Showing posts with label anti-environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-environment. Show all posts

Video - Russia Earns New Fossil Award: Disastrous Diplomacy Dishonorable Distinction (4D)




On June 13 Russia earned the dubious distinction of being awarded a new fossil award called Disastrous Diplomacy Dishonorable Distinction (4D). This is due to the fact that Russia has monopolized the fossil awards lately. For this reason, CAN is giving Russia special recognition with the Disastrous Diplomacy Dishonorable Distinction (4D) Award.


Never before has the agenda and work of an entire Subsidiary Body of the UNFCCC has been held hostage to the whims of one country, or more likely one negotiator.

Russia claims they want to discuss the rules of procedure here at the UNFCCC yet they rejected all solutions that offered to do so. So the mystery of their continued blocking (with Belarus and Ukraine continuing to go along for the ride) around such a political issue remains.

If they do want to make a political statement this should be done between Ministers in a Ministerial meeting, not at the negotiator level.

Disconcertingly, all this it remains unresolved, and it is not clear whether Russia, Belarus and Ukraine will continue to disrupt progress during the COP in Warsaw, when we desperately need to focus on getting emissions down, and finance up.

Related ArticlesRussia, Ukraine and Belarus Derail 2013 UN Climate Talks in Bonn
Canada is a Pariah at COP 17
Canadian Environment Minister: Fossil Awards are "Worn with Honour"
Russia Lining Up Investors for Arctic Drilling
Global Warming Exposes Resources but Arctic Meeting Leaves Some Out in the Cold
The Death of Mikhail Beketov and Environmental Journalism
COP 17 a Premeditated Failure?
More Evidence of Historic Arctic Warming
Heat in the US Northeast and Drought Around the World (2012)
The Most Important Green Business Stories of 2010
McKibben Calls Extreme Weather Events Climate Disasters
Melting Arctic Ice is Releasing Massive Amounts of Methane

House Republicans' Historic Anti-Environment Efforts in 2011 and 2012

In 2011 and 2012, House Republicans have amassed the most anti-environment record in the history of Congress. Contrary to the will of the American people, Republicans continue to resist clean air and clean water. Just before the November 2012 elections, Republicans called the House into session to push for extreme anti-environment and anti-public health bills that have already passed the House.

In 2012, the year that marked the 40th anniversary of the Clean Water Act, House Republicans worked to undermined clean drinking water in the US. The Clean Water Voting Record shows how House Republicans voted to endanger the drinking water sources of 117 million Americans by allowing toxic pesticide to flow into American waterways.

“For forty years, the Clean Water Act has helped protect our water." said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club. "But in the 112th Congress, we’ve seen an unprecedented attack from House Leadership on clean water policy.”

As reported by the Huffington Post, during this period, the House has voted over 300 times on the floor to block environmental regulations, weaken environmental laws and stop environmental research, and H.R. 3409 may well be the single worst anti-environment bill to be considered in the 112th Congress.

Here is a list of the top 10 anti-environment efforts contained in H.R. 3409
  1. denies the findings of climate scientists by repealing EPA's scientific finding that greenhouse gasses endanger public health and the environment
  2. nullifies the broadly supported emissions standards to reduce carbon pollution from model year 2017-2025 vehicles
  3. repeals California's authority to regulation carbon pollution from motor vehicles
  4. bar EPA from requiring power plants and refineries to reduce carbon pollution
  5. eliminate existing requirements for large sources to disclose their carbon pollution
  6. replaced the Clean Air Act with standards that are based on industry costs.
  7. scrap protections that require power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxics pollutants
  8. eliminate the EPA's ability to apply minimum federal water quality standards to protect human health if weaker state standards are in place, as well as 
  9. eliminate the EPA's authority to object to state discharge permits that fail to meet Clean Water Act standards.
  10.  allow mountaintop removal coal mining.
© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Republicans Need a Serious Policy Review
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Accepts the Science of Climate Change (Video)
Hurricane Sandy Underscores Republican's Anti-Science Climate Change Denial (Video)
Climate Denying Republicans Delay their Convention Due to Extreme Weather
The Stark Partisan Divide on Global Warming
Political "Heroes" and "Villains" on US Air Pollution
Big Oil's Influence on US Politicians
Environmental Politics: Obama Versus the Republicans
The Ignorant Anti-Environmental Views of the Republicans
The Koch Brother's Ties to GOP Presidential Candidates
Republicans Vow to Continue Push for Keystone XL
Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Crisis and Implications for the Environment
Republican Cuts Target Green Jobs
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republican's Fail in their Bid to Defund the EPA
Republican Assault on the Environment
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
What is Wrong with the Right
The Business of Climate Change Deception

