Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

China Using Drones to Combat Air Pollution

Chemical dispersing drones are being used by the Chinese government to combat the serious smog problem in Beijing. The pollution in Beijing is caused primarily by the cities five million motor vehicles, nearby coal burning, dust storms and local construction dust.

Previously, fixed wing aircraft sprayed chemicals that freeze floating particles, allowing them to fall to ground. Now these chemicals will be sprayed by an unmanned parafoil drone designed by the state owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China. The new design uses the same chemicals but can carry three time more weight (700kg) than fixed wing designs making it 90 percent less expensive to operate.

Premier Li Keqiang said in his speech at the National People's Congress in Beijing yesterday the government would "declare war" on pollution. It would focus, in part, on reducing PM2.5, the fine particles of pollutants thought to be most harmful to people's health.

The manufacturer has already carried out about 100 hours of test flights, Ta Kung Pao reported.

The company said the technology also has applications in emergency rescue, disaster relief, aerial photography, surveying and seed-sowing.

Tests will be conducted later in March led by the China Meteorological Administration.

Related Articles
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
Beijing Passes New Air Pollution Law
China's New Year: Pollution and Drought Underscore the Contradiction of Pollution and Mitigation
Chinese Smog Crisis is Driving the Transition to a Greener Economy
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling and China Rising
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business

Beijing Passes New Air Pollution Law

China is plagued by dangerous air pollution, and the city of Beijing has taken the first step to address the issue. Beijing, one of the most polluted cities in the world, has introduced China’s first legally binding regulations. The new rules are designed to reduce PM2.5 levels were overwhelmingly approved by Beijing’s municipal congress by a vote of 659 to 23.

Particulate Matter, 2.5 micrometers or less are abbreviated as PM2.5. They are defined as fine particles in the (ambient) air that are 2.5 micrometres or less in size. They are small enough to invade even the smallest airways and they are known to produce respiratory and cardiovascular illness. They generally come from activities that burn fossil fuels, such as traffic, smelting, and metal processing.

China's national standard is 35-micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter, while Beijing has levels that are more than twice that level (89.5 micrograms). Beijing Mayor Wang Anshun has said that air pollution is the biggest problem concerning people’s livelihoods in the capital.

The new air pollution law was passed at the annual session of the municipal legislative body early in February, and will come into effect in March. It contains harsher penalties for polluters, including cumulative daily fines.

The city of Beijing is spending a trillion yuan to improve air and water quality in the city. Previous regulations are geared towards emissions reductions.

© 2014, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
China's New Year: Pollution and Drought Underscore the Contradiction of Pollution and Mitigation
 Chinese Smog Crisis is Driving the Transition to a Greener Economy 
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling and China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations

Chinese Smog Crisis is Driving the Transition to a Greener Economy

Air quality and other environmental concerns are forcing China to transition to a greener more sustainable  economy. With visibility in Harbin, China being reduced to 10 meters, the city was shut down by a thick blanket of smog that descended on Monday, October 21. Levels of smog in the city are five to ten times worse than America's most smog ridden city, (the Southern California city of Bakersfield). While officials are blaming the dense smog in Harbin on heating, the real issue is the country's reliance on coal.

Smog is caused by particle pollution (soot) composed of tiny bits of solids and liquids that can lodge deep in your lungs and raise the risk of heart disease, stroke, and asthma attacks. The Word Health Organization (WHO) recently reported that air pollution leads to cancer. A July report indicated that increasing air pollution in China is cutting short the life spans of people living in the north. According to the study published in the U.S. journal 'Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences' the average person who was alive in the 1990s and living in Northern China will live an average of five-and-a-half years less than his counterpart in southern China.

An index measuring PM2.5, or particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5), reached a reading of 1,000 in some parts of Harbin, in Bakerfield that number hovers around 100. A level above 300 is considered hazardous, while the WHO recommends a daily level of no more than 20.

Harbin is the capital and largest city of Heilongjiang province in China's northeast region, as well as the tenth most populous city in the nation with a population of 11 million people. Harbin is not the only city in China to be severely impacted by smog, other cities in the northeast including Tangshan and Changchun, have their own serious air quality problems. Last winter Beijing suffered its own smog emergency when the PM2.5 surpassed 900.

While China is already a world leader in renewable energy production, these efforts do not appear to have made much progress in smog reduction. Chinese citizens are increasingly alarmed about the situation prompting the government to set ambitious targets for emissions reductions in key industries by 30 percent by the end of 2017. As the world's biggest auto market, Chinese cities have also announced policies that restrict new vehicle purchases.

