Showing posts with label market forces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label market forces. Show all posts

Falling oil Prices and a Global Climate Agreement

The decline in oil prices underscores the risk associated with fossil fuel investment. On December 1 as the COP20 talks began in Lima Peru, the UN's climate chief said that falling oil prices show the "high risk" of fossil fuel investments compared with renewable energies. This perspective was underscored by the December 14th Lima draft agreement that included mention of a world free from fossil fuel emissions by 2050. A final global climate agreement is scheduled to be signed in 2015 at COP21 in Paris. Prior to the Lima agreement there were agreements by the US and China and the European Union to cut greenhouse emissions from the burning of fossil fuels.

Christiana Figueres, head of the UN's Climate Change Secretariat, dismissed suggestions that a tumble in the price of oil to a five-year low on Dec. 1 could undermine hopes for a shift to renewable energies as a cornerstone of the climate deal. Oil price volatility "is exactly one of the main reasons why we must move to renewable energy which has a completely predictable cost of zero for fuel" once wind turbines or solar panels were built, she told a news conference.

"We are seeing more and more the realization that investment in fossil fuel is actually a high risk, is getting more and more risky," she said, welcoming a decision by Germany's top utility E.ON to spin off power plants to focus on renewable energy and power grids.

Still, other experts suggest that falling oil prices could slow investments in renewables and increase the consumption of dirty sources of energy.  To further compound the problem,  countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia may be more reluctant to make concessions at the climate talks, due to concerns that such concessions to devalue their oil assets. 

Related
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy
An Upside to Low Oil Prices?
Video - Why Oil Prices Will Keep Falling
Green Innovation and Fossil Fuels in Canada
Low Oil Prices will Slow Renewable Energy and Impede the Growth of the Green Economy
Higher Oil Prices a Blessing for Fracking but what about Renewables?
High Oil Prices Stimulate Renewable Energy The Economic Costs of Canada's Oil Obsession
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices

Video - Why Oil Prices Will Keep Falling


Oil prices are already low and they continue to decline as more downward pressure is expected. On Friday December 12th the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecast a decline in demand for 2015 and they further predicted that healthy non-OPEC supply gains were poised to aggravate a global oil glut. The current outlook for global oil demand for 2015 was cut from 230,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 0.9 million bpd.


Related
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy
An Upside to Low Oil Prices?
Low Oil Prices will Slow Renewable Energy and Impede the Growth of the Green Economy
Higher Oil Prices a Blessing for Fracking but what about Renewables?
High Oil Prices Stimulate Renewable Energy
The Economic Costs of Canada's Oil Obsession
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices

An Upside to Low Oil Prices?

While there is a clear downside to lower oil prices for renewable energy, there may also be a silver lining. Low oil prices are bad for renewable energy, but if they fall low enough they could decrease extraction of some of the dirtiest fossil fuels.

Declining oil prices are attributable to the fact that there is now more supply than demand. The low oil prices may be part of an effort by OPEC to leverage market forces that will slow extraction of tar sands oil in North America.

As oil prices decline extracting oil becomes less profitable. This particularly applies to dirty energy and resource intensive tar sands oil. By reducing margins it reduces the incentive for extraction. This applies downward pressure on the rush to exploit the Alberta tar sands and the Bakken shale in North Dakota.

To be profitable tar sands oil demands prices of between $60 and $100 per barrel. Goldman Sachs has predicted that oil prices will fall to around $70 per barrel in 2015. That is just ahead of the low end of the breakeven range. The current price of oil is around $80 per barrel.

At $70 a barrel this is below the break-even price for Bakken shale oil which is about $77 per barrel. The break-even point for Alberta's tar sands are even lower at $63.50 per barrel

Even if low oil prices manage to slow extraction of Bakken shale oil and the Alberta tar sands, it would still encourage more oil use and this will increase emissions. Cost cutting measures to maximize profit margins may also eat away at emissions reductions efforts associated with the extraction and refining of these dirty sources of energy.

Low oil prices will have a harmful impact on renewable energy as they will decrease investment and slow the growth of renewable energy.

