Showing posts with label Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Policy. Show all posts

Using Insurance Costs to Advance Action on Climate Change

One of the best ways of changing public attitudes on climate change is by letting people bear the real costs of insurance. This argument suggests that higher insurance costs may be the best way to advance action on climate change.

According to a report by Ceres titled, "Inaction on Climate Change: The Cost to Taxpayers," climate change already costs every American taxpayer $300 and going forward the costs will be debilitating. The report further indicates that every dollar spent on prevention saves four dollars in damages.

The Ceres report called for new laws that would remove government insurance subsidies, it further suggests phasing in of premium rates that reflect climate change associated risks. This should also apply to the federal crop insurance programand taxpayer-funded federal and state wildfire protection.

The absence of cheap insurance would auger more responsible behavior and heighten political interest in mitigation.“Continuing to ignore these escalating risks may be more comfortable than confronting the challenges of climate change, but inaction is the far riskier and more expensive path,” the report stated.

© 2014, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Insurance Company Acknowledges that Extreme Weather is Caused by Climate Change
Hurricane Sandy is a Powerful Reminder for those who Ignore Climate Change
Extreme Weather and the Costs of Climate
The Costs of Global Warming
Extreme Weather Makes a Convincing Case for Climate Change
New Types of Insurance Reduce Premiums
A Greener Insurance Company
Insurance Companies Sustainability Pledges at Rio+20 UN Forum
Policies Contributing to More Robust Climate Risk Disclosure
The Financial Value and Costs Associated with Biodiversity
Bill McGibben: The Planet Wreckers
Hurricane Irene Illustrates the Staggering Costs of Ignoring Climate Change

A Large and Growing Chorus is Calling for an End to Fossil Fuel Subsidies

As we move past the threshold of 400 parts per million of atmospheric CO2, fossil fuel subsidies appear even more unconscionable. These subsidies could be used to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy. In addition ending subsidies could   decrease carbon pollution by 13 percent.

A number of prominent organizations including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the United Nations (UN) are calling for an end to fossil fuel subsidies.

In March, 2013, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released a report that called for an end to fossil fuel subsidies. The IMF report titled, Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications, indicates that these subsidies account for almost nine percent of all annual country budgets, amounting to a staggering $1.9 trillion.

In April 2013, World Bank President Jim Yong Kim has urged the world’s environmental ministers to implement a five-point plan that includes ending fossil fuel subsidies.

A United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report titled Green Economy and Trade-Trends, Challenges and Opportunities, recommended eliminating subsidies that encourage unsustainable production and establishing pricing policies that take account of the true environmental and social costs of production and consumption.

Support for ending fossil fuel subsidies comes from a wide range of sources including:
President Obama has repeatedly called for an end to more than $4 billion a year in subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, arguing that these “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies… impede investment in clean energy sources and undermine efforts to address the threat of climate change.”

At a recent meeting in Bonn of more than 600 government officials and NGOs US negotiators pushed nations to end coal, gas and oil subsidies by 2020, a step they said could cut emissions 10 percent under business-as-usual levels by mid-century.

American support for ending fossil fuel subsidies is strong across the political spectrum. In a 2011 survey titled Public Support for Climate & Energy Policies Yale researchers found that 70% of Americans opposed federal subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, including Republicans, Independents, and Democrats. 70 percent of Americans say global warming should be a very high (12%), high (25%), or medium (33%) priority for the president and Congress, including 44 percent of registered Republicans, 72 percent of Independents and 85 percent of Democrats. Opposition to federal subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, include 67 percent of registered Republicans, 80 percent of Independents, and 68 percent of Democrats. Further, 54 percent of Americans oppose subsidies to the ethanol industry.

A fact sheet by 350.org lists the money that would be saved by eliminating fossil fuel subsidies:

  • $14 billion saved by eliminating the intangible drilling deduction 
  • $12 billion saved by repealing a 2004 law that allows fossil fuel corporations to take deductions aimed at helping American manufacturers by claiming they are manufacturers 
  • $6.8 billion saved by closing the loophole that allows corporations like BP to deduct money they spend cleaning up their own oil spills and paying damages 
  • $2.4 billion saved by stopping fossil fuel companies from investing through Master Limited Partnerships, an option not available to clean energy businesses 
  • $3.7 billion saved by shutting the federal Office of Fossil Energy 
  • $10.6 billion saved by recouping lost royalties for offshore drilling in public waters

The Department of the Interior has given almost $30 billion in government handouts to the coal industry through its coal leasing program. Through noncompetitive “auctions,” the Department sells the rights to publicly-owned coal to coal companies for a fraction of their worth. And there’s almost four billion more tons of this coal that the DOI could give away in the coming years.

Greenpeace has initiated a campaign to tell Interior Secretary Sally Jewell "put an end to these coal industry handouts for good." and keep them from "ramping up efforts to export federally-owned coal abroad....I call on you to put an immediate moratorium on new federal coal leasing and to bring the federal coal leasing program in line with President Obama's call to respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations."


WWF Global Energy Policy Director Stephan Singer says industrialized countries are responsible for the lion’s share of fossil fuel subsidies and should act now to stop them.

“If they were to abolish those subsidies and reform towards renewables and energy efficiency investments, it would more than triple present global investment into renewables,” said Singer. “And that is what is needed for a world powered by 100 percent sustainable renewables.”

A 2012 analysis shows that fossil fuel subsidies in rich countries are, on average, five times greater than those same countries’ pledges towards climate finance.

Other sources say that fossil fuels are subsidized at almost six times the rate of renewable energy. From 2002 to 2008, the US federal government gave the fossil fuel industry over $72 billion in subsidies while the renewable industry only received $12.2 billion.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies Totaling One Trillion Per Year
Rio+20: 350.org Campaign to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Obama Striving to Put an End to Oil Subsidies
GOP Fights Removal of Oil Subsidies
End Fossil Fuel Subsidies
Obama's Call for an End to Oil Subsidies
Tell the G20 to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies Now
Scientists Urge Government Action on Climate Including Removing Oil Subsidies
350.org's Connect the Dots End Fossil Fuel (2012)
Obama Striving to Put an End to Oil Subsidies
Environmental Politics: Obama Versus the GOP
Scientists Urge Government Action on Climate Including Removing Oil Subsidies
4 Principles for Climate and Energy Legislation

Event - 2013 Annual National Environmental, Energy And Resources Law Summit

The 2013 Annual National Environmental, Energy And Resources Law Summit will take place on Thursday Jun 20 to Fri Jun 21, in Yellowknife, NT. at The Explorer Hotel, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. This summit is set against the backdrop of Canada’s arctic region. This engaging program is designed to provide private practitioners, in-house corporate and government counsel, regulators, and other professionals with an annual update on the hottest issues in the environmental, energy and resources law field.

Canada’s economy increasingly revolves around projects devoted to the extraction of its natural resources and the production of energy. As resource extraction projects gain attention, so too does the role of lawyers in the field. More and more, lawyers are advising clients and appearing before courts and tribunals on matters such as the environmental assessment of mining projects, the development of renewable energy generation projects, and the intersecting Aboriginal consultation process and accommodation issues.

This program will feature leading experts and practitioners discussing legal regimes and challenges associated with resource extraction projects such as mining and oil and gas extraction, spanning both north and south of 60. Substantive topics will address off-shore resource development, natural gas extraction, environmental assessment issues, renewable energy, streamlining regulatory processes, sustainable development, and corporate social responsibility. Participants will gain a better understanding of how this burgeoning area is unfolding on the international, national, and local levels. This is a premier program with an added northern lens – not to be missed given the natural resource development opportunities north of 60.

Summit attendees are welcome to attend the NEERLS full-day business meeting on June 22. This is a terrific opportunity to get to know the NEERLS executive, to learn more about section activities, and to get involved!

For more information or to register click here.

Related Posts
Comprehensive Summary of US Green Legislation
New Tool Tracks State Energy Legislation Across the US
Video - Advanced Energy Legislation (AEL) Tracker
New Jersey Supreme Court Ruling Undermines Enforcement of Wetlands Protections
Comprehensive Climate Legislation in the US this Spring?
Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
Republicans Undermined Climate Legislation
The US is Bound by Law to Honor Climate Treaty
4 Principles for Climate and Energy Legislation
US Green Legislation
Green Marketing Legislation
The Passage of Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
State Green Jobs Initiatives Need Federal Legislation
Chinese Green Legislation, Part 2
Chinese Green Legislation, Part 1
European Green Legislation Part 1
European Green Legislation Part 2
Europe's Legislation for Greener Cars
Green IT Investment, Regulation and Legislation
Mexico Passes Climate Change Law
South Korea Passes Cap-and-Trade Legislation
The Lacey Act Combats Illegal Logging
Review of Five Socially Minded Legal Forms

Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
E-Learning Course on the Legal Frameworks and the Environment

Comprehensive Summary of US Green Legislation

It is essential for businesses to keep abreast of the legal imperatives that impinge on their operations. Keeping up with green legislation in the US is no easy task. To help make this effort easier, Greenful has put together a comprehensive summary of environmental legislation from the Clean Air Act (CAA) which was passed in 1967 to Corporate Average Fuel Economy (Cafe) of 2012. Here are 27 links that cover all major green legislation and related amendments:



