Showing posts with label President. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President. Show all posts

Trump's First 100 Days are a Climate and Environmental Nightmare

Trump's first 100 days have been a dismal failure. Trump failed to deliver on almost every single one of his promises leading many to conclude that the self-proclaimed deal-maker can't seem to close. True to his word he is making progress on one front, depriving Americans of clean air and clean water.

Trumps Muslim ban failed, his attempt to pass health-care legislation also failed. Congress will not finance his wall and nor will Mexico.  Rather than drain the swamp he has made the swamp bigger. The president has rewarded the wealthy on the backs of the poor and the middle class. His one-page reward-the-rich tax plan does not have a snowball's chance in hell of passing and if it were ever enacted by Congress it would trigger economic ruin.

Clearly, Trump does not have a clue about how to get things done in Washington.  Here is a general summary of Trump's first 100 days, by most accounts, the worst 100 days in modern US presidential history.



Trump's inauguration was a gloomy affair heralding the coming darkness. Even before Trump took the oath of office he cast a shadow over the proceedings at COP22.

Early in his term, some had the audacity to suggest that a Trump presidency would not be as bad as it seemed. They did not have the courage to face the truth about what a Trump administration would mean for the planet. However, their naive hopes were quickly dashed. Shortly after the inauguration, his administration purged all mention of climate change from the White House and State Department websites. However, they did leave one reference, a promise to eliminate Obama-era climate change policies.

Trump then picked Scott Pruitt to head the EPA and ex-Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson to be the secretary of state. These two men and other members of the administration oppose science-based climate action plans. Trump’s budget director, Mick Mulvaney, like so many others in the administration, opposes government funding for climate research.

This brings us to Trump's budget which was a declaration of war against environmental protections, climate action, and scientific research. Trump made it clear that he wants to decimate environmental protections and climate action in the US.

In their first month, the Trump administration resurrected dead or dying pipelines (the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipeline). Within the first two months, they began eliminating vehicle fuel efficiency standards and then they went to work gutting the EPA with proposed budget cuts of 31 percent.

Trump has broken almost every promise he made except for one, the promise to eliminate environmental regulations

On the one hand, Trump is the most ineffectual US president in history on the other he has wreaked unprecedented environmental damage in his first 100 days.  His Executive Orders have systematically rolled back all vestiges of environmental progress in the US. These are protections that began under Republican presidents. He has ended the era of progressive climate action that we saw under President Obama and he has turned the US into a global climate pariah.

When he was running to be president leading Republican insiders suggested he was not fit to be president. After one hundred days in office, it is safe to say that those who made this statement have been vindicated. Even Trump himself conceded that the job is far harder than he had imagined. One hundred days into his presidency Trump has joined the chorus of those who say he is is not up for the job. The point may become moot if he is impeached for collusion with the Russians.

More than any other president who preceded him, Trump is an unmitigated disaster. However, people are standing up and offering unprecedented opposition.

Even before he was president heads of state, climate scientists and business leaders have all urged him to act on climate change. Early in his term, there was the Women's March. This was followed by the March for Science on Earth Day where scientists and others called Trump out for his war on science. One week later there was the Peoples Climate Movement event that drew attention to his utterly irresponsible climate conduct. Just to make sure we get the point, on April 28th, the eve of the Peoples Climate Movement event, all vestiges of climate science were removed from the EPA website.

Trump's strategy is encountering resistance from some business leaders and the courts are challenging his authority.  People are feeling that it is both necessary and appropriate to protest against Trump and they are seeing that there is power in their resistance.

The situation is grim but we need to try to stay hopeful and keep resisting the incompetence of this administration.

RelatedGlobal Warning 2017: Combating the Dystopia of the Trump Administration
Trump and the Darkness of Post-Factual Media
The Trump Administration is a Kakistocracy

Republicans Trying to Kill the EPA Quickly

Trump drew first blood with an Executive Order that enfeebled some of the EPA's activities, now Republicans are going in for the kill. They recently proposed a bill that seeks to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Known as H.R.861, the bill has the following self-explanatory title: "To terminate the Environmental Protection Agency."

While this bill is unbelievably destructive for the American people it should come as no surprise when you consider Republican obstructionism for the last eight years and the man who is now President of the United States. Within his first two weeks in office, Trump signed an Executive Order that targeted the EPA.

The nomination of Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA sent a clear message that made his intentions clear. Pruitt has spent a good chunk of his adult life trying to dismantle the EPA from the outside. Now after having been confirmed in committee he gets to destroy the agency from the inside.

The proposed bill that would kill the EPA has moved on to committee. Don't wait to see if it moves forward from there. Call or email your congressman, write letters to your local newspapers, talk to your friends, don't let the EPA go down without a fight. Despite what Trump may say, the EPA is not a partisan body. Both Democrats and Republicans want and need clean air and water. Don't let Republicans deprive you of your basic human rights.