More recently, the government has launched an 800 million dollar fund for cities designed to encourage cleaner air initiatives. Another way that China may be able to reduce pollution is through eliminating the nations overcapacity in energy generation.

While there is much that the government can do to minimize emissions from industry, they will also have to tackle the issue of home heating. Policies like handing out free coal for heating are incompatible with efforts to address the smog problem. 

The government cannot afford to dither, Chinese are increasingly speaking out and protesting against poor air quality and other environmental issues. This costs the country in terms of productivity and in terms of slowing the flow of expats returning home from abroad and contributing to the economy.

Concerns about air pollution are driving the transition to more efficient and less polluting energy sources. This will not only calm social tensions caused by an increasingly outraged Chinese public, it will add to longer lifespans which will yield economic dividends.

Do to higher cost of compliance and potentially lower production, a more focused sustainable growth strategy may have short-term economic impacts. But longer term, these measures will generate sustainable growth.

To definitively combat the problem, China will either have to sacrifice growth or invest in cleaner air initiatives associated with a greener economy.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling and China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations
Implications of US Duties on Chinese Solar
Outlook for Chinese Solar in 2012
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
China's Green School Projects
China Wants a Global Climate Change Treaty
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech
China's Green Stimulus, US/China

China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership

China's economy is growing along with the nation's efforts to combat climate change. The nation is an increasingly competitive leader in low carbon thanks to its renewable energy initiatives, sustainability efforts, and reductions in CO2 and HCFCs.

The latest economic reports out of China indicate that the country has increased its rate of growth. The Chinese economy grew by 7.8% in the third quarter of 2013 compared to a year earlier, the highest growth rate so far this year. Foreign investment in China rose to $8.8 billion (US), marking a 4.9% increase over last year. Manufacturing output recorded double-digit growth for the second month in a row, expanding by 10.2% in September. Credit Suisse expects the Chinese economy to grow by 7.6% in 2013 and 7.7% in 2014.

China has pledged to cut carbon emissions per unit of economic output by as much as 45 percent before 2020 from 2005 levels. China is working on reducing its CO2 emissions by an estimated 8 billion tonnes. To help meet these goals China may invest another 2.3 trillion yuan in key energy-saving and emission-reducing projects and the environment ministry is also considering stricter controls on vehicle and industry pollution. The Multilateral Fund of the Montreal Protocol will provide China $385 million over the next 17 years to completely eliminate its industrial production of HCFCs by 2030.

China is also exploring a national emissions cap and trade system which started with seven Chinese cities and provinces in 2012. The country plans to expand its carbon trading pilot program starting in 2015.

According to the Climate Institute/GE Low-Carbon Competitiveness Index earlier this year, China is one of the top three G20 economies that are best prepared to compete in a low-carbon economy. Due in large part to its clean energy investments, China went from seventh to third place. Going forward China is expected to prosper in a low-carbon and clean energy future.

A report released in March, 2013 by The Conference Board found Chinese companies are slowly adopting sustainability reporting practices. One-third of companies surveyed in China now share their sustainability initiatives with the outside world.

China leads the world in installed renewable energy capacity (both including and excluding hydro). Since 2006 we have seen 10-15 GW of annual additional renewable energy. Renewables now provide more than a quarter of China’s electricity generating capacity. By 2050, clean energy is expected to provide half of the nation's energy consumption.

China is massively deploying renewable electricity generation including hydropower, wind, biomass and solar. China’s spending to develop renewable energy may reach 1.8 trillion yuan ($294 billion) between 2010 and 2015.

China has put forth policies that support renewables with ambitious targets.China's Medium to Long-Term Renewable Energy Plan launched in 2007 has shaped sectoral policies and helped to grow renewables. In 2012 the National Energy Administration released draft renewable portfolio standards which would replace the mandatory share program target, it proposes targets averaging 6.5% from non-hydro renewables by 2015.

Investment in renewable energy has risen steadily in China over the last decade, with the wind and solar sectors hitting a record $68 billion in 2012. China has the world’s largest wind power installation capacity and annual wind energy additions are steadily in excess of 10 gigawatts (10 GW) over the last four years. Wind energy is the cheapest among the nations renewable energy options and domestic wind turbines technologies appear to be catching up with foreign companies. The government aims to have 100 gigawatts of wind-power installed capacity by 2015.

Solar and biomass-fired electricity are expected to grow ten-fold over the period 2010-2020. The government aims to have more than 35 gigawatts of solar power by 2015.

Even China’s Petrochemical Corp., (Sinopec Group), said it will invest 22.9 billion yuan on an environmental protection plan.

China and Russia plan to expand cooperation on energy projects, including renewable energy and energy efficiency.

However, China also hopes to work with Russia on natural gas, coal and oil. In September, China imported more oil than any other country in the world with net imports of about 6.47 million barrels a day of crude and products. A September Wood Mackenzie report titled "Russia's pivot east: the growth in energy trade with China," estimated Russia's energy trade with China could quadruple by 2025, to more than 100 million tons of oil equivalent. The report cited Beijing's $25 billion investment towards the construction of the second stage of the Eastern Siberia Pacific Ocean pipeline in return for guaranteed crude supplies. The report suggests that Russia could become China's most important single energy supplier for some decades to come.

Despite all of its prodigious efforts, China, is still the world’s biggest carbon emitter and as evidenced by its increasingly close energy ties with Russia, the nation is destined to remain a massive importer of fossil fuels for the foreseeable future.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling & China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech
China's Green Stimulus, US/China
Partial List of China's Twitter Users Focused on Green and Sustainable Business

Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers

Shifting to a low-carbon economy will require current emitting countries and projected future emitters to rapidly scale up their investments in renewable energy. China is already the leading global investor in renewable energy infrastructure, and is increasing its overseas investments in renewable energy, particularly solar and wind. This working paper aims to help policymakers, investors, and researchers better understand the trends in China’s overseas investments in the wind and solar industries, as well as the factors behind those trends.

Executive Summary

Shifting to a low-carbon economy will require current emitting countries and projected future emitters to rapidly scale up their investments in renewable energy. In recent years, major emerging economies like China, India, and Brazil have been catching up with leading developed country investors in Europe and the United States. By some estimates, China is already the leading global investor in renewable energy infrastructure, and is increasing its overseas investments in renewable energy, particularly solar and wind. If China achieves its goal of sourcing 15 percent of its energy mix from renewables by 2020 and 30–45 percent by 2050, renewable energy will become closer to a mainstream energy resource within the country. Cost reduction incurred in this process would benefit not only China, but also the rest of the world.

This working paper aims to help policymakers, investors, and researchers better understand the trends in China’s overseas investments in the wind and solar industries, and the factors behind those trends. It examines the scale, nature, and types of China’s overseas investments in the wind and solar industries, and identifies the policy and market factors that drive these investments. China has made at least 124 investments in solar and wind industries in 33 countries over the past decade. Of the investments for which data were available, the cumulative value amounted to nearly US$40 billion in 54 investments, and the cumulative installed capacity added was nearly 6,000 MW in 53 investments. Of the 124 investments, 41 were in the wind industry, 81 in the solar industry, and 2 in both the wind and solar industries.

The majority of investments were in electricity generation. Twenty-seven of the wind investments were in wind farms predominantly carried out through joint ventures, as were most of the 41 solar investments. Several investments were made in manufacturing facilities and to establish sales and marketing offices. Most of the investments were concentrated in a few developed countries: the United States, Germany, Italy, and Australia. A handful of developing countries, including South Africa, Pakistan, and Ethiopia, also attracted investments.

China’s investments in the wind and solar industries are driven by a multitude of factors including macroeconomic conditions; industry conditions; policies (both general and specific to the wind and solar industries) that “push” Chinese companies to invest overseas; policy incentives in host countries that “pull” Chinese investors; and financial support from Chinese banks that “enables” these investments.

China is driven to seek solar and wind markets overseas largely because its manufacturing capacity exceeds domestic demand. The Chinese government’s policy support and financial support—mainly from state-owned banks that respond to government policy—encourage this overseas investment trend. Host countries’ policies have also attracted investments from China’s solar and wind industries, either advertently through tax breaks, feed-in tariffs, or bilateral cooperation agreements, or inadvertently as a “side-effect” of policies discouraging imports.

Although the analysis in this working paper points to interesting trends and provides useful insights that enhance our understanding of China’s role as an overseas investor in the wind and solar industries, it is limited by a paucity of information. Beyond the data collected for the 124 investments, the authors also reviewed literature and carried out interviews to deepen the analysis. The analysis is confined to a subset of the renewable energy sector rather than the full range of possible low-carbon investments. The inadequacy of the data does not allow an analysis of the emissions impact of these investments. These limitations suggest areas for further research that could help improve an understanding of China’s potential to reduce emissions beyond its borders, and would allow policy analysis on how China could increase this positive impact, particularly in developing countries.

To download the WRI working paper click here.

