While the President has indicated he will veto the bill, there are steps that could be taken by the GOP to override his decision.
Republicans do not seem to care about the consequences or the costs. NASA's top climate scientist, Jim Hansen, said that fully developing the tar sands in Canada (a necessary step in the development of the pipeline), would mean“essentially game over” for the climate. According to White House statistics, additional emissions from the tar sands pipelines could equal $128 billion in climate costs over the pipeline’s projected lifespan. By 2100 the costs of failing to reign in emissions from fossil fuels will surpass the costs of carbon reduction by $8 trillion.
Thus far a number of protests have succeeded in delaying the pipeline. Reports show that these delays have already prevented at least $17bn in new investments in the Canadian tar sands. These investments would have had the equivalent carbon output of 735 coal-fired power plants.
Related
Obama Standing Up to the GOP by Promising to Veto Keystone Legislation
Reasons Why the Keystone XL is a Pipedream
Keystone XL will Emit 4 Times More Pollution than Originally Thought
The Politics of the Obama Administration's Keystone Delay
Buying Support for the Keystone XL
A Brief Review of the Keystone XL Saga
The Fate of the Keystone XL: The Ball is in Your Court Mr President
Refuting the Rationale for Approving the Keystone XL
Business Leaders, Scientists, Economists and Ordinary People Reject the Keystone XL
Video - Two Million Comments Rejecting the Keystone XL Pipeline
Keystone XL will Fly or Fail Depending on Who you Talk to
The Keystone XL Pipeline: Debunking Four Cardinal Lies
Ten Reasons Why Nurses Oppose the Keystone XL
Comparison of the Keystone XL and Renewable Energy
Video - Farcical Comedy on Keystone XL Jobs
How Come the Keystone XL is so Hard to Kill
0 comments:
Post a Comment