Call the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 to reach your senators or representative, you can also find the direct number to any member's office by consulting the Senate phone list or House phone list.

Related
Republicans to Sell Off Public Lands and Strip Powers from Federal Agencies
The GOP Starts Gutting Environmental Protections and Transparency
Trump's War against the EPA has Begun
The Importance and the Power of Protest: Why We Must Stand Up to Trump
Pipelines Reborn: They're Back Thanks to Trump
Camps Raided as Trump Moves Forward with DAPL
The Obama Legacy and How Trump Signals the End of an Era (Videos)
Trump's Inauguration Met with Protests as Darkness Officially Descends

Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President

An unprecedented number of Republican insiders have indicated that they cannot bring themselves to support Donald Trump even if he is their party's Presidential nominee. Some have said they will vote for Hilary Clinton, others have opted to leave the GOP altogether.  Republicans who refuse to endorse Trump include past presidents, governors, senators, representatives, experts and aides.

The reasons for the exodus should be obvious to all. Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims.

Make no mistake about it the GOP is not a victim of Trump, they created this monster through their own failed strategies. Trump was conceived through their pandering to the basest aspects of the American electorate. They are responsible for the outrage at government due to their legislative obstructionism.

Republicans had been flirting with racism for a long time. The election of Barack Obama appears to have sent older white Americans over the edge. They see their power being diluted by people of color and progressive ideologies. Rather than assuage their insecurities, and usher them into the modern world, Trump stokes the fires of fear.

It is the Republican party that is broken not the American political system. The current Republican presidential nominee has taken the Republicans far from thier roots and in so doing it has ignored African Americans, Latinos, millennials and women.

Trump has played the fear card and in so doing he has created a passionate following. His racist xenophobia panders to an angry disaffected segment of the American population. However, at present it is nowhere near sufficient for him to win the presidency.

Repeated displays of erratic behavior have forced Republicans to question Trump's temperament. Many worry that he is a threat to national security. What is most troubling for Trump's prospects in November is the fact that he is hemorrhaging support from the core of his own party.

President Obama and others has questioned why Republicans would endorse Trump. Some Republicans have vowed to vote for Hilary, others have said they will stay home on election day. Either way Trump currently has no viable path to the White House.

Women

It is clear that at this point Trump has been criticized by almost everyone who still supports him and the numbers of his supporters appears to be shrinking by the day. Trump does not have support from the black community, he has very little support from Latinos and millennials.  Perhaps the most disconcerting stat is the fact that Republican women's vote is slipping away. While Trump used to enjoy the backing of Republican women, that support is eroding fast. The female vote is pivotal for Trump. In the last presidential election ten million more women voted than men. According to polls conducted by The New York Times and CBS News Trump's support from Republican women has fallen by 13 percent recently.

These women are described as "an electoral cornerstone for the party's past nominees," in a New York Times article. Mitt Romney secured the support of 93 percent of Republican women as did George Bush. The article explained, "high-profile Republican women are abandoning decades of party loyalty and vowing to oppose Mr. Trump."

Dina Vela, a lifelong Republican voter has said she will break ranks and vote for Hilary. a project manager in San Antonio

"For people like me, who are Republican but reasonable and still have our brains attached, its hard to see Trump as a reasonable, sane Republican," she said. It would seem that female voters do not take kindly to his calling for Hilary's assassination.

According to the polls, twice as many women support Hilary over Trump in important swing states like Pennsylvania.

Former presidents and presidential candidates

Trump does not have the support of any living former President including those in the GOP. His presidential bid has been opposed by James Earl Carter, Jr., 1977-1981 George Herbert Walker Bush, 1989-1993 William Jefferson Clinton, 1993-2001 George Walker Bush, 2001-2009 and Barack Hussein Obama, 2009-2016.  Trump's presidency has also been opposed by former GOP Presidential candidates john Kasich, Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush.

Experts

Trump has also failed to secure or lost the support of a number of expert Republicans. Earlier this summer many GOP officials signed letter opposing Trump. In August 50 GOP national security experts opposed Donald Trump in a letter. The fifty signatories are prominent Republican foreign policy and national security experts. This includes many veterans of George W. Bush's administration. The letter denounces Donald Trump's presidential candidacy and specifically warns: "We are convinced that in the Oval Office, he would be the most reckless President in American history." The letter also says: "He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our closest allies with his erratic behavior," the letter claims. "All of these are dangerous qualities in an individual who aspires to be President and Commander-in-Chief, with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal."

