Showing posts with label critic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critic. Show all posts

Canada's Leader of the Official Opposition on the Keystone XL Pipeline

Thomas Mulcair is the leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) and the official opposition in Canada's federal parliament appears to be of two minds on the Keystone XL pipeline. He is a lawyer, university professor, and politician. Mulcair is a NDP Member of Parliament for the electoral district of Outremont in Quebec since 2007, he was selected as the leader of the New Democratic Party on March, 2012, with 57 percent of the votes on the fourth and final ballot. Mulcair succeeded the late Jack Layton.

Previously Mulcair was a member of the Liberal Party of Quebec where he was the provincial Member of the National Assembly (MNA) of Quebec for the riding of Chomedey in Laval from 1994 to 2007. He served as the Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks from 2003 until 2006, in the Liberal government of Premier Jean Charest. Elected MP for Outremont in a by-election in 2007, he was named Deputy Leader of the New Democratic Party, jointly with Libby Davies, shortly afterwards, and has won re-election twice.

Mulcair's perspective on the Keystone XL seems a bit contradictory. As reported in the Edmonton Journal, the NDP leader told Americans that it's their decision on whether to approve Keystone but not to believe the Harper government's claims that Canada has a good record on the environment.

He then went on to say, "They [Americans] know that Canada is the only country that has withdrawn from Kyoto. They know that the Conservatives can’t possibly meet their Copenhagen targets (on greenhouse gas emissions) precisely because of the oilsands. They have to stop playing people for fools," he noted adding that he'd rather see a cross-Canada pipeline.

"...A president who has repeatedly identified climate change as one of humanity’s most pressing dangers cannot in good conscience approve [the Keystone pipeline] project that — even by the State Department’s most cautious calculations — can only add to the problem."

While applauded by those who oppose the project, Mulcair's statements on the Keystone XL are at odds with Canadians. According to an Abacus Data survey 53 per cent of Canadians support the development of the pipeline.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Canada is a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canadian Government Spending on Dirty Projects
Report Urges Canada's Federal Conservatives to Regulate Oil and Gas Sector to Meet GHG Targets
Canada's GHG Ranking
Canada is a Dirty Energy Superpower
Canada has the Dirtiest Oil on Earth (Video)
Canadian Conservatives Silence Opposition to the Northern Gateway Oil Pipeline
Canada's Hopes for an Environmentally Friendly Federal Leadership Now Rest with Justin Trudeau

Video: The Inherent Design Flaws In The "Resource Based Economy" Model



This video is Peter Joseph's reply to Zeitgeist's support for a resource based economy. In this video Jospeh reviews the numerous, very real, and legitimate problems. Those problems are not minor details that can be glossed over or fixed at a later date, they are in fact inherent design flaws which render it unworkable.

In light of the recession and political deadlock it is understandable why the ideas behind a resource based economy are popular. It is easy to support being more sustainable, (radical efficiency, recycling, eliminating waste, etc). It is also easy to support the idea of creating a single system that shares resources. While these and other tenants are admirable, a Resource-Based Economic Model, it is yet another unrealistic utopia. Change is difficult for most and we simply do not have the time for the radical changes advocated by the Zeitgeist Movement.

One of the biggest problems with a resource based economy is the notion of removing the monetary exchange system and eliminating free markets. The free market is an efficient system and our monetary system provides incentives and disincentives that are consistent with human psychology. The failure of pure forms of socialism illustrate that this form of governance does not work.

As laudable as the ideals of a resource based economy might be, we have no time for the radical changes they require. The urgency of the threats posed by climate change mean we must be utterly realistic about creating a sustainable world using the most expedient means at our disposal. To make the changes we need to see in the time we have demands that we work within our current economic and monetary system.

© 2012, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Video: The Zeitgeist Movement Explains a Resource Based Economic Model
Video: A Resource-Based Economy