Canadian Implications of Obama's National Climate Strategy

On June 25, 2013, US President Barack Obama delivered a speech that will reverbate around the world and directly impact their neighbors to the north. Several years ago Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper pledged to match US climate change targets and align the two nations’ climate policy. Now that President Obama has launched an ambitious strategy to combat climate change, Harper will be hard pressed to make good on his promise.

Obama has made it clear that under his leadership the US will substantially reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Much of American emissions (40%) come from coal plants which is why these facilities are the primary focus of the President's plan. In Canada coal generated emissions are only 10 per cent of the nation's emissions. However, the President's climate strategy will directly impact Canada's GHG intensive fossil fuel industry and tarsands oil in particular.

Fossil fuels are the largest source of emissions in Canada. Oil and natural gas (including extraction, pipelining and refining) account for 25 percent of country's GHGs and environment Canada anticipates that number will increase to 28 percent by 2020.

Obama's new national climate change mitigation strategy will put pressure on Canada to reduce their emissions. The President's new climate strategy conflicts with the aspiration of Canada's ruling Conservatives who are seeking to expand the nation's role as a dirty energy super-power.  Harper's federal Conservatives have worked tenaciously to support the expansion of Canada's oil and gas and the tar sands in particular. While it has helped to buoy the Canadian economy, the Harper government must now reckon with the fact they have tied Canada's future to a dirty, dangerous and destructive industry.

The American government is changing the way it does business and this will have implications for nations like Canada who have failed to assume responsibility for the emissions they produce.

The President made it clear that he will not tolerate inaction. "I don't have much patience for anyone who denies that this challenge is real. We don't have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society. Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it's not going to protect you from the coming storm. And ultimately, we will be judged as a people, and as a society, and as a country on where we go from here."

As the President enacts regulations and policies to reduce US GHG emissions, Canada's federal government will be pressured to curtail their expansion of dirty energy.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
The Fate of the Keystone XL Pipeline in the Wake of President Obama's Georgetown University Speech
Canada at Odds with US and China on Climate Change
Climate Scientists' Urge Canadian Minister to Back-off Expanded Fossil Fuel Production
Canada is a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canada has the Dirtiest Oil on Earth (Video)
Canada's GHG Ranking
Leading Canadian Economist to Tell Europeans about the Climate Impacts of the Tar Sands
Canada to Fight EU Proposal Labeling Tar Sands as Dirty
Canada's Ruling Conservatives Take Another Swipe at Environmental Protections
Report Urges Canada's Federal Conservatives to Regulate Oil and Gas Sector to Meet GHG Targets
Canadian Conservative Minister Attacks Climate Scientist
Canada Withdraws from UN Efforts to Combat Desertification
Canada Pulls out of Kyoto
Canada is an Environmental Pariah at Rio+20
Canadian Conservatives Silence Opposition to the Northern Gateway Oil Pipeline
Canadian Government Spending on Dirty Projects
Canada is Banking on Carbon Capture to Offset Tar Sands
Enbridge withdraws from Canada's Carbon Capture Farce
SHARE

Melili

  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
  • Image
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment