Showing posts with label House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House. Show all posts

Republicans Oppose the PTC but Support Oil Subsidies

It is not surprising that many Republicans who oppose the Production Tax Credit (PTC) for renewable energy, support fossil fuel subsidies. Although the PTC was extended through 2013, some Republicans have vowed to continue their push to kill it. Conservatives are well known for their love of free markets and distrust of government subsidies, unless of course it involves fossil fuels. Some Republicans in Congress have made it clear that they will seek amendments that erode the PTC.

Republicans including the 2012 presidential nominee Mitt Romney, wanted to let the PTC expire. Romney and other Republicans who oppose the PTC say it costs too much and props up businesses with government subsidies.

Romney spokesman Ryan Williams said in an email that Romney "believes the government should stop playing venture capitalist and doling out open-ended subsidies, and instead encourage private sector innovation and market competition.” This is part of the same conservative philosophy that advocates for unbridled free markets and supports deregulation.

In September of 2012, 46 Republicans voted against the PTC while in March 2011, 46 Republicans voted against closing tax loopholes that let Big Oil collect $4 billion in annual subsidies.

Some Republicans, including Iowa Rep. Tom Latham, Sen. Scott Brown, and Gov. Terry Branstad support the tax credits for renewable energy because of the jobs they create. It is estimated that the expiry of the PTC would have resulted in the loss of 10,000 jobs in the wind industry alone.

However there are other powerful members of the GOP that remain opposed to the PTC. Representative James Lankford (R-OK), the chair of the newly formed House Oversight Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements, has made it clear that his Subcommittee is suspicious of the federal government's support for renewables including the PTC.

The wind industry may have received a one-year reprieve, but if some Republicans have their way this extension will be clawed back by subsequent amendments.

Related Videos
A Condensed History of the Production Tax Credit (PTC)
US Government Support for Renewable Energy Projects
The Solar Industry at a Glance: Past Present and Future
Global Wind Energy at a Glance (China, EU, US)
US Wind Energy Doubles and Eclipses Natural Gas in 2012
Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy

Comprehensive Summary of US Green Legislation

It is essential for businesses to keep abreast of the legal imperatives that impinge on their operations. Keeping up with green legislation in the US is no easy task. To help make this effort easier, Greenful has put together a comprehensive summary of environmental legislation from the Clean Air Act (CAA) which was passed in 1967 to Corporate Average Fuel Economy (Cafe) of 2012. Here are 27 links that cover all major green legislation and related amendments:



  • Clean Air Act
  • Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
  • Clean Air Act PM2.5 Update December 2012
  • Clean Water Act
  • Atomic Energy Act
  • Toxic Substances Control Act
  • Endangered Species Act
  • Environmental Justice for Low-Income Populations
  • Protection of Children from Environmental Risks and Safety Risks
  • Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
  • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
  • Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) (Ocean Dumping Act)
  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Nuclear Waste Policy Act
  • Oil Pollution Act
  • Pollution Prevention Act
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Shore Protection Act
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund)
  • Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008
  • Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • Energy Policy Act of 1992
  • Surface Transportation Acts
  • Alternative Motor Fuels Act
  • Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Final Rule 2012

  • Election 2012: Implications for Coal and Natural Gas

    The reelection of President Obama has already sent a message that is impacting the coal industry and it is likely that investors will be more wary of natural gas pending a review. Well ahead of more stringent regulations on the coal industry investors are already seeing the writing on the wall and divesting from this dirty source of energy.

    As reviewed in the Washington Post, coal's stock valuations have been directly impacted by Obama's reelection. On the day after the election, shares of Peabody Energy fell 9.6 percent, Arch Coal plunged 12.5 percent, Consol Energy dropped 6.1 percent, and Alpha Natural Resources sank 12.2 percent.

    Coal plants will be impacted by the EPA's restrictions on soot emissions from utilities which would tighten the annual exposure to fine-particle soot from 15 micrograms per cubic meter of air to between 12 and 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air.

    Within the next few months, the EPA will probably finalize the first carbon standard for new power plants, which will require any new power plant to emit no more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour of electricity produced. Coal plants emit an average of 1,768 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour.