Its signatories include former CIA and National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, the former directors of Homeland Security under George W. Bush, Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, former Director of National Intelligence and Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte. neocon leader and member of the Council on Foreign Relations Robert Kagan, former Under Secretary of Defense Policy during the first Bush administration and U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Eric Edelman, former World Bank president, U.S. trade representative, deputy secretary of state Robert Zoellick and dozens of others former Republican presidential administration officials and conservative think tank members.

The deputy secretary of state under George W. Bush, Richard Armitage said he will vote for Hilary. He explained his decision by saying Trump "doesn't appear to be a Republican, he doesn't appear to want to learn about issues." Brent Scowcroft, the National Security Adviser to Presidents George H. W. Bush and Gerald Ford, who worked in the White House of Presidents Richard Nixon and George W. Bush also endorsed Clinton.

Aides

It is not only high profile Republicans that are deserting Trump. The RNC has reportedly lost staffers over Trump. Republican aides are jumping ship and voting for Hilary. This includes an ex-Reagan political director Frank Lavin and Maria Comella, Chris Christie's longtime aide who said Trump is "a demagogue"who preys "on people's anxieties with loose information and salacious rhetoric, drumming up fear and hatred of the 'other'." Sally Bradshaw, a top Jeb Bush adviser has even left the GOP altogether saying, Republicans are "at a crossroads and have nominated a total narcissist -- a misogynist -- a bigot." The former top adviser to Sen. John McCain Mark Salter tweeted his support for Clinton saying "the GOP is going to nominate for President a guy who reads the National Enquirer and thinks it's on the level. I'm with her." The former aide to President George Bush Lezlee Westine also supports Hilary.

Senators

Trump has also been criticized by a a number of high profile Republican Senators including John McCain and Paul Ryan. However, they have yet to formally withdraw their support.

Here is a list of Republican Senators that have publicly abandoned Trump, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah)

Many GOP Senators have told their constituencies to break party ranks and vote their conscience. Here are some of the reasons why:

Sen. Jeff Flake from Arizona senator said: "It's becoming increasingly difficult to see that he's going to make the changes that he needs." Sen. Dean Heller from Nevada said Trump "did a lot of damage" and that he thinks it'll be difficult for the Republican nominee to "recover from his previous comments. "I'll give him a chance, but at this point, I have no intentions of voting for him," Heller said. Rep Mike Coffman from The Colorado said in a TV add, "People ask me, 'What do you think about (Donald) Trump?' Honestly, I don't care for him much."

Sen Lindsey Graham from South Carolina senator said he won't vote for Trump. He explained that he thinks the Republican Party has been "conned" by the Republican presidential nominee.

Sen. Susan Collins from Maine said she will not vote for Trump, she wrote in a Washington Post op-ed, that "Trump is antithetical to GOP values"

Sen. Mark Kirk from Illinois said that he "cannot and will not support" Trump, who he said, "does not have the temperament" to be commander in chief."

Sen. Ben Sasse from Nebraska said he will not vote for Trump because he, "does not even know what the Constitution is about."

Former three-term senator Larry Pressler from South Dakota has endorsed Clinton saying she "would be able to handle such explosive situations which are terrorist inspired much better than Donald Trump."

Former senator from New Hampshire Gordon Humphrey said he won't support Trump, and would vote for Clinton. "I am ever more confirmed in my belief that Trump is a sociopath, without a conscience or feelings of guilt, shame or remorse," Humphrey wrote.

Representatives

A similar story is unfolding with House Republicans, here is a list of representatives that have indicated they will not support Trump. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.), Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.), Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, (R- Fla.), Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), Rep. Scott Rigell (R-Va.), Rep. Bruce Poliquin (R-Me.), Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) and Rep. Reid Ribble, (R-Wis.)

Former Representatives that do not support Trump include Chris Shays of Connecticut, Connie Morella from Maryland, Larry Pressler from South Dakota, David Durenberger from Minnesota, Joe Scarborough from Florida, Norm Coleman from Minnesota, Mel Martinez from Florida, J.C. Watts from Oklahoma. Here is a summary of reasons provided for not supporting the Republican nominee:

Rep. Adam Kinzinger from Illinois said that he doesn't see how he can support Trump following his comments about NATO and the Khan family. "I'm an American before I'm a Republican."

Rep Charlie Dent from The Pennsylvania House member said he will not support Trump saying "I think some of us have to stand up once in a while and just have to say how we feel about this."

Rep. Bob Dold from Illinois said, "I will not support Donald Trump," referring to Trump's comments about women, Muslims, Latinos and POWs. "We're looking for a uniter, not a divider," he said.

Rep. Richard Hanna from New York was the first Republican member of Congress to openly announce he will vote for Hillary Clinton. Rep Ileana Ros-Lehtinen from Florida said that she won't back Trump. Rep. Scott Rigell from Virginia said he will not vote for Trump and he will not run for reelection.

Lobbyist and former three term congressman from Minnesota Vin Weber said that he rejects Trump's candidacy. He called Trump's nomination, "a mistake of historic proportions."

