Showing posts with label greenhouse gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greenhouse gas. Show all posts

Carbon Capture and Storage is Essential Post Paris

Interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) has intensified in the wake of the Paris Climate Agreement. CCS refers to a suite of technologies that pull CO2 from a smokestack before it escapes into the air. It is then sequestered in some fashion, most commonly by burying it deep underground. CCS is a much needed technology, if for no other reason than the fact that fossil fuels are likely to be with us for years to come.

There have been a number of notable achievements in the area of CCS in recent years. According to Victor Der, executive advisor and acting general manager – the Americas, Global CCS Institute:

"Up to 28 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions will be captured by existing operational carbon capture and storage projects this year."

There are now 22 CCS projects that are either operating or under construction in 2016 representing a 100 percent increase in the last ten years and 14 more projects are in the advanced planning stages.

Ion Engineering completed a pilot project using its proprietary technology in 2015. According to the company, Ion's CCS process was able to capture more than 99 percent of the CO2 from a coal fired facility.

Another older carbon capture project in Port Arthur, Texas succeeded in capturing more than one million tons of CO2. This process was able to capture more than 90 percent of the CO2 from two commercial-scale stream methane reformers.

One of the early CCS projects was one by the Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC). In 2011 they started a three year trial to pump more than one million tonnes of CO2 underground.

The Department of Energy has invested and continue to invest significant sums of money into CCS. According to Environmental Leader, so far, DOE projects have stored almost seven and a half metric tons of CO2.

Shell’s Quest carbon capture and storage project is already operating at commercial scale in Alberta, Canada. The Quest project is designed to capture one third of the emissions generated by the refinement of oil sands amounting to one million tons per year.

Recently, the world’s first steel plant with large-scale CCS launched in Abu Dhabi. The project is a joint venture between Masdar and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), and it will sequester 800,000 metric tons of CO2 annually.

In 2016 Aker Solutions announced a carbon capture project at a waste-to-energy plant in Norway which the company expects will capture 90 percent of the CO2 emitted.

CCS is an integral part of mitigation planning. Countries like the United States, Europe and Canada are counting on CCS to enable them to meet their INDC pledges. The European Commission's 2030 climate and energy policy framework depends on CCS and Canadian reports indicated that CCS is essential. .Although the US Environmental Protection Agency has also offered some guidance on the subject,  it has yet to be demonstrated cost effectively.

A CO2 Solutions project at Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Québec came in a cost of $28/metric ton, the lowest demonstrated cost in the industry. However, the real-world reality at present puts the cost of CCS on a coal plant at around $100/ton.

While no one denies that carbon capture is technologically possible, the major obstacle has always been cost. This view is eloquently rendered in a 2016 article by Mike Barnard titled, "Carbon Capture Is Expensive Because of Physics"

"Carbon capture and sequestration is expensive because it has three components, each with its own expensive challenges: capture, distribution, and sequestration."

In March 2015 the Global CCS Institute said:

"The next 18-24 months will see CCS deployed across a range of industries and storage types. A further two large-scale CCS power projects are in construction in the US - the Kemper County Energy Facility in Mississippi and the Petra Nova Carbon Capture Project in Texas. Both projects are expected to be operational in 2016. Also in the US, the Illinois Industrial CCS project slated for launch later this year will capture CO2 from the Archer Daniels Midland corn-to-ethanol plant in Decatur, Illinois for storage in an onshore deep saline formation."

As explained in a December, 2015 report titled Closing the Gap on Climate: Why CCS is a Vital Part of the Solution, governments need to enact supportive policies.

This report indicates that CSS is essential to keep us within the 2 degrees Celsius upper threshold limit. Governments need to pass laws, support regulations and provide incentives to help advance CCS. Governments will likely provide incentives for sequestration in the form of tax credits on a per-ton basis.

We currently have 22 CCS facilities but we will need thousands around the world to make a difference.

Related
Ambient Air Carbon Capture (Video)
Innovations that Sequester Carbon and Combat the Climate Crisis (Videos)
The Failure of Clean Coal
The Farce of Canada's Carbon Capture
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands

Carbon Air Capture and Storage (Videos)

We need technologies that draw carbon dioxide from the air and either re-use or store it. While we must curtail our carbon emissions we must also find ways to reduce existing levels of atmospheric carbon. Climate change is caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, especially carbon. Prior to the dawn of the industrial revolution atmospheric carbon levels were below 300 ppm, they are currently above 400 ppm and climbing.
In 2009 Columbia University Physicist Peter Eisenberger claimed to have invented a machine that could clean carbon from the air. As explained in MIT Technology Review, his company called Global Thermostat uses chemicals called amines rather than sodium hydroxide.

