Showing posts with label destroy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label destroy. Show all posts

Oil Spill in Peru is a Life Threatening Emergency for Local Indigenous People (Video)

There is another fossil fuel tragedy taking place that is going largely unnoticed by the world. This one is taking place in Peru and like so many oil spills it does not get press attention despite its destructive human and ecological impact. It could be that this is due to the fact that spills are common. As has become common, there were dozens of oil spills in North America in 2015 making the point that there is no safe way of transporting fossil fuels. It is well known that fossil fuels are the leading cause of the climate crisis we are facing but the problems associated with extraction and transporting hydrocarbons often goes unnoticed.

In the northern jungles of Peru people are in peril after two pipeline ruptures spilled crude oil into various waterways, including the Marañon River, a principal tributary of the Amazon River. For indigenous people these waterways are their lifeline, they provide food and water for crops and consumption.

The first spill was reported on January 25 and then on February 3 another spill occurred on a different section of the same pipeline. The spill is known to have killed fish, crocodiles and plants. So far at least 2,000 barrels of oil are known to have spilled in the regions of Amazonas and Loreto.

The state-owned Petro-Perú that operates the pipelines has been fined $3.5 million. The company has been criticized for its slow and inefficient response times and use of child labor to do recovery work. Heavy rains have exacerbated the clean up operation.

Here is a video of the oil spill from the 42 year old oil pipeline that is spilling thousands of barrels of oil into waterways that run through the Amazon.


This is just the latest of a long series of spills in Peru. A review of published reports shows that there have been at least 11 oil spills in the area since 2010. A comparable spill from June 2014 saw 3,000 barrels of oil spilled from another Petro-Perú pipeline, a disaster that affected 20,000 families.

In 2015, 68 cubic metres of crude oil leaked into the sea after a hose from the Maltese tanker Ariete became detached during a storm on Saturday. Many seabirds were killed by the slick.

Here is some raw footage from the AP Archive


Related Articles
Another Water Contaminating Spill Courtesy of the Coal Industry
Duke Energy Spills Tons of Coal Ash into the Dan River
West Virginia Chemical Spill: Water Contamination from Coal and Regulatory Insufficiency
Bankruptcy Protection for the Company the Poisoned Drinking Water in Virginia
Oil Spills in Trinidad: Fossil Fuels and Politics Don't Mix 
The Dangers of Transporting Fossil Fuels
Video - Train Carrying Oil Derails Illustrating the Dangers of Transporting Fossil Fuels
Video - Truck Carrying Oil Crashes and Explodes Illustrating the Dangers of Transporting Fossil Fuels
Three of the Most Destructive Tanker Oil Spills in History
Unstoppable Oil Leak at a Tar Sands Production Site in Alberta
Infographic: 13 Oil Spills in 30 Days
Top 25 Oil Spills Over 1000 Tonnes in the Last Decade
Pipelines and Oil Spills in Alberta Canada
Offshore Oil is an Avoidable Tragedy
Transocean to Pay $1.4 billion for its Role in the Gulf Oil Spill
The Costs of Oil: BP Liable for up to 90 Billion

Canadian Minister Attacks Leading Climate Scientist

Canada's natural resources minister Joe Oliver is stepping up personal attacks against climate scientists. Oliver may be feeling insecure about the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline in the wake of the release of a recent EPA report that clearly outlines many concerns with the pipeline project which if completed will ferry unprecedented amounts of carbon-heavy tar sands bitumen from Alberta to Texas. In the face of a scientific consensus and growing popular support for efforts to combat global warming, Oliver appears to be pulling out all the stops to sell his government's support for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline project.

During a visit to a Washington DC Thinktank, Oliver lambasted NASA climatologist James Hansen, saying he should be "ashamed" of his warnings about the dangers of the tar sands and his opposition to the Keystone XL.

For more than a quarter century Hansen has been raising public awareness about climate change, more recently he has been focusing his efforts on opposing the Keystone XL. However, Oliver told the audience at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, "this is exaggerated rhetoric. It's frankly nonsense. I don't know why he said it but he should be ashamed of having said it."

Oliver reflexively rejects criticisms of Alberta's tar sands. Last year he wrote an open letter in which he denounced tar sands critics as "radicals" in the pay of foreign special interest groups.

The climate change denial from Oliver and other members of the ruling Conservatives have prompted Hansen to refer to this Canadian government as "Neanderthals," while expressing the view that Canadians are far more advanced than their national leadership.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Canada Ruling Conservatives at Odds with US and China on Climate Change
Report Urges Canada's Federal Conservatives to Regulate Oil and Gas Sector to Meet GHG Targets
Canada Withdraws from UN Efforts to Combat Desertification
Canada Pulls out of Kyoto
Canada's Ruling Conservative Government is Trying to Silence American Scientists
Canada's Ruling Conservatives Muzzle Scientists
Canada is an Environmental Pariah at Rio+20
Canadian Government Spending on Dirty Projects
Conservative Budget Guts the Environment
Canada is a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canada's Hopes for an Environmentally Friendly Federal Leadership Now Rest with Justin Trudeau
Canada's Leader of the Official Opposition on the Keystone XL

2012 Review of Forests and Trees

In 2012 we saw some very significant findings related to the importance of forests for the health and well being of the planet. We also saw destructive trends that are compromising forests as well as efforts to undermine forests protections. While forests create jobs and significantly contribute to the economy they also play a crucial role in mitigating climate change. Forests cover 30 percent of Earth's land surface and store 45 percent of the carbon found in terrestrial ecosystems and sequester as much as 25 percent of annual carbon emissions from human activities.

Forests reduce the impacts of climate change by sequestering carbon and releasing oxygen, however, less trees means more carbon and less oxygen. This constitutes a dangerous feedback loop. Declining forests are being impacted by global warming and this is interfering with the natural processes that mitigate climate change. In addition to reducing atmospheric CO2, forests are important for drinking water, they protect against soil erosion and contribute to biodiversity that provides habitats for countless species of plants and animals.

Climate Change is Killing Forests

Perhaps most troubling was a 2012 study which demonstrated that climate change is causing a massive forest die-offs on almost every continent on Earth. In the US, there has been an increase in the incidence and severity of forest fires since 2000. A wide range of forest are being adversely impacted by global warming including the Redwood forest in Marin, CA. Rainforest in Borneo. Forests in Southeast Asia, the Russian Far East, and the Amazon. Roughly a million hectares of Amazon rainforest suffered from severe drought stress in 2010.

Deforestation of Tropical Rainforest Decreases Precipitation

Another 2012 study showed that in addition to increased carbon emission and decreases in atmospheric oxygen, the deforestation of tropical rainforests can also significantly decrease rainfall. According to the study titled, "Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests," the destruction of tropical forests could reduce rain across the Amazon basin by more than a fifth (21%) in the dry season by 2050. This study suggests that rainforests can double the amount of rainfall even in areas thousands of kilometres away.

Trees are Increasingly Being Used to Generate Electricity

In 2012 an increasing number of American and European companies are cutting down forests to convert trees into pellets for electricity. It is tragically ironic that trees are being destroyed in the name of renewable energy. This is greenwash at its worst. As developed nations turn away from coal they are increasingly burning trees for electricity. According to many assessments wood is even worse than coal in terms of the carbon emissions they generate.

Illegal Logging

Illegal logging has a significant economic cost, it also is a serious environmental threat. Clear-cutting of forests in the tropics accounts for 8-15 percent of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Illegal loggers have a particularly detrimental effect on legal producers as they are able to undercut stolen wood at artificially low prices. This practice creates trade distortions that decrease the global price of legal wood by about 16 percent which results in job losses and an estimated billion dollar in losses for the wood industry. The World Bank estimates that illegal logging costs governments and businesses at least $10 billion to $15 billion in losses each year. .

Assault on the Lacey Act

The Lacey Act is US legislation that protects against illegal logging. The Lacey Act was first passed in 1900 to ban the transport of poached game across state lines. It was amended in 2008 to bar importing wood that is illegally exported under another country’s laws. The Lacey Act blocks the importation of raw material and products made from illegal wood, eliminating the US market for these products.

The Lacey Act is supported by organizations like the American Forest and Paper Association and the National Wood Flooring Association. Many large organizations also support approaches like those contained in the Lacey Act. Companies like Staples, Home Depot and Lowe’s support policies that reduce the threat that illegal wood products pose to the US market.

In 2012 Republican members of Congress sought to erode the Lacey Act. In March, two Republicans, Paul Broun, R-Ga., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., introduced legislation to repeal the requirement that US companies comply with foreign environmental laws. Their bill would have lowered the penalties for violations under the Lacey Act.

The Broun/Paul bill would have allowed illegally traded wood — which is cheap and often taken from over-forested or protected land — to make its way into the US market.

Scientists Defend the Lacey Act

In 2012 a prominent group of scientists published a report that illustrates how the Lacey Act legislation curbs deforestation and enhances the competitiveness of US logging and wood processing industries. The new report urges Congress to leave the law alone and provide enough money to enforce it.

The report was released on April 16, by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), it is titled “Logging and the Law: How the U.S. Lacey Act Helps Reduce Illegal Logging in the Tropics. ” The report outlines how illegal logging poses a significant threat to the US economy and endangers tropical ecosystems around the world.

In addition to harming US businesses, the report shows that illegal logging causes significant damage to tropical forests by reducing biodiversity, destroying soil, damaging trees and releasing carbon dioxide that contributes to global climate change. Every year illegal logging contributes to tropical forest loss, which in total is roughly the size of Pennsylvania.

Businesses Supporting Trees

There is a great deal the business community can do to contribute to the health and well being of forests. In 2012, a number of businesses and organizations partnered with Arbor Day in support of trees. A diverse array of businesses initiated programs in support of trees and forests For example Enterprise Rent-A-Car initiated a program to plant 50 million trees over 50 years. Other businesses that have demonstrated their support include Blooms Today, Bota Box, Brother International, Disney's Friends for Change, Deere & Company, Mary Kay, Inc., Toyota, UPS Foundation, Wells Fargo and Wyndham Vacation Ownership.

A number of organizations are also working with Arbor Day to plant trees and raise awareness they include Project Plant It, and Humana,

REDD is the Key

REDD is an abbreviation for "Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries." REDD is a UN initiative and the key mechanism to reduce forest loss. While there was some incremental progress in 2012, overall REDD is not getting the global support required.

If we are serious about protecting forests we must focus on putting the REDD framework into practice.

Related Articles
The Economic and Employment Benefits of Forests
What The Business Community Can Do To Protect Forests
Arbor Day 2012 Business Partners
Using Trees for Electricity is Not Green Energy
Study Shows Deforestation of Tropical Rainforest Decreases Precipitation
Study Shows that Climate Change is Killing Forests
The Costs of Illegal Logging
The Lacey Act Combats Illegal Logging
Challenge to the Lacey Act
Scientists Defend the Lacey Act
Video: Reducing Emissions Through Forest Preservation with REDD