Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts

Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement

Republicans used the looming debt crisis to force their anti-environment agenda on America. The credit ceiling agreement passed by the House on August 1, makes the Tea Party the big winner and intransigence the winning tactic. Although widely referred to as a "compromise," the Democrats made most of the concessions including eradicating tax increases for the top 2 percent of Americans and big cuts to the EPA. There is also significantly reduced funding for important energy and water projects.

As reported in Platts, former Clinton administration energy advisor Elgie Holstein said the agreement will result in cuts to a range of energy and environmental programs. These cuts are expected to be around the same levels as those House Republicans proposed for the fiscal 2012 budget.

"I think the house FY12 numbers give us a preview of that, and these new numbers are probably going to be even tougher," said Holstein, now a senior director at the Environmental Defense Fund. "While the big headline grabbing fight over the debt ceiling deadline may be settling down, the real program-by-program fights are just beginning."

The agreement, raises the debt ceiling in two tiers each with an accompanying set of spending cuts. The bill immediately puts in place federal spending limits for the next 10 years, beginning with the fiscal 2012 budget.

For Democrats there is not a lot of good news. For those concerned about the environment it is even worse.

For fiscal 2012, the deal would allow a total of $1.043 trillion in federal discretionary spending. These spending caps make it very unlikely that the Senate will be able increase spending levels for energy and environmental programs.

The energy and water development appropriations bill (H.R. 2354) approved by the House on July 15, would provide the Department of Energy with $850 million less than it received in 2011 reducing the DOE budget to $24.7 billion in fiscal 2012.

Under the Interior appropriations bill (H.R. 2584), the Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department and related agencies would receive $3.8 billion less than the amount requested by the White House reducing the budget to $27.5 billion. EPA would get $1.5 billion less than this year for a total budget of $7.1 billion in 2012.

The cuts are far from over with a congressional committee scheduled to find another $1.5 trillion in cuts later this year.

White House spokesman Jay Carney tried to find a silver lining to this dismal agreement for the environment by saying that oil subsidies could be on the table for congressional committee cuts later this year.

"If the joint committee decides, for example, that part of a balanced deal should be to eliminate tax subsidies for oil and gas companies -- as the president has called for, they can do that and they would raise revenues through doing that," Carney said at a White House briefing.

After being rewarded for their obstructionism, there is no reason to believe that Republicans will stop using the tactics that got them this far. Even though tax increases for the wealthiest 2 percent are supported by the majority of Americans, they are unlikely to get any Republican support.

Even with all the concessions made by Democrats, many Republicans are still complaining they did not get enough.

A vote will be held in the Senate later today where the agreement on the debt ceiling is expected to pass.

GOP partisanship is undermining America's democracy. Although it does not reflect the democratic will of the American people, Republicans and their Tea Party supporters held America hostage, and won.

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
The Credit Downgrade and the Green Economy
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
Let Boehner Know that US Competitiveness Should not be Compromised
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career

Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion

Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion



The Tea Party has already had a powerful impact on the forthcoming midterm elections, however, many are asking questions about the competence of Tea Party candidates.

Jobs are a predictable indicator of electoral outcomes, but the Republicans inclusion of Tea Party candidates, with radical conservative agendas, may test this theory.

The Tea Party movement is putting pressure on Republican leaders to significantly cut spending and taxes, to repeal health care legislation and financial regulations passed this year, and to phase out Social Security and Medicare in favor of personal savings accounts.

Will the Tea Party's radical conservatism succeed? Will misinformation campaigns paid for with corporate cash be enough to cause Americans to confuse political gridlock with advancing the national interest? Will anger cause Americans to overlook the questionable intellects of Tea Party Candidates?

In Delaware, the nomination of tea-party-backed Christine O'Donnell, has clearly helped her opponent, Democrat Chris Coons. Coons has said he supports efforts to control greenhouse gases blamed for climate change. O'Donnell, who worked with Sarah Palin's people, is using scare tactics claiming that a vote for her opponent will cost the average Delaware family up to $10,000. There is no basis for this statement, even O'Donnell was not able to explain how she came up with that number, however, her campaign does make use of reports from the conservative propaganda machine known as the Heritage Foundation.

The O'Donnell campaign has offered some unbelievable soundbites. Christine O'Donnell's now infamous statement, "I am not a witch, I am you" was eclipsed by a classic moment that epitomizes the worst of this new slate of Tea Pary Republicans. On October 19, Christine O'Donnell seemed incredulous when she was told that the separation of church and state was in the Constitution.

O'Donnell, who badly trails Coons, is leading many Republicans to believe that the nomination of O'Donnell, has given away Delaware. Had she not won the nomination, Rep. Michael Castle (R), Delaware would likely have been a Republican win.

Kentucky is a Republican held state where many are also asking questions about the GOP nominee Rand Paul, another tea party candidate.