Related
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy
Video - Why Oil Prices Will Keep Falling
Green Innovation and Fossil Fuels in Canada
Low Oil Prices will Slow Renewable Energy and Impede the Growth of the Green Economy
Higher Oil Prices a Blessing for Fracking but what about Renewables?
High Oil Prices Stimulate Renewable Energy The Economic Costs of Canada's Oil Obsession
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices

The Economic Costs of Canada's Oil Obsession

Canada's dependence on fossil fuels not only contributes to climate change it represents a serious threat to the economy. As oil prices plummet to a five year low, the Canadian economy is feeling the heat.  The declining price of hydrocarbons have driven down the value of the Canadian dollar and impacted stock prices on the TSE.

Canada's ruling Conservatives have bet on oil and this has disastrous implications for all Canadians. The fact that Canada is so closely tied to fossil fuels means that the nation's petro-currency is subject to profound market volatility.

The ramifications of Canada's dependence on oil will reverberate across the country making it more difficult to balance both provincial and federal budgets. The current market volatility indicates that an economy based on dirty energy is destined to falter which also imperils Canada's economic recovery. 

By investing so heavily in fossil fuels the federal government risks the future of all Canadians. While other nations are moving towards cleaner sources of energy the Conservatives under Prime Minister Stephen Harper have doubled down on the tar sands which are some of the dirtiest energy on Earth.

The science is clear, humans are the cause of global warming and fossil fuels are the primary cause. As the world begins to move towards cleaner energy, Canada remains mired in the old energy economy. Independent of the powerful environmental logic of moving away from fossil fuels, there is a strong economic case that has been made for moving towards cleaner energy.

The carbon bubble is growing and our carbon budget runs out. There is a growing consensus that more than two thirds of all the oil, gas and coal reserves are unburnable if we are to have a chance at keeping temperatures within the internationally agreed upon 2 degrees Celsius upper threshold limit. The combination of lower demand, higher supply and growing global pressure to reduce emissions will strand trillions of dollars of oil assets.

The need to address climate change is being driven home by significant increases in costly extreme weather events.

The calls for more responsible governance are coming from every quarter, not just environmental groups. Reputable organizations around the world have issued warning stating unequivocally that we must stop burning fossil fuels and step back from the brink of a climate disaster. These warning come from a wide range of sources including PricewaterhouseCooper, AGU, World Resources Institute, International Renewable Energy Institute, International Energy Agency (IEA), World Meteorological Organization, World Bank, and UNEP

Even the former head of the Bank of Canada (currently the head of the Bank of England), Mark Carney, acknowledges that we cannot burn most of the known fossil fuel reserves. He further cautions investors about the long-term threats.

Canada must change direction so that it can capitalize on the nation's abundant renewable resources and begin to develop a low carbon economy. Unless Canada changes its perilous course they will be the authors of their own ecological and economic demise.

Related
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy
An Upside to Low Oil Prices?
Video - Why Oil Prices Will Keep Falling
Green Innovation and Fossil Fuels in Canada
Low Oil Prices will Slow Renewable Energy and Impede the Growth of the Green Economy
Higher Oil Prices a Blessing for Fracking but what about Renewables?
High Oil Prices Stimulate Renewable Energy
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices

Low Oil Prices will Slow Renewable Energy and Impede the Growth of the Green Economy

With oil prices at a 5-year low, renewable energy and the green economy are being hit with some serious headwinds. Low oil prices are not only detrimental to the growth of renewable energy it is also decreases demand for hybrid and electric cars as well as cleantech in general. High oil prices buoy interest in renewables, while low oil prices put downward pressure on the growth of the low carbon economy.

For more than a quarter century we have been exploring the ways in which oil prices are related to renewable energy. A 1989 World Bank study showed how renewable energy technologies are directly impacted by the price of oil. However this study added the caveat that the impact is muted in remote and rural applications (where fossil fuels are less available).

Historically, we have seen how sustained development of new energy sources always rests on the condition of the old ones. Europe did not turn to coal until it had cut down almost all of its trees. A more recent illustration comes from the oil embargo and high oil prices in the 70s. This led to an interest in alternative energy sources and fuel efficient cars. However, that all but collapsed as the price of oil declined in the 80s.

Over the last decade we have seen steady and growing interest in Renewable technologies such as wind and solar. So much so that they have gone from being an obscure pipe dream to representing a serious contributor to the energy mix of many nations.

Lower oil prices may be part of an OPEC conspiracy to make fossil fuels more price competitive at a time when renewable sources of energy are on the rise. Even more importantly, OPEC may want to keep oil prices low to keep the US from increasing its domestic extraction. Low oil prices leverage market forces that delay further investment in renewables.