Related Posts
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech

Four Leading Chinese Environmental Activists

In a recent interview Ralph Litzinger, a Duke Univeristy anthropologist who writes about important Chinese issues, offered his list of notable environmental activists in China. His list includes Ma Jun, Li Bo, Liu Jianqiang and Feng Yongfeng.

Ma Jun and his Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs in Beijing have been doing extraordinary pollution mapping work in China, and have created a network of environmental activists around what they call the “Green Choice Alliance.” They were instrumental in the first reports to expose the links between Apple and its suppliers’ environmental and health record in factories across China.

Li Bo recently stepped down as director of Friends of Nature. He remains deeply involved in a range of environmental justice struggles in China, from toxic waste to energy politics and dam building in west China.

Liu Jianqiang is a journalist turned activists. He recently gave talks in the United States to different audiences in New York and Washington D.C., so his voice and perspective is now getting the attention it deserves, and he has a very important essay, “Defending Tiger Leaping Gorge.”

Feng Yongfeng, a journalist and founder of the organization Green Beagle, is one of the most tireless environmental activists working in China today. His work too rarely gets read or acknowledged in the western press.

Related Articles
Environmental Activism is Changing China
Turkish Environmentalists Spark National Protests
A New Environmental Movement Breeds Hope for the Future
Crafting a Positive Environmental Narrative
Pessimism is Impeding Environmental Advocacy
Environmental Success Stories: Mercury, SLCPs and Many More 
Building Support for Action on Climate Change Before We Reach Tipping Points
Why We Need to Reach American Climate Change Deniers
How Morality Can Win the War on Climate Change
Earth Conscious People in History
Greenpeace's Consumer Powered Pressure Campaigns
Why a Dozen Clothing Giants Have Bowed to Greenpeace
Greenpeace Toxics Campaigner John Deans Talks Campaign Strategy

9. Installers Comment on the Effects of Chinese Tariffs on the Solar Industry - Renewable Energy World's Top 10 Most Watched Videos of 2012

Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part1 (Video)

Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part2 (Video)

Duties on Chinese Solar Higher than Expected

On May 17, 2012, The US Department of Commerce announced stiff anti-dumping tariffs that were much higher than expected. These duties amount to around 31 percent on crystalline silicon solar panels imported from China. The duties come in response to the Chinese government's dumping of solar panels below the cost of production.

As reported in Renewable Energy World, the DOC has set duties at 31.14 percent for Trina, 31.22 percent for Suntech and 31.18 percent for other Chinese solar manufacturers that chose to participate in the investigation. The companies that chose not to participate were hit with a 250 percent tariff. The tariffs will be retroactive and be applied to panels that were shipped from as far back as about the middle of February 2012.

Some insiders are concerned that these duties will adversely impact the growing American solar industry.They are likely to make Chinese solar panels much more expensive. It is expected they will add about $0.30 a watt to the price of a panel.

Chinese companies are expected to set up workarounds like tolling in which they send panels through another country, or even set up remote manufacturing facilities outside their country. Tolling is expected to add about $0.06 to $0.08 per watt

The Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy (CASE)believes the overriding goal should be to make solar energy as competitive as possible. Steep penalties on Chinese panels would inhibit the rate at which solar has been growing in the American market. Lower costs have made solar more appealing option to investors.

However, in the absence of duties, non-Chinese solar manufacturers would be pushed out and leave the world at the mercy of a virtual Chinese monopoly. China could then dictate the price and the type of solar technology that dominates the market.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Implications of US Duties on Chinese Solar
Outlook for Chinese Solar in 2012
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
China's Green School Projects
China Wants a Global Climate Change Treaty
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech
China's Green Stimulus, US/China
Partial List of China's Twitter Users Focused on Green and Sustainable Business

Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific

The Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific is offered to member States to help policymakers. The report from the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) balances ecology and economic growth.

The report looks to build synergy between ecology and growth by framing resource constraints and the climate crisis as opportunities for growth capable of reducing poverty in the region.

This Roadmap provides five tracks for an economic system that pursues green growth as a new economic development path.  The Roadmap draws upon innovative approaches to promote low carbon green growth in the region, and in particular from the Republic of Korea.

To download the report click here.

Related Posts
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part1 (Video)
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part2 (Video)
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech
China's Green Stimulus, US/China
Implications of US Duties on Chinese Solar
Outlook for Chinese Solar in 2012
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence China's Green School Projects
China Wants a Global Climate Change Treaty
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
Partial List of China's Twitter Users Focused on Green and Sustainable Business
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies

China's Twitter Users Focused on Sustainability

As published in Collective Responsibility, here is a partial list of some of the Chinese people and organizations who use Twitter and are focused on sustainability and the environment. 