Former congressman Chris Shays of Connecticut wrote "I think many Republicans know Donald Trump could cause great damage to our country and the world at large, and still plan to vote for him. But not me. He represents practically everything I was taught not to be, and everything my wife and I taught our daughter not to be."

Governors

In addition to Kaisch there have been other Republican Governors who have indicated that they will not vote for Trump either. This includes Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan and Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker who said he likely won't support Trump because of, "The things he said about women and Muslims and religious freedom, I just can't support."

Former Michigan governor William Milliken said he won't support Trump. He further indicated that he will vote for Hilary. The former governor of Montana and former chairman of the Republican National Committee Marc Racicot wrote in an op-ed, he "cannot endorse or support" Trump.

Party elders

Former first lady Barbara Bush said Trump has said "terrible things about women, terrible things about the military." "I don't even think about him," she said. "I'm sick of him." The 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney has railed against Trump saying he will not vote for him and pointing out his racism and misogyny.

The Republican Treasury secretary Hank Paulson endorsed Clinton. In an op-ed he said, "a Trump presidency is unthinkable." "To my Republican friends: I know I'm not alone," Paulson wrote.

The longtime conservative commentator and columnist George Will said he left the Republican Party because of Trump -- "I decided that in fact this was not my party anymore," he said.


Business leaders

The president and CEO of Hewlett-Packard Meg Whitman is a major GOP donor who has said she will support Hilary both financially and with her vote. She explained her decision by saying that Trump's "demagoguery has undermined the fabric of our national character."

Republican donor Paul Singer said he will not support Trump neither will Charles and David Koch who have been important supporters of Republican candidates with financial and logistical support. They also have a vast network of think tanks and conservative groups that have helped influence electoral outcomes. Also included in the list of business leaders who will not support Trump is former GM CEO Dan Akerson who has indicated he will vote for Hilary.

As reported by Quartz, Jim Greenwood, the CEO of the Biotech Innovation Organization has expressed serious reservations about the implications of a Trump presidency for business. Robert Atkinson, the head of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, said. “A number of companies are explicitly sitting to the side. There’s a different feel.”

According to Politico corporate donors reneged on millions in donations to the RNC, this includes companies like Apple, BP, United Health, Visa, FedEx, Pepsi and Coca-Cola.

Environmental leaders

It is widely known that a Trump presidency will spell disaster for the environment and efforts to address climate change. As reported by Grist, 2 former Republican EPA chiefs have publicly refused to support Trump and endorsed Hillary for president. William D. Ruckelshaus, who ran the agency under Richard Nixon and again under Ronald Reagan, and William K. Reilly, who was EPA administrator for George H. W. Bush, both argue that Donald Trump would roll back decades of environmental progress made under both Republican and Democratic presidents.

"Donald Trump has shown a profound ignorance of science and of the public health issues embodied in our environmental laws," Ruckelshaus and Reilly write in a joint statement.

Christine Todd Whitman is another American Republican politician who was Governor of New Jersey from 1994 to 2001, and  head of the EPA under administration of President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2003. She said  that she would probably support Clinton over Trump.

Supporters

Trump does have supporters. His core demographic is composed almost entirely of old, white, uneducated men. This is a group that pines for the glory days when the white man ruled and "colored" people knew their place. They have watched that world slip away and they fear further erosion of their privileges.

He also has some international admirers. Trump was lauded as a "genius" by Russia'a Vladimir Putin and he is also respected by North Korean crazy-man Kim Jong Ill. As reported by Reuters, DPRK, North Korea's State controlled press called Trump "a wise politician and a prescient presidential candidate."

Trump also enjoys the support of professional wrestlers (Jesse "The Body" Ventura and Hulk Hogen), a bevy of ditzy airheads (Fran Drescher, Tila Tequila and Jessica Simpson), a convicted rapist (Mike Tyson), a drug addict (Charlie Sheen), and a couple of celebrities whose sanity is highly questionable  (Denis Rodman and Gary Busey).

Related
Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump
Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division
Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump

When it comes to climate and the environment, the DNC made it abundantly clear that the Democratic ticket is a far better choice than the Republican alternative. Despite what some are saying the Democrats are the only choice. However, Trump's lies and ignorance are being bolstered by misrepresentations from the left.  At the DNC speakers praised Hilary Clinton's support for climate action and they lauded the most progressive Democratic platform in the party's history. This is in stark contrast to the Republican National Convention, the GOP's platform and Donald Trump's own words.

The Democrats not only accept science, they embrace it. While the Republican nominee flouts science and subscribes to a populist world view that tells older white men what they want to hear. The GOP are bereft of reason, and Trump's combination of ignorance and lies have thus far been the foundation of his bid for the presidency.

