Showing posts with label Climate Action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Action. Show all posts

Ranking National Climate Action - 2020 Performance Index

The United States and Canada are some of the worst climate performers in the world. None of the countries reviewed in the 2020 Performance Index have demonstrated that they are on a path that is compatible with the goals laid out in the Paris Climate agreement. Sweden leads the group of high-performing countries, as it did in the 2018 and 2019 Indices. The other four top performing countries in the top five are Denmark, Morocco, the UK and Lithuania. The US is in last place. The 2020 Climate Change Performance Index tracks the performance of 57 countries and the EU on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, renewable energy, energy use and climate policy. The 2020 Index finds that “no country performs well enough in all index categories to achieve an overall very high rating,” meaning that no country is yet “on a path compatible with the Paris climate targets.” Countries are assessed based on their compatibility with ambitions to keep temperatures from warming beyond 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial norms.

On GHG emissions, 31 out of 57 high-emitting countries recorded decreasing emissions. Sweden received a very high rating and Egypt received a high rating for its comparatively low level of current GHG per capita emissions, additional emission reductions over recent years and an ambitious 2030 target. The UK is classified as medium for current per capita emissions, but achieved high ratings for the other three GHG emissions indicators, including a high rating for its 2030 GHG emission target. The bottom performers in this category include the Republic of Korea and Saudi Arabia.

Overall, no country received a very high rating for all the renewable energy indicators, which indicates that there is significant room for improvement in mitigating emissions by accelerating deployment of renewable energy. However, the Index states that, “additions of renewable power generation outpaced net installations of fossil fuel and nuclear power”. Sweden, Latvia and Denmark were the top performers in renewable energy. The bottom performers on renewable energy are Malaysia, Iran and the Russian Federation. The report emphasizes that Malaysia has failed to make any improvements in renewable energy, and the Russian Federation has a very low rating for its ambition in the 2030 target. On energy use, Malta, Morocco and Mexico are the top performers. Saudi Arabia, Canada and the Republic of Korea are the bottom three performers.

On climate policy, no country received a very high rating for the category, although Portugal, Finland, Sweden and Norway achieved a very high rating for their international climate policy performance. Portugal ranked first, followed by Finland, recognized for its target to become carbon neutral by 2035 and its ban on burning coal by 2029. Morocco ranked high based on its ambitious 2030 targets. The bottom three performers are Turkey, the US, and Australia.

The Index is prepared by a group of thinktanks comprising the NewClimate Institute, the Climate Action Network and Germanwatch. To read the complete report click here (PDF).

Related
We are Falling Further Behind on Emissions Reduction
Heat Records Tell Us What We Need to Know
You Can't Say You Haven't Been Warned

Top 10 Democratic Presidential Contenders Participate in Climate Town Halls

On September 4th, Democratic presidential contenders made history with their participation in back-to-back climate focused town halls in New York City. For seven hours, one after another, the ten Democrats vying for the party's presidential nomination spoke on the subject of the climate crisis. All ten of these candidates have put forth climate plans and this represents a historic shift for the party and the country. They all agree about the veracity of anthropogenic climate change and the need for consorted action. This is in stark contrast to the current president and most GOP legislators, who equivocate about the veracity or deny it outright.

Andrew Yang indicated he wants to re-calibrate gross domestic product (GDP) by incorporating metrics that assess environmental variables. "Let's upgrade it with a new score card that includes our environmental sustainability and our goals," Yang said. He also said, "You should not be stressed out about the water that you are drinking, the water your kids are drinking, this is again the problem of having the almighty dollar running our society, where people look up and say replacing the pipes is too expensive, using another substance is expensive, are you kidding me, you know what is expensiveness poisoning our kids."

Elizabeth Warren pulled no punches when it came to the fossil fuel industry and other corporate interests, saying these interests want us to focus on smaller issues like light bulbs and plastic straws to distract us from focusing on the real issue which is their contributions to the climate crisis. Warren explained, "You don't get to ruin the air for everyone else, the water for everyone else, the soil for everyone else, we don't, just to help giant corporations. They don't get to make our kids sick they don't get to shorten lifespans because it increases their profitability."

Kamala Harris said that if she were elected president she would direct the Department of Justice to go after oil and gas companies. They are causing harm and death in communities. And there has been no accountability." She also called out GOP legislators, "Every one of those [Republican members of Congress] need to look at the babies and grand-babies in their life and then look in the mirror and ask themselves why have they failed to act because on the issue of this climate crisis, I am going to tell you, I strongly believe this is a fight against powerful interests, and leaders need to lead, so lead, follow or get out the way, and get out the way starting with Donald Trump"

Bernie Sanders said, "we are the most powerful country on Earth we should be leading an energy transition and you have a president who thinks its not real that is idiotic".

Pete Buttigieg said, "Congress right now is like a room full of doctors arguing about what to do over a cancer patient and half of them are arguing whether medication or surgery is the best approach and the other half are saying cancer doesn't exist. Think of what a disservice, this is a life or death issue." He did not make light of the scale of the problem we face. Buttigieg said combating the climate crisis will be "more challenging than" winning WW II and the "hardest thing we will have done in my lifetime as a country."

Amy Klobuchar criticized the Trump administration's decision to kill methane regulations calling it "very dangerous". She also said, "We need environmental justice in this country."

Julián Castro also referred to the need to assist the economically disadvantaged especially people of color who bear the brunt of climate impacts. He argued for "new civil rights legislation" to address environmental racism in minority communities. Castro also said, "As we experience more storms with more intensity we will take the right steps to prevent climate change so that wont happen, but then when it does, if it does, to address it no matter who you are and make it affordable in part through that national flood insurance program"

Beto O'Rourke sounded fatalistic as his thoughts focused on climate adaptation, "In the year 2100...this planet will have warned 4.5 - 5 Celsius, as scientists say at that point we are screwed." He said he would spend federal dollars to help people move from flood prone areas.

Cory Booker said that while he will not try to change what people eat he will employ nuclear power in the fight against climate change. According to Booker people who reject nuclear, "just aren't looking at the facts". He also said "If you elect me your president I am going to ask more from you than any other president in your lifetime because I grew up from parents who taught me if there is not struggle there is no progress. We can ignite that moral imagination of this country and we can deal with this problem as big as it may seem it is not bigger than who we are as a people together."

Joe Biden's can-do message optimistically declared, "This is the United States of America there is not a damn thing we've not been able to accomplish once we set our mind to it"

G19 Leaves Trump Behind and Moves Forward on Climate Action

A recent G20 summit communiqué out of Hamburg Germany acknowledged the abdication of Trump but emphasized the global commitment to responsible climate action. Historically the G20 has made unanimous declarations but Trump's decision to quit the Paris Climate Agreement resulted in a break with this tradition. Despite the isolation of the US, the world's leading economic powers indicated that they remain serious about climate action. The summit was marked by riots and Trump was singled out as the preferred target of the protestors.