Sustainability & Environmentally Focused People

@Alex Wang – China’s environment/energy
@Alice Wong – China, Sustainability, and Innovative Technology
@Alison L – A 15 year old teen from HK supporting The Ian Somerhalder Foundation
@Angel Hsu- PhD in environmental policy at Yale
@Barbara Finamore – NRDC China Program Director
@Bill Fisher – American living in Shanghai & Hong Kong
@CC Huang – China, environment, technology, and anything strange, innovative or beautiful
@Charlie McElwee – Climate Change Policy & China
@Chris Brown – General Manager, North America for Asia Cleantech Gateway
@Christina Larson - Beijing-based contributing editor at Foreign Policy magazine
@Cleaner Greener China- The Greener side of Collective Responsibility
@David Pinto – CleanTech & Semiconductor Communications/Journalism/Marketing
@Elizabeth Balkan _ Monitoring energy and environmental news in China
@Ed Sappin – Renewables & Alternative Investments leader. China strategist.
@Fran Fremont-Smith – Working with youth raise their understanding of China,its language, culture and the environment
@GreenLeapFwd- Cleantech attorney
@Ina Pozon – climate/energy and water in Asia
@Isabel Hilton - Founding Editor of China Dialogue
@James Parker – China Sustainability Mgr for a major US MNC
@James Tweetcroft ‏ - Business strategy consultant and joint venture facilitator
@Jonathan Watts – Asia environment correspondent for The Guardian. Author of When a Billion Chinese Jump
@Keith Bradsher – Hong Kong bureau chief of The New York Times. Currently covering Asia energy, rare earths, autos, trade and economics, especially China.
@Linden Ellis – US director of China Dialogue
@Lisa Genasci – CEO of The ADM Capital Foundation
@Lucia Green-Weiskel – climate change policy in China
@Manuela Zoninsein – journalist covering the push for cleantech, eco-living & sustainable meat free food, especially in emerging nations.
@Mark Englehart Evans ‏ - China-based, sustainability-minded technologist, strategist & consultant.
@Mark Tong – digital media, green tech, eco-friendly public policies, sustainable development, renewable energy.
@Perrine Bouhana – Sustainability consultant working at international PR firm
@Sam Geall – Deputy Editor of China Dialogue
@Rob Earley – Director for Clean Transportation Program
@Sustainable John – US-China relations, energy efficiency and power storage as enablers for renewable energy, communication on climate change, eco-rap
@Tan Copsey – BBC Media Action. Climate change and Asia
@Terry Cooke – US-China Cleantech, Clean Energy & Innovation

Sustainability and Environmentally Focused Organizations

@Asia Water Project – Water
@Beijing Air – Hourly air quality readings from American Embassy in Beijing
@China Dialogue -Where China and the world discuss the environment
@China Organic – All things green, sustainable & eco
@China Wind Power – China Wind Power International Corp.
@Clean Air Network – HK’s leading NGO on air pollution
@EcoAsia – Asia’s first bilingual online Green lifestyle magazine
@Environment China – Retweeting Air Quality releases of US Embassy in Beijing
@Go Green Hong Kong – Dedicated to provide latest green-related news, technology tips and best practices.
@Greenpeace HK ‏
@Greenpeace China
@Greennovate team – Sustainability concepts for businesses and communities
@Green Drinks China
@Green Energy China – Clean Technology, Renewables, Alternative Energy, Resource Efficiency, Green Building, Environment, Climate Change & Green Jobs in China
@GreenITers – eco-innovation community in Asia. We globally encourage everyone to Green it!.
@GREEN LONG MARCH – Longest and largest youth conservation movement by university students in China
@H&K HK Green Team – Hill & Knowlton Hong Kong’s Green Team.
@HKUST Sustainability – Tweeting HKUST’s Green and Sustainable Initiatives
@ISF HONG KONG – We are not the only organisms on this planet.
@JUCCCE – Joint US China Collaboration on Clean Energy
@Nature China-highlighting the best research being produced in Hong Kong and Mainland China
@Sustainability China – The Shanghai Center for Sustainability
@Wild China – Beijing-based adventure travel company focusing on sustainable travel in China.
@WWF-Hong Kong
@YaleE360 – Opinion, Analysis and the Latest Environmental News

Related Posts
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech
China's Green Stimulus, US/China
Implications of US Duties on Chinese Solar
Outlook for Chinese Solar in 2012
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence China's Green School Projects
China Wants a Global Climate Change Treaty
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies

Video: Move to Green Economy a Global Competition



Bruce J. Katz is a vice president at the Brookings Institution and founding Director of the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program which aims to provide decision makers in the public, corporate and civic sectors with policy ideas for improving the health and prosperity of cities and metropolitans areas. Katz regularly advises federal, state, regional and municipal leaders on policy reforms that advance the competitiveness of metropolitan areas.