    Although the average natural gas plant in the US emits 800 to 850 pounds of CO2 per megawatt hour, the EPA is also studying the environmental impact of hydrolic fracking, which will likely result in new federal standards.

    © 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Election 2012: A Mandate for Action on Climate Change
    The 2012 Election Saw the Rise of Environmentalists as a Political Force
    Republicans Need a Serious Policy Review
    Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
    President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
    A Vote for Obama is a Vote for Survival
    The State of Government Sustainability Efforts
    What is ESG and Why is it Important
    How Governments can Show Support for Cleantech

    Election 2012: A Mandate for Action on Climate Change

    Although not everyone agrees, some environmentalists see the election of 2012 as an endorsement of action on climate change. As reported in a Guardian article, "activists say that it would be wrong to read the election as a stamp of approval for four more years of business as usual. They argue that voters have sent a clear signal that they want more aggressive action on the environment during the president's second term."

    Environmental Defense Fund President Fred Krupp is amongst those environmentalists who say that the election provides a mandate for aggressive action on climate change. After the election Krupp issued a statement on Wednesday November 7 saying:

    “Exit polls confirm that for millions of American voters, Hurricane Sandy and climate change were decisive factors in this election. As the historic storm just reminded us, we have no time to waste; we must get serious about climate solutions in order to protect our loved ones and communities from terrible impacts -- extreme weather disasters, droughts, heat waves, and other dangerous consequences of global warming. Especially in the wake of Sandy, which demonstrated that doing nothing about climate change is much costlier than taking action, this issue clearly should be a top priority for our leaders in government.”

    The same day Frances Beinecke, the president of the Natural Resources Defense Council echoed these sentiments saying:

    "By rejecting Big Oil's candidates, voters sent a message loud and clear that they want more clean energy, less climate denial and an end to the $4bn in taxpayer subsidies for fossil fuels."

    Predictably, officials from the oil and gas industry have a different interpretation of the results. Despite the decisive defeat of Republican challenger Mitt Romney, they say the election was about the economy. While there is no doubt that the economy is an important issue for Americans, it would be a mistake to interpret the election as an affirmation of business as usual.

    © 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Election 2012: Implications for Coal and Natural Gas
    The 2012 Election Saw the Rise of Environmentalists as a Political Force
    Republicans Need a Serious Policy Review
    Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
    President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
    A Vote for Obama is a Vote for Survival
    The State of Government Sustainability Efforts
    What is ESG and Why is it Important
    How Governments can Show Support for Cleantech

    The 2012 US Election Saw the Rise of Environmentalists as a Political Force

    Environmentalism has been around for decades, but in 2012, despite a highly polarized electorate and a lack of formal discussion on climate change, environmentalists have emerged as a political force to be reckoned with.

    As reviewed in the Washington Post, in the election of 2012, the environmental community played a key role in several stated including "New Mexico, Montana, Texas and other states, winning seven of eight targeted Senate races and at least three targeted House races."

    A lot of money was spent by a number of different groups but even the fossil fuel industry was forced to concede that environmental groups appear to have invested their money wisely.

    “There is evidence that the environmentalists have become a more mature political force,” said Scott H. Segal, who lobbies for utility companies at the firm Bracewell & Giuliani.

    “Environmentalist spending was up considerably this cycle, and they seemed to resist the frequent trap of supporting third-party or crank candidates in ways that would have siphoned off votes from mainstream Democrats,” Segal said.

    Some of the environmental groups that provided funding and volunteers included the League of Conservation Voters (LCV), the Sierra Club, National Wildlife Federation Action Fund, Defenders of Wildlife Action Committee, Environment America and Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund.

    © 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Election 2012: Implications for Coal and Natural Gas
    Election 2012: A Mandate for Action on Climate Change
    Republicans Need a Serious Policy Review
    Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
    President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
    A Vote for Obama is a Vote for Survival
    The State of Government Sustainability Efforts
    What is ESG and Why is it Important
    How Governments can Show Support for Cleantech

    Political "Heroes" and "Villains" on US Air Pollution

    A new analysis from the NRDC Action Fund, released in conjunction with advocacy group Environment America reveals "Who Votes Dirty?" The report, released on September 12, lists members of the US House and Senate as either "clean air heroes" or "dirty air villains" based on their votes on legislation related to air pollution. According to the NRDC's analysis, 99 members of the House and 43 senators were dubbed heroes, while 139 House members and 39 Senators were labeled villains.