At the DNC in Philadelphia, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) were among a number of people who pointed to Hilary's stance on climate action. While at the RNC fracking kingpin Harold Hamm was the only one who mentioned climate change saying that it "isn’t our biggest problem." He went on to say we need to see more oil and gas production. This is a position that has been supported by Trump.

At the DNC Sanders said,
"This election is about climate change, the greatest environmental crisis facing our planet, and the need to leave this world in a way that is healthy and habitable for our kids and future generations. Hillary Clinton is listening to the scientists who tell us that ― unless we act boldly and transform our energy system in the very near future ― there will be more drought, more floods, more acidification of the oceans, more rising sea levels. She understands that when we do that we can create hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs. Donald Trump? Well, like most Republicans, he chooses to reject science. He believes that climate change is a “hoax,” no need to address it. Hillary Clinton understands that a president’s job is to worry about future generations, not the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry."
As reported by Politico, Trump was once again rebuffed by the Koch's after he reached out to them this weekend. Very early on when he was still vying for the party's leadership the Koch's said that Trump was unelectable, this position persisted even after Trump reluctantly agreed to have Mike Pence serve as his Vice Presidential running mate. With this most recent rejection, it looks as though the Koch brothers money and sophisticated king-making apparatus will not be put in the service of The Donald. Trump maintains that it was the Koch's who reached out to him, something that a Koch brothers spokesman denied.

Despite the fact that Hilary is the best choice for climate action, a dedicated group of people in the so called "Bernie or Bust" movement stubbornly refuse to back her. It would appear that they would rather remain true to their ideals than accept a compromise that may be our last best chance of saving the planet. In a powerful DNC speech President Obama refuted this approach and reminded the American people about the intentions of the founding fathers and the need for compromise to make democracy work.

Green Party leader Jill Stein said, "If you don't want to vote for a warmonger or racist billionaire, there are more options." While she will not come close to winning, if enough people buy into her lie, she may be a spoiler candidate who succeeds in splitting the vote just enough to allow the Republican presidential abomination to win the White House.

We have seen a few examples of how vote splitting changed the outcome in the presidential elections in recent years. This includes the elections of 1992, 1996 and 2000. Ross Perot split votes away from Republican president George H.W. Bush (1992) and senator Bob Dole (1996), causing Democratic candidate Bill Clinton to win. Similarly in 2000, Ralph Nader split votes away from Democratic candidate Al Gore, contributing to the victory of Republican candidate George W. Bush.

With runaway climate change in the balance, this election is arguably the most important in American history. If climate hawks and others on the left do not vote strategically, they will have only themselves to blame.

Related
Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President
Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division
Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division

As the Republican National Convention drew to a close Donald Trump delivered a speech in which he made it clear that he will dismantle US efforts to address climate change all while exacerbating its cause. He wants to get rid of environmental regulations and expand the domestic production of fossil fuels. Here is a succinct analysis of climate and environment related remarks made by Trump during his acceptance speech at the RNC on July 21, 2016.
Trump reiterated his climate destroying policy positions as follows:
"Then we are going to deal with the issue of regulation, one of the greatest job killers of them all....we will end and it very quickly. We are going to lift the restrictions on the production of American energy...Our steelworkers and are miners are going back to work again."
The RNC of 2016 was a reflection of the Trump campaign and the man himself lots of bluster with little substance. Although Trump tried to suggest that the convention was a success, it was defined more by who did not show up rather than those who did. Despite the talk of unity, it was a convention marked by division and discord. 

While Trump mentioned the crises faced by Americans, he was referring to minor threats compared to the dangers of climate change.  Comparatively speaking, Trump's fear mongering on the subject of domestic terrorism is a false flag as is his reference to attacks against law enforcement. Neither one of these issues is anywhere near as devastating as climate change, let alone what it will be if we fail to act. While climate change kills more than a quarter of a million people annually, the most recent statistics show that 18 Americans were killed by terrorism in 2014. The Guardian reports that except for 2013, last year (2015) there were fewer police fatalities than at any point in the last quarter century. Millions are expected to die each year if we do not address climate change.

Trump said that he will protect the LGBT community from ISIS but who is going to protect them from Republicans? The GOP party platform is the most anti-LGBT position in the party's history. Who will protect African Americans from Republicans? There were fewer African Americans at the 2016 RNC than at any previous convention in over a century.

Trump said, "We will completely rebuild our depleted military." And yet the pentagon and the various branches of America's armed services are saying that we must act on climate change as it represents one of the greatest threats to American security. He also wants to take care of veterans however he fails to mention that they support clean energy.

The urgent need for climate action makes the US election of 2016 critically important.  The misguided frustration of the American people may very well propel Trump to an election victory and if this happens we all will lose.