Katz says the move to a greener economy is a global competition. The US must wisely and expeditiously develop both policies and practices that encourage more innovation and growth in this critical area. Growth through Innovation.

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Video: China Leading the Green Economy while America's Democracy is Being Undermined
Government Investment Green Jobs and Economic Recovery
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
Rare Earth Minerals Power the Green Economy and Embolden China's Bid for Dominance
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
China Poised to Challenge Global Auto Giants in the Greener Vehicle Market
The US is Positioned to Lead the Global Competition for EV Supremacy
Competition in the Global EV Market
Competition in the 2011 Greener Car Market
Competition in the Green Vehicle Market
Germany and the Global Competition for EV Supremacy
Clean Tech Job Trends 2010 Report: Growth and Global Competition

G20 Must Cooperate for a Sustainable Recovery

The cooperation of G20 member states is the key to a sustainable recovery. Although the global financial crisis revealed the interconnectedness of the modern economy, it also underscored the importance of cooperation.

The Toronto G20 meeting was billed as a final checkup to ensure agreements reached in Pittsburgh would be finalized at a November gathering in Korea, where leaders would then plan for a post-crisis world.

"Our highest priority in Toronto must be to safeguard and strengthen the recovery," President Barack Obama wrote in a letter to his G20 colleagues. "We worked exceptionally hard to restore growth; we cannot let it falter or lose strength now."

"This crisis proved, and events continue to affirm, that our national economies are inextricably linked," Obama said. "And just as economic turmoil in one place can quickly spread to another, safeguards in each of our nations can help protect all nations."

In 2009, despite disagreements between wealthier and developing nations, the financial and climate change crises spurred unprecedented levels of global cooperation.

In 2010, although we are in recovery, a slowdown has been signaled by the Economic Cycle Research Institute's weekly leading index.

Issues that threaten the recovery include Europe's debt difficulites, slow US job growth, and an unstable US housing market. With interest rates near zero, the most powerful policy tool remaining is resuming asset purchases, but printing money will cause inflation.

Economic uncertainty is highlighting disagreements between the United States, Europe and China.

Jose Vinals, director of the IMF's monetary and capital markets department, said G20 unity was one of the biggest positive economic developments in recent years, but disunity would damage the recovery. "It's fundamental that you keep your house in order, but it's also fundamental that when the going gets rough, you cooperate," he said at a conference in Washington.
________________________________

Related Posts
G20 and Central Bank Governors Joint Communique
G20 Disagreements and Global Economic Reforms
Competing National Priorities
Program and Plans for G8 and G20 Summits in Canada
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
The G20 and the Green Economy
UN Chief Asks G20 to Focus on a Sustainable Recovery
G20 Security Concerns Force Cancellation of Sustainable Supply Chain Event
G20 Protestors Dilute Green Message
The Tyranny of Protest and Climate Change Pragmatism
Local Business Promotes Green Agenda for G20 in Pittsburgh
G20 and Developing World Disagree on Climate Change
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
Global Warming Exposes Resources but Arctic Meeting Leaves Some Out in the Cold
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets
IMF Reforms
China Showing Leadership America Must Follow
China-US Cooperation: The Way to Recovery
Global Cooperation Ahead of COP 15
Businesses Must Cooperate for Climate Change Solutions

G20 Disagreements and Global Economic Reforms

There are a number of disagreements between G20 member nations. Although the passage of a US financial reform bill was an important step for the recovering world economy, diverging national assessments threaten a coordinated global strategy.

The UN would like to see the developed world assume a greater share of its responsibilities for the green economy. Americans and Europeans disagree on whether to maintain or withdraw stimulus. The US warns against choking off nascent growth, while European countries are imposing austerity measures to manage rising levels of debt.

Canada disagrees with key European nations on taxing banks. Canada has argued against taxing banks to guard against future financial crises, while Britain, France and Germany want to see a tax on the banking sector.

China's recent announcement of renewed flexibility in its currency, the yuan, will probably succeed in deflecting attention away from new protectionist measures.

There appears to be agreement that the global system is under-capitalized and a there is a broad consensus on the need to invest more capital. Although there is agreement on the broader issue, there is disagreement on implementation time frames. Europe wants to move slowly to give its banks time to adjust, while the U.S. would prefer to see a faster pace.

The G20 has a pivotal role to play, decisions made by economic leaders in Toronto will not only determine the future of the economy, they will decide the future of our environment. While there seems to be agreement on the need for sustainable growth, charting a strategy to get there is proving difficult.

We need international economic reforms that will help maintain stability. We also need a strategy that positions green as the engine that will drive the global economy.
_________________________________

Related Posts
G20 Must Cooperate for a Sustainable Recovery
Competing National Priorities
Major G20 Disagreements
Program and Plans for G8 and G20 Summits in Canada
The G20 and the Green Economy
UN Chief Asks G20 to Focus on a Sustainable Recovery
G20 Security Concerns Force Cancellation of Sustainable Supply Chain Event
G20 and Central Bank Governors Joint Communique
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
G20 Protestors Dilute Green Message
The Tyranny of Protest and Climate Change Pragmatism
Local Business Promotes Green Agenda for G20 in Pittsburgh
G20 and Developing World Disagree on Climate Change
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
Global Warming Exposes Resources but Arctic Meeting Leaves Some Out in the Cold
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets
IMF Reforms

Competing National Priorities

The members of the G8, G20 and other nations all have their own interests, the way these competing interests come together will ultimately determine the strategic direction of the global economy. Here is a simplified summary of the national priorities of eight key players:

Canada: Sustainable global growth, avoiding a bank tax, and the stabilization of government debt particularly in Europe.

The United States: Slow the global removal of fiscal stimulus to protect the recovery.

The European Union: Financial reform regulation, (bank tax and IMF reforms), fiscal sustainability and growth.

China: Ward off protectionism.

Japan: Avoid a bank tax, and free trade.

Russia: Medium-term European fiscal sustainability and preserving the recovery.

Brazil: More rights within the IMF.

India: Greater representation in the IMF and opposition to a bank tax.

Competing national interests will make it difficult to find agreement. The need for economic stewardship demands that our leaders look beyond local and regional interests to forge the basis of a consensus.
____________________________________

Related Posts
G20 Must Cooperate for a Sustainable Recovery
G20 Disagreements and Global Economic Reforms
G20 and Central Bank Governors Joint Communique
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Program and Plans for G8 and G20 Summits in Canada
The G20 and the Green Economy
UN Chief Asks G20 to Focus on a Sustainable Recovery
G20 Security Concerns Force Cancellation of Sustainable Supply Chain Event
G20 Protestors Dilute Green Message
The Tyranny of Protest and Climate Change Pragmatism
Local Business Promotes Green Agenda for G20 in Pittsburgh
G20 and Developing World Disagree on Climate Change
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
Global Warming Exposes Resources but Arctic Meeting Leaves Some Out in the Cold
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets
IMF Reforms

The Road to Copenhagen (COP 15): Implications for Business

As business communities around the world are straining under the weight of this recession, in Bonn, UN Climate Change delegates continue to discuss possible frameworks for emissions reductions.

This is a pivotal year for climate change policy, in December, the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen (COP 15) will convene and if they are successful they will forge a new international climate change treaty that will commit all signatory countries to broad reductions in domestic emissions. Ahead of COP 15, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) meetings are working out the details. See the Timetable for Action on Climate Change.

According to an article written by Ryan Schuchard, manager of environmental research and development at Business for Social Responsibility, this new climate policy will have a direct impact on how businesses operate, including raising the cost of energy, imposing new production process requirements, and changing competitive dynamics.

Understanding the issues associated with the new climate policy has important implications for businesses. Negotiators at the Copenhagen Conference will seek a global treaty for greenhouse (GHG) gas emissions, specifically solutions to the critical problem migrating sources of emissions to the places of least regulation (leakage). And under the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities, all countries will be held "responsible to protect the global climate, but taking into account their different historical contributions and relative capacity to act in requiring commitments."

A global treaty will shape domestic legislation which in turn has major implications for the business community. "[C]reating many layers of price and risk for companies that use, produce, or manage value chains that rely on carbon-intensive energy. Specifically, the treaty is expected to outline regulations and incentives related to not only reducing emissions, but adaptation, technology transfer, finance and international development, a global carbon market, and deforestation."

Although 183 countries have already indicated their willingness to support an updated version of the Kyoto protocol, for the first time the US is expected to participate under the guidance of President Obama.