Trump was characteristically awkward at the summit and he appeared to have difficulty following the discussion at times. At one point Trump had to be diverted from his day-dreaming to turn around and pose for the cameras. Trump's only contribution was an initiative to help other countries burn fossil fuels more cleanly. This is rather ironic as the Paris Agreement seeks to end the burning of hydrocarbons.

Trump's decision to quit the Paris Climate Agreement met with widespread resistance. The entire world (except Syria) has embraced the need for climate action and this includes most Americans. Although Trump claims to be a champion of economic growth his decision is being resisted by corporate America and other levels of government.  Led by California, US states and cities have vowed to counteract the Trump administration's inaction. While Trump's climate denial is unpopular at home it is openly reviled abroad.

World leaders

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tried to educate Trump on the relationship between climate action and economic growth. Trudeau also pointed to the efforts of Canada's provinces, municipalities, and businesses in the absence of federal leadership on climate change during the Conservative rule of Stephen Harper.

"The fact that the G20 stayed strong and committed, even with the United States stepping aside, is a strong indication that the global community in general is committed and united," Trudeau told reporters. "I think that we can look at the global community holding together so strongly on the topic of climate change is a credit to the G20."

Both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the UK's Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May said they were "dismayed" by Trump's decision to withdraw from the climate deal.

"Like other world leaders here, I am dismayed at the U.S. decision to pull out of the Paris agreement and I have urged President Trump to rejoin the Paris agreement," May said.

Merkel said she regretted the fact that the US had abandoned the climate consensus. However, she added that she is, "grateful that every other head of state and government acknowledges that the Paris Agreement is irreversible."

Although there is a broad consensus to act on climate change Trump's withdrawal has caused Turkey to consider reevaluating its participation.

Social inequality

Despite attempts by advocates, social issues failed to gain traction at the summit. This is unfortunate because there is an intimate relationship between social inequality and the election of populist leaders like Trump. Social issues must be taken into account if we are to safeguard our democracies against future political travesties.

Despite the efforts of Oxfam's Jörn Kalinski, social inequality was all but ignored. "[I]nequality is destroying social cohesion. People who feel left behind get frustrated and run into the arms of right-wing populists. And that is a threat to democracy," Kalinski told DW.

Russia

The meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin went as planned. The two despots denied Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and agreed to work together. Although it did not make the headlines, cooperation between these pleonectic leaders could augur an environmental and climate disaster.

The end game may be the lifting of sanctions. Putin needs Exxon's cooperation to extract oil from beneath the ocean floor of the Russian Arctic. There is a half a trillion dollars of fossil fuels up for grabs and the climate consequences are catastrophic. If it goes through the "deal" would unleash a massive carbon bomb at a time when we desperately need to reduce emissions by moving away from fossil fuels.

Conclusion

Trump's decision to quit Paris is counterproductive and may not serve his political agenda.  Although he may have support from the minority of Americans that make up his base, his policies, particularly those related to climate action are at odds with the global consensus and reality itself.

"Trump has lost another collision between fantasy and reality. No other global leader shares his fantasy that climate change is a hoax," said Tom Burke, chairman of E3G, a London-based think tank on energy and environmental issues. "Other governments, cities, businesses, entrepreneurs, and communities, including many in his own country, will carry on with the serious business of tackling the greatest strategic threat to our prosperity."

No one did a better job of reviewing Trump's failure at the G20 summit than the award-winning political editor Chris Uhlmann. As reported in the Guardian, Uhlmann said Trump is a man with, "no desire and no capacity to lead the world". The centrist Australian reporter described Trump as "isolated and friendless" at the G20. "He was an uneasy, lonely, awkward figure at this gathering and you got the strong sense that some of the leaders are trying to find the best way to work around him," Uhlmann said.

He went on to say that Trump isolated the US, confused and alienated its allies and ultimately diminished America. Uhlmann concluded that Trump's policies are contributing to the "decline of the United States". He also described the American demagogue as "the biggest threat to the values of the west".

Uhlmann said Trump was obsessed with "burnishing his celebrity" and had "diminished" his own nation to the benefit of Russia and China.

In his final assessment of Trump's malfeasance Uhlmann said he is, "a man who barks out bile in 140 characters, who wastes his precious days as president at war with the west’s institutions like the judiciary, independent government agencies and the free press."

After only five months of Trump's rule, his presidency is proving to be an unmitigated disaster. Trump is more than a disgrace, he is a clear and present danger both domestically and abroad. The sooner his presidency comes to an end the safer the world will be.

Related
Corporate America Rejects Trump's Climate Ignorance
Business Leaders Advocate for Sustainability and Refute Trump
Trump Casts a Dark Shadow Over COP22
Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force
Business and the Paris Climate Agreement
The Earth Day Signing Ceremony for the Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables

Vive La France! French Electorate Rejects Climate Denial and Commits to Progressive Action

The world can breathe a sigh of relief as the country that hosted COP21 has recommitted itself to continue its climate leadership. On Sunday May 6th, three-quarters of French voters rejected the anti-globalization, anti-immigration, anti-climate rhetoric of the far-right.

Emmanuel Macron won the French election by a landslide (66 percent), beating xenophobic candidate Marine Le Pen and her National Front party. In the French election globalization defeated populism, a more open worldly vision for France defeated the closed, nativist view of the far-right.

Climate change appears to have been a key issue that contributed to Le Pen's defeat. She was forced to change her stance on the issue because unlike her counterpart in the US, French voters would not go along with her climate denial. In 2012 Le Pen said: "I am not sure that human activity is the principal origin of this phenomenon." In an attempt to capture voters she recently revised her position adopting the Republican line saying, "I am not a climate expert, I think that human activity does contribute to a proportion, which I can’t measure, to this phenomenon."

Unlike Americans who were duped by Russian cyber-interference, French voters were not deterred by the online publication of thousands of hacked campaign documents. The New Yorker has quite rightly pointed out that this elections gives France the right to claim intellectual superiority. Despite being the target of a number of violent terrorist attacks, France has not succumbed to the kind of racist tribalism that has enticed Americans to vote for Donald Trump.

Reflecting the gravity of the threat many of Europe’s mainstream leaders, both center-right and center-left broke with protocol and endorsed Marcon. Some have credited Trump -- who praised Le Pen but is very unpopular in France -- for Macron's win. In the end, it appears that French citizens voted against Le Pen's Trump-like policies rather than for Macron. This vote effectively saves Europe from disintegrating and buoys hope for climate action on the continent.

Macron issued a message of welcome to American researchers, entrepreneurs, working on climate change saying "here you are welcome. I do know how your new president now has decided to jeopardize your budget your initiatives as he is extremely skeptical about climate change. I have no doubt about climate change and how committed we have to be regarding this issue."

For french and European researchers Macron said, "we will preserve our budgets, we will reinforce our investment our public and private investment, in order to do more and accelerate our initiative in order to deliver in line with COP21."

To the rest of the world and America, in particular, Macron said:

"Please come to France its your nation we like innovation we want innovative people. We want people working on climate change, energy, renewables, and new technologies. France is your nation."

Macron is now the leader of the free world. France is a global climate leader and one of the most sustainable countries in the world.  They have made tremendous progress on a number of fronts. France has shown energy leadership including renewables for more than a decade.  France along with other nations in Europe are moving towards 100% renewable energy. The nation has indicated that they will end coal power generation in the country by 2023. France has also made sustainability reporting mandatory, and restricted both GMOs and cars.

Former French President Hollande signed an agreement to work with former President Obama on climate change.  Hollande also warned Trump not to abandon the Paris Agreement and threatened to impose a carbon tax if the US failed to meet is emissions reductions targets.

Voters in the United States and the United Kingdom have been swayed by powerfully destructive forces that are at odds with the long tradition of democratic leadership in these two countries. The heart of modern democracy has succumbed to a parasitic disease that if left unchallenged will kill its host.

That is why Macron's victory is so important to the future of the free world and by extension climate action. The resistance to globalization and diversity are a threat to economic prosperity and to the reality that the world is fundamentally interconnected. Failure to address problems in one part of the world have been shown to have global repercussions. Islamic extremism is a case in point. Climate denial cannot go unchallenged and nation's that engage in climate action will reap their share of the $23 trillion windfall.

France has helped stem the spread of right-wing populism and saved climate action in the process. Europeans are rejecting the politics of Donald Trump and Theresa May. Instead they are embracing a progressive centrist form of government. If Germany joins France and the Netherlands we will have a bulwark against a cancerous form of nationalism.

Event - COP 22 and IRENA Renewable Energy Side Events

COP 22 will take place November 7-18, 2016 in Marrakech, Morocco. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), established in 1994, aims to stabilize the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a level that prevents "dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system".

The Framework’s Conference of Parties (COP) was created and put in place in order to structure the efforts of the Parties to the Convention as they address climate change. The COP meets annually to review and assess the implementation of the UNFCCC and any other legal instruments the body adopts with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fighting climate change.

At this year’s COP, COP22, IRENA will host several side events related to advancing the deployment of renewable energy. Details of the side events can be found on the renewable energy track website.

Related
Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force
President Obama Outmaneuvers Deniers to Protect the Paris Climate Deal
US China and Others to Ratify Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides
Everything You Need to Know About COP21 (Video)

Event - Green Sports Alliance Summit: College Sports Sustainability Summit

PAC-12 will host the first conference wide College Sports Sustainability Summit. It will take place on June 27th 2017 in Sacramento, California. This event is part of the annual Green Sports Alliance Summit.

The College Sports Sustainability Summit is part of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy's (OSTP) call to action to tackle climate through sports. This event is supported by member universities that have pledged to take a leadership position in promoting sustainability through sports.

The mission of this event is to influence conferences and universities around the country. This summit will convene sustainability officers from across the conference to design new collective initiatives and share best practices to transform college sports into a platform for environmental progress.

“Our member universities and athletics departments are national leaders in minimizing their impact on the environment,” said Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott. “In hosting this summit, we look forward to convening an esteemed group of experts to design new initiatives and share best practices to enhance our collective efforts.”

The pledge was part of a larger push to use sports to address climate change. Earlier this year, the OSTP put out a call to action to capture new commitments and actions that leagues, teams, and organizations were taking in the climate space. Today’s announcement by the OSTP featured the Pac-12’s commitment along with other organizations’ pledges to minimize the environmental impact of their footprint and increase their response to counter the impact of climate change.

As part of the Pac-12’s pledge, Pac-12 Networks will also continue to shine a light on meaningful sustainability initiatives across the Conference.

Previous programming on Pac-12 Networks highlighted the Green Sports Alliance’s Zero Waste Challenge on Pac-12 campuses. In 2015, the Pac-12 joined the Green Sports Alliance, following the lead of the conference’s 12 institutions, which were already members of the Alliance.

The Pac-12 was the first collegiate sports conference to count all its members as Alliance participants.

About the Pac-12 Conference: Recognized as the 'Conference of Champions' for its unequaled NCAA Cohampionships, the Pac-12 Conference comprises the 12 leading universities located in the Western United States: The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, the University of California-Berkeley, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), the University of Colorado, the University of Oregon, Oregon State University, Stanford University, the University of Southern California, the University of Utah, the University of Washington and Washington State University. For more information on the Conference’s programs, member institutions, and Commissioner Larry Scott.

About the Green Sports Alliance: The Green Sports Alliance leverages the cultural and market influence of sports to promote healthy, sustainable communities where we live and play. The nonprofit does so by inspiring sports leagues, teams, venues, their partners, and millions of fans to embrace renewable energy, healthy food, recycling, water efficiency, species preservation, safer chemicals, and other environmentally preferable practices. Alliance members represent over 370 teams, venues and universities from 20 leagues in 14 countries.

For more information or to register click here.

Related
Green Sports Alliance: Making Athletics more Sustainable
Glory Eclipsed by Shame at the Rio Summer Games
Game to make Super Bowl 50 Net Postive
Solar Energy and Other NFL Sustainability Initiatives
Panel Discussion - Sport, Sustainability & Community Engagement: 2015 Toronto Pan Am Games
Super Bowl XLVlll the Greenest Ever
World Cup 2014: An Environmental Post Mortem
Olympic Sized Greenwashing at the Sochi Olympics
CSA Standards for Sustainable Events

Paris Climate Agreement Comes into Force

The world's first global initiative to reign in climate change has come into effect. On October 5, 2016, less than a year after the Paris Climate Agreement was signed at COP21, a critical threshold was passed. With the ratification of more than 62 countries, the pact will formally enter into force on November 4, 2016.

Many thought we would not be able to secure a deal in Paris at the end of last year. Then detractors doubted that enough countries would ratify it. The naysayers have been proven wrong.

This historic agreement is designed to combat climate change through drastic emissions reduction pledges known as the INDCs. To bring this carbon cutting global agreement into force 55 countries representing 55 percent of global emissions had to formally join.  The US, China and the EU have all signed onto the deal.

President Obama welcomed this historic step in our global efforts to combat climate change saying:

"If we follow through on the commitments this agreement embodies, history will judge it as a turning point for our planet." The President also said that the deal will contribute to a wave of opportunties. "[The pact will] unleash high-tech low carbon investment and innovation at a scale we have never seen before. So this gives us the best possible shot to save the one planet we've got."

See the President's full remarks in the video below:



Related
President Obama Outmaneuvers Deniers to Protect the Paris Climate Deal
US China and Others to Ratify Paris Climate Agreement
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement

Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change

Anyone interested in climate action needs to appreciate that Hilary Clinton is our last best hope. Clinton has emerged as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and she is a far better choice than the Republican candidate Donald Trump. To get a handle on what is at stake, voters need to understand that without US involvement, efforts to reign-in climate change are doomed to fail. Clinton has recently received endorsements from the greenest candidate in this election cycle Tom O'Malley and Potus himself, President Barack Obama.

Clinton is now in a position to be the first women ever to be president of the United States. This is even more significant following on the heels of the successful presidency of Barack Obama. The first African American president and the greenest president in US history. Regardless of who becomes president Clinton is the first female presidential nominee of the two major US parties.

Arguably even more import than this historic achievement, Clinton is now the only one who can stop the presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Make no mistake about it, a Trump presidency at this juncture would kill any hope we have of reigning in climate change. We are rapidly running out of time before we trigger unstoppable tipping points from which we could not recover. So in this sense, Clinton is the best hope we have to tackle climate change.

As revealed by Clinton's recent evisceration of Trump, she has the toughness that it takes to do what the field of Republican presidential contenders could not. 

Clinton has made her views on climate change known in the first Democratic primary debate and through her published policy positions. Here is a brief summary of her climate and energy policies:

Paris Climate Agreement

Clinton accepts the veracity of climate change and the 1.5 - 2.0 degree Celsius upper threshold temperature limits included in the Paris Climate Agreement. She will increase US emissions reductions to 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. This is a slight improvement on the Obama administration's goals of cutting emissions 26 to 28 percent. She will also work to preserve Obama's climate actions including the Clean Power Plan, which faces stiff opposition from Republicans. Clinton will also continue Obama's national fuel efficiency standards and the new methane rules.

Social and Environmental Justice

She has also indicated that she will try to make the transition to cleaner sources of energy more palatable to the majority of Americans. To illustrate she has indicated that she will work on economic development in coal mining communities that are out of work. Clinton recently released a comprehensive plan on environmental injustice that includes efforts to address lead.

Renewables and Efficiency

On her website she pledges that all American homes will be powered by renewables within a decade and she will oversee the installation of half a billion solar panels by the end of her first term. She will also work to make America more energy efficient saving $8 billion a year in energy and health care costs.

Clinton has also proposed a National Infrastructure Bank that would support grid investments for distributed energy, and investments in clean energy R&D. She would also ease permitting on new electricity transmission, increase the amount of renewable energy used in federal buildings and on public land. raise the bar on efficiency standards for all federal procurement and federally funded infrastructure.

Through a program called the Clean Energy Challenge, she has promised $60 billion in grants provided to states who show climate leadership.

Fossil Fuels

One of her biggest climate fails may be her support for natural gas as a bridge fuel. However, Clinton wants natural gas to be cleaner. She has proposed a National Infrastructure Bank that would reduce the number of leaks in natural gas pipelines, Through clean energy and efficiency measures she has also promised to reduce US oil consumption by a third. She does not support oil and gas production in the Arctic and the Atlantic coast, and she supports Obama's moratorium on new coal leasing. She does not support a blanket ban on new oil and gas leases on public land.

Nuclear

Clinton wants to keep existing nuclear plants operational. While Bernie Sanders has indicated that he would like to phase them out over time. Nuclear power provides 20 percent of all electricity generation in the US and 60 percent of all zero-carbon energy. Clinton also wants to increase investment in new forms of nuclear power.

Comparison

There are a number of differences that have emerged between Clinton and Sanders. A side by side comparison reveals that Clinton is not be as green as Sanders and certainly not as green as O'Malley, but she is the last person standing capable of taking on Trump.

Anyone but Trump

Trump's policy positions, if you can call them that, are largely unintelligible. His populism appears to be cobbled together on the spot so it is hard to weave a coherent narrative out of his rants. Although he may not have a proper platform, many of his stated actions would cause great harm. This is not only about climate change and the environment. A Trump presidency would hobble the economy and derail America's energy agenda. When compared to the horror-show that a Trump Presidency would augur, Clinton is the best choice by a country mile. Those who support climate action may not have an ideal candidate, but unless they want to abet disaster by abstaining to vote, they must support Clinton.

Related
Climate Focus at the April 14th Democratic Debate
Climate Related Excerpts from the March 9th Democratic Presidential Debate
Hilary Maintains her Climate Silence as O'Malley Pushes his Green Agenda (Iowa Democratic Town Hall)
Climate Change May Give Democrats the Edge in the 2016 Federal Election

US China and Others to Sign the Paris Climate Agreement on Earth Day Suggesting an Early Start to Implementation

The US and China, the world's leading carbon emitters have agreed to sign the historic Paris Climate Agreement at a signing ceremony on Earth Day. The signing of the agreement on Friday April 22nd at UN headquarters is more than just a symbolic gesture.

Of the 196 countries on-board at COP21 in Paris last December, as many as 155 other nations, including India, are expected to sign the agreement on Earth Day.

The signing by the US and China is crucial as they account for 38 percent of global emissions. This sends a powerful message that will be heard around the world. This is but the latest cooperative climate statement by these two nations.  In November, 2014 the US and China launched their joint efforts to limit carbon emissions and then they followed this up with more climate cooperation in September, 2015.

To make the agreement operational 55 percent or 55 countries will need to sign the agreement.This would mean that the agreement would come into effect far sooner than the 2020 target date floated prior to COP21. The final Paris agreement does not make mention of the 2020 implementation date. Early implementation will increase the political pressure to increase carbon reduction targets in 2018.

More ambitious targets are necessary given that current INDCs will increase global temperatures to 2.7C (the upper threshold limit set in the Paris agreement is between 1.5C and 2C). We need to see emissions peak by 2020 if we are to be able to keep temperatures from breaching 2C of warming above pre-industrial times.

As reported by the Guardian, Eliza Northrop, an analyst at the World Resources Institute, said there was growing momentum behind an early approval of the agreement.
"It’s likely it could come into effect in 2017. It could even happen this year," she said.
Related
Optimistic Predictions for Climate Action in the Wake of the COP21 Deal
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Canadian Leadership at COP21
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides

Justice Scalia's Death Bodes Well for the Clean Power Plan

The EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP), the centerpiece of the Obama administration's climate efforts was stayed by the US Supreme Court on February 9, however the death of Conservative justice Antonin Scalia just a few days later breathes new life into the plan.

In total 27 states, the coal industry, and the Republican party want to stop the EPA's efforts to reign in emissions from US power plants. Their efforts to undermine the plan are at odds with American opinions. Polls show that the majority of Americans support the CPP even in states that oppose it.

The unprecedented Supreme Court ruling ignored the merits of the plan which includes health, cost and climate benefits. The implementation of the plan are now on hold until the D.C. Circuit Court reviews the legality of the case. The same court denied a request for a stay of the CPP. For the CPP to be killed by the courts the challengers will have to prove irreparable-harm and such claims are almost impossible to prove.

The EPA and President Obama remains confident that we will see the plan proceed after the hearing scheduled for June. As Obama explained:
"I've heard people say, 'The Supreme Court struck down the clean power plant rule.’ That's not true, so don’t despair people. This is a legal decision that says, 'Hold on until we review the legality.' We are very firm in terms of the legal footing here."
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy made a statement in which she said that the ruling “is not going to slow us down.”

However, even the most optimistic environmentalists are disappointed by the Supreme Court's actions. At the very least it provides a legal basis for states to refuse to move forward on the implementation of the plan. At its worst it is a major blow to the COP21 climate agreement reached in December of last year in Paris.

As everyone knows global emissions reductions are contingent on US leadership. President Obama was instrumental in getting countries like China, India and Brazil to sign-on to the Paris deal. The failure of the US to substantially reduce its emissions represents a major impediment to global climate action. It significantly increases the likelihood that the world will not ramp up emissions reductions to keep temperatures from rising beyond the 1.5 to 2 degree Celsius upper threshold limit.

The CPP would reduce emissions from US power plants by one third by 2030. If it is not implemented the US will not be able to meet its pledge to cut its carbon emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The legal case against the CPP is premised on the fifth and tenth amendments to the US Constitution (confiscation of private property and states' rights). The rebuttal to these claims is that coal will continue to be part of the power mix and the US Supreme Court's ruling that the EPA has the right to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. Regulators already have the authority to monitor toxic releases as they cross state boundaries.

Even without the CPP there is still hope for emissions reduction from the US energy sector as renewables and gas are replacing coal for economic reasons. Other sectors are also decreasing emissions. The next president could rewrite the CPP, reform fossil fuel leasing programs, and regulate methane. However the stay on the CPP makes an already difficult battle that much more arduous.

The Supreme Court's stay of the CPP speaks to the power of the ideological conservative judicial activists on the Supreme Court. The 5-4 decision had conservative and moderate justices ruling that a “stay” was appropriate while the more liberal judges dissented from the majority decision.

The stay indicated that a majority of the justices foresee a reasonably high likelihood that they would ultimately strike down Obama’s plan. Now that Scalia is gone, getting a majority of justices to strike down the CPP is very unlikely. The D.C. Circuit panel composed of a majority of Democratic appointees will almost certainly uphold the regulations in June.

Although Republican legislators can be counted on to continue their politically motivated campaign of obstructionism, even if they refuse to support a replacement to Scalia it is very unlikely the Supreme Court justices who oppose the CPP will get the support they need to kill the plan.

The Conservative majority in the Supreme Court has died along with Justice Scalia. This turn of events is critical because climate change cannot be stayed by the courts. As the EPA explained in a statement:
"We’re disappointed the rule has been stayed, but you can’t stay climate change and you can’t stay climate action."

air, clean, emissions, reduction, climate action, United States, U.S., Obama Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, pollution,

Related
Clean Power Plan Facing Lawsuits Despite Raft of Benefits
President Obama Introduces and Explains the Clean Power Plan (Video)
The Health Benefits of Combating Climate Change and the Clean Power Plan
Family Health and the Clean Power Plan (Videos)The Clean Power Plan for the Health of Latinos: Congresswomen Sánchez Testimonmy to the EPA
Republicans at Odds with Americans on Climate Change and the Clean Power Plan
Clean Power Plan: Business Opportunities and Economic Benefits
Hundreds of US Companies and Investors Support the Clean Power Plan
Historic Clean Power Plan Includes Three New Additions
The EPA's Efforts to Reign in Climate Pollution from New Power Plants and the Supreme Court
Coal vs EPA: The Benefits of the Clean Power Plan Far Outweigh Costs
The EPA's Clean Power Plan and US Energy Efficiency
Video - The EPA's Clean Power Plan
Infographic - Obama's Clean Power Plan Explained
US GHGs and the EPA's Clean Power Plan (Infographic)
Congresswoman Linda Sanchez in Support of the Clean Power Plan
Support for the EPA's Clean Power Plan

Green Sports Alliance: Making Athletics more Sustainable

With 344 members, 300 teams, 172 venues and 20 leagues, in 14 different countries the Green Sports Alliance is a major force in sustainable athletics.  The Green Sports Alliance helps sports leagues to be more sustainable.

Sports are an incredibly powerful activity that garner the attention and interest of billions of people around the world. With this is mind the Green Sports Alliance strives to leverage the cultural and market influence of sports to promote healthy, sustainable communities.

They inspire sports leagues, teams, venues, their partners and millions of fans to embrace renewable energy, healthy food, recycling, water efficiency, species preservation, safer chemicals and other environmentally preferable practices.

The Green Sport Alliance brings together venue operators, sports team executives and environmental scientists to develop more sustainable practices in sport. Their collaborative approach has generated innovative and cost competitive solutions.

The Green Sports Alliance was conceived and founded by the Seattle Seahawks, Portland Trail Blazers, Seattle Sounders FC, Seattle Mariners, Seattle Storm, Vancouver Canucks and the Natural Resources Defense Council with support from Bonneville Environmental Foundation, Green Building Services and Milepost Consulting.

Click here to download the Green Sports Alliance Summit highlights (pdf) or here for more information.

Related Articles
Game to make Super Bowl 50 Net Postive
Solar Energy in US Professional Sports (Infographic)
Solar Energy and Other NFL Sustainability Initiatives
Panel Discussion - Sport, Sustainability & Community Engagement: A Focus on the 2015 Toronto Pan Am Games
Super Bowl XLVlll the Greenest Ever
World Cup 2014: An Environmental Post Mortem
Video - World Cup 2014: Carbon Credits
Video - World Cup 2014: Unsustainable Road Transportation
Video - World Cup 2014: Sustainability Training for Stadium Management
Video - World Cup 2014: Green Stadiums
Graphic - World Cup Energy and CO2
Infographic - Brazil World Cup 2014
Olympic Sized Greenwashing at the Sochi Olympics
CSA Standards for Sustainable Events

Hilary Maintains her Climate Silence as O'Malley Pushes his Green Agenda (Iowa Democratic Presidential Town Hall)

Hilary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley are the three remaining candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for president. On January 25th they fielded a barrage of questions from voters in a town hall meeting at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, The moderator was CNN anchor Chris Cuomo.

O'Malley emerged from the Iowa Town Hall as the greenest of the three candidates with Sanders trailing some distance behind. O'Malley bluntly stated that "this planet is worth saving," and Sanders reaffirmed his commitment to tackle climate change. Hilary remained silent on climate and clean energy and let her rivals steal the green thunder.

As in previous debates, Hilary did not mention climate change or the clean energy economy once. Perhaps she is taking her cues from Republican presidential hopefuls or perhaps she knows that this is one area where she cannot hope to compete with her Democratic rivals (see the climate positions of the Democratic presidential candidates: O'Malley, Sanders and Clinton).

Alternatively, Hilary's silence on green issues may be part of a clever strategy. According to a poll conducted towards the end of 2015, Americans do not think climate change is anywhere near as important a concern as the economy. Only 3 percent of Americans said that they thought global warming was the most important issue facing the country today.

Climate is not a priority issue for the vast majority of voters so Hilary has nothing to gain from being a climate champion. Conversely embracing climate action risks alienating voters who are worried about the economic costs.

By allowing O'Malley and Sanders to own the climate spotlight she may be trying to entrench herself as the most "moderate" Democratic candidate. Her campaign may be betting that this will appeal to independent voters or even soft conservatives. Hilary's shrewd politics may win a general election, but she must first secure the Democratic nomination. With her lead shrinking and Sanders ahead in some states, it remains to be seen whether Hilary's strategy will succeed in getting her through the primary process.

Climate Change

Both O'Malley and Sanders made it clear that there is no cause to doubt the scientific veracity of anthropogenic climate change. Early in the evening Sanders got in a good shot at Republicans when he said, "in terms of climate change, which everybody here knows - and apparently everybody in the world knows except Republican candidates for president, is one of the great environmental crises facing this nation." O'Malley followed up by reiterating that he thinks climate change is the single biggest issue we face.

Green Energy Economy

The emerging green energy economy will be worth trillions by the time it replaces fossil fuels. However of the three Democratic hopefuls, only O'Malley appears to understand the scale of the economic opportunity this transition represents. "Climate change is the greatest business opportunity to come to the United States in 100 years" O'Malley said. "And I am the first candidate in either party to put forward a plan to move us to a 100 percent clean electric energy grid by 2050, and create 5 million jobs along the way."

O'Malley, cited the fact that Iowa gets 30 percent of its electricity from wind power. He also pointed to the 5000 jobs the wind industry has created in that state. He indicated that he wants to manufacture cleantech components like wind turbines in America. He wants to train people to retrofit buildings and install distributed energy systems. He also said that he wants to put American cities at the center of the low carbon economy, or as he put it, be at the, "leading edge to this clean green environment."

O'Malley indicated that all three Democratic hopefuls aspire to do right by the planet, but he was quick to distinguish himself as the most focused on clean power. In a shot that appeared to be directed towards Hilary's moderate stance on green energy, O'Malley said:

"And we're not going to get to 100 percent clean electric grid with an "all of the above" strategy, any more than we got to the moon with an "all of the above" strategy. It was an engineering challenge. And we are up to this as Americans. But incrementalism, half steps, splitting the loaf, that's not going to get us. And that's not what your generation wants. You want the straight truth and you want us to face our challenges fearlessly and make this new reality ours."

Sustainable Agriculture

O'Malley was the only candidate who spoke to the importance of sustainable agriculture:
"The ability to consume and to grow, and to do that within the footprint of this place that we call home. So, I would like to work with congress, and I plan to work with congress, to do more in the Farm Bill to reduce the barriers of entry to new farmers as they start up. Huge capital costs that go into buying the land and buying the equipment. But it's also what's best for keeping our rural economies, and it's best for America. So I've seen in my own state a whole movement to the "buy local" movement and the sort of farming that you describe. We need to do more as a nation to encourage young farmers to go into farming to reduce those barriers and those capital costs, even at the same time that we push back against the concentration monopoly power in the agricultural sector. And that's what I intend to do."
Fossil Fuels

Sanders has repeatedly come out against fossil fuel pipelines. He spoke about his opposition to the Keystone Pipeline, the Bakken Pipeline and pipelines in Vermont and New Hampshire. "I think we've got to break our dependence on fossil fuel." Sanders said. He then asked the question, "Why did it take Hillary Clinton such a long time before she came into opposition to the Keystone Pipeline?"

Related
Climate and Energy Excerpts from the Fourth Democratic Primary Debate
Climate Excerpts from the CBS Democratic Primary Debate
Climate and Clean Energy in the Third Democratic Debate
Climate all but Absent from the Republican CNBC Presidential Debate
Climate Change a No-Show in the First Republican Debate
Republican Presidential Candidates Say the US Should Not Do Anything to Combat Climate Change
Opposition to Climate Action in the November Republican Primary Debate

Climate and Energy Excerpts from the Fourth Democratic Primary Debate

Three candidates met for the fourth Democratic debate hosted by NBC News and YouTube and moderated by anchor Lester Holt. The debate took place in Charleston, South Carolina, on Sunday January 17th. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley were present for the debate. However, except for a passing reference to renewables ("I would work quickly to present to the congress my plans for creating more...clean and renewable energy...") Clinton did not address climate change or energy issues. Hilary's silence on these importance issues in the fourth debate mirrors her strategy in the preceding debate.

Here are the climate and energy remarks made by Sanders and O'Malley during the fourth debate:

Climate Change

Sanders: The debate is over. Climate change is real. It is already causing major problems. And if we do not act boldly and decisively, a bad situation will become worse. It is amazing to me, and I think we’ll have agreement on this up here, that we have a major party called the Republican Party that is so owned by the fossil fuel industry, and their campaign contributions, that they don’t even have the courage, the decency to listen to the scientists. It is beyond my comprehension (APPLAUSE) how we can elect the president of the United States, somebody like Trump, who believes that climate change is a hoax, invented by the Chinese. (LAUGHTER)

Energy

O'Malley: I believe the greatest business opportunity to come to the United States of America in 100 years is climate change. And I put forward a plan to move us to a 100% clean electric energy grid by 2050 and create five million jobs along the way. (CHEERING) Thank you.

Sanders: Bottom line is, we need to be bold and decisive, we can create millions of jobs. We must, for the sake of our kids and grandchildren, transform our energy system away from fossil fuel to energy efficiency and sustainable energy.

O'Malley: ...we need a new agenda for America’s cities. We have not had a new agenda for America’s cities since Jimmy Carter. (APPLAUSE) We need a new agenda for America’s cities that will invest in the talents and the skills of our people, that will invest in CBBG, transportation, infrastructure and transit options and make our cities the leading edge in this move to a redesigned built, clean, green energy future that will employ our people.

O'Malley: Lester, on this stage tonight, this Democratic stage, where we actually believe in science, (LAUGHTER) I would like to challenge and invite my colleagues here on this stage to join me in putting forward a plan to move us to a 100% clean, electric energy grid by 2050. It can be done with solar, with wind, (APPLAUSE) with new technologies, with green buildings.

Related
Climate Excerpts from the CBS Democratic Primary Debate
Climate and Clean Energy in the Third Democratic Debate
Climate all but Absent from the Republican CNBC Presidential Debate
Republican Climate Avoidance and the 6th Primary Debate
Climate Change a No-Show in the First Republican Debate
Republican Presidential Candidates Say the US Should Not Do Anything to Combat Climate Change
Opposition to Climate Action in the November Republican Primary Debate
Climate Change May Give Democrats the Edge in the 2016 Federal Election
To Understand Republican Presidential Candidates you need to Follow the Money

Republican Climate Avoidance and the Sixth GOP Debate


Republican candidates for president seem to think that if you ignore the climate crisis American voters won't notice. During the sixth Republican debate there was no mention of climate change or global warming, the COP21 deal, renewable energy, cleantech, or the low carbon economy, and of course nary a word was uttered on emissions or greenhouse gases.

Climate change was a no show in the first Republican debate, the CNBC presidential debate and in the November debate they made their opposition to climate action clear. Republican presidential candidates have stated that they do not believe we should not do anything to combat climate change.

For their part the Democratic Presidential contenders have made their support for climate action clear in the CBS debate and the third debate. In fact the differences between the two parties on climate change have led some to conclude that it may give the Democrats the edge in the 2016 election.

The current slate of Republicans presidential contenders are vulnerable to criticism. Their anti-science policy positions will not stand up to scrutiny. Republicans have tried to kill the Clean Power Plan and they have worked to sabotage the COP21 deal.

Despite polls which show that American climate deniers are an increasingly rare breed, Republicans keep ignoring or undermining climate action.

Republicans are at odds with Americans on the subject of climate change and the Clean Power Plan. Even Pope Francis has condemned Republican climate denial in his address to Congress. To understand the Republican's seemingly irrational stance you need to follow the money to the fossil fuel industry.

In the sixth Republican debate closest anyone got to a discussion of anything green was when the it was used as a prefix to the word card in a xenophobic exchange on the horrors of immigration. Rubio even suggested that "radical jihadist" are somehow behind the issuance of green cards.

The only one of the candidates who mentioned energy and oil is Kasich. It came up when he was asked the following question:
"while everyone has been focusing on Iran’s provocations, I’m wondering what you make of what Saudi Arabia has been doing and its recent moves in the region, including its execution of a well-known Shi’ite cleric and its move to dramatically increase oil production, some say in an effort to drive down oil prices and force a lot of U.S. oil producers out of business. Sure enough, oil prices have tumbled. One brokerage house is predicting a third or more of American oil producers and those heavily invested in fracking will go bankrupt, and soon Saudi Arabia and OPEC will be back in the driver’s seat."
Kaisich replied saying:
"With Saudi Arabia and oil production, first of all, it’s so critical for us to be energy independent, and we’re getting there because of fracking and we ought to explore because, see, energy independence gives us leverage and flexibility, and secondly, if you want to bring jobs back to the United States of America in industry, low prices make the difference. We’re seeing it in my state and we’ll see it in this country. And that’s why we must make sure we continue to frack."
It is ironic that in Kasich's closing remarks he explained that his grandfather was a coal miner, who went blind and died of black lung.

Climate all but Absent from the Republican CNBC Presidential Debate
Climate Change a No-Show in the First Republican Debate
Republican Presidential Candidates Say the US Should Not Do Anything to Combat Climate Change
Opposition to Climate Action in the November Republican Primary Debate
Climate and Energy Excerpts from the Fourth Democratic Primary Debate
Climate Excerpts from the CBS Democratic Primary Debate
Climate and Clean Energy in the Third Democratic Debate
The Green Elements of the First 2012 Presidential Debate
Climate Change May Give Democrats the Edge in the 2016 Federal Election

COP21 Deal Signals the End of Fossil Fuels and the Beginning of an Era of Unprecedented Growth for Renewables

The Paris climate deal erases any doubt that fossil fuels will be replaced by renewable energy. Even before the start of COP21, the world had already begun to accept that the end of fossil fuels and the dawn of a low carbon economy powered by renewables. We now have the political will, investment dollars and technological innovation required to drive the transition from fossil fuels to renewables.

In an interview taped for CBS' Face the Nation, John Kerry called the climate pact "a breakaway agreement" that will change how countries make decisions and "spur massive investment." We have already seen how reduced demand and increased supply have resulted in a glut of oil pushing prices to around $36 a barrel. Oil prices have not been this low in more than five years.

A Forbes article titled, Oil Matters Less than Wall Street Thinks, suggests that oil has not hit bottom and prices will continue to slide, "in the long term, oil can go a lot lower...the demand side trends all point lower." As the article indicates, "oil is fading into history." We are already seeing clear evidence of this trend. In 1980, energy (mostly fossil fuel) stocks were responsible for almost 29 percent of the S&P 500, now they make up less than 9 percent of the total market value of the index.

Fossil Fuels on the decline

Post COP21, we can expect to see far more radical disruptions in the fossil fuel industry. Concerns about the risks associated with fossil fuels are driving the shift away from fossil fuels. Specifically, the fear of stranded assets related to unburnable carbon. These concerns are reviewed in a 2013 report titled Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets from Carbon Tracker and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at London School of Economics. The report indicates that between 60 to 80 percent of coal, oil and gas reserves of publicly listed companies are “unburnable” if we are to keep the planet from warming less than 2° Celsius. We currently have five times more fossil fuels that can be safely burned to stay within the 2C upper threshold limit.

Now that the COP 21 agreement has reduced the upper threshold limit to 1.5C, even more fossil fuels will need to stay in the ground. As reported in Climate Change News, scientists confirm that the 1.5C warming limit means that fossil fuels must be phased-out by 2030. 350.org’s Do the Math campaign says we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide and stay below 2°C of warming — anything more than that risks catastrophe for life on earth. We have 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide in fossil fuels.

A new report suggests that there are trillions of dollars of fossil fuel investments that are at risk of becoming worthless. In the article Global Warmings Terrifying New Math, Bill McKibben quotes John Fullerton, a former managing director at JP Morgan who now runs the Capital Institute, as saying that there are about $20 trillion in fossil fuel assets that are at risk.

Even big oil is coming to terms with the risks associated with their core business activities. ExxonMobil recently published a “Carbon Asset Risk” report in which it acknowledged that climate change will drive down the valuation of its oil reserves. The report shows how market forces and climate regulation will make some of its carbon reserves unburnable.

Concerns about stranded assets used to be an issue of interest to environmentalists, economists and savvy investors. Now the term is informing both private and public policy decisions. Fossil fuel assets will encounter serious headwinds once pollution controls are partnered with carbon pricing schemes. Social and political movements will also contribute to the stranding of fossil fuel assets. This includes growing fossil fuel divestment, environmental advocacy and public protest.

Investors cannot ignore the risks associated with high carbon holdings. Led by organizations like Ceres, investors are becoming increasingly mindful of the dangers associated with traditional carbon laden investments.

As Jonathan Koomey PhD explained in a 2014 blog post: "[O]nce markets realize there’s an arbitrage opportunity, they relentlessly chip away at it until it is eliminated. And the stranded fossil asset arbitrage opportunity is one that’s worth many trillions of dollars. So the pressure will continue to build, and soon the disclosures will result in attention paid to this asset risk that simply hasn’t been present before. That attention will become a flood very rapidly. It’s the beginning of the end of the fossil-fuel economy, but the big players just don’t realize it yet (or if they realize it, they’re not admitting it)."

A report, Stranded Carbon Assets (PDF), from Generation Foundation, thinks that the process of transitioning away from fossil fuels will be much quicker than some expect. "The inevitable transition to a low-carbon economy will revolutionize financial markets at an unprecedented magnitude...investors who equate the transition with drawn-out, incremental change do so at their own peril as the stranding of carbon assets may occur at unforeseen rates and at an unpredictable scale." The fall in the costs of renewable energy will also continue to leverage market forces in a way that shifts investment dollars into clean energy, effectively stranding fossil fuel assets.

Growth of renewables

Renewable energy is already experiencing tremendous growth and the Paris climate deal will accelerate that growth exponentially. As reported by Scientific American, studies show that, "switching to an entirely renewable energy system would save money and lives."

Rich and poor nations alike agree that renewables are a cost-competitive source of energy. They are not only good for the climate, they are good for the economy and they provide good jobs. The combination of new policies, new regulations, new investments, new technologies and new partnerships will grow renewable energy at an ever accelerating rate.

Driven in part by the growth of renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions are already declining in 2015. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is among those who have provided evidence that the shift towards renewables is happening now. Their annual World Energy Outlook for 2015 report states, “There are unmistakable signs that the much needed global energy transition is under way,” with “60 cents of every dollar invested in new power plants to 2040 [to be] spent on renewable energy technologies.”

The IEA says that between 2015 and 2040, global investments in renewable energy will total $7 trillion, representing 60 percent of all power plant investment. In 2013, renewables contributed only 12 percent of global energy to power generation; however, by 2040 they will supply at least 24 percent.

Contrary to the facetious rhetoric from big oil, renewable energy is powering the growth of the developing world. This includes places like Brazil, China, India, Afghanistan, Albania, the Caribbean, and Costa Rica. The IEA says that the developing world alone will spend $2.7 trillion on renewable-based power plants between 2015 and 2040.

Over the past three decades, renewable sources of energy have been growing at a prodigious rate. In the last three decades, solar power has been doubling every two years while the costs have been falling (75 percent in the last five years). At the current rate, solar will be able to effectively supply all of our energy needs in less than 2 decades.

Solar is seeing tremendous growth in places like Germany, Spain, Portugal, Australia, and the U.S. Wind is seeing tremendous growth in places like Brazil, China, South Africa and the U.S. Growth is also expected with other clean energy sources like biomass, thermal, tidal, and waste-breakdown energy.

A Grist article by Michael Klare titled, Renewables poised to surge after Paris Agreement, says that "2015 can be viewed as the year in which the epochal transition from one set of fuels to another took off, with renewables making such significant strides that, for the first time in centuries, the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel era has come into sight."

A number of initiatives have been launched at or around COP21 that are not only good for the climate, they represent good business practices.

Indian Prime Minister Modi has pledged to get 40 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030 and 175GW of renewables by 2022. Solar power generation in India is expected to grow by 2,500 percent over the next seven years, expanding output from 4 to 100 gigawatts.

India has brought together 120 countries to be part of a solar energy alliance. Modi has committed $30 million for the establishment of the alliance’s headquarters in New Delhi. The eventual goal is to raise $400m from membership fees and international agencies. Some of the companies involved in the project include Areva, Engie, Enel, HSBC France and Tata Steel. Another solar initiative called the Global Solar Council comprises over 1000 companies.

To accelerate clean energy innovation, several leading countries launched Mission Innovation. Bill Gates and a number of other CEO's are fostering innovation through an initiative called the Breakthrough Energy Coalition. It will seek both private and public funds to expedite the development of advanced green-energy technologies to speed the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. Private sector initiatives like RE100 have dozens of global business leaders who have pledged to source all of their electricity from renewable sources.

Governments see the wisdom of sourcing their energy from renewables. On December 4, 1000 mayors and local leaders signed the "Paris City Hall Declaration" committed to "support ambitious long-term climate goals such as a transition to 100% renewable energy in our communities, or an 80% greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2050." As explained by Klare:

"As the consumption of renewable energy explodes, the incentives for power and money-saving technical breakthroughs are only going to grow and the rate of discovery is sure to rise as well, undoubtedly offering enormous payback possibilities for those getting a piece of the action early...make no mistake about it: The future belongs to renewables."

While there are some who are skeptical that renewables can replace fossil fuels, a 2014 Washington Post article titled, The coming era of unlimited - and free- clean energy, makes the point that many megatrends had early detractors who were proven wrong. A Greenpeace report indicates that 100 percent renewable energy is possible by 2050.

The more renewables that are deployed the more it will reduce costs, which in turn will drive even more growth. Post COP21, we will see an unstoppable shift away from fossil fuels that will augur the unprecedented growth of renewable energy.  

Related
COP21 Agreement is a Momentous Leap Forward
COP21 is an Unprecedented Turning Point
Market Reaction to COP21 Deal: Fossil Fuels Crash while Renewables Soar
Subsidies and Renewable Energy Post COP21 (Infographic)
Unpacking the COP21 Paris Climate Agreement (Infographic)
The COP21 Climate Deal and the Crucial Role of Obama's Leadership (Video)
Republican's Failed Attempts to Undermine the COP21 Climate Agreement
How the Paris Terror Attacks are related to Climate Change and why a COP21 Deal is More Important than Ever
Breaking: We Have a Final Draft Climate Agreement at COP21 
Environment and Climate in the Republican Spending Bill: Oil Exports in Exchange for Clean Energy, Air, Water, and Green Climate Funding
As We Near the End of COP21 People are Demanding Climate Action
Optimism at COP21 Despite Disagreements on the Meaning of Differentiated Responsibilities
Being Hopeful About the COP21 Climate Deal (Video)
Canadian Leadership at COP21
COP21 Compact of States and Regions Pledges Emissions Reductions Equivalent to China's Annual Output
Be Part of History: Help Make COP21 a Success
A Guide to COP21 and Clean Energy Solutions from 24 Hours of Reality and Live Earth (Video)
Al Gore Says COP21 Will be a Turning Point in Global Policy (Video)
COP21 and Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets
COP21 History and Guides
COP21 Starts With Pledges of Action from World Leaders
President Obama's Address at the Opening Session of COP21
Everything You Need to Know About COP21 (Video)
Tell World Leaders that we Want Bold Climate Action at COP21 (Video)
COP21: March4Me (Video)
Canadian PM and Provinces Unified for COP21
Summary of the Final Round of Climate Talks Before COP21
Saudi Arabia is on the COP21 Naughty List
COP21 Naughty List: Republicans Presidential Contenders