Showing posts with label wealthy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wealthy. Show all posts

Climate Change Pushed Off the G8 Agenda in June 2013

The crisis in Syria has pushed climate change off the G8 agenda. Although world leaders at the G8 summit in Lough Erne, Ireland were supposed to address climate change at the June meeting, but this was preempted by events in Syria.

The preceding G8 meeting in April delivered a weak communique on climate change that articulated support for the UNFCCC climate talks and indicated that climate risk would be discussed at the Lough Erne meeting in June. Climate change is one of five priorities for the UK’s G8 presidency.

In March France and Germany indicated that they wanted climate change to be a priority issue at the Lough Erne meetings, but this was rejected. Instead world leaders focused on Syria, transparency and tax reform.

French President Hollande, writing in the Huffington Post last week, said: “It is the responsibility of the international community as a whole to ensure the success of the negotiations. The G8 must do its part and give a strong political impetus to curb carbon emissions.”

“The economic community and world leaders need to understand what the World Bank and the OECD are saying, that dealing with climate change is not an environmental issue. It’s about preparing your economy for the future,” the European climate action commissioner Connie Hedegaard told the BBC.

Friends of the Earth’s executive director Andy Atkins said, "G8 policies are not only failing to tackle major international crises like climate change, world hunger and the trashing of our natural resources; they often make them worse...The world’s richest nations must stop pursuing economic growth at any cost and build economies that allow us all to live sustainably and equitably within the planet’s limited resources,”

To make matters worse Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper used the meeting as an opportunity to push for the expansion of the tar sands through his advocacy in support of Keystone XL pipeline.

The news is not all bad as the focus on ending tax evasion and boosting transparency has important implications for sustainable development. Further, the fact that G8 leaders managed to defy expectations and secure unanimous agreement on Syria, offers a glimmer of hope that they will also be able to build a consensus on climate change this fall.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
The G8 Climate Change Roundtable: Principles, Policy and Participating Companies
G8 Agrees to Cut Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
The G20 and the Transition to a Greener Economy
The G20 and the Green Economy
Greenpeace's G20 Checklist
G20 Disagreements and Global Economics
The G20 and the Developing World Disagree
Tell the G20 to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies Now
G20: Cost of a Global Deal on Climate Chang

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable: Principles, Policy and Participating Companies

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable was formed in January 2005 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Its purpose was to address the global climate change issue facing governments, business and civil society. The first meeting was held in Gleneagles, Scotland, from 6–8 July 2005, to coincide with the 31st G8 summit.

The roundtable was established by twenty-three leading international businesses with the assistance of G8 President and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair, to co-operatively engage in a global plan of action. The aim of the group was to ensure that a long-term policy framework was set up to enable consistent and transparent market-based solutions in mitigating climate change, while also addressing issues linked to climate change; such as economic growth, poverty, and adequate energy supplies. Carbon trading is one of the most popular pricing mechanisms used to the reduce greenhouse emissions worldwide.

The group devised a Framework for Action which called for technology incentive programs, the establishment of common metrics, for example in energy efficiency, and the expansion of emissions trading schemes.

Some of the companies participating include Ford, British Airways, HSBC, EdF and BP.Now, the Climate Change Roundtable has a membership of 150 businesses spread across the globe.

Environmentalists raised concerns that the body's statement does not call for targets or include timetables. Friends of the Earth noted that the roundtable represented a major shift by the business community towards efforts to mitigate climate change.

Key Principles

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable stated 5 key points to be addressed:
  • Companies must recognize their responsibility in addressing climate change. 
  • The issue of climate change requires further international attention and support. 
  • Market forces must be considered in the crafting of a solution, consumer support is needed to solve the problem. 
  • Specific policies for the mitigation of climate change. 
  • Specific policies which should be adopted by G8 members. 
Key Principles for Business 

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable developed 5 key principles for businesses to consider when crafting a climate change mitigation strategy. These principles are:
  • Strategies should be based on scientific and economic facts. 
  • Businesses should adopt market based policy frameworks which are transparent and offer consistent price signals in the long-term.
  • Solutions should be adopted globally in order to achieve long term success. 
  • Climate change solutions should be considered separately from other global challenges, such as ensuring access to energy, expanding availability of clean water, alleviating poverty, and achieving economic growth in emerging markets.
  • Businesses should seek a system wide solution, identifying opportunities for CO2 mitigation throughout the supply chain. 
Key Principles for Governments 