"Negative emissions are definitely needed to restore the atmosphere given that we’re going to far exceed any safe limit for CO2, if there is one," says Daniel Schrag, director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment.

Reducing the emissions that we produce is essential but we need to think about a post-sustainability world. Our current INDC pledges are inadequate as they will not reduce emissions enough to keep up from breaching the 2 Celsius upper threshold limit. We must begin thinking about technologies that will enable us to actively remove carbon from the air.

Carbon Engineering is working on the industrial-scale capture of CO2 from ambient air. This video explains the technology and the rationale behind direct capture of CO2 from the atmosphere and what Carbon Engineering is doing to commercialize air capture.


Below you will find a Carbon Talk, by Dr. Richard Adamson, President of Carbon Management Canada Research Institutes. This video explores the need and the state of  industrial-scale air capture technology development.

Dr. Naoko Ellis, Professor of Chemical Engineering at UBC, introduced the audience to some of the innovative technologies currently under development, including different methods for carbon capture from the air such as amine scrubbers, sorbents, and metal-organic frameworks. She also discussed engineering new forms of hydrocarbon combustion that do not release CO2 and the need to commodify CO2. Following the presentation, discussion during the dialogue touched on the role of technology in creating climate solutions and how carbon pricing can drive economic innovation.

Panelists: -- Richard Adamson, President, CMC Research Institutes -- Naoko Ellis, Professor, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of British Columbia


Related
Innovations that Sequester Carbon and Combat the Climate Crisis (Videos)
The Failure of Clean Coal
The Farce of Canada's Carbon Capture
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands

US Proposals to Cut Methane and Other Pollutants

As an extension of his Climate Action Plan President Obama through the EPA has announced a series of proposals that will reduce methane and other harmful emissions. While there are there are already some voluntary programs to reduce methane emissions, the EPA has proposed new regulations that will significantly reduce methane in the oil and gas sector as well as in landfills.

In June of this year the EPA announced that it was preparing plans to limit methane. On August 18, 2015, the EPA publishes more details of the new rules. The standards are intended for the oil and gas sector. They are designed to reduce methane, VOCs and other toxic air pollutants. Under the proposed regulations the oil and gas industry would have to cut methane emission by 40 to 45 percent from 2012 levels by 2025.

The new standards would reduce methane emissions by between 340,000 and 400,000 short tons. This is equivalent to reducing 7.7 to 9 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. According to EPA estimates the net climate benefits will be worth between $120 and $150 million. In addition to methane the new rule will eliminate as much as 180,000 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

To achieve these goals the new EPA rules require the oil and gas industry to find and repair leaks, capture gas leaking from fracking wells, as well as limit emissions from pumps and other equipment. Several studies have shown that due to leakages, natural gas has a higher emissions profile than coal.

The new standards also address airborne toxins, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. Under the plan as much as 2,500 tons of these toxic emissions will be eliminated.

On August 14, 2015 the EPA issued two other proposals that are intended to reduce methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills which are the third largest source of anthropogenic methane. As part of the proposals landfills would have to reduce methane emissions by almost one third. 

Landfills generate around 18 percent of methane emissions which is the equivalent to 100 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution.

The proposed rules are expected to reduce methane emissions by an estimated 487,000 tons a year which is equivalent to reducing 12.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.

The EPA estimates the climate benefits of the combined proposals at nearly $750 million in 2025 or nearly $14 for every dollar spent to comply. Combined costs of the proposed rules are estimated at $55 million in 2025.

Related
EPA Announces Plans to Regulate Methane
Video - Methane is a Potent Greenhouse Gas
Video - Methane is the Ticking Time Bomb Beneath the Ice
Radiative Forcing: Carbon Dioxide and Methane
Natural Gas (Methane) is Not Clean Energy
A Primer on Greenhouse Gases
Video - Massive Costs Associated with Arctic Methane
Video - Unlocking Methane in the Permafrost is a Global Warming Time Bomb
The Dramatic Implications of Melting Arctic Sea Ice
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Video - Arctic Warming: Risks for Methane Emissions

Innovations that Sequester Carbon to Combat Climate Change (Videos)

There have been a wide assortment of innovative solutions proposed to combat the climate crisis. While most of these technologies offer low carbon alternatives to existing technologies, others actually remove greenhouse gases (GHGs) like carbon right out of the air.

