Test - fight

Showing posts with label fight. Show all posts

Protests are a Necessary and Appropriate Response to the Trump Administration

February 07, 2017 1 Comment Edit

Donald Trump has augured protest unlike any that have gone before it. The level size and scope of these protests are unprecedented. They started while Trump was on the campaign trail and persist to this day. We have seen a massive protest on Inauguration Day January 20th and the Women's March that took place on January 21.

The electoral victory has spawned an unprecedented movement. Protest is important and never more than in the dark times heralded by Trump's win in November. The reasons to protest are numerous and include the numerous swipes Trump and Republicans have taken on climate action and environmental protections.

Republicans emboldened by Trump's win have already started to gut environmental protections and transparency. Trump's Executive Order (EO) to enfeeble the EPA was followed by the GOP's efforts to kill the agency outright. Republicans also want to sell-off public lands and strip enforcement powers from federal agencies. Trump has used his executive authority to reanimate two fossil fuel pipelines. These pipelines are both massive carbon bombs and they are incompatible with efforts to keep temperatures within acceptable limits. Following Trump's EO the last remaining Dakota Access pipeline protest camp was raided and burned to the ground.

This is a very dark time in American history, however, there may be a light at the end of the tunnel if Americans take note and realize that their democracy is at risk alongside their planet.

Another salient reason for protesting is Trump's slate of nominees including Rex Tillerson as the Secretary of State and Scott Pruitt at the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Betsy Devos as the Education Secretary nominee. Other reasons why people are protesting include the Muslim ban which has been condemned roundly and leading businesses are challenging in the courts.

President Obama has also indicated that he supports the right of protesters to resist the policies of the Trump administration. Obama, in his first public statement since leaving the White House, said he was "heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country...Citizens exercising their Constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by the elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake," he said.

So much has been accomplished through protest. In the US protest succeeded in helping to kill the Keystone XL pipeline and the Dakota Access pipeline (although both of these decisions have been reversed by Trump's Executive Order).

Perhaps the most heartening and relevant global protests for those opposing Trump took place in Romania. Recent protests in that country caused the Romanian government to back down from an emergency decree that decriminalized some forms of corruption. The people said no and they turned out for five consecutive days by the hundreds of thousands forcing the government to back down. As they said in Romania, "we have an obligation and a duty to resist."

Protests against Trump are truly global. Avaaz has put together a "global letter" to Trump signed by people all around the world. The letter concludes with the following words: "As citizens of the world, we stand united against your brand of division."

Opposition to Trump is not only coming from environmentalists and leftists, even the Episcopal Church has urged its members to protest. The Church Times reports that dozens of Episcopalian Bishops urged Episcopalians to protest Trump.

There is also more shadowy opposition from groups like Anonymous who have warned Trump to resign by February 28th citing his lies and support for the Dakota Access pipeline. They mention his "unprecedented attack on basic human decency and civil rights" and they go on to say, "We will protest, resist and continue to practice civil disobedience until we can clearly state that this regime is at an end. You have exactly 35 days or we will take to the streets in a day of resistance...We are a nation founded on revolution and we will continue that tradition until our government is once again stable and incompetent hands.

If Trump and his administration does not resign (and of course we all know they will not) Anonymous is calling for another day of mass protest on March 1, where Trump and his administration can "expect us all."

While there have been and will be a number of protests, perhaps the biggest will take place on April 29th. Organized by the People's Climate Movement, this march is arguably the most important protest in American history. On this day a broad coalition will come together to say "no" to the Trump administration's environment and climate assaults.

The Green Market Oracle has studied the cost of climate and environmental neglect and we will remain focused on protest as a powerful form of resistance to the authoritarian dystopia of the Trump administration.

People resist Trump for love of country, respect for people and the Constitution. We all need clean air and water, this should be a fundamental human right and yet these are among the things that are at risk. We protest in defense of our planet and future generations, we stand up so that we will be counted as those who said "no" to Trump's dark policy agenda.

How will you resist?

The Importance and the Power of Protest: Why We Must Stand Up to Trump

January 31, 2017 Add Comment Edit

The need for protests challenging the Trump administration's destructive actions and their deceptive narrative have become even more glaringly apparent in the wake of the tragic murder of peaceful Muslims in a Quebec city mosque. Look at the face of terrorism, note the pale skin and the light blue eyes. The man who committed this barbaric crime was not an ISIS sympathizer he supported Donald Trump and other racist nationalistic movements. This man is what is called in French "pure laine" literally meaning pure wool, referring to those whose ancestry is exclusively French-Canadian. As reported by The Independent, the killer's Facebook page indicates that he is a supporter of nationalistic movements including Donald Trump in the US, Le Pen in France, and the separatist Parti Quebecois.

The Quebec City massacre killed six Muslims and wounded many others who were attending a mosque for evening prayers. The criminal whose name should be forgotten is a 27-year-old resident of Quebec. He has been charged with six counts of first-degree murder and five counts of attempted murder with a restricted weapon.

"I wrote him off as a xenophobe. I didn't even think of him as totally racist, but he was enthralled by a borderline racist nationalist movement," Vincent Boissoneault, a fellow Laval University student, told The Globe and Mail newspaper.

Perpetrators of hate crimes

Trump has inspired hateful acts of violence before he was elected. Here are some of the hate crimes committed at Trump rallies during the election campaign and violence inspired by Trump before the election. After his electoral victory, there was another uptick in violent hate crimes. This is the demagogue who now leads the free world.

In the alternate universe promulgated by Trump and his people, the homeland must be protected from outsiders. That may be the narrative that some white people want to hear, but the truth is that the real terror threat is not from Muslim refugees seeking to escape the horrors of war, these refugees have committed zero acts of terrorism and they actually have a lower incidence of criminality than Americans born in the country.

According to Global Research, in both the US and Europe the overwhelming majority of mass shootings were perpetrated by non-Muslims. According to Charles Kurzman, Professor of Sociology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Muslim terrorism accounts for less than 1 percent of the 180,000 murders in the US since 9/11.

Some of the deadliest terrorist attacks in the US were perpetrated by white people. In 1995 Timothy James McVeigh killed 168 people and injured over 600 in Oklahoma. In 2015 Dylann Roof killed 9 black people in a South Carolina church.

Trump's revisionism

In yet another example of twisted logic, the Trump administration used this attack to support their xenophobic policies including the Muslim ban which has been condemned by world leaders. As they often do, DT co-opts real world events that challenge his legitimacy and revises the facts so that they support his narrative.

"We condemn this attack in the strongest possible terms. It’s a terrible reminder of why we must remain vigilant, and why the president is taking steps to be proactive, rather than reactive, when it comes to our nation’s safety and security," press secretary Sean Spicer said at his daily briefing on Monday.

The fact remains that Bissonnette is a Trump supporter who shares Trump's disdain for Muslims.

Control of the narrative

We cannot sit idly by and let the White House control the narrative. We must challenge their lies. Throughout his campaign, Trump lied repeatedly and even after being elected president he resorted to fake news with regard to Russia and he has attacked CNN dismissing the facts they report. We must oppose fake news and the darkness of Trump's post-factual narrative.

Trump recently called the New York Times, the gold standard of fact-based reporting, "fake news" in a Twitter post. Donald Trump and his chief strategy advisor, a racist by the name of Steve Bannon are the real purveyors of fake news. What makes the situation even more troubling is that their deceitful narrative is now coming directly from the White House.

Power of protest

Now more than ever we need to acknowledge the importance and the power of protest. We must not forget that Trump lost the popular vote by an unprecedented three million people. There were massive protests against DT after he was elected. This continued on inauguration day and was followed by the Women's March on January 21. It is important to note that the Women's March had a far bigger turnout than Trump's Inauguration in Washington, D.C., a day earlier.

There are many who feel disheartened and beaten by the election of DT. However, we need to reflect upon what protest has accomplished. Consider what was accomplished through civil rights protests and the protest against the Vietnam war.

More recently climate protests have helped to augur change on the world stage. The People's Climate March in September 2014 helped to create momentum that ultimately culminated in the historic Paris Climate Agreement. Almost half a million people and more than 1,500 organizations took to the streets in New York City to demand climate action as world leaders convened at the United Nations headquarters. There were 2646 rallies in 162 countries. The event generated more than 5000 articles and over 630,000 social media posts.

The September 21st Climate March was the largest climate oriented march in history. There were a number of ground-breaking environmental protests that preceded it. In 2013 we were seeing signs of growing environmental activism and the beginnings of the new environmental movement. By the end of 2014 the people-powered environmental movement had come of age. In 2016 we saw how protest helped to kill the Dakota Access Pipeline. Previously, years of protest against the Keystone XL helped to create the support President Obama needed to cancel it.

Activists are also responding to DT's crimes against the environment and assaults on climate. This includes his revival of the KXL and DAPL pipelines, his war against the EPA (including naming a climate denier by the name of Scott Pruitt to head the agency), the nomination of Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson as the Secretary of State.

Recently, Greenpeace activists hung a massive, 70-by-35-foot banner reading "RESIST" from a crane only blocks from the White House Wednesday. Trump's Muslim ban has spawned ongoing protests in the US and around the world.

Trump's wall rhetoric spawned massive protests in Mexico and when Trump visits the UK this summer he will be greeted by what is being described as "the biggest protest ever" (tentatively scheduled for July 1).

This administration's is a kakistocracy and their unprecedented deceit warrants protest. There has never been a better reason to make our voices heard.

Another People's Climate March is scheduled to take place on April 29th, 2017. It will be a global opportunity to protest Trump's war against science, climate and the environment. This protest will take place in Washington, D.C., in cities nationwide and around the world.

The US and China Working Together on Climate Change

June 16, 2014 Add Comment Edit

The US and China have well earned reputations as the global leaders in greenhouse gas emissions so the fact that the two nations are working together to combat climate change is very significant. Together their combined emissions account for around 40 percent of the world’s greenhouse gases. However, the leaders of both nations are making prodigious strides in efforts to reduce their footprints.

In addition to its global leadership in utility scale renewable energy projects, China has a stated goal of installing 8 gigawatts of distributed solar generation in 2014. The Chinese government has also set stringent restrictions on diesel emissions with the aim of eliminating trucks that produce significant amounts of things like nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide. Perhaps the most significant action taken by China involves its pledge to cut carbon pollution.

The Chinese pledge came exactly one day after President Obama announced that he was significantly reducing emissions from US power plants. This is but the latest initiative under the President's Climate Action Plan. Under this plan the Obama is addressing air pollution, increasing renewable energy and setting the stage for a global agreement on climate change.