    A large number of the Dirty Air Villains, 48 Congressmen and 25 Senators, represent districts in towns and cities the American Lung Association (ALA) have ranked as the 25 most polluted cities in the US.

    The NRDC's determination of a dirty Air villain or hero hinges on 13 clean air votes in the House of Representatives, and four such votes in the Senate. Those who voted against each are labeled Dirty Air Villains, while those who voted against each are labeled as Clean Air Heroes.

    Before going to the polls on Nov. 6, every concerned citizen should get the facts at www.WhoVotesDirty.org.

    Here is the full state by state list of Congressmen and Senators identified by the NRDC:

    Colorado

    Dirty Air Villains: Reps Scott Tipton (R-CO3), Doug Lamborn (R-CO5), Cory Gardner (R-CO4) and Michael Coffman (R-CO6).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senators Mark Udall (D-CO) and Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO1).

    Florida

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Reps. Sandra Adams (R-FL24), Vern Buchanan (R-FL13), Ander Crenshaw (R-FL4), John Mica (R-FL7), Richard Nugent (R-FL5), Bill Posey (R-FL15), David Rivera (R-FL25), Tom Rooney (R-FL16), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL18), Dennis Ross (R-FL12), Steve Southerland (R-FL2), Cliff Stearns (R-FL6), Daniel Webster (R-FL8) and Allen West (R-FL22).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) and Reps. Theodore Deutch (D-FL19), Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL20), and Alcee Hastings (D-FL23).

    Illinois

    Dirty Air Villains: Reps. Peter Roskam (R-IL6), Joe Walsh (R-IL8) and Adam Kinzinger (R-IL11) (each of whose districts overlap with the 18th dirtiest MSA in the US for soot pollution) and Randall Hultgren (R-IL14), Donald Manzullo (R-IL16), Robert Schilling (R-IL17) and John Shimkus (R-IL19).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Reps. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL4), Michael Quigley D-(IL5), Bobby Rush (D-IL1) and Janice Schakowsky (D-IL9).

    Iowa

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Reps. Tom Latham (R-IA4) and Steve King (R-IA5).

    Clean Air Hero: Senator Harkin (D-IA).

    Michigan

    Dirty Air Villains: Reps. Dan Benishek (R-MI1), Bill Huizenga (R-MI2), Justin Amash (R-MI3), Fred Upton (R-MI6), Tim Walberg (R-MI7), Mike Rogers (R-MI8), Candice Miller (R-MI10) and Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI11).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) and Reps. Hansen Clarke (D-MI13), John Conyers (D-MI14), Dale Kildee (MI-5) and Sander Levin (D-MI12).

    Nevada

    Dirty Air Villain: Rep. Joseph Heck (R-NV3).

    Clean Air Hero: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

    New Hampshire

    Dirty Air Villain: Rep. Frank Guinta (NH-1).

    Clean Air Hero: Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH).

    New Mexico

    Dirty Air Villain: Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM2).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senators Tom Udall (D-NM) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), and Rep. Ben Lujan (D-NM3).

    North Carolina

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) and Reps. Renee Ellmers (R-NC2), Virginia Foxx (R-NC5) and Patrick McHenry (R-NC10).

    Clean Air Heroes: Senator Kay Hagan (D-NC) and Reps. Brad Miller (D-NC13), David Price (D-NC4) and Melvin Watt (D-NC12).

    Ohio

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Rob Portman (R-OH), Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH8) and Reps. Steve Chabot (R-OH1) (whose district includes the Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN MSA which ranks 21st in the nation for Ozone pollution and eighth for year-round particulate pollution), Jean Schmidt (R-OH2) (whose district includes the Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN MSA which ranks 21st worst for Ozone pollution and 8th for year-round particulate pollution), Michael Turner (R-OH3), Jim Jordan (R-OH4), Robert Latta (R-OH5), Bill Johnson (R-OH6), Steve Austria (R-OH7), Patrick Tiberi (R-OH12), Steven LaTourette (R-OH14) and Jim Renacci (R-OH16) (both of whose districts overlap part of the Cleveland-Akron, OH MSA which is the nation's 14th most polluted for year round soot), Steve Stivers (R-OH15) and Bob Gibbs (R-OH18.)

    Clean Air Heroes: Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Reps. Betty Sutton (D-OH13) and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH10).

    Pennsylvania

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Patrick Toomey (R-PA) and Reps. Mike Kelly (R-PA3), Glenn Thompson (R-PA5), Patrick Meehan (R-PA7) and Joseph Pitts (R-PA16) (whose districts include the Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD MSA which is ranked 16th worst for ozone pollution and 10th worst for year-round particulate pollution and #22 for Short-term particulate pollution), Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA8), William Shuster (R-PA9), Thomas Marino (R-PA10), Lou Barletta (R-PA11), Charles Dent (R-PA15) and Timothy Murphy (R-PA18)(whose district includes the Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA MSA which is ranked 20th for ozone pollution and 6th for Year-round particulate pollution and #6 for Short-term particulate pollution).

    Clean Air Heroes: Robert Brady (D-PA1), Mike Doyle (D-PA14), Chaka Fattah (D-PA2) and Allyson Schwartz (D-PA13).

    Virginia

    Dirty Air Villains: Reps. Scott Rigell (R-VA2), Randy Forbes (R-VA4), Robert Hurt (R-VA5), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA6), House Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA7) and Morgan Griffith (R-VA9).

    Clean Air Heroes: Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-VA11), James Moran (D-VA8) and Robert Scott (D-VA3).

    Wisconsin

    Dirty Air Villains: Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Reps. Paul Ryan (R-WI1), James Sensenbrenner (R-WI5), Sean Duffy (R-WI7) and Reid Ribble (R-WI8).

    Clean Air Hero: Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI2).

    Related Articles

    Big Oil's Influence on US Politicians
    Climate Change and the Democratic Party Platform at the DNC
    Democrats Against Efforts to Manage Climate Change
    DNC Platform is Less Environmentally Focused than in 2008
    Mitt Romney's Love Affair with Fossil Fuels
    Romney's Coal Fired Campaign Versus Obama's Wind Power
    What Romney's Energy Policy looks Like on the Ground (Video)
    Mitt Romeny: The Legacy He Will Leave for our Children
    Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Climate Change
    Climate Denying Republicans Delay their Convention Due to Extreme Weather GOP VP Candidate Paul Ryan's Unsustainable Voting Record on Energy and the Environment
    Environmental Politics: Obama Versus the Republicans
    The Ignorant Anti-Environmental Views of the Republicans
    The Koch Brother's Ties to GOP Presidential Candidates
    Republicans Vow to Continue Push for Keystone XL
    Video: Conservatives Against Republican Denialism
    Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
    Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance
    Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Crisis and Implications for the Environment
    Republican Cuts Target Green Jobs
    Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
    Republican's Fail in their Bid to Defund the EPA
    Defend Clean Air and Oppose the TRAIN Act
    Republican Assault on the Environment
    EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
    Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
    Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
    Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
    Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
    Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
    Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    What is Wrong with the Right
    The Business of Climate Change Deception

    Tell Congress to Expedite Renewable Energy

    Sign this petition to tell Congress that we need to expedite the growth of renewable energy in the US. We need to see Congress act to pass legislation that will help us transition to a cleaner, renewable energy future. Signing this petition sends an email to US Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), chair of the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources, US Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and the House Energy & Commerce Committee.

    This petition unites the voices of Americans who demand our leaders take seriously the energy and climate crisis and immediately work to implement the policies to move our country toward a sustainable future.

    I WANT CONGRESS TO PASS A RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICY THAT:

    • Mandates an aggressive RES (renewable electricity standard)
    • Sets a limit and tax on greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4)
    • Puts an end to subsidies for fossil fuels and nuclear power
    • Provides incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects
    • Modernizes the electrical grid
    • Provides market certainty to accelerate investment in renewable energy
    • Invests in research and development for battery storage and renewable energy technologies
    • Encourages distributed generation to help localize energy generation
    • Defines renewable as non-combustion sources of energy
    • Puts Americans back to work by creating green jobs and a sustainable economy
    • Makes the U.S. a leader in fighting climate change and global warming
    • Puts the health of people and the planet before corporate profits

    To sign the petition click here.

    Related Posts
    China and the Growth of Global Wind Power
    The Promise of Renewable Energy in the US
    Renewable Energy in 2012: The Global Economic and Environmental Climate
    Renewable Energy Is Our Only Hope 
    How the West can Capitalize on the Growth of Chinese Cleantech in 2012
    Outlook for the Chinese Solar Industry in 2012
    India is the World Leader in Cleantech Investment Growth
    The EU Debt Crisis did Not Curb the Growth of Renewables in 2011
    UK Renewable Energy 2011 Overview
    UK Wind Energy
    Cuts to UK Solar FiTs Could Prove Deadly
    Cuts to UK Wind Power ROCs & FiTs
    The Implications of the Expiration of US Renewable Energy Subsidies
    Obama 2013 Budget Seeks to Make Renewable Tax Credits Permanent
    US Wind Energy Market Review and Forecasts for 2012
    US Solar Energy Review and 2012 Forecasts
    Geothermal Energy Market Review and Forecasts for 2012
    British Government to Lead the Green Economy
    Market Forces and the UK's Green Deal
    UK Government Investments in Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    Corporate Sustainability is Driving Green Businesses in the UK
    UK Renewable Energy 2011 Overview
    Cuts to UK Wind Power ROCs & FiTs
    UK Wind Energy
    Cuts to UK Solar FiTs Could Prove Deadly
    Scottish Wind Energy Can Power Europe
    The Growth of London's Green Economy
    The EU Debt Crisis did Not Curb the Growth of Renewables in 2011
    Sustainability and the European Super Grid

    Democrats' Chances in the 2010 Midterms

    As voting day approaches for this year's midterm elections, Democrats are trending in the right direction. However, the momentum leading up to the midterms favors the Republicans who are fueled by rabid hatred of Democratic policies if not Obama himself.

    The conventional wisdom suggests that the Republicans will fare well because they have an energized base of support. However, according to new surveys, the black vote may break with tradition and turnout in greater numbers for midterm elections. Surveys found that 80 percent of black Democrats are as interested, or more interested, in the midterm elections as they were in the 2008 presidential election.

    Also, 62 percent of all black Democrats polled said they are likely to encourage others to support certain candidates, compared with 47 percent of white Democrats and 57 percent of all Republicans.

    A month ago, a Washington Post/ABC News poll indicated that Republicans had an enormous 53% to 40% lead among likely voters. A month later, polls showed the Republican advantage slipping, and the Washington Post/ABC News poll in early October offers similar evidence. On the generic ballot, a month ago, the GOP lead was 13 points, (53 percent to 40 percent). More recent polls indicate that the Republican advantage has shrunk to six points, (49 percent to 43 percent).

    An October 17th NPR article reports that polls are showing the GOP's advantage in many key Congressional races is indeed narrowing. President Obama’s approval rating has also improved to 50 percent, and support for the president’s handling of the economy is up four points to 45 percent.

    Republicans may have peaked in late August and early September and the Democrat's fortunes are improving as we enter the final stretch.

    Midterm elections are rarely harbingers of presidential elections. Remember the success that Republican's had in the midterms in 1994 and subsequent Clinton victory in 1996. However, the six point spread may yet prove devastating to Democrats particularly when you consider that at this point in 1994, the GOP had a two point lead and they went on to make significant gains.

    Perhaps Americans will wake up to the fact that this midterm election is not about checks and balances, or even venting frustrations, it is about a choice between progress and two long years of legislative stagnation.

    People are voting Democrat so that the US can be competive with the rest of the world, others are voting Democrat to protect the planet for future generations, still others are voting Democrat to keep the wolves out of Washington.

    Next: Election 2010 Midterm Predictions


    Related Post
    Environmental Issues in Six Key Senate Races
    The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
    Republican Political Finance and the 2010 Midterm Elections
    Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
    Republican's Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
    Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
    The Tea Party and Republican Obstructionism
    Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
    California's Proposition 23
    The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
    Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
    What is Wrong with the Right
    Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
    Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
    Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
    Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
    Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
    Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
    The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
    How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
    Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
    Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
    Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
    Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
    Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
    Palin is No Friend of Green
    The New International System: The Role of Government