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable developed 3 key principles for governments to consider when addressing climate change. These principles are:

  • Focus their resources on measuring the effects of climate change on human, economic and environmental health.
  • Increase their understanding of current and future changes taking place within the global environment. (e.g. sea level rise, sea/ice cover). 
  • Quickly and effectively adopt climate stabilization policies with the goal of mitigating future environmental harm. 
Policy Framework 

The G8 Climate Change Roundtable aimed to create a long-term policy framework which was both transparent and consistent. Through market based solutions such as carbon trading, the Roundtable established a policy framework which now encompasses 150 businesses across the globe.

By creating long term value, these members established a market based framework extending to 2030 and indicative signals extending to 2050. This policy framework they hoped would take on a global scale, with consistent policies throughout the various states. The framework was meant to not only mitigate climate change but also promote sustainable development by addressing issues of poverty, energy and economic growth in emerging markets.

The Roundtable recommended encouraging technological innovation through performance based incentives. By quickly commercializing low carbon technologies they aimed to mitigate climate change quickly. They noted that by ensuring that climate change mitigation goals aligned with societal goals, governments would be able to optimize greenhouse gas reductions. By ensuring that emerging markets, such as China, India, Brazil, South African and Mexico, invest in low carbon economic growth, new technologies can be applied globally while streamlining emerging markets. New investments should align with societal goals, creating partnerships between G8 nations as well as emerging nations. Through such a partnership, members can effectively collaborate on specific projects within countries or rapid dissemination of specific technologies.

Members of the new policy framework should establish common metrics. By streamlining greenhouse emissions reporting processes and systems, countries can achieve this goal. Business and G8 governments should use supply chain drivers and the power of procurement to integrate climate change solutions into their global supply chain requirements. By committing to the use of the Roundtable’s policy framework throughout the supply chain, optimal greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved.

Participating Companies

ABB, Fred Kindle, CEO

Alcan, Travis Engen, President and CEO

BP, John Browne, Group Chief Executive

British Airways, Martin Broughton, Chairman

BT, Ben Verwaayen, CEO

Cinergy, James E. Rogers, Chairman, President & CEO

Cisco Systems, Robert Lloyd, President, Operations, Europe, Middle East, Africa

Deloitte, John Connolly, CEO, UK and Global Managing Director, Deloitte, Touche Tohmatsu
Deutsche Bank, Tessen von Heydebreck, Member of the Board of Managing Directors
E.ON, Burckhard Bergmann, Member Executive Board of E.ON, CEO of E.ON Ruhrgas
EADS, François Auque, Head of Space Division

EdF, Pierre Gadonneix, Chairman and CEO
Eskom, Reuel J. Khoza, Non-Executive Chairman

Ford, William Clay Ford, Chairman and CEO

HP, Mark Hurd, President and CEO
 HSBC, Sir John Bond, Group Chairman

Petrobras, Jose Eduardo de Barros Dutra, President and CEO

RAO UESR, Anatoly B. Chubais, CEO

Rio Tinto, Paul Skinner, Chairman

Siemens, Klaus Kleinfeld, President and CEO

Swiss Re, Jacques Aigrain, Deputy CEO

Toyota, Katsuhiro Nakagawa, Vice Chairman

Vattenfall, Lars G. Josefsson, President and CEO

Volkswagen, Bernd Pischetsrieder, Chairman of the Board of Management

Source: Wikipedia

Related Posts
Climate Change Pushed Off the G8 Agenda in June 2013
G8 Agrees to Cut Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
G8's More Aggressive GHG Targets
G20 Lays the Foundation for a Better World
The G20 and the Transition to a Greener Economy
The G20 and the Green Economy
Greenpeace's G20 Checklist
G20 Disagreements and Global Economics
The G20 and the Developing World Disagree
Tell the G20 to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies Now
G20: Cost of a Global Deal on Climate Chang

Yvo de Boer's Comments and Predictions Post COP 17

Ex U.N. climate chief Yvo de Boer had some very positive things to say about last year's climate talks. As we are getting into the final stretch of COP 18 it is interesting to look back on COP 17 in Durban. On January 6, 2012, Environmental Leader published an article detailing de Boer's views.

The former executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change said that Durban sent a strong message to business that the world’s governments are serious about tackling climate change. He said that the Durban climate talks indicate that it is time for businesses to start preparing for a low-carbon economy. He also said that market-based mechanisms such as carbon trading will continue and he further expected that there will be clear reporting guidelines on GHG emissions.

At the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit (COP 15) de Boer was one of the driving forces behind the voluntary commitments made by member states to cut emissions by 2020. At COP 17 in Durban negotiators agreed a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, to run from 2013 through 2017, and bound themselves to agree in 2015 to a deal to force them to cut emissions by 2020. Durban also saw agreement on the broad strokes of a green climate fund, which is set to channel $100bn a year from rich to poor countries by 2020.

De Boer indicated that Durban resulted in an agreement to develop a common system for measuring, reporting and verifying emissions cuts, which was a key to progress on GHG reduction, and also key to private sector investment.

De Boer applauded voluntary commitments and suggested that a legally binding agreement may be forthcoming.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
COP 18: The History of Carbon and Respective Responsibilities
COP 18: WBCSD on Establishing a Global Carbon Market
Figueres on COP 18: We Need Domestic Legislation
COP 18 Drivers of Deforestation (Video)
Doha progress update by Christiana Figueres on 30 November 2012 (Video)
Christiana Figueres on the Objectives of COP 18 (Video)
COP 18: Major Issues, Flooding in the UK, What We Have Achieved on Climate Change and the US Position (Video)

COP 18: WBCSD on Establishing a Global Carbon Market

Recently the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) resurfaced work that it undertook back at the start of the Long-term Cooperative Action (LCA). The discussion on LCA includes a broad range of issues including the Green Climate Fund (GCF), the Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMA), the New Market Mechanism (NMM) and more recently, the Framework for Various Approaches (FVA).

The WBCSD has published a paper entitled “Establishing a Global Carbon Market,” it looks at how the substance of the Kyoto Protocol carbon market can be applied much more broadly to an evolving world of various approaches.

As reviewed in the paper, a refined single track approach will bring much needed focus back to the discussions which then paves the way for at least some hope that the 2015 goal for a new agreement can be met.

According to the paper, the big asks for COP 18 are:

1. Agreeing to a continuation of the Kyoto Protocol through to 2020 and then politely ushering this Grand Dame of the UNFCCC off the stage with some reverence and applause.

2. Bringing closure to the LCA work programme and shifting some key components (e.g. GCF, TEC) into the formulation of the ADP.

3. Establishing a clear work programme for the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP). The ultimate goal of the ADP track is a new global climate deal by 2015 which will take effect in 2020. One of the primary efforts involves the establishment of a carbon market infrastructure.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Yvo de Boer's Comments and Predictions Post COP 17
COP 18: The History of Carbon and Respective Responsibilities
Figueres on COP 18: We Need Domestic Legislation
COP 18 Drivers of Deforestation (Video)
Doha progress update by Christiana Figueres on 30 November 2012 (Video)
Christiana Figueres on the Objectives of COP 18 (Video)
COP 18: Major Issues, Flooding in the UK, What We Have Achieved on Climate Change and the US Position (Video)
US Climate Change Policy: Hurricane Sandy, Drought and Rising Sea Levels (Video)

COP 18: The History of Carbon and Respective Responsibilities

There are massive disparities between the developed and developing world that compound the issue of emissions reduction at COP 18 and beyond. Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution CO2 has increased about 41 percent. Research from climate scientists indicates that we need to act now to reduce emissions. The temperature of the planet has already increased about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1850 and our current trajectory will warm the planet well beyond safe upper limits. However, if we are to make progress on global emissions reductions we will need to address the respective responsibilities of the developed and developing world.

Emissions are falling slowly in many developed nations including the US, but this is partly due to the state of the economy and the transfer of some manufacturing to developing countries.

While emissions may be falling in some developed countries, emissions from coal fired plants in developing nations like China and India are growing dramatically.

“If we’re going to run the world on coal, we’re in deep trouble,” said Gregg H. Marland, a scientist at Appalachian State University who has tracked emissions for decades.

Despite global agreement that emissions must be reduced, according to a recent study entitled The Challenge to Keep Global Warming Below 2° C, emissions have increased 3 percent in 2011 and are expected to increase and additional 2.6 percent in 2012.

Throughout the course of their industrial development, wealthy countries have emitted vast quantities of GHGs, as a consequence, they have a historical responsibility for climate change. Countries that have undergone fossil fuel dependent development are also in a better economic position to contribute to climate solutions.

Current positions from many wealthy countries including the US make little or no allowance for their historical responsibilities.

The question yet to be answered at COP 18 in Doha is: What responsibilities do different countries hold in carbon reduction, and how can we implement climate solutions fairly?

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Yvo de Boer's Comments and Predictions Post COP 17
COP 18: WBCSD on Establishing a Global Carbon Market
Figueres on COP 18: We Need Domestic Legislation
COP 18 Drivers of Deforestation (Video)
Doha progress update by Christiana Figueres on 30 November 2012 (Video)
Christiana Figueres on the Objectives of COP 18 (Video)
COP 18: Major Issues, Flooding in the UK, What We Have Achieved on Climate Change and the US Position (Video)
US Climate Change Policy: Hurricane Sandy, Drought and Rising Sea Levels (Video)

Figueres on COP 18: We Need Domestic Legislation

Before we get an international consensus on a binding treaty under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change we will need to see domestic legislation. Almost 200 Nations have convened for COP 18, but on its own these efforts are inadequate. Those assembled in Doha, Qatar will not deliver the immediate results we need. The modest agenda this year means that no new emissions targets will be set and little progress is expected on a protocol that is supposed to be concluded in 2015 and take effect in 2020. The rate at which emissions are growing means we cannot wait for 2020. A number of studies indicate that are nearing tipping points from which we will not be able to recover.

Christiana Figueres, the executive secretary of the climate convention, said the global negotiations were necessary, but were not sufficient. According to her to move forward nations will need to work on passing legislation in their home countries before we can make progress on an international binding agreement.

“We won’t get an international agreement until enough domestic legislation and action are in place to begin to have an effect,” Figueres said in an interview. “Governments have to find ways in which action on the ground can be accelerated and taken to a higher level, because that is absolutely needed.”

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles


Related Articles
Yvo de Boer's Comments and Predictions Post COP 17
COP 18: The History of Carbon and Respective Responsibilities
COP 18: WBCSD on Establishing a Global Carbon Market
COP 18 Drivers of Deforestation (Video)
Doha progress update by Christiana Figueres on 30 November 2012 (Video)
Christiana Figueres on the Objectives of COP 18 (Video)
COP 18: Major Issues, Flooding in the UK, What We Have Achieved on Climate Change and the US Position (Video)
US Climate Change Policy: Hurricane Sandy, Drought and Rising Sea Levels (Video)Global Carbon Project: Immediate Action Required to Stay Within Acceptable Upper Temperature Limits
Scientist Warn Time is Running Out to Avert a Climate Catastrophe
World Banks Warning: We Need to Act Now on Climate Change (Video)
World Bank Climate Change Warning
World Bank Report Warns of A 4°C World
World Resources Institute Warning About New Coal Plants
PricewaterhouseCoopers Climate Change Warning
International Renewable Energy Institute Climate Warning
Warning from the International Energy Agency: The World's Ongoing Reliance on Fossil Fuels Crushes Hopes of Averting Climate Change
World Meteorological Organization Climate Warning
UNEP Warning: We are on The Brink of a Climate Catastrophe
Comprehensive Review of the Science on Anthropogenic Climate Change
10 Charts on Climate Change
September 2012 was the Warmest in Recorded History (NOAA)
Strong Body of Evidence for a Changing Climate
American Meteorological Society Corroborates Anthropogenic Climate Change
More Scientific Support for Anthropogenic Climate Change
Science and Pernicious Ignorance of Climate Change Denial
The Fifth Global Environmental Outlook Report
A New Study Indicates We Are Reaching a Tipping Points
Environmental Tipping Points
Climate Change Science
Top Four Climate Studies of 2011
State of the Climate Global Analysis Nov 2011
Interactive Map Reveals Warmer Spring 2012
2012 is but the Latest Year Marked by Heat and Drought
Heat in the US Northeast and Drought Around the World IN 2012
Temperature Data: 1880 - 2011 (Video)
New NASA Video Graphically Illustrates that the Earth is Warming
Popular Media is Distorting the Facts about Climate
State of the Climate Global Analysis Nov 2011
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and other GHGs
Video: Why People are Confused about the Scientific Veracity of Climate Change
Bill McKibben: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math
The Effects of Global Warming