prime Minister Modi has pledged to get 40 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030 and 175GW of renewables by 2022. Solar power generation in India is expected to grow by 2,500 percent over the next seven years, expanding output from 4 to 100 gigawatts.

India has brought together 120 countries to be part of a solar energy alliance. Modi has committed $30 million for the establishment of the alliance’s headquarters in New Delhi. The eventual goal is to raise $400m from membership fees and international agencies. Some of the companies involved in the project include Areva, Engie, Enel, HSBC France and Tata Steel. Another solar initiative called the Global Solar Council comprises over 1000 companies.

To accelerate clean energy innovation, several leading countries launched Mission Innovation. Bill Gates and a number of other CEO's are fostering innovation through an initiative called the Breakthrough Energy Coalition. It will seek both private and public funds to expedite the development of advanced green-energy technologies to speed the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. Private sector initiatives like RE100 have dozens of global business leaders who have pledged to source all of their electricity from renewable sources.

Governments see the wisdom of sourcing their energy from renewables. On December 4, 1000 mayors and local leaders signed the "Paris City Hall Declaration" committed to "support ambitious long-term climate goals such as a transition to 100% renewable energy in our communities, or an 80% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2050." As explained by Klare:

"As the consumption of renewable energy explodes, the incentives for power and money-saving technical breakthroughs are only going to grow and the rate of discovery is sure to rise as well, undoubtedly offering enormous payback possibilities for those getting a piece of the action early...make no mistake about it: The future belongs to renewables."

While there are some who are skeptical that renewables can replace fossil fuels, a 2014 Washington Post article titled, The coming era of unlimited - and free- clean energy, makes the point that many megatrends had early detractors who were proven wrong. A Greenpeace report indicates that 100 percent renewable energy is possible by 2050.

The more renewables that are deployed the more it will reduce costs, which in turn will drive even more growth. Post COP21, we will see an unstoppable shift away from fossil fuels that will augur the unprecedented growth of renewable energy.  

Related
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement
How the Paris Terror Attacks are related to Climate Change and why a COP21 Deal is More Important than Ever
Breaking: We Have a Final Draft Climate Agreement at COP21 
Environment and Climate in the Republican Spending Bill: Oil Exports in Exchange for Clean Energy, Air, Water, and Green Climate Funding
As We Near the End of COP21 People are Demanding Climate Action
Optimism at COP21 Despite Disagreements on the Meaning of Differentiated Responsibilities
Being Hopeful About the COP21 Climate Deal (Video)
Canadian Leadership at COP21
COP21 Compact of States and Regions Pledges Emissions Reductions Equivalent to China's Annual Output
Be Part of History: Help Make COP21 a Success
A Guide to COP21 and Clean Energy Solutions from 24 Hours of Reality and Live Earth (Video)
Al Gore Says COP21 Will be a Turning Point in Global Policy (Video)
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides
COP21 Starts With Pledges of Action from World Leaders
President Obama's Address at the Opening Session of COP21
Everything You Need to Know About COP21 (Video)
Tell World Leaders that we Want Bold Climate Action at COP21 (Video)
COP21: March4Me (Video)
Canadian PM and Provinces Unified for COP21
Summary of the Final Round of Climate Talks Before COP21
Saudi Arabia is on the COP21 Naughty List
COP21 Naughty List: Republicans Presidential Contenders

Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar

As predicted renewable energy stocks soared while fossil fuel holding have continued their slide after the announcement of the COP21 agreement. At the Paris climate summit a total of 195 countries effectively agreed to end fossil fuels and transition to renewable energy. This worsens an already grim forecast for fossil fuels and improves the prospects for even more growth in renewables. While clean energy is the clear winner fossil fuels are the clear loser post Paris. Due to the deal that was struck at COP21, the fossil fuel industry is facing a $33 trillion hit to its expected revenues over the next 20 years.

While it has long been known that fossil fuels are the leading cause of both pollution and climate change, it is now unavoidably obvious that petrochemicals are also a bad investment. Conversely renewable energy is both good for the environment and a tremendous investment opportunity.

