Showing posts with label nomination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nomination. Show all posts

Obama's Choice for Budget Director

Obama announced his choice to lead the White House budget office. As expected, Obama selected Sylvia Mathews Burwell, the president of the Walmart Foundation, (the charitable group). She worked for a long time at the Gates Foundation at a high level. She has also worked extensively in the Clinton administration.

Burwell worked on the Clinton-Gore presidential campaign in 1992, she became staff director for the National Economic Council under Robert Rubin, she followed Rubin to Treasury where she was his chief of staff before working as as deputy chief of staff under Erskine Bowles, and then she was deputy director of OMB under Jack Lew.

Educated at Harvard and Oxford, Burwell is only 47, she will play a pivotal role in cutting and spending, particularly as it concerns clean energy technology.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Obama Nominates Former Oil Employee and Conservationist as Head of the Interior Department
Obama Nominates Nuclear Physicist for Energy Secretary
Obama Nominates Air Quality Expert to Head the EPA

Obama Nominates Former Oil Employee and Conservationist as Head of the Interior Department

Obama's nominee for Head of the Interior Department is a study in contrasts. Sally Jewell's resume includes work in the oil industry, banking and more recently CEO of an outdoor equipment company where she was described as a conservationist. Jewell was nominated on February 6, 2013 and if she is confirmed by the Senate, Jewell would replace Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. This is an important portfolio for the environment as the Interior Department manages the nation's public lands, water, wildlife and energy resources.

Jewell holds a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Washington. Jewell is married and has two grown children.

Most notably Jewell worked as an engineer with Mobil Oil and prior to that she spent two decades in the banking industry. Her most recent job in banking was overseeing Washington Mutual's commercial-banking group, according to The Seattle Times. She had previously served as president of WestOne Bank from 1992 to 1995, and as an executive at Rainier Bank/Security Pacific from 1981 to 1992.

Recently Jewell served as the chief executive of Sumner, Washington-based Recreational Equipment Inc. or REI, a popular retailer of outdoor gear. The company said its sales doubled during her tenure, from $1 billion annually to nearly $2 billion, expanded its network of stores by 71. REI regularly makes Fortune Magazine’s list of the Best Companies to Work For.

In a written statement following her nomination, REI said its CEO's "broad business background, community leadership, and her depth of knowledge of the range of issues managed by the Department of the Interior will be of significant value to the department and great service to the nation.

Jewell is described as an outdoors enthusiast and strong advocate of protecting the nation's resources who is an expert on energy and climate change. She was CEO of REI at a time when it donated millions of dollars to protect trails and public parks. REI stores get a fifth of their power from renewable energy sources.

"She knows the link between conservation and good jobs," Obama said in announcing Jewell's nomination. "She knows that there’s no contradiction between being good stewards of the land and our economic progress; that in fact, those two things need to go hand in hand. She has shown that a company with more than $1 billion in sales can do the right thing for our planet."

If Obama's nominees get confirmed by the Senate, Jewell will work with Gina McCarthy as head of the EPA and Ernest Moniz as the Energy Secretary. This trio will execute Obama's energy agenda and spearhead the President's climate change efforts.

The actions of these three people will determine the outcome of key climate and energy issues in the US. They include decisions about the exporting of US fossil fuels and the highly contentious natural gas extraction technique known as hydraulic fracturing.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Obama's Choice for Budget Director
Obama Nominates Nuclear Physicist for Energy Secretary
Obama Nominates Air Quality Expert to Head the EPA

Obama Nominates Nuclear Physicist for Energy Secretary

On Monday March 4, President Barack Obama announced that he had nominated a nuclear physicist from MIT as his choice for energy secretary. The President tapped Dr Ernest J Moniz to take over for Steven Chu as head the Department of Energy (DOE).

The President will look to Moniz, to reduce US dependence on foreign oil and establish America as a leader in clean energy technology. Moniz was the Under Secretary of the DOE during the Clinton administration.

Moniz was confirmed by the US Senate as Under Secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE) on 28 October 1997. As Under Secretary, Dr Moniz advised the Secretary and oversaw the DOE’s research and development portfolio, including energy and environmental technologies, national security, and fundamental science. He oversees the national laboratory system and national security programmes, including stockpile stewardship and non-proliferation.

Before joining the DOE, Dr Moniz was Professor of Physics and Head of the Department of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he was responsible for the research and educational programmes of the department.

Prior to that, he served as the Associate Director for Science in the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President, a position to which he was nominated by President Clinton in June 1995. His principal research interests are in theoretical nuclear physics. He joined the MIT faculty in 1973 and served as the Director of the Bates Linear Accelerator Center from 1983.

Moniz has served numerous universities, national laboratories, professional societies, and government agencies in advisory roles. He received a BS degree in physics from Boston College in 1966 and a doctorate in theoretical physics from Stanford University in 1971. With a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation, he performed research at the Center d’Etudes Nucleaires de Saclay in Gif-sur-Yvette, France, and at the University of Pennsylvania from 1971–73. He received an honorary doctorate from the University of Athens in 1997. He is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the Humboldt Foundation, and the American Physical Society.

In his current capacity as the director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MITs) Energy Initiative, Moniz works on projects aimed at reducing greenhouse gases.

His research interests give the impression that Moniz is an advocate of climate change action. However, this may not offer an accurate nor a complete picture of the man. It is interesting to note that Moniz's research group gets funding from oil industry giants like BP, Chevron, and Saudi Aramco.

When making the announcement the President was sure to stress Moniz's belief that you can increase energy production, grow the economy and take appropriate environmental precautions.

Some environmentalists have suggested that Moniz is too close to the fossil fuel industry especially natural gas. They cite a 2011 MIT study on the future of natural gas that was chaired by Moniz which came to the conclusion that the US should not "erect barriers to natural gas imports or exports."

Environmentalists are concerned about this alleged bias and they worry that he will not be able to make an impartial decision on the subject of hydraulic fracturing (aka fracking) for natural gas (arguably the most important short term issue he will have to face).

As a nuclear physicist Moniz may also bolster support for nuclear power.

The nomination of Moniz seems to be a blatant attempt to select someone who personifies Obama's "all of the above" energy strategy.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Obama's Choice for Budget Director
Obama Nominates Former Oil Employee and Conservationist as Head of the Interior Department
Obama Nominates Air Quality Expert to Head the EPA

Obama Nominates Air Quality Expert to Head the EPA

On Monday March 4, President Barack Obama announced that an air quality expert would be his nominee for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a veteran of the EPA, Gina McCarthy is a good choice to replace Lisa Jackson as administrator.

The 58 year old McCarthy earned a B.A., from the University of Massachusetts and has an M.S., from Tufts University. She is married to Kenneth McCarey; and has three children.

One of the more interesting aspects of McCarthy's previous work experience is the fact that she is a former employee of Mitt Romney.

She was commissioner, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection from 2004-2009, deputy secretary, Massachusetts Office of Commonwealth Development from 2003-2004 and undersecretary for policy, Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs from 1999-2003. McCarthy is currently the assistant EPA administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation.

Obama described her approach on clean air as "practical" and "cost-effective." Obama made a point of emphasizing McCarthy's support for economic growth while insisting that "she welcomes different points of views."

Although Obama's introduction suggests that he is trying to preempt GOP concerns, some Republicans can be expected to insist that she promotes policies that cost jobs.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Obama's Choice for Budget Director
Obama Nominates Former Oil Employee and Conservationist as Head of the Interior Department
Obama Nominates Nuclear Physicist for Energy Secretary

President Obama Set to Nominate Gregoire as Head of EPA

As reported in Seattle PI, President Obama may nominate outgoing Democratic Washington governor Chris Gregoire as the chief of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Gregoire was first elected to the position of Governor of Washington in 2004 and won re-election by a slim margin in 2008.

Gregoire has a mixed record on the environment. Before being elected Attorney General in 1992 she was director of Washington’s Department of Ecology. She served as the director of the Washington Department of Ecology from 1988 until 1992.

One of her greatest achievements concerns the Hanford nuclear waste cleanup agreement. She successfully negotiated a three party agreement in 1989 with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy to clean up waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

Although vociferously resisted by the first Bush administration, the three party agreement withstood legal challenges and held up in court. As attorney general she sued several times to try to get a more adequate cleanup job.

She also launched an ambitious Puget Sound cleanup effort early in her first term as governor and she was a leader in the Western Climate Initiative.

However Gregoire's environmental record is not unblemished. She has allied herself with shipping, agricultural and other economic interests against efforts to restore salmon runs to the Columbia River system.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
EPA Chief Forced Out By Dirty Industries and Anti-Environment Republicans
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Koch Industries War with the EPA
EPA's New Soot Rule
EPA's New Vehicle Standards
EPA's Carbon Pollution Standard has Strong Support
EPA Limits GHGs from Power Plants
EPA Proposes Standards for the Airline Industry
The EPA Seeks Historic Proposal to Limit Pollution
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
EPA's Carbon Pollution Standard
The EPA's Top Green Powered Organizations
EPA's Energy Winners for 2012 Energy
EPA's Green Power Partnerships
EPA's 2012 Green Power Partnership Winners
EPA's Top Green Powered Organizations
Top Companies in the 2012 Climate Leadership Awards
EPA Green Education Services

Video: Newt Gingrich & Nancy Pelosi Ad to Combat Climate Change



Before Newt Gingrich was running for the GOP presidential nomination he was a leading advocate to combat climate change. This ad is part of the "We Can Solve It" global warming ad campaign sponsored by former Vice President Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Video: Newt Gingrich on Climate Change "The Evidence is Sufficient"
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change

Video: Newt Gingrich on Climate Change "The Evidence is Sufficient"



Before running for President, Newt Gingrich was an advocate supporting efforts to combat climate change. In this video he is seen saying, "the evidence is sufficient...to move towards most effective possible steps to reduce carbon loading." He even talked about the need for "green conservatives." He also addressed Republican concerns about big government but he went on to say that we need to discuss "whats the most effective way to solve it rather than get into a fight about whether or not to solve it."

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Video: Newt Gingrich & Nancy Pelosi Ad to Combat Climate Change
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change

Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

Utah governor Jon Huntsman's Presidential campaign came to an end when he said, ‘I respect science.’ This is political suicide for anyone seeking the GOP presidential nomination.

Huntsman told Time Magazine in May of 2011: “All I know is 90 percent of the scientists say climate change is occurring. If 90 percent of the oncological community said something was causing cancer, we’d listen to them. I respect science.”

Huntsman is the only Republican candidate who professed his belief in anthropogenic climate change and he even aspired to create policy solutions to address it.

“In order to get to the heart and soul of carbon emission, which is a problem, because it leads to polluted skies and air quality problems and climate change, we must put a value on carbon,” Huntsman said Until we put a value on carbon we’re never going to be able to get serious about dealing with climate change longer term,” Huntsman said. “Putting a value on carbon either suggests that you go to a carbon tax or you get a cap-and-trade system underway.”

The Republican Party has no time for science and it is deeply offended by the suggestion that humans have contributed to climate change.

Huntsman once tweeted: “To be clear. I believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy.”

Huntsman was anything but crazy, he was by far the most reasonable candidate in a field full of ignorant Luddites. Sadly, Huntsman was forced to drop out of the race because Republicans involved in the primary process want no part of reason.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change

Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change

Republican's confusion on climate change is well known, but this ignorance is not only a defining feature of those left in the GOP presidential race, it also applies to those who dropped out. Here are the views of three Republican candidates who are not longer in the 2012 race. At one time these candidates were viewed as the most promising contenders for the Republican nomination for President. The list of failed popular contenders includes Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, and Herman Cain.

Rick Perry

Governor Perry dismissed climate change as a ‘contrived, phony mess.’ Perry said that the “theory” of climate change is a hoax concocted by data-manipulating scientists to keep research money coming in to their projects. On August 17th, 2011, Perry said: “I think there are a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects...Yes, our climates change. They’ve been changing ever since the earth was formed. But I do not buy into, that a group of scientists, who in some cases were found to be manipulating this data.” In 2007 after Rick Perry parted ways with his former boss Al Gore, he said: “I’ve heard Al Gore talk about man-made global warming so much that I’m starting to think that his mouth is the leading source of all that supposedly deadly carbon dioxide.” As an amusing side note Perry's nick-name used to be "crotch" because he wore tight fitting pants.