Like the US, China's efforts are not limited to restricting CO2. The nation is passing environmental laws designed to combat air pollution including HFCs. They are also moving away from coal as well as doing more to protect their water resources.

The US-China Climate Change Working Group launched in Beijing last year is working together to develop plans to deal with the UN climate change negotiation that takes place in Paris next year.

As explained by the US Secretary of State, "we have hopes that this unique partnership between China and the United States can help set an example for global leadership and global seriousness," Kerry said. "But this is not just about china and the United States. It’s about every country on Earth doing whatever it can to pursue cleaner and healthier energy sources. And it’s about the all of us literally treating the pain in the foot, so the whole body hurts a little less."

These two nations working together to reduce emissions is a very significant development. This is the first time both the US and China have restricted CO2 emissions. The efforts of the world's two leading economic powers may help to inject new life into efforts to sign a global climate treaty in Paris next year.

Related Articles (US)
The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions
Obama Increases Federal Renewable Energy Adding to His Climate Action Plan
Obama Signs a Climate Change Resilience Executive Order
Environmental Action in a New Agreement Between the US and Nordic Countries
The Obama Administration's Climate Action (Spring - Summer 2013)
Combat Climate Change: 3 Ways to Support President Obama
Reaction to President Obama's Historic Georgetown University Speech
Infographic - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Full Transcript of President Obama's June 25th Georgetown University Address on his Climate Action Plan
President Obama Climate Action Plan (Full Document)
Video - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Obama's Speech Signals the End of the Debate on Climate Change and the Dawn of Consorted Action
Thank President Obama for his Bold Leadership on Climate Change
Obama Reigning in Emissions from Existing Coal Power Plants, Transportation and Homes
President Obama Set to Unveil a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
Video - White House Announces President Unveiling of a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
President Obama's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
President Obama's Clean Energy Trust Fund
Green Excerpts of President Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address
President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address: "We Will Respond to the Threat of Climate Change"
Green Inauguration of President Obama: "Faith in America's Future"
Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
Taking Stock of President Obama's Environmental Efforts in His First Term

Related Articles (China)
China's New Year: Pollution and Drought Underscore the Contradiction of Pollution and Mitigation
Chinese Smog Crisis is Driving the Transition to a Greener Economy
2013 Low Carbon Competitiveness Index: US Falling and China Rising
Asian Policies for the Low Carbon Economy and Renewable Energy
Innovation in the Low Carbon Energy Economy
China's Economic Growth and Low Carbon Leadership
Working Paper - China’s Overseas Investments in the Wind and Solar Industries: Trends and Drivers
Smog Pollution Mutes Chinese New Year Celebrations
Outlook for Chinese Solar in 2012
China is Leading in Renewable Energy
China's Most Recent Five Year Plan is Greener than Ever
China Leading the Green Economy (Video)
China Powers Ahead in Green Technologies
China's Green Laws for Business
Green Investment Opportunities in China
China's Green Investments and Growing Economic Preeminence
China Wants a Global Climate Change Treaty
Green Asia: China
The Greening of China's Cities, Counties and Towns
China More Receptive to EVs than the US
China Poised to Challenge Global Green Auto Market
China-US Green Cooperation
China can School the US About Green Growth
China's Green Innovation and the Challenge for America
China's Green Stimulus, US/China

The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions

June 13, 2014 Add Comment Edit

The new rules curbing power plant emissions in the U.S. will have far reaching impacts both domestically and around the world. Curbing emissions from power plants is part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan which he announced in 2013. Last September, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released proposed standards to curb U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) from new power plants. On June 2nd of this year, the EPA announced it will restrict emissions including carbon, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide by more than 25 percent by 2030 from all power plants. The EPA guidelines also include plans to prepare the U.S. for the effects of climate change, including strengthening roads, bridges and shorelines.

To circumvent the obstinacy of Republicans, the President is using his executive authority and putting forward the new rules under the Clean Air Act. The historic announcement will reduce carbon pollution from power plants by almost one third (30 percent) from 2005 levels by 2030. Even more significantly, they may spur global action that enables us to secure a binding climate treaty in 2015.

President Obama has previously pledged to reduce U.S. GHG emissions by 17 percent by 2020 compared with 2005 levels. America is already a third of the way towards meeting the national average of a 30 percent reduction in emissions. Some states, especially those in the north-east have already cut their power plant emissions by 40 percent compared with 2005 and over 1,000 mayors have signed agreements to cut their cities’ emissions.

The new power plant emissions standards are significant because energy generation is the single largest source of GHGs, accounting for nearly 40 percent of the emissions that cause climate change.

Two camps

A number of environmental organizations including the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council lauded the proposal as a “historic step to combat climate change.” Republicans and business groups including the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Chamber of Commerce are vociferously resisting the new rules saying they will undermine U.S. competitiveness, hurt the economy and cause an energy crisis. Ceres and their green investor network heralded the announcement as “a critical step” to dealing with climate change. A 120-day public comment period will allow both camps to offer their views before the final rules are released in 2015. We can expect a fierce battle over the issue during this year’s mid-term elections.

Coal power

Coal power is going to be substantially curtailed under the new rules. Even before the new rules were announced about one third of coal plants online in 2009 have closed or are slated to close. The closure of coal plants is significant because coal-fired electricity generation is the most carbon intensive energy source in the U.S. and as such, it is responsible for the lion’s share of the nation’s GHG emissions. Coal is responsible for 40 percent of American power generation and 74 percent of the country’s CO2 emissions from the electricity sector. The new rules will impact the nation’s 1,300+ coal-fired power plants and many of these plants are unlikely to be able to meet the new standards.

Flexibility

The new rules have incorporated a good deal of flexibility so that each state can develop a unique plan based on their differing energy mixes. In addition to cleaner forms of energy, states can also choose to focus on energy-efficiency schemes as a way of meeting EPA standards. States have until 2016 (or 2017 if they need more time) to come up with a strategy for meeting the targets. The new rules will come into force in all states in 2020. If states do not submit a compliant plan, EPA will make one for them.

Legal

There are two legal facets that have a bearing on the new rules for power plants in the U.S. The first is the Supreme Court’s ruling that the EPA is obligated to regulate carbon under the Clean Air Act. The second involves the fact that these new rules are flexible and pay heed to both technical feasibility and economic impacts. This will make it more likely that the rules will survive inevitable legal challenges.

Renewable energy and emissions trading

These new rules will drive rapid growth of renewables and clean energy jobs. In addition to supporting the growth of renewable energy, the new rules will also help to grow emissions trading programs, under which renewable energy facilities would receive credits, which could be sold to coal plants. States can set up their own emissions-trading programs, or participate in existing programs. Nearly a dozen states have already implemented their own market-based programs to reduce carbon pollution. Emissions trading will help to prevent energy shortages which could occur if all coal plants were forced to close at once.

Innovation

The new rules will also spur green innovation. A few illustrations were provided in a recent analysis by Lux Research. This report suggests the rules will contribute to improvements in the efficiency of natural gas powered turbines, demand for commercial and utility scale solar power, energy efficiency programs, as well as carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for surviving coal plants.

Health and economic benefits

As explained by EPA chief Gina McCarthy, this move will not cause energy prices to skyrocket, in fact it will save vast sums of money from medical bills associated with pollution. Coal-fired electricity generates airborne toxins like mercury, which causes neurological problems, and sulfur, which contributes to respiratory ailments. It has been repeatedly demonstrated that curbing pollution will reduce medical problems and premature deaths.

While all Americans will benefit from the new rules, the most vulnerable communities stand to benefit the most from the new rules. This includes people of color, the elderly, and those in low income communities. The plan will help to reduce asthma among black and Latino youth who are twice as likely to be hospitalized for this condition and four times as likely to die than their white peers.

“In just the first year that these standards go into effect, up to 100,000 asthma attacks and 2,100 heart attacks will be avoided — and those numbers will go up from there,” President Obama said. Overall, the economic value of these savings far outweigh the tiny increases in costs.

Global impact

The new rules will enhance the U.S. bargaining position at international climate talks and pressure other nations to get onboard. The standards give the U.S. government the credibility it requires to lead international efforts to combat climate change. It may even provide the impetus to encourage other countries to sign a globally binding climate treaty by the end of 2015.

As described by Andrew Steer, the chief executive of the World Resources Institute, the new rules are a “momentous development” for America’s efforts to deal with climate change.

“These new standards send a powerful message around the world that it’s time to face the global threat of climate change,” Steer said.

There is reason to believe that the new rules may already be having an impact. Just one day after the new rules were released, China, the world’s biggest greenhouse gas emitter, announced that it’s considering a cap on carbon emissions.

Impediments to progress

The fact that Republicans control the House of Representatives means the President cannot promise to do anything requiring congressional action. Further, international treaties require ratification by two-thirds of the Senate and that is highly unlikely. However, we may be able to see an international agreement that does not require Senate ratification.

Beyond domestic political resistance, two of the biggest hurdles to a global climate deal may come from Australia and Canada, both of whom are racing to cash in on their fossil fuel reserves. According to a report in the Morning Herald, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott is in the process of putting together an alliance of British Commonwealth countries to reject a climate agreement.

Despite the insane lack of foresight from some national governments, the idea of reigning in emissions represents little more than common sense. The absence of emission limits is ecologically untenable and contrary to the short term thinking of some, failing to reign in climate change is ultimately economic suicide. As the EPA tweeted, “When it comes to climate change, the most costly thing to do is to do nothing.”

The new rules signal the end of coal and the beginning of a cleaner future in the U.S. and perhaps even the wider world.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related
Video - The White House's Climate Assessment Explained
The Paradox of President Obama's All of the Above Energy Strategy
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
President Obama's 2014 State of the Union Address: Summary and Green Highlights
The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions
Video - Reason to be Hopeful for 2014: Obama Found the Courage to Act on Climate Change

Video - The White House's Climate Assessment Explained

May 31, 2014 Add Comment Edit

Referencing the White House's Climate Assessment, Dr. John Holdren, President Obama's Science Advisor, says that climate change "is not a distant threat, it is affecting the American people already."

Depending on where you are in the US, summers are longer and hotter, we are seeing more wildfires and allergies as well as heatwaves, extreme precipitation events, storm surges, draught and other impacts on agriculture. To learn more about President Obama's climate action place click here.

Related
The Paradox of President Obama's All of the Above Energy Strategy
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
President Obama's 2014 State of the Union Address: Summary and Green Highlights
The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions
Video - Reason to be Hopeful for 2014: Obama Found the Courage to Act on Climate Change

Obama and Hollande Call for Climate Action

February 11, 2014 Add Comment Edit

The French and American Presidents have called for an ambitious global climate agreement. The French President, Francois Hollande has joined forced with US President Barack Obama to ask the world to increase clean energy, create jobs and help developing countries transition to a low carbon economy.

President Hollande arrived in the US on Monday, the same day that the leaders issued an op-ed that was published in the Washington Post and Le Monde newspapers.

Obama and Hollande are setting their sights on the 2015 deadline for a global climate agreement which is scheduled to be signed at the end of the year in Paris. This is welcome news as the rest of Europe has scaled back its ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets due to ongoing economic woes. In addition to Europe, the US, Japan, Australia and Canada have all reneged on their original climate commitments.

© 2014, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
The Paradox of President Obama's All of the Above Energy Strategy
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
President Obama's 2014 State of the Union Address: Summary and Green Highlights
The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions

Video - Reason to be Hopeful for 2014: Obama Found the Courage to Act on Climate Change
Obama Increases Federal Renewable Energy Adding to His Climate Action Plan
Obama Signs a Climate Change Resilience Executive Order
Environmental Action in a New Agreement Between the US and Nordic Countries
The Obama Administration's Climate Action (Spring - Summer 2013)
Combat Climate Change: 3 Ways to Support President Obama
Reaction to President Obama's Historic Georgetown University Speech
Infographic - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Full Transcript of President Obama's June 25th Georgetown University Address on his Climate Action Plan
President Obama Climate Action Plan (Full Document)
Video - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Obama's Speech Signals the End of the Debate on Climate Change and the Dawn of Consorted Action
Thank President Obama for his Bold Leadership on Climate Change
Obama Reigning in Emissions from Existing Coal Power Plants, Transportation and Homes
President Obama Set to Unveil a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
Video - White House Announces President Unveiling of a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
President Obama's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
President Obama's Clean Energy Trust Fund
Obama Resurrecting Nixon to Advance Environmental Policy
Will Obama's Actions Match his Words?
Green Excerpts of President Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address
President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address: "We Will Respond to the Threat of Climate Change"
Green Inauguration of President Obama: "Faith in America's Future"
Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
Taking Stock of President Obama's Environmental Efforts in His First Term

The Paradox of President Obama's All of the Above Energy Strategy

February 06, 2014 Add Comment Edit

Staying within prescribed climate change limits will be difficult under Obama’s all-of-the-above strategy. Although Obama may be the greenest President in American history he is not doing enough to stave off the worst impacts of climate change. In his State of the Union address, he did talk about the veracity of climate change and the need to further reduce America’s greenhouse gas emissions, however his ongoing support for fossil fuel extraction is dangerous and imperils hopes that we can tackle the issue of climate change before we reach irreversible tipping points.

The President made many laudable points during his address including his desire to increase protections for air, water, land and American communities. He quite correctly explained that, “we have to act with more urgency because a changing climate is already harming western communities struggling with drought and coastal cities dealing with floods.”

The President touted the growth of solar power saying: “[W]e’re becoming a global leader in solar too. Every four minutes another American home or business goes solar, every panel pounded into place by a worker whose job can’t be outsourced.”

The President has repeatedly stated his desire to put an end to tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry and use that money for fuels of the future (ie renewables). A point which he reiterated in his State of the Union address.

The President also touted his efficiency efforts including efficiency standards for new cars. He went on to suggest that he will be imposing new fuel efficiency standards for medium and heavy weight trucks. However, their is an irreconcilable paradox between efficiency and the expansion of fossil fuel.

The President indicated that he wants to “cut red tape” to help businesses build factories that use natural gas. As he explained, “If [natural gas is] extracted safely, it’s the bridge fuel that can power our economy with less of the carbon pollution that causes climate change.”

While natural gas could be made far less destructive if we could eradicate (or substantially reduce) methane leaks associated with extraction, it is easier said than done.

The President made the point that the U.S. has reduced its carbon pollution more than any other nation on Earth over the last 8 years. He further indicated that he wants to set new standards for power plants which would tighten restrictions on CO2 emissions.

All of the above – Obama can’t have it both ways

While efforts to reduce GHGs are beyond reproach, his overall strategy conceals an irreconcilable contradiction. Reducing GHGs is at odds with increasing domestic dirty energy exploitation. The simple fact is he cannot have it both ways.

Despite pleas from the leading U.S. environmental organizations to stop fossil fuel extraction, President Obama’s State of the Union address indicates that he intends to move forward with his “all of the above” energy strategy.

The reliance on natural gas and oil may undermine efforts to stay within prescribed scientific limits. The first limit concerns temperature increases, the second involves greenhouse gas emissions. If we are to keep warming below the internationally agreed upon upper threshold limit of 2°C, we will need to stop pumping greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. It is widely known that the primary contributors of GHGs are fossil fuels.

This is the conclusion reached by numerous studies including the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, which was published late in September 2013. According to the IPCC report, we cannot add more than another 140 gigatons of carbon globally (500 GtCO2).

If we continue to exploit and burn fossil fuels at the current rate, we will considerably exceed these limits. If we burn only 20 percent of estimated available carbon reserves we will have already reached the upper allowable limit of carbon emissions. If the remaining reserves are exploited there will be no way to stop runaway climate change.

We cannot afford to move forward with planned coal projects or the tar sands, nor can we afford President Obama’s “all of the above” energy strategy.