The oil industry and by extension the banks have reason to be nervous. Wall Street is feeling the pinch from low oil prices and firms that finance oil have ongoing concerns about impending defaults associated with the poor outlook for fossil fuels.

As reported by CNN Money long before the Paris conference, banks that finance the fossil fuel industry were already hurting. Bank of America reported $46 billion in commercial credit exposure to the energy industry up from $41.5 billion in 2014. After the COP21 deal the financial outlook for fossil fuels worsened considerably. The worries associated with these debts were also exacerbated by the positive outcome at COP21.

"[Banks] are going to lose money on the loans they've made. That's pretty evident -- whether oil prices go to $30 or $80 a barrel," said Dick Bove, an analysts who covers banks at Rafferty Capital.

Banks like JPMorgan Chase (JPM) are having to put money aside to deal with the impending wave of defaults. Wells Fargo (WFC) mentioned the "deterioration in the energy sector" and Bank of America (BAC) said that it is preparing to deal with troubled commercial loans in its oil and gas portfolio.

Oil represents around 3 percent of big banks' total loans and if they start calling in credit it will be the death knell for a number of oil companies.

There could be an increase in bankruptcies "if the financial sector gets scared or handcuffed," said Riccardo Bertocco, a partner at Bain & Co. who specializes in oil and gas.

While fossil fuels are tanking renewable energy companies are seeing big upticks due to the Paris deal. When the markets opened on Monday December 14th after the signing of the COP21 agreement on Saturday December 12th, fossil fuel stocks tumbled while renewable energy soared. The Paris deal reiterated the reality that the era of fossil fuels is rapidly being replaced by renewables.

According to Reuters, “The MAC Global Solar Energy Index was up 4.5 percent. The iShares Global Clean Energy exchange-traded fund, which allows investors to trade a basket of renewable energy stocks, rose 1.4 percent. The U.S. Oil & Gas Index fell 1 percent before reversing losses, and was up 0.2 percent as oil edged higher after plumbing the lowest levels in about seven years."

Shares of companies that produce coal also took a hit. For example Peabody Energy Corp. plummeted 12.6 percent. Investors are understandably worried about stranded assets post COP21. 

Portfolio manager Thiemo Lang of Zurich’s RobecoSAM told Reuters the Paris agreement “will help boost the mid- to long-term fundamentals in renewable energy generation, especially solar, while making any further investments in fossil fuels increasingly vulnerable.”

Wind and other forms of renewable energy are expected to keep climbing as are electric cars, battery makers and efficiency focused products and services. 

"Without question, solar is positioned to make the single biggest contribution of any industry to carbon reduction goals – more than wind, more than efficiency, more than any other technology on the horizon," SunPower Corp Chief Executive Officer Tom Werner said.

Shares of SunPower increased by 8.7 percent, while First Solar Inc gained 5 percent.

"So for those companies, renewable energy policies and goals created around the world create a lot of opportunities, regardless of the landscape in the US," said Alex Klein of IHS in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

As reported by RenewEconomy, oilEnergy analysts from the UK-based investment bank Barclays said the COP21 agreement will "result in a boost to renewable energy, and will cause a rethink from investors about new investments in fossil fuel sources."

They quote lead analyst Mark Lewis who says "the implications for the fossil fuel industry are profound, and will likely cause it to suffer a loss in revenue of around $US33 trillion out to 2040 over business as usual." The push towards decarbonization will cause the oil sector to lose $22 trillion, the gas sector is expected to lose $6.1 trillion and the coal sectors will lose $5.7 trillion. These loses will come mostly from fossil fuel investments that will not move forward.

The Paris deal will increase concerns about the risks of fossil fuels and investors are expected to exercise greater caution. To illustrate this point the Bank of England has announced that it will avoid over-investment in what appear to be stranded fossil fuel assets.

‘The upshot of the Paris Agreement will be a tightening of climate policy over time that should speed up the deployment of renewable and other zero and low-carbon energy sources and thereby accelerate the transition to a low-carbon global energy system that is already underway in any case,” Lewis says in the report.

“The message from our analysis for fossil-fuel companies is that they will need to be increasingly cautious regarding future investments in high-cost, high-carbon projects, as these are the ones most vulnerable to future stranding under any future policy tightening of the carbon constraint.

“Moreover, given the sheer size of the numbers we are talking about here, it would not require a policy outcome in future climate negotiations to be fully in line with a 2°C world for the appropriate investment profile for fossil-fuel companies to change significantly.”

Indeed, Lewis says the COP21 deal will “significantly lower fossil-fuel investments and much higher clean-energy investments” than the trajectory the world is on at the moment.

“With the Paris Agreement now committing the Parties to a more ambitious long-term temperature objective than ever before, and to five-year reviews of their INDCs (country pledges) as a way of getting on track to meet that long-term objective, the ground has been laid for an ongoing tightening of climate policies globally over the next few decades.”

Lewis pointed to the decision by The Financial Stability Board creation of a Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) to be chaired by the former mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg. The task force will help to create a consistent global reporting standard for companies on the climate-related risks they are exposed to, and give financiers s the information they need to allocate capital as efficiently as possible.

“We think this will lead to increased pressure on companies to monitor and disclose their carbon risks, and to greater awareness of and attention to the carbon intensity of different companies on the part of investors.”

The deal not only signals an end to fossil fuels it heralds the beginning of a brave new expedited phase of renewable energy growth.

“We know where we’re going now,” Bill McKibben said. “No one can doubt that the fossil fuel age has finally begun to wane and that the sun is now shining on, well, solar."

The oversupply and reduced demand that we saw in 2015 will keep oil prices low in 2016. A revised analysis from JPMorgan Chase (JPM) indicates that "oil prices will remain low for longer."

The glut of coal and declining demand in places like China will make coal even less attractive to investors. A more stringent regulatory environment will put significant downward pressure on all fossil fuel stocks. Cheap, clean renewables will replace dirty and expensive forms of energy and we will see more investment and new technologies will come online which will drive prices down even further.

The goal of the Paris agreement is to keep temperatures from increasing more than 1.5 degrees Celsius. Sewn into the deal is an agreement to review national emissions reduction pledges every five years. So we can expect that the current level of emissions reductions promises will be followed up by even more drastic reductions so that the world can keep temperatures from exceeding 1.5 C.

To help keep temperatures within these limits it is expected that fossil fuel subsidies will come under increasing scrutiny in the aftermath of the Paris conference. The combination of existing emissions reductions, improved commitments, regulation, the elimination of subsidies, and carbon pricing will continue to exert even more downward pressure on fossil fuels.

The demise of fossil fuels will accelerate the ascendancy of renewable energy.  Investors can no longer ignore the risks associated with fossil fuels or the opportunities associated with investing in renewable energy.

Related
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement
How the Paris Terror Attacks are related to Climate Change and why a COP21 Deal is More Important than Ever
Breaking: We Have a Final Draft Climate Agreement at COP21 
Environment and Climate in the Republican Spending Bill: Oil Exports in Exchange for Clean Energy, Air, Water, and Green Climate Funding
As We Near the End of COP21 People are Demanding Climate Action
Optimism at COP21 Despite Disagreements on the Meaning of Differentiated Responsibilities
Being Hopeful About the COP21 Climate Deal (Video)
Canadian Leadership at COP21
COP21 Compact of States and Regions Pledges Emissions Reductions Equivalent to China's Annual Output
Be Part of History: Help Make COP21 a Success
A Guide to COP21 and Clean Energy Solutions from 24 Hours of Reality and Live Earth (Video)
Al Gore Says COP21 Will be a Turning Point in Global Policy (Video)
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides
COP21 Starts With Pledges of Action from World Leaders
President Obama's Address at the Opening Session of COP21
Everything You Need to Know About COP21 (Video)
Tell World Leaders that we Want Bold Climate Action at COP21 (Video)
COP21: March4Me (Video)
Canadian PM and Provinces Unified for COP21
Summary of the Final Round of Climate Talks Before COP21
Saudi Arabia is on the COP21 Naughty List
COP21 Naughty List: Republicans Presidential Contenders