Michelle Bachmann

As the Chair of the Tea Party Caucus Rep. Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota knew that she could not even consider climate change science. She has made statements like “It’s all voodoo, nonsense, hokum…” In 2009, Bachmann said there’s no reason to worry about carbon dioxide because “Carbon dioxide is natural...It is not harmful. It is a part of earth’s life cycle. And yet we’re being told that we have to reduce this natural substance and reduce the American standard of living to create an arbitrary reduction that is naturally occurring." As a side note Bachman paid $30 each for 6OOO voting tickets in Iowa, she won with around 4000 votes, meaning that a third of those votes she paid for did not vote for her.

Herman Cain

Cain considers climate change to be "a scam." Cain derided Democrats for falling for the “scientifically manufactured results” that support the science of climate change. This is no longer a controversy. This is conclusive," he said. Cain also calls green energy a joke, declaring to a group of Iowans this spring, “I have studied it!” Cain claimed that solar and wind could provide at best “5 percent of our energy needs.” As a side note Cain was eventually forced to withdraw due to numerous allegations of sexual harrassment. He also was seriously challenged on economic and foreign policy issues, he once referred to Uzbekistan as "Uz-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan."

In addition to their peccadilloes, these three failed GOP candidates for president share a common disdain for the facts on climate change.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2

As revealed in a Treehugger article titled Rick Santorum Has Absolutely No Idea What He is Talking About, Santorum has some convoluted ideas. Here is his response to a man in New Hampshire who questioned him about climate change:

"The question is on how do I get my policies with climate change science. I get asked this question a lot, and you look at the data and you can see some change in the climate. But then again, pick a point in history where you haven’t seen a change in the climate. The climate does change. The question is, what is causing the climate to change?

And I think most scientists, in fact, I assume all scientists would agree there are a variety of factors that cause the climate change. I don’t think any scientist in the world would suggest there isn’t a variety of factors, and I think the vast majority of scientists would say there’s probably a hundred factors that cause the climate to change.

And so why have we decided that this one particular factor, carbon dioxide, is in fact that tip of the tail that wags the entire dog. Why from a scientific point of view do we make the assertion that this is in fact what is the case when there is a whole lot of other factors out there that could be affecting it? So, that’s the question.

Some people have very strong feelings that it is that. There are a lot of other people who don’t. Here’s the question. Let’s even assume, for purposes of argument, not that I agree with it, but for purposes of argument, that they are right. Then what would be a rational response?

Well, if you have a problem and you want to craft something, what should that thing that you’re crafting do? Solve the problem. Do any of the proposed solutions put forward by Al Gore and his friends do anything to solve the problem? Even the scientists who support the theory will admit to you that it doesn’t do anything to solve the problem. So query, why support the solution, other than you may have some other agenda that may be in place here."

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
Rick Santorum's Anti-Environmental Theology
Foster Friess is the Climate Denying Money Man Behind Santorum
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has made a slew of absurd statements about climate change. Not only does he believe that climate change is a hoax, he refers to the large body of scientific evidence as "bogus" or "junk." Rather than rail against Santorum for his lack of understanding, here are a few examples that effectively illustrate his ignorance:

"The left is always looking for a way to control you. They’re always trying to make you feel guilty, so you’ll give them power so they can lord it over you. They do it on the environment all the time."

"The dangers of carbon dioxide? Tell that to a plant, how dangerous carbon dioxide is."

"[Climate change is] an absolute travesty of scientific research that was motivated by those who, in my opinion, saw this as an opportunity to create a panic and a crisis for government to be able to step in and even more greatly control your life."

"We have to have all sorts of government regulations now because of the threats of hydrofracking. It’s the new bogeyman. It’s the new way to try to scare you … And they’re preying on the Northeast, saying, “Look what’s going to happen. Ooh, all this bad stuff’s gonna happen, we don’t know all these chemicals and all this stuff, what’s gonna happen?” Let me tell you what’s going to happen: Nothing’s going to happen, except they will use this to raise money for the radical environmental groups so they can go out and continue to try to purvey their reign of environmental terror on the United States of America."

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
Rick Santorum's Anti-Environmental Theology
Foster Friess is the Climate Denying Money Man Behind Santorum
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science

Santorum has criticized President Obama for embracing climate science, but he has also offered similar criticisms to fellow Republicans. Santorum is unique amongst those vying for the Republican nomination in that, unlike his rivals, he has not had to change his views on climate change.