Mitt Romeny: The Legacy He Will Leave for Our Children

Now that Mitt Romney has formally secured the Republican presidential nomination he is going on the attack with new ads that reveal his anti-environment agenda. These ads indicate that his top priorities include approving the Keystone XL Pipeline and the repeal of regulations designed to protect human health. Romeny wants to transport dirty tar sands oil from Canada, through highly sensitive areas of America, to the already endangered Gulf Coast. He has also indicated that he wants to repeal regulations like those put forth by the EPA. He dismisses the idea that some regulations are good and can actually create jobs while keeping people safe.

The unlimited funding allowed by Super PAC are sure to provide Romney with vast sums of money from billionaires who will use their influence to get the executive office to do their bidding.

Romney has sought out "advice" from people like Harold Hamm who serves as Romney’s top energy advisor. Hamm is the billionaire chairman and CEO of Continental Resources. He has contributed nearly $1 million to the pro-Romney Super PAC.

The influence of these billionaires will hurt average Americans while the wealthy will benefit from another tax cut. Another assault on regulations will further erode America's troubled environment.

Before they vote for Romney, Americans need to ask themselves if they care about basic quality of life issues like clean air and water. Perhaps most importantly Americans need to ask themselves what their children will think about the environmentally destructive legacy that Romney will leave behind.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts

New York Times Inadvertently Supports Denial

In May 2012, the New York Times published an article by Justin Gillis titled, "Clouds' Effect on Climate Change Is Last Bastion for Dissenters." This article lends legitimacy to the climate deniers subterfuge by unwittingly casting doubt.The article seems to infer that if you cannot predict with certainty the way clouds will behave you cannot predict that the earth will keep warming. The article explains that scientists cannot predict future temperature, so the inference is that we cannot predict global warming. "The result is a big spread in forecasts of future temperature, one that scientists have not been able to narrow much in 30 years of effort." 


Deniers whose views are shaped by reason and science acknowledge that the Earth is warming and the climate is changing. These literate deniers have adopted a new strategy focused on the unpredictability of clouds and the mistaken believe that although the planet is warming it will not be catastrophic.

There are already climate induced catastrophes taking place all around the world. Apparently deniers do not believe that deadly extreme weather or mass starvation due to drought is catastrophic.

Dr. Richard Lindzen is a climate denier from MIT, he also gave the Heartland 2010 keynote address. Lindzen thinks we should not invest in emissions reduction, "If I'm right, we'll have saved money" by avoiding measures to limit emissions, Dr. Lindzen said in the New York Times interview. "If I'm wrong, we'll know it in 50 years and can do something." If only we had that much time.

Inevitably, even the deniers will be forced to acknowledge the catastrophic effects of climate change just as they are being forced to accept that the Earth is warming. In the interim, these slow learners cannot be allowed to impede progress towards a more environmentally sustainable world.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Right Wing War Against Sustainability
The Business of Climate Change Deception
Foster Friess is the Climate Denying Money-Man
Republican's Anti-Science Stance on Climate Change
The Koch Brother's Ties to GOP
A Reintroduction to the Climate Denying Duo Known as the Koch Brothers
The Kochs' War Against Obama and the Democrats
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial
The Kochs' Cato Institute's Climate
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Misrepresentation
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
What is Wrong with the Right
The Politics of Intransigence