Of the eight nationally known Tea Party supported candidates, pollsters now say only a few have a chance of winning. But Tea Partiers are involved in at least 35 races across the country.

The Tea Party may end up hurting Republicans more than helping. Polls suggest that in the Senate, the hurt may outweigh the help. O'Donnel is not the only The Tea Party candidate whose questionable grasp of the issues, are undermining Republican chances. In Nevada, for example, Sharon Angle, has improved the odds that Senator Harry Reid, the leader of the Democratic majority, hangs onto his seat.

Americans are angry, but are they so mad that they will vote for a slate of incompetents? We will have to wait until November 2, 2010 to find out if protest votes are enough to carry either the House or the Senate.


Related Posts
Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
Koch's Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
Video Linking the Koch Brothers and the Tea Party
The Kochs War on Oversight and Environmental Regulation
Koch Spending on Political Influence
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Climate Change is a Security Issue
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
Democrats' Chances in the 2010 Midterms
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
California's Proposition 23
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
What is Wrong with the Right
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
Palin is No Friend of Green
The New International System: The Role of Government

Tea Party's Climate Change Denial

Tea Party supporters deny the existence of climate change and oppose any attempt to regulate emissions. Despite their distrust of science and resistance to civil debate, the Tea Party's crusade is gaining momentum. Republican organizers are hoping to channel Tea Party anger into electing a conservative Congress in 2010 and a conservative president in 2012.

The Tea Party movement began about a year ago as a protest against government bailouts and health care legislation. Starting last Thursday and culminating this weekend, the first national Tea Party convention was fittingly held at Nashville's Gaylord Opryland Hotel and Convention Center.

Tea Party conservatives resent the Democrats stimulus spending even though it staved off economic collapse and helped to pull the world out of recession. Tea Party attendees tend to frame issues in terms of the choice between free markets and Marxist-Socialism. Many argue that conservative policies are counter indicated by current realities. The climate crisis, recession, and geopolitical situation require bold leadership not laissez faire capitalism.

Unlike last year's Tea Parties this years inaugural National Tea Party Convention had no posters comparing Obama to Hitler or Stalin. However, the punch lines were toned down variations of the same old propaganda. On Friday, Joseph Farah, editor of the conservative Website WorldNetDaily, opened his speech at the Tea Party convention with jokes about the President's citizenship and was met with a thunderous ovation of approval.

Tea Party supporters proudly proclaimed their support for Tom Tancredo who blamed illiterate voters for putting a "committed Socialist ideologue" in the White House. Former congressman Tom Tancredo stirred up controversy with his opening night speech Thursday. He called for making literacy tests a prerequisite for voting, like the banned Jim Crow laws that prevented many blacks from voting prior to the introduction of civil rights legislation. Tea party convention organizer Judson Phillips called Tancredo’s speech “fantastic.”

A Tea Party supporter recounted organizing a bowling party which he called "Knock Down the Pinheads of Communism." A strike equaled Mao, a spare, Pol Pot.

The Tea Party Convention speakers included Judge Roy Moore, the judge who fought to keep a monument of the Ten Commandments outside his courthouse and is now running for Alabama governor. President Obama "has ignored our history and our heritage by denying we are a Christian nation," Moore said.

As reported in Politics Daily, Tea Party supporter and global warming skeptic Steve Milloy called modern environmentalism, "tatalitarianism." Milloy and other Tea Party failthfuls are not only critical of Democrats, they criticize Republicans who work with Democrats.

South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham was criticized for cooperating with Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on climate change legislation; California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's environmental efforts had Milloy calling for "reverse immigration." Milloy, who runs the website junkscience.com, questioned the sanity and morality of cap and trade supporters, whom he called "bad people."

Tea party supporters are trying to use social media to help promote their agenda, but unlike Obama's supporters, most supporters of the Tea Party Movement are too old to understand how to make the most of this technology. Apparently the youth are not much interested in Tea Parties.

The core of Tea Party supporters are still angry old conservatives whose passion precludes the facts. They say they are angry because of the growth of the federal government and President Obama's policies. Truth is, the average age of the Tea Party supporters speaks volumes. Perhaps they are angry because they cannot keep pace with a rapidly changing world.
_________________________________

Next: Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green

Related Articles
The Tyranny of Protest and Climate Change Pragmatism
What is Wrong with the Right
The Business of Climate Change Deception
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Green Science
The Effects of Global Warming
Primer on CO2 and other GHGs
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
Obama Responds to Republican Lies on Health Care Reform
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Green Dissent (Part 1)
Green Dissent (Part 2)
The Politics of Intransigence
Obama's Achievements Ahead of COP15
Boxer-Kerry Climate Change Bill
Action on Climate Change
The US is Bound by Law to Honor Climate Change Treaty