Perhaps the most significant obstacle to American participation comes from China. American legislators will not ratify cap-and-trade legislation without guarantees that China will participate. "So far, however, China firmly opposes binding commitments, resists the need to act in advance of the U.S., and instead calls on developed countries like the U.S. to provide financial support and a transfer of technologies. Chinese leadership has taken this stance because it believes the country should be as unrestricted in industrializing as the U.S. was under the Industrial Revolution." Further complicating this debate, much of China’s emissions come from manufacturing goods headed to the West.

Business is sure to be affected as climate considerations are being factored into diverse policy arenas. From transportation to agricultural to national security, climate issues are an integral part of our wider economic and social dialogues.

According to an article entitled What Climate Change Policies Mean for Your Business, "policy is part of a general contract between business and society, and social groups may start to hold companies accountable via direct pressure. These actions, according to a recent Harvard paper (PDF), can range from events targeting single companies to strikes and riots deriving from social instability exacerbated by climate change.

The essence of climate policy is putting a price on carbon emissions, which means either regulation by taxes or cap-and-trade. However this also constitutes a regulatory risk as such a system would exposure business to the price of carbon.

Emissions targets can be achieved through direct regulation (a cap-and-trade system or a carbon tax) and various supporting policies. Supporting policies include standards like fuel efficiency. Standards define the requirements for end products and will eventually be applied to the production processes. Technology incentives, include "funding for R&D, the removal of barriers to enter new industries (particularly energy), and financial incentives such as tax credits to encourage companies to generate renewable energy on site."

Market mechanisms can also create positive incentives by taking advantage of the commodity aspect of carbon. The market can "promote activities being done at the lowest-cost locations where investments in activities that reduce carbon emissions are cheaper. With market mechanisms, companies can buy reductions when it is cheaper than “making” them."

The impact of these policies will differ depending on your industry and the country within which you operate. "These types of policies could also influence competitive dynamics. For example, incentives for renewables might lower entry barriers for ICT companies in the energy sector, while feed-in tariffs might enable consumer products companies to develop better cost positions over rivals. Also, with investor groups like the Carbon Disclosure Project demanding more information about companies’ self-appraisals of policy risk, those firms that are willing and able to disclose more have increasingly preferential access to capital."

Carbon taxes could also lead to "reduced availability of carbon-intensive inputs such as steel. Such a tax could also lower demand for products that create higher emissions during their use." Environmental leakage is another big issues, in addition to competition problems.

According to the Peterson Institute and World Resources Institute, the most vulnerable industries are those that have high energy intensity of production, low potential for efficiency improvement, little ability to switch to low-carbon energy sources, and high elasticity of demand. These include, in particular, energy utilities and heavy manufacturing sectors. [While] companies in industries that address adaptation problems, such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, stand to gain." Efficiency and renewable energy will be a lot more valuable especially for energy intensive industries.

In a recent interview, Ryan Schuchard predicted that "as the global market mechanisms form, we would expect probably some measures [border taxes or border tax adjustments]. He goes on to explain, "a border tax would be relevant if a country has a tax itself, as opposed to a cap-and-trade system, in which case, a border permit would be more likely. A border tax would probably be relevant for some of the heavy-emitting industries like aluminum, steel, maybe glass, paper products."

"[I]mports would likely be taxed or could be taxed if they were from a country that didn’t have adequate regulations by the view of the importing country... exports being taxed (by) the market that they would be exporting to. Specifically, you would see the most energy-intense or emissions-intense sectors getting likely caught there, and those would be things like aluminum, cement, steel, paper, glass, chemicals, iron -- these sorts of very intense industries. When countries like the U.S., Canada, China and other large countries have more serious taxes or caps on carbon, they would want to keep out or at least put constraints on imports. It’s both competitive and environmental reasons..."

"[N]o matter how you slice it, there’s increasingly pressure for the use and propagation of lower carbon fuel and energy. So being on the right side of that makes sense and that is true both in terms of the direct price on energy and carbon associated with the energy, as well as indirect effects, like how suppliers might be affected, about products that you’re selling. So in very many ways, indirectly and directly, there is increasingly a premium on using and propagating low carbon energy and fuels."

Despite the negative implications for some high energy intensity businesses, there are tremendous opportunities for low-carbon businesses. Many companies that generate renewable energy can expect to grow exponentially. Climate change legislation will drive efficiency innovation and provide opportunities for companies that can exploit novel technological applications.

Next: The Road To Copenhagen: Part 3, Positioning Your Business (Ahead of Legislation)