In fairness, President Obama acknowledges the veracity of climate change but he is constrained by the Republicans in congress and the general ignorance of many Americans. We cannot appreciate efforts to engage climate concerns without factoring political considerations. Obama may be advancing domestic fossil fuels for political reasons, not the least of which is the impending midterms. If he loses control of the Senate, his efforts to manage climate change will suffer a serious blow.

A Ceres report titled, “Inaction on Climate Change: The Cost to Taxpayers.” sees political factors as a major part of inaction. “[T]he reason for our collective shortsightedness is that the issue of climate change, and what to do about it, has become politicized in the U.S,” the report said.

Despite his considerable efforts (not the least of which is his climate action plan), the President can be faulted for failing to lead efforts to educate Americans. To create the political support we need to see, Americans need to be apprized of the implications of failing to act. Obama’s State of the Union address focused on education and this could be expanded to include efforts to explain the rationale for action and expose the ignorance of climate denying Republicans who control the House.

More than any other single factor, people respond to economic considerations. The focus on the economy and jobs in the President’s State of the Union speech is a reflection of this understanding. He needs to do a better job informing Americans about the price associated with climate change.

The President can do far more to help Americans apprehend the scope of the costs of failing to stay within the prescribed limits. Failing to heed these limits will result in a massive price tag that will cripple the U.S. (and global) economy and ultimately, irrevocably change life on Earth.

The costs of climate change

Evidence for these costs are not just part of some apocalyptic future, they are with us here and now. According to the the Ceres report, Federal and state disaster relief payouts are estimated to have cost every person in the U.S. more than $300. According to the report, the costs of climate change to taxpayers going forward will get worse and ultimately be “debilitating.” A cogent argument can be made for acting now, as one dollar spent on prevention saves four dollars in damages. From this perspective mitigation efforts are a far better investment than adaptation.

“Continuing to ignore these escalating risks may be more comfortable than confronting the challenges of climate change, but inaction is the far riskier and more expensive path,” the Ceres report concluded.

“[T]he debate is settled. Climate change is a fact. And when our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did,” the President said.

However, “booming” oil and natural gas production is inconsistent with efforts to combat climate change. Reducing emissions while boosting domestic oil and gas production is a contradictory policy position. At a time when we most need the President to lead, we really got nothing new in this state of the Union speech.
The U.S. cannot simultaneously be a leading producer of fossil fuels and at the forefront of efforts to combat climate change. Selling the facts to the American public will not be easy, but it is necessary.

“The the shift to a cleaner energy economy won’t happen overnight, and it will require some tough choices along the way,” the President said. The question is whether he is prepared to make those tough choices.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Articles
The US and China Working Together on Climate Change
President Obama's 2014 State of the Union Address: Summary and Green Highlights
The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions
Video - Reason to be Hopeful for 2014: Obama Found the Courage to Act on Climate Change
Obama Increases Federal Renewable Energy Adding to His Climate Action Plan
Obama Signs a Climate Change Resilience Executive Order
Environmental Action in a New Agreement Between the US and Nordic Countries
The Obama Administration's Climate Action (Spring - Summer 2013)
Combat Climate Change: 3 Ways to Support President Obama
Reaction to President Obama's Historic Georgetown University Speech
Infographic - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Full Transcript of President Obama's June 25th Georgetown University Address on his Climate Action Plan
President Obama Climate Action Plan (Full Document)
Video - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Obama's Speech Signals the End of the Debate on Climate Change and the Dawn of Consorted Action
Thank President Obama for his Bold Leadership on Climate Change
Obama Reigning in Emissions from Existing Coal Power Plants, Transportation and Homes
President Obama Set to Unveil a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
Video - White House Announces President Unveiling of a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
President Obama's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
President Obama's Clean Energy Trust Fund
Obama Resurrecting Nixon to Advance Environmental Policy
Will Obama's Actions Match his Words?
Green Excerpts of President Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address
President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address: "We Will Respond to the Threat of Climate Change"
Green Inauguration of President Obama: "Faith in America's Future"
Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
Taking Stock of President Obama's Environmental Efforts in His First Term

President Obama's 2014 State of the Union Address: Summary and Green Highlights

January 29, 2014 Add Comment Edit

President Obama's 2014 state of the union address did reference carbon pollution and the need for more action on climate change, but environmental concerns did not receive the attention that some had hoped for.

The President's focus was on continuing to grow the nations economy and provide more jobs. He citing the "more than 8 million new jobs our businesses have created over the past four years." Much of his speech addressed the issue of education. He boasted that "America's graduation rate to its highest levels in more than three decades." The President further elaborated his focus on education stating that America needs to focus on building "tomorrows workforce." He talked about innovative private sector funding for pre k, and making it easier for kids to afford college. He also explained that he has directed Vice President Biden to work on new training and apprenticeship programs.

Obama reiterated his belief that connecting people to the Internet is important for America and he explained how he is behind efforts to provide online connectivity to schools.

He talked about alleviating poverty, reducing gender inequality in the workforce, providing opportunities for immigrants and of course health care.

The President mentioned diplomatic efforts in both Iran and Syria and he indicated that he is prepared to continue the ongoing fight against terrorism, including al-Qaida, while taking America off of the permanent war footing it has been on.

He outlined some ambitious investment support plans including MyRA which will guarantee that when people are investing for retirement, they will not lose their capital and he further stated that he will provide protection for homeowners against another housing credit crisis.