Although renewables are close to being competitive with fossil fuels, their value decreases as the price of fossil fuels diminish. The net result for investors is that they can expect reduced profitability from alternative energy sources.

Consequently, falling oil prices can be expected to delay some of the investment capital pouring into renewable energy, electric and hybrid cars. Lower oil prices and declining investment could even augment fossil fuel use which would in turn increase emissions and accelerate the pace of global warming.

Governments could do at least four things to help remedy this situation

1. Remove fossil fuel subsidies

2. Tax fossil fuels

3. Increase support for renewables and cleantech

4. Regulate carbon emissions (ie put a cap on emissions)

Market forces and price competition in particular are not the only factors driving the low carbon economy. However, in the absence of government involvement, low oil prices will slow the green economy at a time when we urgently need to see accelerated growth.

Related
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy
An Upside to Low Oil Prices?
Video - Why Oil Prices Will Keep Falling
Green Innovation and Fossil Fuels in Canada
Higher Oil Prices a Blessing for Fracking but what about Renewables?
High Oil Prices Stimulate Renewable Energy
The Economic Costs of Canada's Oil Obsession
The Keystone XL and Rising Fuel Prices

Market Forces and the UK's Green Deal

In 2012 the UK is launching the green deal, which will unleash the competitive forces in the energy efficiency market. The green deal will be the biggest home energy improvement programme of modern times. Due in part to the green deal the energy efficiency market in the UK could reach £800m by 2020.

Under the scheme nationwide brands, small local businesses and community organisations will compete to deliver the best offers. Competing not just on price but on quality and service. Insulation is one area where the green deal will generate new demand and increase jobs to an estimated 65,000 by 2015.

The green deal allows energy companies to offer improvements at no upfront cost and recoup payments through energy bills, but has to date been primarily targeted at the domestic sector, businesses will also need to be incorporated into the plan to maximize energy savings and minimize emissions reductions.

Non-domestic buildings account for 18 per cent of all UK CO2 emissions, about half of which comes from organisations not covered by existing emission reduction policies such as the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) and the EU’s emissions trading scheme.

Bill Easton director of Ernst & Young’s power and utilities team, told BusinessGreen, “The ideal scenario is getting to a world where both those businesses choosing to participate and the energy companies doing this want to do it, like the NCAP safety ratings for cars,” he said. “If we had something similar around energy efficiency ratings, landlords and tenants could see some benefits for the brand.”

For the green deal to realise its full potential, Easton said, “We need some strong lead from government: a threat of something mandatory if there’s slow take-up.” However, a Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) spokesman ruled out mandatory requirements for ths scheme, saying the Green Deal would be “a market-led initiative that avoids overly bureaucratic Government intervention.”

Given the fact that 65 percent of UK businesses rent space, there needs to be a change to building regulations so that the leasing of properties is covered under the plan. It would also be benefitial to have targeted marketing promoting the benefits of the scheme.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
British Government to Lead the Green Economy
UK Government Investments in Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Corporate Sustainability is Driving Green Businesses in the UK
UK Renewable Energy 2011 Overview
Cuts to UK Wind Power ROCs & FiTs
UK Wind Energy
Cuts to UK Solar FiTs Could Prove Deadly
Scottish Wind Energy Can Power Europe
The Growth of London's Green Economy
The EU Debt Crisis did Not Curb the Growth of Renewables in 2011
Sustainability and the European Super Grid

Social Capitalism

Social Capitalism



Social capitalism is a new market-based economic system. It addresses the problems inherent in both capitalism and socialism. Traditional capitalism often overlooks human and environmental interests and the central planning of traditional socialism impedes a rational allocation of resources.

In social capitalism, governments create greater profit opportunities for entrepreneurs by investing in desirable future industry and technologies (like rewable energy).

The essence of social capitalism is that markets work best and output is maximized through sound social management of the macroeconomy. Social capitalism posits that government regulation, and sponsorship of markets, can lead to superior economic outcomes.

Government investment in the green economy or securities regulation are examples of social capitalism. Regulation should be as limited as possible, however, regulation is needed to ensure that individuals and corporations do not exploit markets for personal gain at the expense of market growth, economic stability and environmental sustainability.

For business, social capitalism is the ability to create positive, healthy development. Businesses practicing social capitalism give back to society while creating an environment that is conducive to profit maximization.

Social capitalism is not hostile to free markets or the private ownership of property. Instead, social capitalism recognizes the unique success of capitalism, particularly under appropriate social supervision. Social capitalism thus seeks to create a balanced approach to business and the role of the state, with a view to optimizing the business environment for maximum sustainable economic growth.

Related Posts
Creative Capitalism: Market-Based Social Change
Consumer Demand for Green
The Greening of Cyberspace
New Year's Resolutions for a More Sustainable World in 2010
Hope for the Holidays
The New Normal
The New Normal and Sustainability
The New Normal and Implications for Business
Carrotmobs: Adding Incentives to the Consumer Arsenal
The Future is Green
Green's Coming of Age
People Remain Loyal to Green Even in an Economic Downturn
Green Drivers
Green's Bottom Line: Staying Competitive in Volatile Economic Times
Green Stimulus and Free Markets
Creating a Sustainable Future
An Open Model of Innovation
Silencing Earth Day Critics

Private Public Cooperation Behind SA Joule

The Joule electric city car is manufactured by Optimal Energy with help from the government of South Africa (SA). The Joule is the first vehicle to be developed and manufactured by a wholly owned SA company. The major powers in the global economy are developing greener vehicles, but so are small companies from less affluent nations. The Joule is getting ready to meet the growing demand. It is widely believed that by 2020, 10% of world automotive production will be in electric vehicles.

The project is being funded partly by the Industrial Development Corporation, the Department of Trade and Industry, and the Department of Science and Technology. The Joule is benefiting from the SA government's second industrial policy action plan, which seeks to increase local automotive content and manufacturing.

Commercial production of the Joule should begin in 2013, reaching 50000 units a year by 2015. The company will employ more than 2000 people in its assembly operation, while supplier and support activities could create a further 8000 downstream jobs.
Kobus Meiring, CEO of Optimal Energy said, "We want to make it clear that we are not aiming at the green market as such, but rather the C-segment, in competition with cars like the Toyota Corolla," he says.

SA Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said in this year's budget speech the government hoped "to influence the composition of SA's vehicle fleet to become more energy efficient and environmentally friendly".

These efforts will help SA meet her Copenhagen Accord commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 34% by 2020 and 42% by 2025.

Although the car is expected to establish a local market, the company says 90% will be exported. If more green vehicles are to be sold in SA, there needs to be better support infrastructure and better market education.

Above all, "it must be a combined drive between government and industry," says Mike Whitfield, CEO of Nissan SA.

The fact that the SA motorists will not pay more for a greener car means that the Joule must not only have zero emissions it must also be inexpensive.
________________________________________________

Related Posts

Creative Capitalism: Market-Based Social Change

To be sustainable a business must also be profitable. Readers of The Green Market know that I am an earnest advocate of viable socially responsible business. This philosophy is put into practice in my firm's Green consulting projects with the small business community. Implicit in this philosophy is the marriage of market forces and social responsibility.

This is not a new idea. Almost half a century ago David Rockefeller, the president of Chase Manhattan Bank, said, "The old concept that the owner of a business had a right to use his property as a he pleased to maximize profits has evolved into the belief that ownership carries certain binding social obligations." In recent years Microsoft's Bill Gates has joined the ranks of a growing number of people who share this view. For the past 20 years, Microsoft has used corporate philanthropy as a way to bring technology to people who don't have access. They have donated more than $3 billion in cash and software and perhaps most importantly shown people how to use technology to create solutions. In a January 24, 2008 speech at the World Economic Forum, Gates outlined sensible solutions to the challenges we face.

Gates used to believe that technology could solve all the key problems and although this is true for billions of people, "breakthroughs change lives only where people can afford to buy them—only where there is economic demand. And economic demand is not the same as economic need." Technological innovations are important but insufficient to address the myriad challenges we face. To truly improve the fate of the planet and its inhabitants we require what Gates has called 'system innovation'.

We have reason for optimism, we have seen significant improvements on many fronts from the status of women and minorities, to radicaly increased life expectancy. And political, social and economic freedoms have never been enjoyed by more people around the world. However, like Gates, I am an impatient optimist who seeks expedient solutions to the problems we face.

A major problem with capitalism is that market incentives often cause people and the environment to benefit in inverse proportion to their need. Capitalism that serves large corporations and wealthier people must be made to serve poorer people and the environment as well. We need to refine the capitalist system so that it benefits the environment and all its inhabitants. "The great advances in the world have often aggravated the inequities in the world. The least needy see the most improvement, and the most needy see the least. Not only do these people miss the benefits of the global economy – they will suffer from the negative effects of economic growth they missed out on. Climate change will have the biggest effect on people who have done the least to cause it."

Capitalism may be flawed in some important respects but they are fixable problems which do not detract from its many positive attributes. "The genius of capitalism lies in its ability to make self-interest serve the wider interest. The potential of a big financial return for innovation unleashes a broad set of talented people in pursuit of many different discoveries. This system driven by self-interest is responsible for the great innovations that have improved the lives of billions."

Capitalism harnesses self-interest in helpful and sustainable ways, but only on behalf of those who can pay. And environmental, philanthropic and governmental organizations are inadequate to meet the needs of the earth and its poor. We need a system that is capable of providing rapid improvements, a system that integrates creative innovation and market driven business.

A social mission is compatible with profits. In Gate's own words "To make the system sustainable, we need to use profit incentives whenever we can." When profits are not possible, recognition is a powerful market-based incentive for socially responsible businesses. "Recognition enhances a company's reputation and appeals to customers; above all, it attracts good people to the organization. As such, recognition triggers a market-based reward for good behavior. In markets where profits are not possible, recognition is a proxy; where profits are possible, recognition is an added incentive. The challenge is to design a system where market incentives, including profits and recognition, drive the change." Consumers then reward companies who do good work by buying their products. To help us to recognize those who have made contributions to social causes like Green, we need to invest intellectual capital to find ways for businesses, governments, NGOs, and the media to develop tools to measure social responsibility. "[R]ecognition brings market-based rewards to businesses that do the most work."

According to Gates, "there are two great forces of human nature: self-interest, and caring for others. The system innovation proposed by Gates is nothing less than a paradigm shift. He calls this innovation creative capitalism. "This is an approach where governments, businesses, and nonprofits work together to stretch the reach of market forces so that more people can make a profit, or gain recognition, doing work that eases the world's inequities." Helping others and the environment is not as far removed from the core of capitalism as some might think. The father of capitalism Adam Smith opened his first book with the following lines: "How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortunes of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it."

"Creative capitalism takes this interest in the fortunes of others and ties it to our interest in our own fortunes—in ways that help advance both. This hybrid engine of self-interest and concern for others serves a much wider circle of people than can be reached by self-interest or caring alone." We must give our most innovative thinkers the time and resources to come up with solutions to the challenges of environmental degradation, poverty and disease. "This kind of creative capitalism matches business expertise with needs in the developing world to find markets that are already there, but are untapped. Sometimes market forces fail to make an impact in developing countries not because there's no demand, or because money is lacking, but because we don’t spend enough time studying the needs and limits of that market."

There are numerous examples of creative capitalism in the world today. One of the most accessible approaches employs tiered pricing. When the World Health Organization wanted to expand vaccination for meningitis in Africa, it first ascertained what people could afford to pay. Then they challenged their partners to meet this price. Another is Bono's RED Campaign which has demonstrated that people will pay a premium for the chance to be associated with a cause they care about. One of my personal favorites is Muhammad Yunus' now worldwide movement in microfinance. And cap and trade systems of greenhouse gas management are yet another well known example of creative capitalism. The potential ways in which creative capitalism can serve socially responsible causes are limitless.

Creative capitalism includes a direct role for governments in funding research and setting policy (legislation). Governments should disburse funds in ways that create market incentives for sustainable business activity. "What unifies all forms of creative capitalism is that they are market-driven efforts to bring solutions...As we refine and improve this approach, there is every reason to believe these engines of change will become larger, stronger, and more efficient. There is a growing understanding around the world that when change is driven by market-based incentives, you have a sustainable plan for change—because profits and recognition are renewable resources. These are not a few isolated stories; this is a world-wide movement, and we all have the ability and the responsibility to accelerate it."

There is a place for business, government and the non-profit world. Creative capitalism stretches the reach of market forces to help push things forward. From foreign aid to charitable gifts, we must find ways to put the power of market forces behind the effort to reduce our environmental impact.

We are living at a pivotal moment in human history, the paradigm shift proposed will enable us to find approaches that address the environmental and social problems we face. We need to understand that sustainable solutions entail projects that generate profits and where profit is not possible, recognition that enables consumers to reward these companies by buying their products. We can change the world and creative capitalism is key to the growth of socially responsible movements like Green, because there is no Green future without profitable Green companies.