Like petulant children millions of disaffected Americans want to vent their frustration against the system by making a self defeating choice at the ballot box. Rather than blame the the fossil fuel powered obstructionism of Republicans many ill informed Americans are laying blame equally on both parties.  They are prepared to express their outrage by cutting their nose to spite their face, very much like Britain's Brexit vote. The facts are our only hope, we must believe that reason will prevail and people will see Trump for who he is and what he represents.

Trump concluded his speech by saying, "History is watching us now. It's we don't have much time. We don't have much time. It's waiting to see if we will rise to the occasion," He went on to talk about "every parent who dreams for their child, and every child who dreams for their future..." He is right that we don't have much time and he is right that we must rise to the occasion. However the elephant in the room that he and his Republican cohorts fail to mention is climate change. On this, economic and foreign policy issues, a Trump presidency would be an anathema for anyone who dreams of a better life for their children.

History is indeed watching and if Americans vote for this man, they will be voting for an unprecedented disaster that will augur suffering on a scale never before seen.

Trump said that "Any politician who does not grasp this danger is not fit to lead our country." he also made the ridiculous and impossible claim that violence will "come to an end" on the first day that he takes office. As Trump explained, "The most basic duty of government is to defend the lives of its citizens. Any government that fails to do so is a government unworthy to lead." If he took his own advice he would disqualify himself and his party from vying for the highest office in the land.

Related
Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President
Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump
Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention

As an omen of what is to come, the Trump motorcade had an accident on the way to the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. A Trump presidency would not only be calamitous for the economy it would likely push us past climate tipping points. Trump has indicated that he will double down on fossil fuels and this means that if Trump wins we all lose

There continues to be determined focused resistance to Trump's Presidential bid from almost all quarters of American society. The small but growing number of Republicans who accept climate science will not be at the convention along with a surprising number of others. Trump has little support from Hispanics, blacks, millennials and women.

Women and minorities tried to shine some light into the proceedings with an art installation focusing on the value of progressive women's voices. The artist behind the project, Spencer Tunick, said the installation was a way for people to positively channel “their anger through art against the hateful repressive rhetoric of many in the Republican party.”

The 2016 Republican National Convention is noteworthy more for who is not attending than for those who are speaking. The speakers lineup is composed largely of Trump family and friends. Conspicuously absent are a bevy of GOP stars including John McCain, Mitt Romney, George Bush (junior and senior), John Kasich.

Although Trump does not have the support of political insiders, he does enjoy support from a number of other groups including white supremacists and bikers. There was also an armed group of Trump supporters who stood outside the convention hall ready to shoot "thugs" who get too uppity.

The list of speakers says it all. Instead of the kind of political thinkers that normally speak at these conventions, Trump has lined up an assortment of supermodels, soap opera stars and reality television personalities.

One of the highlights is Willie Robertson, CEO of Duck Commander and star of Duck Dynasty. Although speakers like Robertson may lack political acumen, his show has good ratings and he is nothing short of a god to rednecks.

Although some Republicans are trying to convey party unity, many delegates do not appear to have gotten the memo. The #NeverTrump contingent, headed by Utah senator Mike Lee, drove the Republican leadership from the podium on the first day of the convention. Those who continue to oppose Trump claimed they had secured signatures from a majority of delegates from 9 different states or territories to keep their hope of dumping Trump alive. The powers that be refused to hear their pleas. The effort to depose Trump as the party's nominee is far from settled. As frustrated Colorado delegate Kendal Unruh said on the convention floor, "you will see more insurgency, because, and I have nothing to do with the fact that people now know that their voices were squelched."

Republican delegates did however pass the party's platform which is in stark contrast to the progressive climate and environment platform passed by Democrats. One of the planks of the GOP's climate destroying platform is borrowed directly from the Clean Coal Coalition. It involves the absurd notion that coal is an “abundant, clean, affordable, reliable domestic energy resource.”

As reviewed in a Progressive Pulse fact checking post, not only is coal a major driver of climate change it is also responsible for air pollution.

"From the mine to the pit, from the ash pond to the smokestack, coal is in reality, a very dirty form of energy. Coal-fired power plants are the biggest emitters of mercury and arsenic. They also emit numerous hazardous compounds, some of them cancer-causing, plus sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which help form acid rain."

The convention, like Trump's campaign, is fueled by the rage of old, ignorant white men.

Related
Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President
Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump
Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)

The Republican presidential nominee's choice of VP suggests that the Trump camp may have been hoping to secure support from conservative Christians and the Koch brothers (David and Charles). Earlier this week Donald Trump unceremoniously revealed that Michael Richard "Mike" Pence as his pick for his Vice Presidential running-mate.

Pence is a climate denier and supporter of dirty energy who has sat in the House of Representatives where he amassed an anti-climate and anti-environment voting record.  He has been the governor of Indiana since 2013 where he has been a vocal critic of the Clean Power Plan.


Climate denier supporter of dirty energy

Pence is not overly delicate on the subject of climate change, in fact he has dismissed it as a hoax. In 2001 he explained that he did not agree with the scientific consensus on climate change, he added that the Earth was “actually cooler than it was 50 years ago and that global warming was a “myth.”

“Global warming is a myth...The [Kyoto] global warming treaty is a disaster. There, I said it … The chant is ‘the sky is warming! the sky is warming!’. The only problem is that many Americans, including Vice President Al Gore, didn’t learn of their deceit the last time around and are buying this new bit hook, line and sinker....I think the quiet expansion of the liberal environmentalist agenda by Al Gore and Clinton White House that will cost thousands of jobs could be more important. Say no to the global warming treaty.”

In 2009, he told MSNBC, “I’m all for clean coal technology." In the same interview, he insisted the science of climate change is “very mixed” and he claimed that in “the mainstream media, there is a denial of the growing skepticism in the scientific community on global warming.”

In a 2014 interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, Pence said that he didn’t think the science of climate change was “resolved,” he supported his statement with the observation that Indiana had a “tough winter” that year.

"I don't know that that is a resolved issue in science today ... just a few years ago we were talking about global warming. We haven't seen a lot of warming lately. I remember back in the 70's we were talking about the coming ice age."

Here are some other energy and climate comments made by Pence in an interview with Chris Matthews:



Pence even supported more offshore drilling in the wake of BP's deadly explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform and devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. He was also a strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline.

Voting record in the House of Representatives

When he was in Congress the League of Conservation Votersreported that he voted 201 times against environmental interests and just 18 times in favor. He twice voted against climate legislation and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Opposition to the Clean Power Plan

Pence does more than just question the existence of climate change he works to thwart national efforts to address it. Pence is one of the governors that sued the federal government over the Clean Power Plan. Released on August 3, 2015, the plan imposes emissions regulations that will cut carbon pollution from power plants by 32 percent by 2030 from levels recorded in 2005. The opposition from Pence comes despite a host of economic and employment benefits. Pence has said that no matter what the outcome of his legal challenge, under his leadership Indiana will not comply with the Clean Power Plan.

Anti-science

As reviewed above, Pence has consistently ignored and derided the science of climate change. In a bid to encourage him to engage in a policy informed by science Indiana scientists came together and drafted a letter to Governor Pence criticizing his stance on climate change.



Koch brothers

In tapping Pence, Trump may have hoped that he could access both funding and big data, however it has not worked. As explained in an NPR article, Pence's ties to the Koch brothers has not won the oil billionaires support for the Republican ticket.

Pence is a climate denier of the first order but what sets him apart from the others on the short list of VP possibles are his close ties to evangelical Christians and the Koch brothers. Pence describes himself as a religious conservative and he is also a supporter of the Tea Party movement. It should be noted that the founding of the Tea Party has been linked to the Koch brothers.

Pence is much loved by the Koch front group Americans For Prosperity (AFP). Two years ago Pence attended the American Dream Summit, the annual grassroots convention organized by the AFP. Pence has made several appearances at other AFP events.

The Koch brothers ties with Pence run deep and go all the way back to 1991 when he became president of the Koch's Indiana Policy Review Foundation. As a member of the House, Pence's chief of staff was Marc Short, who later became president of Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce which is a central office of the Koch network. Pence's congressional press aide, Matt Lloyd, went on to become communications director for Koch Industries. Then Lloyd returned to Gov. Pence as a deputy chief of staff.

As Charles Koch said early on in the Republican primaries, Trump is "unelectable." Charles described the choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as voting for either “cancer or a heart attack.” The Koch brothers disdain for Trump is a serious obstacle to the Republican presidential bid in 2016.

Although David Koch has reportedly given Pence hundreds of thousands of dollars, he has withdrawn a million dollar donation to the Republican National Convention because Trump is the party’s nominee. 

Choosing Pence may have been an attempt by Trump to access to the Koch brothers i360 voter data, which is replacing the RNC voter data platform. Trump has been banned from using the Koch brothers big data project. Trump desperately needs access to this sophisticated machinery as he has no ground game of his own.

In selecting Pence the Trump campaign hoped to tap into the $900 million that the Koch network has earmarked to influence outcomes in this election cycle.

However, a terse email from Freedom Partners spokesman James Davis appears to indicate that the Trump camp's strategy has failed. As explained in the email: "We are not engaging in the presidential. Our focus will remain on the Senate."

Failure to secure support from the Koch brothers is a disastrous blow to the Trump campaign.