Some innovations use renewable energy to power traditional technologies like air conditioning and water desalination. Others use structures in novel ways like rotating power-generating buildings and skyscrapers.

Microsoft founder turned philanthropist Bill Gates advocates creative renewable technologies like solar chemical power, in which sunlight converts water into hydrogen fuel. Gates is also a fan of high-altitude wind power, which uses the intense energy of jet stream 20,000 feet above the ground. Another novel approach involves generating electricity with orbiting solar arrays. While these approaches are feasible they are still years away.

We need technologies that can be implemented in the short term. Some agricultural innovations are already a reality like vertical farming. Other innovations are adaptations to a warmer world where we can expect much higher sea levels. This includes things like floating houses and even floating cities.

There can be no doubt that the best way to reduce the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere involves not putting them there in the first place. However, the next best approach seeks out ways of siphoning GHGs directly from the air.

Carbon sequestration is a problem because even if it can be done cost effectively, where to put all the of the CO2 once it’s been captured. Some suggest that we can recycle carbon instead of mining fossil fuels.

One possibly groundbreaking approach was created by a Canadian company called Carbon Engineering. They have created a wall that can suck carbon dioxide straight out of the air and convert it into fuel. As shown in the video below, air flows through the row of fans. They are connected to a carbon dioxide-rich solution, which absorbs carbon compounds out of the air. The solution is purified, with the carbon dioxide within it extracted, and then purified again for reuse.



There are a number of other innovative inventions that remove carbon from the air including tiny silicon capsules that employ bicarbonate (baking soda) to dissolve CO2. This process is called encapsulated liquid sorbents.



Scientists at the University of Southern California, have used a cheap and easy to synthesize polymer called polyethylenimine (PEI) to filter carbon from smokestacks or right out of the air. The polymer coated with a substance called fumed silica can be packed into columns, which can be inserted into flues and chimneys in factories and power plants. Carbon is collected and when it becomes saturated, the PEI device is replaced. When the PEI device is heated above 100 degrees Celsius, it releases the carbon. This is easy way to collect and concentrate carbon dioxide so that it can be reused as fuel.

Graphene is another material capable of sequestering carbon that may indeed prove to be a game changer. Although these technological innovations may prove invaluable, we should realize that forests are by far the most powerful source of carbon sequestration currently existing on earth. Oceans also sequester carbon, although this causes acidification which has a destructive and costly impact on marine ecosystems.  New research reveals that deserts also sequester carbon. 

Related
The Failure of Clean Coal
The Farce of Canada's Carbon Capture
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands

Seminar - Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK

The seminar, Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK is subtitled "policy priorities, collaboration and long-term confidence." It will take place on Tuesday July 7th, 2015 at the Royal Aeronautical Society, No. 4 Hamilton Place, London, UK. This CDP certified event features Peter Emery, Director, Capture Power and Production Director, Drax Group; Bill Spence, Business Opportunity Manager, Peterhead Project, Shell and Amy Clemitshaw, Deputy Director, Fossil Fuel Generation and Carbon Capture and Storage Policy, Department of Energy and Climate Change.

This seminar will provide a timely opportunity to assess progress and next steps of the Government's Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Commercialisation Programme as the UK seeks to move into Phase 2 of rollout.

Delegates will consider priority challenges for deploying CCS technology at a commercial level, including development of CCS in large industrial sectors, technology and engineering issues, and requirements for supply chain and transportation infrastructure.

Additional areas for discussion include investment priorities and the level of Government support in light of the £2.5 million funding to develop North Sea CO2 storage. There will also be assessment of EU support for projects including the future of the new "NER 400" innovation fund, announced in the 2030 framework for climate and energy policies, which will succeed the NER 300 programme to provide funding for the development of innovative low-carbon technologies and environmentally safe CCS demonstration projects.

Further sessions will evaluate international CCS development and collaboration, as well as the future of this technology in the context of agreement of EU climate targets to reduce emissions by 40% by 2030, and as a wider international climate deal is sought.