  • Clean Air Act
  • Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
  • Clean Air Act PM2.5 Update December 2012
  • Clean Water Act
  • Atomic Energy Act
  • Toxic Substances Control Act
  • Endangered Species Act
  • Environmental Justice for Low-Income Populations
  • Protection of Children from Environmental Risks and Safety Risks
  • Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
  • Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
  • Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) (Ocean Dumping Act)
  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Nuclear Waste Policy Act
  • Oil Pollution Act
  • Pollution Prevention Act
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
  • Safe Drinking Water Act
  • Shore Protection Act
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund)
  • Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008
  • Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • Energy Policy Act of 1992
  • Surface Transportation Acts
  • Alternative Motor Fuels Act
  • Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Final Rule 2012

  • Course - Environmental Law & Regulation

    The course Environmental Law and Regulation takes place on March 27, 2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m (Check-in time: 8 a.m.)in New Brunswick, NJ.

    Redesigned and updated for 2013, this interactive course is "TEAM" taught by NJ's top environmental attorneys, regulators and consultants. Case studies in the areas of air, water and land use will be presented in a way that demonstrates the different roles and viewpoints of all members of the team. A client's perspective will also be incorporated into the case studies. The team leaders for each featured topic will present a lightning-round overview of the important statutes, regulations and case law related to their subject areas so that all discussions have context. The consultant and agency representatives will coordinate with the team leaders to present a real-world view of the operation of the law in question from a permitting, enforcement and litigation point of view as they affect both businesses and individuals.
    Agenda: Wednesday, March 27, 2013

    8:00-8:30: Registration
    8:30-10:45 CERCLA and Spill Act
    10:45-11:00: Break
    11:00-12:30: Industrial Site Recovery Act
    12:30-1:30: Lunch
    1:30-2:45: Natural Resource Damages
    2:45-3:00: Break
    3:00-4:30: LSRP/SRRA
    4:30: Adjourn

    Rutgers University Course Code: EL0101CA13

    For more information click here.

    Related Posts
    Comprehensive Summary of US Green Legislation
    New Tool Tracks State Energy Legislation Across the US
    Video - Advanced Energy Legislation (AEL) Tracker
    Supreme Court Decision Undermines Climate Change Legislation
    Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
    Protecting the Planet from Corporate Influence
    4 Principles for Climate and Energy Legislation
    US Green Legislation
    Green Marketing Legislation
    Green IT Investment, Regulation and Legislation
    Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
    E-Learning Course on the Legal Frameworks and the Environment
    The Lacey Act Combats Illegal Logging

    CPAC 2013: Leading Conservatives Don't Want Change

    The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) came together for their annual gathering and they have once again snubbed climate change, green jobs and a sustainable US economy. CPAC is hosted by the American Conservative Union Foundation (ACUF), a 501(c)3 charity.

    The conference was founded in 1973 by the American Conservative Union and Young Americans for Freedom. The majority of attendees are young people under the age of 30, appropriately the theme in 2013 is “America’s Future: The Next Generation of Conservatives.”

    Aside from a few derisive comments, there was no mention of climate change, clean energy or the environment.

    Those who did mention climate change did so with the intent of undermining the green agenda. Speaking at CPAC on Friday March 15, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) tried to disprove climate change by noting that President Obama wore a jacket during his chilly inauguration in January!

    “He [Obama] talked about global warming at his inauguration, I found it ironic that the President was wearing a trench coat it was so cold but he’s talking about global warming,” Rep. Scalise said.

    Conservatives continue to believe that the federal government is overreaching when it tries to move forward on environmental protections and climate change. When Conservatives are not ignoring renewable energy, they are dismissing it. Sen. Rand Paul went so far as to call the solar power industry "wasteful."

    Given the fact that in the 2012 elections conservatives failed to win the Presidency and lost ground in both the House and the Senate, it would stand to reason that some changes may be in the offing for the GOP. However, right from the beginning of the conference change was rebuffed.

    The first speaker at CPAC was the Virginia Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli, he avoided any hint of change and instead preached the old line about American exceptionalism, Marco Rubio added to the no-change agenda saying, "we don't need new ideas." These sentiments were also echoed by Texas Governor Rick Perry.

    Allen West, former U.S. Representative and 22-year Army veteran, stressed that conservatives must not change their message to fit the times. He went on to dismiss the need for change as “malarkey.”

    Their 2012 election defeat clearly indicates that Republicans need to change if it wants to have national majority support. But if you listen to conservatives assembled at CPAC you would never know they have a problem. It seems that denial is not reserved for their stance on climate change. Speaker after speaker banged the same old drum.