Related
Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President
Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump
Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division
Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Hilary Clinton is our Last Best Hope of Tackling Climate Change
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come

Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump has taken his first beating. His ill informed and contradictory statements make for easy fodder. Thinking people recoil in horror at Trump's populism. The man known as "The Donald" has been variously described as a con-man, pathological liar and fascist. On June 2nd the likely Democratic Nominee Hilary Clinton lashed out at the Republican presidential nominee. The verbal lashing was the first time that a rival has taken on Trump since failed GOP contender Ted Cruz took his best shot.

By most accounts Hilary KOed Trump in what promises to be his first of many beatings. It is not that Hilary is such a great orator, it is simply that Trump's litany of absurd statements make him especially vulnerable.

"He's not just unprepared -- he's temperamentally unfit" Hilary said. She is not the first to suggest he is unfit to be president. There have been many serious commentators who have questioned Trump's ability to be president. This point was reiterated in a recent Washington Post op-ed that said essentially the same thing.

"Donald Trump's ideas aren't just different -- they are dangerously incoherent," Clinton said. "They're not even really ideas -- just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies." Clinton said in her speech. "We cannot put the safety of our children and grandchildren in Donald Trump's hands. We cannot let him roll the dice with America."

Hilary pointed to the stark differences between her and her rival. She described the forthcoming presidential election as a a choice "between a fearful America that is less secure and less engaged with the world, and a strong America that leads to keep us safe and our economy going."

All around the world Trump is perceived as an offensive joke. As Mexican reporter Luis Kaim Gebara wrote: "It is difficult for a person of his ilk to be taken seriously,"

President Obama said that the Trump presidential bid has "rattled" world leaders. As the world's wealthiest and most powerful nations were meeting in Shima Japan, the President told reporters that the leaders of G7 nations (Italy, Japan, Britain, Canada, France and Germany), are "rattled" by Trump. He added "and for good reason. I think it’s fair to say that they are surprised by the Republican nominee; they are not sure how seriously to take some of his pronouncements."

Obama went on to explain that

"A lot of the proposals that he’s made display either ignorance of world affairs or a cavalier attitude or an interest in getting tweets and headlines instead of actually thinking through what it is that is required to keep America safe and secure and prosperous and what’s required to keep the world on an even keel."

At the end of the summit Obama said: "[Trump] doesn’t know much about foreign policy or nuclear policy or the Korean Peninsula or the world generally. We don’t want somebody in the Oval Office who doesn’t recognize how important that is."

While the Republican nominee may be reviled by heads of state around the world he has received an endorsement from North Korea. An editorial in the state-owned DPRK Today praised Trump as a "wise politician" and "far sighted presidential candidate."

At the end of May Trump shared his views on America’s energy future at the North Dakota Petroleum Council conference in Bismarck. He derided the Obama administration for blocking production of oil and natural gas and he indicated that he would dismantle the EPA's Clean Power Plan.

"Here is my 100-day action plan: Rescind all the job-destroying Obama executive actions, including the climate action plan," Trump said.

Trump went on to explain that his "America First" energy policy would exploit "$50 trillion" worth of untapped coal, oil and gas by dismantling safety and environmental regulations. Saying that "Federal regulations put coal miners out of business," and his plan would put coal miners back to work. He would also review the Keystone XL pipeline.

Trump said of the COP21 deal: "We’re going to cancel the Paris climate treaty." While the agreement worked out at COP21 may be hard to cancel, by not honoring it he can effectively kill the deal.

"We are going to turn everything around," Trump said "and quickly, very quickly."

Trump further indicated his eagerness to kill any form of climate assistance to developing nations. "We have deep problems and we can't be sending our money all over the world," he said.

Among his many dishonest statements, Trump saved some of his biggest lies for the wind industry. He disparaged wind turbines by saying they kill millions of birds. He also stated that "wind is very expensive."

Lets be clear, a Trump Presidency would signal the death knell for climate action capable of keeping the world from warming more the the upper threshold limit of 2 degrees Celsius.

"Trump’s energy policies would accelerate climate change, protect corporate polluters who profit from poisoning our air and water, and block the transition to clean energy that is necessary to strengthen our economy and protect our climate and health," said Tom Steyer, a billionaire environmental activist.

Trump's hypocrisy and opportunism are revealed in his dismissal of global warming as "bullshit" on the one hand and efforts to protect his own assets on the other. All this while while promising to undue protections for Americans.

In response to rising seas attributable to global warming, his seaside golf resort, Trump International Golf Links & Hotel Ireland, has applied to build a sea wall.

As reviewed in Politico:
"Trump’s company has warned not only the county council of the perils of climate change, but also local residents."
Trump's presidential aspirations do not appear to be helping his brand. In a classic case of people voting with their wallets, bookings at Trump Hotels have plummeted by almost 60 percent since he became the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

Related
A Trump Presidency Would Kill Climate Action and Push us Past Irreversible Tipping Points 
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose 
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others