We are delighted that Amy Clemitshaw, Deputy Director, Fossil Fuel Generation and Carbon Capture and Storage Policy, Department of Energy and Climate Change; Peter Emery, Director, Capture Power and Production Director, Drax Group; Bill Spence, Business Opportunity Manager, Peterhead Project, Shell; Professor Stuart Haszeldine, Director, SCCS and Professor of Carbon Capture and Storage, Edinburgh University; Ed Heartney, Counsellor, Environment, Science, Technology and Health, Embassy of the United States, London and Luke Warren, Chief Executive, Carbon Capture and Storage Association have agreed to deliver keynote addresses at this seminar.

John Baker, Site Senior Technologist, Lotte Chemical UK and Spokesperson, Teesside Collective; Professor Jon Gibbins, Director, UK CCS Research Centre; Andrew Green, Programme Manager, Carbon Capture & Storage, Energy Technologies Institute; William Hazell, Principal Consultant - Impact Assessment and Planning, ERM Alan James, Managing Director, Pale Blue Dot; Alex Kazaglis, Senior Analyst, Power Sector, Committee on Climate Change; Harsh Pershad, Lead Technologist - Energy (Generation and Supply), Innovate UK; Dr Adina Popa, Sector Leader, Carbon Capture and Storage, Mott MacDonald; Paul Sullivan, CCS Business Lead, National Grid and Peter Whitton, Managing Director, Progressive Energy have also agreed to speak.

Matthew Billson, Programme Director, Energy 2050, University of Sheffield and former Head of Strategy, Communications and International, Office of Carbon Capture and Storage, Department of Energy and Climate Change and Lord Redesdale, CEO, Energy Managers Association have kindly agreed to chair this seminar.

To register click here.

Related
The Failure of Clean Coal
The Farce of Canada's Carbon Capture
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands

The Failure of Clean Coal

Despite billions of dollars in investments it would appear that clean coal is an expensive pipe-dream that is not delivering results. Clean coal technology has been plagued with cost overruns and it has been shown to be far less effective at sequestering carbon than its supporters had promised. Independent assessments also suggest that it is proving to be a financial boondoggle.

The Canadian province of Saskatchewan has the first full sized coal fired plant that captures and stores emissions. This heavily subsidized clean coal project, is known as the Boundary Dam Power Station which is run by the province's utility monopoly SaskPower. The one and a half billion dollar price tag of the plant was shouldered by Canadian tax payers and SaskPower customers.

Carbon sequestration is ostensibly intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, one of the greatest ironies associated with the project is the fact that it is being used to produce more climate change causing fossil fuels. The captured carbon dioxide is compressed into liquid form and transported through a pipeline to Cenovus Energy's Weyburn oil field where it is used to boost oil production.

The sulfur dioxide captured in the process is turned into sulfuric acid and sold for industrial use and fly ash is also captured and sold for industrial use. Even if we tally up the sale of energy, liquid carbon, sulfuric acid and fly ash, the numbers do not justify the expense.

A financial analysis of the plant’s operations indicate that it operates at a substantial loss. The project has exceeded initial cost forecasts (initial estimates were $1.2 billion but its actual costs is $1.47 billion). Over the 30-year life of the plant it is expected to net out at a $1,042 million loss. Subtract that $391 million profit from the boiler from the $1,042 million loss from the CCS facility and you get a $651 million net financial loss for SaskPower customers.

Perhaps even more troubling is the fact that the amount of carbon sequestered is far lower than the amount promised. While SaskPower says the plant will capture 30-million tonnes of CO2 (90 percent of its carbon emissions) during its lifetime they overestimate the plants abilities by almost one third or 10 million tonnes. However, more than 10 percent of that ( 3.3-million tonnes) will be lost in the capture process. An additional 28 percent (9-million tonnes) will be lost during processing of the CO2/crude mix recovered from the Weyburn oil field. The net carbon savings will be only 17.7 million tonnes. This translates to a cost of $100 per tonne of sequestered carbon.

As pointed out in the assessment a similar investment in renewable energy like wind power makes much more financial sense. 

Even industry insiders like Enbridge have already withdrawn from the farce of carbon capture. The technology is not viable but it is being kept alive by politicians and business interests who are hell bent on finding devious ways of extending the life of the coal industry.