    Even Mitt Romney seemed to acknowledge the need for the GOP to change, “It is up to us to make sure that we learn from my mistakes, and from our mistakes, so that we can win the victories those people and this nation depend upon,” Although Romney was well received, his message fell on deaf ears.

    Conservatives cannot seem to comprehend that American attitudes on issues like climate change are changing. The most recent surveys indicate that a growing number of Americans (including Republicans) are accepting the veracity of climate change. Nonetheless, these Luddites laugh at clean energy, deride the science of climate change and scoff at the idea that we need to do more to protect the environment.

    CPAC once again illustrates that the one thing conservatives can't do, is the one thing they need to do - change.

    © 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Articles
    Republicans Need a Serious Policy Review
    Climate Denying Republicans Delay their Convention Due to Extreme Weather
    The Stark Partisan Divide on Global Warming
    The Ignorant Anti-Environmental Views of the Republicans
    The Koch Brother's Ties to GOP's 2012 Presidential Candidates
    Video: The Republican War on Climate Science
    Video: Republicans Anti-Scientific Stance

    Green Excerpts of President Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address

    President Obama has reasserted his commitment to addressing climate change in his 2013 State of the Union address. Here are climate and energy related excerpts of the President's address.

    The American people don't expect government to solve every problem. They don't expect those of us in this chamber to agree on every issue. But they do expect us to put the nation's interests before party. They do expect us to forge reasonable compromise where we can. For they know that America moves forward only when we do so together; and that the responsibility of improving this union remains the task of us all.

    And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms.

    Most Americans – Democrats, Republicans, and Independents – understand that we can't just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that's the approach I offer tonight.

    So let's set party interests aside, and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future.

    Our first priority is making America a magnet for new jobs and manufacturing.

    If we want to make the best products, we also have to invest in the best ideas. Today, our scientists are....devising new material to make batteries ten times more powerful. Now is not the time to gut these job-creating investments in science and innovation. Now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race. And today, no area holds more promise than our investments in American energy. After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone's energy bill is lower because of it. And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen.

    But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change. Yes, it's true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is, the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15. Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, and floods – all are now more frequent and intense. We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it's too late.

    The good news is, we can make meaningful progress on this issue while driving strong economic growth. I urge this Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago. But if Congress won't act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.

    Four years ago, other countries dominated the clean energy market and the jobs that came with it. We've begun to change that. Last year, wind energy added nearly half of all new power capacity in America. So let's generate even more. Solar energy gets cheaper by the year – so let's drive costs down even further. As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we.

    In the meantime, the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence. That's why my Administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water.

    Indeed, much of our new-found energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together. So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good. If a non-partisan coalition of CEOs and retired generals and admirals can get behind this idea, then so can we. Let's take their advice and free our families and businesses from the painful spikes in gas prices we've put up with for far too long. I'm also issuing a new goal for America: let's cut in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next twenty years. The states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make it happen.

    America's energy sector is just one part of an aging infrastructure badly in need of repair. Ask any CEO where they'd rather locate and hire: a country with deteriorating roads and bridges, or one with high-speed rail and internet; high-tech schools and self-healing power grids. The CEO of Siemens America – a company that brought hundreds of new jobs to North Carolina – has said that if we upgrade our infrastructure, they'll bring even more jobs. And I know that you want these job-creating projects in your districts. I've seen you all at the ribbon-cuttings.

    modern schools worthy of our children. Let's prove that there is no better place to do business than the United States of America. And let's start right away.

    But none of it will matter unless we also equip our citizens with the skills and training to fill those jobs. And that has to start at the earliest possible age.

    Tonight, I'm announcing a new challenge to redesign America's high schools so they better equip graduates for the demands of a high-tech economy.

    We'll reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering, and math – the skills today's employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.

    We are citizens. It's a word that doesn't just describe our nationality or legal status. It describes the way we're made. It describes what we believe. It captures the enduring idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another and to future generations; that our rights are wrapped up in the rights of others; and that well into our third century as a nation, it remains the task of us all, as citizens of these United States, to be the authors of the next great chapter in our American story.

    Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

    Related Articles
    Will Obama's Actions Match his Words?
    President Obama's 2013 Inaugural Address: "We Will Respond to the Threat of Climate Change"
    Green Inauguration of President Obama: "Faith in America's Future"
    Hopes for Environmental Action in President Obama's Second Term
    President Obama's Victory Speech: "The Best is Yet to Come"
    Taking Stock of President Obama's Environmental Efforts in His First Term