Showing posts with label transition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transition. Show all posts

Infographic - Power Shift



Related Articles
Event - Power Shift 2013: Youth Conference Convenes to Fight Climate Change
2013 Global Power Shift in Istanbul Turkey
Video - A Debate about the 350.org Fossil Fuel Divestment Campaign
Video - Bill McKibben Makes the Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment at Middlebury College
Video - Do the Math: The Movie
Video - Bill McKibben and NEI President Bob Massie: "Divestment And The New Economy"
Video - Bill McKibben: Climate Change is an Environmental and Economic Problem
Debate: McKibben vs. Epstein—Are Fossil Fuels a Risk to the Planet? (Video)
350.org's Connect the Dots End Fossil Fuel (2012)
350.org's Bill McKibben on Connect the Dots (2012)
Bill McKibben: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math
Rio+20: 350.org Campaign to End Fossil Fuels (2012)
350.org's Bill Mckibben Calls Hurricane Sandy a Wake-up Call (2012)
Bill McKibben on The Fight of Our Lives Video (2012)
Business and Climate Impacts Day from 350.org (2012)
Success of the End Fossil Fuels Campaign (2012)
350.org's Power Shift Rally at the US (2011)
350.org's Moving Planet: Beyond Fossil Fuels (2011)
Bill McKibben and the 350 Team's Global Strategies for 2011
The Next Big Thing from Bill Mckibben and the 350.org Team (2011)
350.org and Business (2011)
350.org's The Global Work Party (2010)
350.org's 10/10/10 Global Work Party Message for Governments (2010)
350.org's 10/10/10 Event (2010)
Bill McKibben Goes to the White House (2010)
350.org Succeeds in Getting the White House Agrees to "Put Solar On It" (2010)
350.org Makes History (2009)
350.org: International Day of Climate Change Action (2009)

Corporate Sustainability Report: 4 Ways to Transition from 2012 to 2013

In 2012 a solid majority of North American companies indicated that they had or were creating a sustainability plan. According to SCA's Tork Report, the 2012 sustainability data was much improved compared to the year before. Their study shows that 64 percent of US companies had a sustainability plan or were planning to draft one in 2012. This is almost twice the number of American companies who indicated that they were doing so in 2011.

The survey which is titled "The Sustainability Gap," indicates strong similarities in both the American and the Canadian data. A total of 31 percent of US firms and 30 percent of Canadian firms said their sustainability plans are having a positive impact on the bottom line. Only 12 percent of US companies and 10 percent of Canadian companies said their sustainability initiatives negatively impacted their bottom line. The rest (57 percent of US companies and 60 percent of Canadian companies) indicated they saw no impact on their bottom line.

“We’ve seen sustainability continue to be important to consumers and business alike,” said Mike Kapalko, Tork's sustainability marketing manager. “A real area of concern is the gap; companies reporting they have sustainability plans, yet they ignore the risks to their business from climate change, severe weather, or unhealthy employee habits.”

One of the more interesting findings of the SCA research is that industry is quickly coming to the end of the first and easiest phase of sustainability initiatives, namely inexpensive cost cutting measures like greater efficiency.

SCA recommends that the best way to get to the next level of sustainability involves reducing food waste, adding a universal sustainability index, minimizing greenwashing and increasing workforce health,

1. Food Waste

Americans waste 40 percent of the nation’s food supply, the single biggest contributor to solid waste in landfills. According to the IMechE report titled "Global Food: Waste Not, Want Not," between 30 percent and 50 percent of all the grain, fruits, vegetables and meats produced each year is thrown away. This amounts to nearly 2 billion metric tons (2.2 billion tons) of good food worldwide, much of which ends up rotting in landfills.

2. Universal Sustainability Index

A universal sustainability index is a guide to help consumers and companies make smarter product choices. Nearly 75 percent of Americans think a sustainability index would be a good idea, while only 26 percent of respondents said they would not use such an index for making a purchasing decision.

3. Greenwashing

Reducing the amount of “green washing,” or false claims by companies that tout a product’s environmental benefits. The unjustified appropriation of environmental virtue by a company undermines the value of product or service offerings of those who are legitimately green.

4. Health

According to the report we do not take good care of ourselves. To address this issue sustainability plans should also incorporate issues related to the health of a company workforce. The SCA report advocates the three "P's" of People, Planet and Profit.

To see the Sustainability Gap report click here.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
State of Green Business Report 2012
Energy & Environmental Report
The Fifth Global Environmental Outlook Report (GEO-5)
Key Findings of the Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-5)
Biodiversity Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-5)
Video on the Hopeful Elements in the Global Environment Outlook (GEO-5)
Scientists Defend the Lacey Act with New Report
Air and Water in the OECD Report
State of Green Business Report 2012
Retail Sustainability Leadership Report
A Slowdown for Green Business in 2012
IPCC Report
Report from The Green Economy
Global Carbon Rankings 2011 from the EIO
Clean Tech Job Trends 2010 Report Part 1
Clean Tech Job Trends 2010 Report: Part 2
WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
Report on the UN's World Water Day Panel
Corporate Sustainability is Driving Green

The Cycle of Climate Change Acceptance

Like all major socio-economic revolutions the acceptance of climate change takes time. Although reluctance to fully engage the battle against climate change may seem painfully slow, it is consistent with the theoretical stages in what is known as the cycle of acceptance.

The popular attitude towards climate change, must go through various stages before the bitter truth can be inculcated into the public psyche.

Organizations and individuals who are confronted with facts about global warming have been thrown into a cycle of acceptance. The stages in the process of acceptance are part of a well known process first introduced by Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in her 1969 book, On Death and Dying. The Kübler-Ross Model is commonly known as The Five Stages of Grief, it is also referred to as the Cycle of Acceptance. In essence it involves 5 steps:

1. Denial
2. Anger
3. Depression
4. Bargaining
5. Acceptance

Denial, although a waste of valuable time, is the first step on the road to acceptance. Over the last couple of years we have seen a lot of denial and anger surrounding the issue of climate change, but there are indications that we may be moving towards acceptance.

People are at different stages when it comes to climate change. While some are still stuck in the denial phase, there are others who feel hopeless and depressed due to the slow acceptance of climate change in North America. While many polls indicate that American support for climate change declined in 2009 and 2010 there may be a positive trend beginning to develop in 2011.

Popular support for the issue of combating global warming has languished over the last couple of years, however, according to a May 2011 Yale Survey titled Public Support for Climate and Energy Policies, an increasing number of Americans now believe that tackling climate change should be a national priority.

We are currently experiencing an upswing in a cycle that will entrench environmental issues into the popular psyche.

The Pembina Institute provides policy research leadership and education on climate change and energy issues. Clare Demerse, acting director for climate change at the Pembina Institute’s Ottawa offices, believes it’s only a matter of time before we are all talking about global warming.

“All issues go through a cycle where they are at top and then fall off and that’s where we are now. It will be back up there again.”

However, the amount of time it takes a person or an organization to complete the cycle of acceptance is critical. The longer they take to come to the stage of acceptance, the less likely they are to ever fully complete the cycle, and the less likely they are to make the difficult decisions to deal with the problem wisely.

© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
The False Choice Between the Economy and the Environment
Belief in Global Warming is Tied to the Economy
A New Survey Shows that Americans Now Want to Address Climate Change
US Consumer Attitudes on Green
The Rise of the Green Consumer
Surveys of America's Greenest Brands Suggest that Redemption is Possible
People Remain Loyal to Green Even in an Economic Downturn
Green's Coming of Age
Consumers Continue to Embrace the Burgeoning Green Market