Related
The Farce of Canada's Carbon Capture
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands

Video - The Most Important Carbon Numbers on Earth are 530, 840 and 310


This video shows a very simplistic way of understanding that we can only add so much more carbon to our atmosphere before we reach catastrophic temperature increases. While most are familiar with levels of atmospheric carbon this is not the most important number. The most important carbon numbers relate to the amount of carbon we have added to date, the total amount that we can add to avoid runaway climate change and the difference between the two which is our carbon budget.

310

Simply put, we cannot afford to add more than 310 gigatons of carbon emissions into the atmosphere if we are to keep global temperature below the internationally agreed upon upper temperature limit of two degrees Celsius.

530 and 840

We have already emitted 530 of carbon, and according to the IPCC's latest report we can only add a total of 840 gigatons of carbons to stay with the 2 degree C limit. This leaves us with a carbon budget of 310 gigatons.

Related Articles
US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

White Paper - The Logistics, Carbon and Business Data Book

The Logistics, Carbon and Business Data Book: Fall 2013 Sustainability Trends provides sustainability executives, decision-makers, and research teams a collection of charts presenting logistics, sustainability and sustainable business-driven data. The goal of this 31 page white paper is to gather together the essential information and metrics about sustainable business for corporate teams.

Environmental Leader assembles the data and research in this summary report for executives and corporate sustainability teams to utilize in their planning and decision making. A collection of 19 charts covering the important metrics in the specific areas of Sustainable Strategy, Green Fleets, Sustainable Energy, and Energy & Carbon Management.

Click here to register to download the White Paper.

Related Articles
The Green (Low Carbon) Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling & China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

US CO2 Emissions at a 19 Year Low Due to Less Coal and Warmer Winters

Due in large part to reduced coal use and warmer winters, the US is producing less carbon emissions than they have in almost two decades. The combination of warmer winters, significantly less electricity from coal, and reduced gasoline consumption reduced carbon emissions to their lowest level in almost two decades.

According to a report titled "U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2012" release on October 21, 2013 by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), US carbon dioxide emissions generated from energy consumption and production fell 3.8 percent in 2012 to 5,290 million metric tons, reaching their lowest level since 1994. The annual energy-related emissions in the US were 5,498 million metric tons in 2011. Although the US economy grew by 2.8 percent in 2012, energy intensity (Btu per dollar of GDP) fell by 5.1 percent.

A total of 50 percent of the emissions decline were attributable to reductions in the residential sector. This is in large part due to a reduction in heating due to a warmer than usual first quarter. By the end of March 2013, the EIA report indicates that the cumulative heating degree days were about 19 percent below the 10-year normal and 22 percent below 2011.

The EIA report found that emissions are at their lowest level since 1994 and over 12 percent below the recent 2007 peak. After 1990, only the recession year of 2009 saw a larger percentage emissions decrease than 2012.

Overall there appears to be a clear trend towards reductions in energy-related emissions. In five of the past seven years energy related emissions have and dropped despite a small population increase of 0.7 percent increase in population in 2012.

Another EIA report published in May states that CO2 emissions from energy between 2000 and 2010 declined in 32 states and rose in 18. While Texas had the greatest absolute decline (58.8 million metric tons) representing an 8.3 percent reduction in emissions, the state still led the US in CO2 emissions from energy with 663 million metric tons in 2010. Almost 50 percent of the emissions from Texas emissions are attributable to fossil fuels.

It is noteworthy that while reducing energy generated by coal was predictably a key factor,  warmer winters have also played a significant role in helping to decrease CO2 emissions in the US. This may suggest that there is a tiny upside to global warming in an otherwise perilous trend towards a world ravaged by climate change.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

World Bank President on the Cost of Carbon

In an interview for the Climate Reality Project's Cost of Carbon event on October 22, World Bank President Jim Yong Kim explained the Bank's increasing focus on sustainability. Dr. Jim Yong Kim is the 12th president of the World Bank Group, he is also a champion of efforts to combat climate change.

When asked why is the World Bank is so involved in the climate crisis, Dr Kim responded that while he thought he was well informed about the latest science, when he assumed his position at the Bank he was shocked to discover just how perilous our current trajectory is.

He framed his response in terms of his sons and the terrible impact it will have on them. He envisioned them asking him why he did not do more to avert the impending climate catastrophe.

He then asked the question, "are we doing everything we possibly could be doing?" His answer was that while the Bank is doing a great deal, so much more could be done to address the climate crisis.

He went on to talk about solutions, proposing two large scale solutions and three areas we can focus on in the interim.

Large scale solutions

1. Price carbon
2. Remove subsidies for fossil fuels

He stated that these two large scale solutions are central facets of a dual strategy to solve the climate crisis but conceded that they are politically difficult. He said that the US, China and the EU must agree on establishing a price on carbon and removing fossil fuel subsidies. In the meantime we must work on energy, urbanization and agriculture.

Three areas of focus

1. Energy: Encouraging sustainable and renewable energy sources
2. Urbanization: Smarter, greener cities
3. Agriculture: Climate smart agriculture

He went on to explain the need for long term financing for such things as renewable energy to ensure greater access to sustainable energy

In terms of the World Bank itself he believes that it is important to "set clear targets and holding ourselves accountable."

Al Gore who was also present during the interview said to Dr Kim, "your leadership is a breath of fresh air." Gore asked, what are the prospects for getting world leaders up to speed and embracing a global view? Dr. Kim replied that he is optimistic. In his meetings with the Chinese and the Europeans he sees a sense of urgency and according to Kim, President Obama sees combating climate change as a legacy issue.

He concluded by talking about how the widespread adoption of cell phones is a good model for the dissemination of renewable energy. He also said that there are great job opportunities associated with carbon pricing, removing fossil fuel subsidies, renewables, smarter cities and better agricultural practices.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

Courses - Carbon Professional Path (CPP)

Carbon Professional Path (CPP) will take place on Tuesday Oct 22 to Wednesday Oct 23, 2013, Toronto, Ontario. The Carbon Professional Path is a groundbreaking program that will prepare you in obtaining a CSA Greenhouse Gas Inventory Qualifier; a globally recognized certification. The certification demonstrates your competence to quantify, assess and report GHG emissions and HRCarbon is the only global provider of a pre-CSA GHG Inventory Quantifier exam program. This learning event is organized by HR Carbon.

This two day course will provide the following two sustainability courses:
• Corporate Carbon Management
• CSA Examination Review

The CSA certification will provide the recipient with the backing of an international organization, prove their legitimacy as a carbon professional and give recipients a major competitive advantage in the emerging climate change sector.

The HR Carbon team has over 25 years experience in corporate carbon strategies within North America, Europe and Africa. While based in Toronto, Canada we have offices in the U.S. and U.K. and work with local and global partners (for profit, not-for-profit, academic and government agencies).

For more information about HR Carbon and on other upcoming events click here.

For more information on CPP click here.



Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

Training Program - Carbon Professional Path (Fast Track)

Carbon Professional Path (Fast Track) will take place on Nov. 19, and Nov. 20, 2013, in Toronto, Ontario. This 2-Day ‘Carbon Professional Path – Fast Track’ program leading to CSA Groups globally recognized, professional GHG Inventory Quantifier Certification that demonstrates competence to develop, quantify, assess and report GHG Inventories.

HRCarbon’s Carbon Professional Path to CSA GHG Inventory Quantifier Certification Fast-Track Program includes the following two courses:
1. Corporate Carbon Management
2. CSA Examination Review

Course Price is $995.00 CAD + HST. Early Bird Discount Deadline is October 21, 2013

For more information click here.

Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

Training Program - Carbon Professional Path

Carbon Professional Path, will take place on Monday September 23 to Friday September 27, 2013 in Dubai, UAE. This program provides comprehensive training in corporate climate-risk and carbon management. This unique program has been developed on the fundamental principle that all functions and processes need to integrate the new carbon math. The Carbon Professional Path equips professionals from different functional backgrounds with the necessary language and skills enabling them to apply the carbon knowledge within their respective vocations. The program also prepares participants to take the CSA GHG Inventory Quantifier Certification exam – a globally recognized credential from an ISO 17024 organization.

For more information click here

Related Articles
The Dangerous Trajectory of CO2 Growth Since the 1880's
C02 Concentrations are the Highest in 3 Million Years
The Safe Upper Limit of Atmospheric Carbon is 350 PPM
Arctic Monitoring Stations Report High Levels of CO2
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
Primer on CO2 and Other GHGs
The Green Economy is the Right Solution for our Troubled Times
Action on Climate Change
The Effects of Global Warming

Video - Unlocking Methane in the Permafrost is a Global Warming Time Bomb



Methane has been locked in the permafrost of the far north for thousands of years, but it is being released because of the thaw associated with global warming. The permafrost has been thawing rapidly over the last three decades and if this trend continues the consequences could be catastrophic. Referred to as a methane pulse, vast amounts of this destructive GHG could be released into the atmosphere. This will profoundly exacerbate global warming and may push us pass irreversible tipping points.

Methane is one of the worst greenhouse gases because it stays in the atmosphere more than 20 times longer than carbon dioxide. More methane equals more warming and the release of even more methane.

For more information see NBC's series called "Changing Planet" which explores the impact that climate change is having on our planet. Information in this series is provided by the National Science Foundation.

Related Articles
Video - Methane is the Ticking Time Bomb Beneath the Ice
Radiative Forcing: Carbon Dioxide and Methane
A Primer on Greenhouse Gases
Video - Massive Costs Associated with Arctic Methane
The Race to Exploit the Arctic's Resources Ignores the Costs
More Evidence that Arctic Warming is an Economic and Ecological Time Bomb
Why the Fate of the Arctic Should be of Concern to Us All
The Dramatic Implications of Melting Arctic Sea Ice
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane
Video - Arctic Warming: Risks for Methane Emissions
Environmental Tipping Points
Bill McKibben: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math

Infographic - How Much Water Does Fracking Consume

Infographic - How Much Water Does Fracking Consume

Fracking: A Tragic Waste of Water Resources

The natural gas mining method known as hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" is another major source of water usage and a serious source of contamination. The EPA estimates one well in a coal bed can require anywhere from 200,000 litres to more than 1 million litres while a horizontal well in a shale formation can use between 7.5 million to 19 million litres of water.

The EPA estimates anywhere from 15 to 80 per cent of water is recovered. There are several ways of disposing of the water used in the process. It can be stored underground in impermeable injection wells that prevent it from leaking into the environment or in steel tanks or pits; recycled for use in another fracturing well; or treated and discharged back into the water supply. Because of its high salt content, the waste water is often also bought by municipalities for use in de-icing and dust suppression on roads.

Although the fluid used in fracking is mostly water, some acids, emulsifiers and other chemicals are added to make the water more viscous and effective at fracturing the rock. These include guar gum, boron, zirconium, titanium, iron and polyacrylamide.

Aside from such additives, the process of fracking also releases naturally occurring salts, metals, radioactive elements like barium and strontium and carcinogens like benzene.

Water use: the process uses large amounts of fresh or potable water. Waste disposal: space is needed to store the waste water safely; sometimes, this involves clearing trees or disrupting habitats. The waste water must be treated at facilities that critics say are not always equipped to remove the contaminants particular to hydro-fracking. Contamination: the fear is that the chemicals used and released during fracking contaminate drinking- and groundwater — either during the process itself or through the waste water that is recycled and used afterward. The substances released along with the natural gas can continuing leaking from the well for decades after the extraction process.

In addition to deleterious water impacts, fracking also causes air pollution and adds greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, even before the natural gas is burned in combustion engines. Some of the methane gas being extracted during fracking escapes or is vented at the well head during the process and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, some people living near fracking wells have complained of noxious fumes that they say cause headaches, nausea and other symptoms and that they attribute to some of the substances released during fracking, such as benzene and toluene. The New York Times reported that parts of Texas where hydro-fracking is common have seen higher rates of asthma although these could not be directly attributed to the industry as the areas had high air pollution generally.

In 2011, researchers at Cornell University concluded that shale gas extraction through fracking causes enough emissions to give it a bigger greenhouse gas footprint than conventional gas or oil.

Related Articles
Natural Gas is Not Clean Energy
Whats the Fracking Problem?
World Water Day 2013: International Year of Water Cooperation
Solutions to the World Water Crisis Requires International Cooperation
Solutions to Diminishing Ground Water
Reducing Water Use in the United States
Water Efficiency: Stopping the Flow from Leaky Pipes
How Much Water is there on Earth
Water as a Weapon of War
Alarming Facts About Water
Population Growth and Climate Change will Add to the World Water Crisis