GOP presidential candidates like Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul have been accused of subscribing to a scientific view on climate change.

Santorum accurately portrays himself as the only candidate who has never believed in global warming. Santorum has said:
"I for one never bought the hoax… And yet we have politicians running to the ramparts — unfortunately politicians who happen to be running for the Republican nomination for president — who bought into man-made global warming and bought into cap-and-trade."
This position appeals to the so called values driven conservatives. Santorum may not understand economics or geopolitics but he does seem to enjoy strong support from uneducated rural conservative men. Part of that support comes from his tacit dismissal of the science of climate change.

The far right that dominates the Republican primary process demands that aspiring presidential nominees abandon climate change. While others have had to change their positions on climate, Santorum has been consistent. Unlike his rivals for the GOP presidential nomination, Rick has not had to dumb down his campaign. If nothing else Santorum's ignorance on climate change is authentic.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Rick Santorum's Anti-Environmental Theology
Foster Friess is the Climate Denying Money Man Behind Santorum
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s

Republicans seeking the presidential nomination have been forced to abandon their scientific assessments of Climate change. Republican flip flops on climate change are evidenced by the positions of the GOP presidential contenders. Here is a brief summary of the changing views of Republican candidates Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul.
\
Newt Gingrich

In 2008, Newt Gingrich did a PSA with then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) calling for action on climate change. He once said that “the evidence is sufficient,” but now that he is seeking the GOP presidential nomination Gingrich has asked for public hearings on climate change and a review of the National Academy of Science findings. Gingrich recently said, “Environmentalists, have been infiltrated over the last 40 years by people on the left who are against business and against local control and they use the environment as an excuse.”

Ron Paul

On the campaign trail in 2007, Ron Paul said that big emitters of CO2 should not be allowed to freely pollute the air because it is a violation of others’ property rights. Paul argued that big polluters should be taxed and he has even admitted to believing that human activity is at least partly responsible for global warming. More recently he has changed his position saying, “the greatest hoax I think that has been around for many, many years if not hundreds of years has been this hoax on the environment and global warming.”

Like Mitt Romney, both Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul have to manufacture strong views against climate science to even be considered for the GOP nomination.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change


This video is about the changing views of Republicans. On the one hand you have the GOP presidential candidates on the other hand there are thinking Republicans. At the moment they appear to be moving in opposite directions. It is widely recognized that running for the GOP presidential nomination also involves running from climate change. However there is a group of Republicans who want to change the anti-scientific stance of the party. One such group is New Hampshire Republicans for Climate. They want their party leaders to adopt responsible policy positions that acknowledge the facts and respond to climate change.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Dems Seek Hearing on Climate to Educate GOP
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance

Video: The Republican War on Climate Science



Republicans and their corporate masters for years have been trying to keep the truth about climate change from reaching the American public. They work tirelessly to tell us that the earth isn't getting hotter; or that there is no scientific consensus that global climate change is real; or even that climate change is a good thing because its going to open up shipping routes in the arctic. Their latest efforts, however, go far beyond their usual tactics, as they're now trying to get their anti-science agenda taught in public schools. Mike Papantonio discusses this issue with Chris Mooney author of Republican War on Science.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Dems Seek Hearing on Climate to Educate GOP
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change
Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance

Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change



Newt Gingrich, once believed in climate change, but like others seeking the GOP presidential nomination, he has found religion on climate change and now dismisses it at every opportunity. The 2012 Republican presidential candidate claimed he was qualified to deny climate change science because he is an "amateur paleontologist". In this video, the Young Turks host Cenk Uygur makes fun of Gingrich's laughable justification for his denial of climate change.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
Rick Santorum's Anti-Environmental Theology
Foster Friess is the Climate Denying Money Man Behind Santorum
Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming

Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance



Here is an interview with Adam Lee in which he reviews how Republican presidential hopefuls all seem to have at least one thing in common -- they hate science. Although there are only four remaining GOP nominees vying for the nomination, the full slate of 2012 Republican presidential contenders shared a common disbelief in science. Being anti-science is de reiguer because this is what those participating in the GOP primary process are demanding from their presidential nominees. For an article by Adam Lee titled "Why the Anti-Science Creationist Movement Is So Dangerous," click here.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Dems Seek Hearing on Climate to Educate GOP
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change
Video: The Republican War on Climate Science

Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change

As the rest of the world is coming to grips with some of the solutions to the difficult challenges posed by climate change, US Republicans are still denying the very existence of global warming.