Obama said that the US is "better-positioned for the 21st century than any other nation on Earth." He indicated his desire to out-compete other nations in high tech manufacturing and thereby provide jobs. To this end he announced that his administration has launched two hubs for high-tech manufacturing in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Youngstown, Ohio. These hubs connect businesses to research universities that can help America lead the world in advanced technologies.

He articulated his support for small business which account for 98 percent of US exports. He stated that his administration has made more loans to small business than any other American administration. He also indicated that he wants to do more to "help the entrepreneurs and small business owners who create most new jobs in America."

The President also said that he want to undo last year's cuts to basic research and he supports a patent reform bill "that allows our businesses to stay focused on innovation, not costly and needless litigation."

As far as Congress is concerned he suggested that he is willing to work with them where possible but he also intimated that he will act on his own when he has to.

On the environmental front there was some good news, like the fact that America is now building some of the most fuel-efficient cars in the world. However the President also cited some unfortunate facts associated with his "all of the above" energy strategy. This includes the fact that America has significantly increased its oil production. While buying less foreign oil is undeniably a good thing, under Obama the US has become a leading producer of fossil fuels and this is antithetical to efforts to manage climate change.

Here are excerpts of his comments on energy including solar as well as his statements on carbon pollution and climate change.

All of the Above Energy Strategy

"Now, one of the biggest factors in bringing more jobs back is our commitment to American energy. The "all the above" energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working, and today America is closer to energy independence than we have been in decades."

Natural Gas

"One of the reasons why is natural gas. If extracted safely, it's the bridge fuel that can power our economy with less of the carbon pollution that causes climate change. Businesses plan to invest almost a hundred billion dollars in new factories that use natural gas. I'll cut red tape to help states get those factories built and put folks to work, and this Congress can help by putting people to work building fueling stations that shift more cars and trucks from foreign oil to American natural gas."

Clean Environment

"Meanwhile, my administration will keep working with the industry to sustain production and jobs growth while strengthening protection of our air, our water, our communities. And while we're at it, I'll use my authority to protect more of our pristine federal lands for future generations."

Solar

"Now, it's not just oil and natural gas production that's booming; we're becoming a global leader in solar too. Every four minutes another American home or business goes solar, every panel pounded into place by a worker whose job can't be outsourced."

Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Let's continue that progress with a smarter tax policy that stops giving $4 billion a year to fossil fuel industries that don't need it so we can invest more in fuels of the future that do.

Efficiency

"And even as we've increased energy production, we've partnered with businesses, builders and local communities to reduce the energy we consume."

Fuel Efficiency Standards

"When we rescued our automakers, for example, we worked with them to set higher fuel efficiency standards for our cars. In the coming months I'll build on that success by setting new standards for our trucks so we can keep driving down oil imports and what we pay at the pump."

Carbon Pollution and Climate Change

"[O]ur energy policy is creating jobs and leading to a cleaner, safer planet. Over the past eight years the United States has reduced our total carbon pollution more than any other nation on Earth. But we have to act with more urgency because a changing climate is already harming western communities struggling with drought and coastal cities dealing with floods. That's why I directed my administration to work with states, utilities and others to set new standards on the amount of carbon pollution our power plants are allowed to dump into the air. The the shift to a cleaner energy economy won't happen overnight, and it will require some tough choices along the way. But the debate is settled. Climate change is a fact. And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did."

© 2014, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles

US President Barack Obama

The Implications of Curbing US Power Plant Emissions
The Obama Administration's Climate Action (Spring - Summer 2013)
Will Obama's Actions Match his Words?
President Obama's Clean Energy Trust Fund
Obama Resurrecting Nixon to Advance Environmental Policy
Green Excerpts of President Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address
Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address: "We Will Respond to the Threat of Climate Change"
Green Inauguration of President Obama: "Faith in America's Future"
Senate Endorses Obama's Pick for Secretary of State
Obama Says the Number of Keystone XL Jobs are "Negligible"
Obama Refutes the Keystone XL's Economic and Jobs Benefits

Obama's Climate Action Plan

Video - President Obama's Historic Georgetown University Speech on June 25th 2013
Reaction to President Obama's Historic Georgetown University Speech
Infographic - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Full Transcript of President Obama's June 25th Georgetown University Address on his Climate Action Plan
President Obama Climate Action Plan (Full Document)
Video - President Obama's Climate Action Plan
Obama's Speech Signals the End of the Debate on Climate Change and the Dawn of Consorted Action
Obama Reigning in Emissions from Existing Coal Power Plants, Transportation, Homes While Advancing Renewable Energy
President Obama's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
President Obama Set to Unveil a National Climate Change Mitigation Strategy
Video - White House Announces President will be Unveiling a National Climate Change Strategy

Obama's Executive Orders

Obama Increases Federal Renewable Energy Adding to His Climate Action Plan
President Obama's Green Executive Orders
Executive Order 13514: Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance
Executive Order 13626: Accelerating Investment in Industrial Energy Efficiency
Executive Order 13423: Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management
Obama Signs a Climate Change Resilience Executive Order

Climate Change in Africa by Jim Heck

January 14, 2014 Add Comment Edit

Climate change in Africa is Jim Heck's #5 story for 2013. Jim began his career with the United Nations, working in several capacities for UNESCO, the International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In 1976 he and his wife formed Morgan Tours, Inc., which in 1979 became Explorers World Travel (EWT). For the last 15 years, Jim has specialized in East Africa and probably knows more about the Serengeti and other wilderness touring in the area than any man alive. But his career in Africa spans a much wider area:
He has been kidnapped in Nigeria, jailed in Guinea-Bisseau, rescued from the last Rwandan war; was the first westerner allowed to leave Addis after the Red Terror; had canoes overturned among crocs and hippos on the Zambezi; been charged by an elephant that he hit with a plate of waldorf salad; lost in the jungles of Cameroun; marooned in the Ituri Forest and rescued by Rhodesian sanction busters; and was among the few outsiders to travel through Uganda during the time of Idi Amin. Jim has never lost a client or fired a gun.

So without further ado here is "Climate Change in Africa," One of Jim's top stories of 2013.
_________________________________

The incremental warming of earth neither stops great variations in weather or singularly increases what was bad before. Still, African farmers seem a lot less stupid than some American Senators.

One effect of incremental global warming is to make the equatorial regions wetter. The equatorial part of Africa is one of its principle food baskets. But it’s only been in this generation that agriculture has grown in any significant way from just a subsistence industry.

So there are fewer good farming techniques and poorer seeds, less mechanization and irrigation, significantly no crop insurance, and basically a farmer’s harvest is beholding to Mother Nature.

I spoke with several African farmers over the last several years in Kenya and Tanzania who know that planting maize or millet three times a year is ruining their soil, but with the added moisture now available, “subsistence” is trumping “sustainability.”

There’s another reason they do it unabashedly. The common effect of global warming around the earth is to make the extreme moments of weather even more extreme.

So when a drought comes to equatorial Africa, as it normally has done forever, it’s worse. In the past small harvests were common in common droughts. Today everything is lost completely.

One could say that global warming is winning the race against modernizing agricultural in equatorial Africa.

Cyclones and typhoons (“tropical depressions” and “hurricanes” in western hemisphere jargon) have always been very rare in equatorial Africa because the spread between very hot and very humid and very cool and dry required to create these phenomena just doesn’t exist.

Not only have they been on the increase, they’ve crawled right up the Red Sea! That’s almost like Hurricane Sandy winding her way down the St. Lawrence into the Great Lakes!

Last year these kinds of unusual winds and storms in Rwanda, Tanzania, Somali and Ethiopia produced enormous devastation.

Farms are destroyed, towns are washed away, whole communities are dissolved … literally. In Kenya and Tanzania, where tourism is still a very important part of the economy, rains so heavy that they were off the charts quite nearly destroyed Lake Manyara National Park.

Farmers are anxious for solutions, and some may be coming. The most talked about one is called “re-greening” which represents numerous small-scale initiatives for dealing with climate change.

But it’s uncertain any techniques can deal with the speed of things changing. There’s just not much you can do when the entrance to a national park is covered by a mud slide.

Victoria Falls is one of the greatest tourist attractions not just on the continent of Africa, but in the world. It has always cycled from low water to high water, but about the only effect was to create a season that was safe for white water rafting.

Now the low water cycles of the falls are so low that many travel professionals are advising against a trip to the falls from September through December, the normal low water period. And conversely as well, the high water which normally comes in March – May is sometimes to great that the mist is so intense you can’t see anything.

That essentially reduces tourism to the falls by a half year!

And this cycles right back from tourism to agriculture. With such a ridiculous variance in flow from the Zambezi River that produces the falls, there is now a serious battle between the countries in the area that want to dam it to better regulate their own needs.

African politicians rightly see global warming as the real war on earth, far more important than the War on Terror.

First, Africans didn’t cause this but they’re being made not to contribute to it, and this stifles traditional development.

The developed world will not invest in African countries to mine coal, for instance. But coal is abundant throughout Africa. But there’s plenty of investment for extracting oil, which can contribute just as much to global warming as coal, because the developed world still lusts for oil.

Second, extremes in weather increase social conflict.. There’s a good case to be made that the whole problem in Somalia might never have happened if the area’s agriculture hadn’t been decimated by global warming (and if the country’s fisheries hadn’t been exploited by western powers).

Even on a much more local level, the stress caused by frequent droughts followed by frequent floods leads to considerable tensions. Increased Kenyan police action in the area of the country where the desert meets fertile ground has grown exponentially. This year the military was sent in to keep warring factions apart.

I wonder if a science fiction writer in the 18th or 19th centuries looking forward into today would paint what is simply typical news to us as apocalypse.

The world can no longer deny climate change, but Africa is the poor cousin that fears being sacrificed to save the lovely pumpkin farm in the Hamptons.

Source: Africa Answerman

Related Articles
Climate Change Exacerbates Social Tensions and Causes Conflict
Climate Change and Conflict: Excerpts from a 2013 US Intelligence Report
Environmental Regulations Shaping Today's Sustainable Supply Chains
Water as a Weapon of War
15 National Security Officials on the Threat of Climate Change
The DoD's Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap (CCAR)
Africa a Renewable Energy Superpower?
Africa Industrialization Day: Leapfrogging with Sustainable Energy
East Africa Can Learn from Iceland's Geothermal Energy Industry
South Africa and the Rise of Renewable Energy on the Continent
Lesotho's Renewable Energy Projects One of the Largest in Africa
Arab Spring Fueling the World's Most Ambitious Solar Project in North Africa
Arab Spring and the Environment in North Africa