According to a recent poll, the number of people in the US denying climate change has dropped to 26 percent, those who are left are are mostly intransigent Republicans.

The poll indicates that almost half (47 percent) of Republicans deny the evidence of global warming while four fifths (80 percent) of Democrats accept the facts.

Those who resist the truth about climate change tend to be very dogmatic in their views. This was revealed by the level of certainty each respondent associated with their answers.

The capacity of many Republicans to insulate themselves from the reality of global warming would be fascinating if it were not so detrimental to the passage of crucial energy and climate legislation.

To see the full report (pdf) from the Brookings Institution click here.

Related Posts
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards
Dems Seek Hearing on Climate to Educate GOP
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change
Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance

Romney Increasingly Uncertain about the Science of Global Warming

Republican front runner Mitt Romney seems to being getting more obtuse about climate change as his campaign goes forward. Speaking at a closed-door fundraiser in Pittsburgh, Romney told donors at the Consol Energy Center, "My view is that we don't know what's causing climate change on this planet. And the idea of spending trillions and trillions of dollars to try to reduce CO2 emissions is not the right course for us."

This is far from the position that he put forward in his 2010 book, No Apology, Romney wrote, "I believe that climate change is occurring...I also believe that human activity is a contributing factor."

As recently as June 2011, Reuters reported that Romney said that the US should "reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may be significant contributors."

At a stop in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney said, “I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course, but I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that.”

In August he again said, "I think the earth is getting warmer. ... I think humans contribute to that."

Even if he secretly believes in global warming it does not appear that he is willing to do anything about it. At the fundraiser, Romney was asked whether he would reject a cap-and-trade bill to limit carbon emissions linked to climate change. Romney replied, "I do not believe in a cap and trade program." He has also said, The U.S. “Cap and trade effectively constitutes an enormous, hidden tax on the American people and American businesses.”

Romney resists the green economy by alleging that it costs jobs. Contrary to Romney's assertion that clean energy "loses jobs for Americans," Republican governors are forced to acknowledge that green energy is a net creator of jobs.

"My view with regards to energy policy is pretty straightforward." Romney said, "And that means let's aggressively develop our oil, our gas, our coal, our nuclear power."

Romney's support for fossil fuels and skepticism about climate change plays well with conservatives, but it is a hard sell for thinking independents who are capable of rational thought. These independents may very well determine the outcome of the 2012 Presidential election. However, to win the Republican nomination, Romney has to play dumb on climate change.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
GOP Presidential Hopefuls Gingrich and Paul's Climate Change 180s
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 2
In His Own Words Santorum on Climate Change Part 1
Santorum's Unwavering Opposition to Climate Science
Video: Gingrich's Absurd Dismissal of Climate change
Failed GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates on Climate Change
Huntman's Belief in Science Was His Undoing

Too Dirty to Fail: The GOP's Ongoing War with EPA Standards

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has a motto for industrial plants that would be spared from new pollution limits if Republicans have their way: They are "too dirty to fail." This comment was made by Jackson in response to the GOP who accuse the EPA of killing jobs with thier efforts to provide clean air and water for the American people.

"No credible economist links our current economic crisis -- or any economic crisis -- to tough clean-air and clean-water standards," Jackson wrote.

If indeed there are any job losses they would be offset by jobs gained elsewhere, including for the workers who install and maintain pollution control equipment. Not to mention the benefits of improved air and water quality.

"If these plants continue to operate without pollution limits, as a legislative wish list from [Cantor] would allow, there will be more cases of asthma, respiratory illness and premature deaths -- with no clear path to new jobs," Jackson wrote.

"The environment is not usually a top-tier issue in a presidential election," O'Donnell said. "But it has the potential to become one now, especially because a number of Republicans are calling for the end of EPA, or a significant cutback to it."

The electorate may very remember that the Republicans fought for dirty air and water rather than the promise of economic renewal offered by the green economy.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Republicans Deny Facts on Climate Change
Dems Seek Hearing on Climate to Educate GOP
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Video: Conservatives Against Republican Ignorance on Climate Change
Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance