Climate Protests are at the Heart of Growing Resistance to Trump

Climate concerns are at the core of an intensifying barrage of protests against Trump and his administration. In the face of the Orwellian nightmare of this government, the only sane response is resistance. There is no avoiding the fact that Trump's first 14 months in office have been an unprecedented disaster. Little more than one third of Americans approve of Trump and he is considered by experts to be the worst president in American history. Common sense dictates that Trump's rule must be challenged at every turn.

Protests against this administration are both necessary and appropriate. When Trump is not being challenged he is simply being ignored. No one paid him much attention when the G20 met in July and the same can be said when world leaders met for the Bonn Climate Talks in November.

However, people are doing far more than just ignoring this administration. They seem to be heeding the maxim that all that it takes for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing. People have realized that protest is an important way of combating Trump's dystopia.

Widespread and growing

The resistance movement has been energized by Trump's litany of malfeasance. The widespread opposition to Trump's dysfunctional rule comes from, world leaders, subnational governments, scientists, environmentalists, women and children. Others like Mustafa Ali have chosen to resign from government to voice their protest (Ali was the head of the Office of Environmental Justice). There have been hundreds of similar resignations.

Trump's victory spawned unprecedented protests. On the day Trump was inaugurated the protests began and a year later the scope of protest appears to be growing. 

Resistance to the Trump administration and the GOP is a large and growing phenomenon. It takes place against the backdrop of Special Prosecutors Robert Mueller's ongoing investigation into a wide range of criminal wrongdoing that appears to be getting ever closer to Trump himself.

Women leading the charge

Trump's sexism is legendary as are the long list of complainants that have come forward to report allegations of sexual abuse against the president. This tidal wave of resistance takes place against the backdrop of the ME TOO movement which has empowered women to step forward and report abuse. 

Just after Trump was inaugurated women were among the first to organize massive protests. To commemorate his first year in office there were protest actions across the country, Americans turned out in record numbers to let the president know that his days are numbered. As white conservatives paid $100,000 per couple to celebrate Trump's first anniversary, millions of people, mostly women, marched to protest the most unpopular president in the history of the United States. Protestors gathered in cities and towns all across North America carrying signs like "grab him by the midterms".

Women are leading the resistance movement. Last year 86 percent of the calls to members of Congress were made by women. Female candidates, including women of color, immigrants and trans, were elected in "Trump country". Almost 2.5 million people came out for the second annual Women’s March to fight for women’s rights, reject Trump and the Republican agenda. In 2018 women are competing in every congressional district. This is not just a one day march this is a movement.

Coalitions of opposition

Broad coalitions of groups that are coming together to oppose the Trump administration. Subnational governments are working with businesses and civil society as part of big tent coalitions that are intent on resisting the policy agenda of the commander and chief.

There was widespread resistance to Trump's decison to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. A number of powerful coalitions are focused on resisting Trump's decision to quit Paris. This includes the United States Climate Alliance, Citzens Climate Lobby and a movement called "We Are Still In". This movement was organized by climate champion Michael Bloomberg. It includes 1,800 businesses and investors, 252 cities and nine states.

Trump's decision to exit the Paris Climate Agreement prompted leaders of US states to come together during the United Nation's General Assembly (UNGA) in September 2017 to pledge their support for the goals set forth at COP21. This is the first time the governors have played such an active role at the UNGA.

"You have allies in the United States. You shouldn’t put your foot on the brake or even tap it just because we have a climate denier in the White House. You’re not alone", Washington Governor Jay Inslee told world leaders at UNGA.

One of the leading organizations combating Trump's climate denial is America's Pledge. This is a coalition that supports the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is comprised of more than 2,500 non-federal actors  across America, including states, counties, cites, businesses, universities and universities. Together they are taking action to fight climate change, grow the economy, and protect public health.  This group wants to ensure that the US remains a global leader in emissions reduction. This is no small coalition, together they represent more than half the US economy. When pooled together their combined economic output would make them the world's third largest country. America's Pledge is led by California Governor Jerry Brown and UN Special Envoy on Cities and Climate Michael Bloomberg.

Renewables as protest

Support for renewable energy is both a practical approach to combating climate change and a way of refuting Trump's irrational energy policy. His disdain for renewables and affinity for fossil fuels is harmful to both people and the planet. 

"The trend is very clear...To fight Trump, the investment and deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency have continued growing." Alden Meyer, director of strategy at the Union of Concerned Scientists said at the end of last year.

Climate science expert Michael Mann and others believe that the increasing use of renewables will enable the US to achieve its emission reduction commitments even though Trump has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement.

Protest in Trump country

Even in places where Trump enjoyed strong support people are protesting and expressing their displeasure with this administration. We have seen a string of Democrats beat Republicans in state elections. This includes red states like Virginia and Kentucky. A House District vote in Kentucky went from being 73 percent Trump in 2016 to having a Democrat by the name of Linda Belcher win by the same margin a year later.

People are not only protesting at the ballot box. In the Trump-friendly West Virginia state workers including teachers walked off the job to protest Trump's love for coal. These workers want to know why the coal industry gets so much government support and they don't. Each week they are going to the state capital to vent their frustration. Some of the thousands of protesters that descended on Charleston chanted, "We'll remember in November!".

Democrats AND Republicans are resisting

Three freshman Democratic House members announced that they had formed the United for Climate and Environmental Justice Task Force. Nanette Diaz Barragán of California, Pramila Jayapal of Washington, and Donald McEachin of Virginia pledged to fight to protect the fundamental rights of all Americans to clean air and water. 

Republicans are also voicing their displeasure at the Trump administration. Environmental budgets have been slashed by this administration affecting operations all across the country.  Pushback from Trump's own party comes from a number of places including Ohio where Sen. Rob Portman is resisting the Trump administration's proposal to slash local cleanup efforts as part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. "We have a fight on our hands," Portman told local leaders. It seems Portman had made a deal to support Pruitt as head of the EPA in exchange for a pledge of ongoing funding.

In a display of bipartisanship, Portman has joined an alliance to retain Great Lakes funding that includes lawmakers from Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. There is also a bipartisan congressional coalition dedicated to protecting funding for Chesapeake Bay.

We must keep fighting for a better world because there is so much at stake. Although these are dark times, the broad spectrum of resistance gives us reason to hope.

Related
Corporate America Resists Trump and Embraces Sustainability

Program - 2018 Institute for CSR Certificate

The 2018 Institute for CSR program will take place Mar. 15 – 16, May 10 – 11, July 26 – 27, Sept. 20 – 21 in Washington, DC. Over the course of four, two-day sessions, participants learn from some of the field’s most innovative thinkers, authors, and practitioners, expand their professional networks learning alongside CSR peers from across the country, all while earning a Professional Certificate in CSR from Johns Hopkins University.  Coursework will focus on a wide range of topics, including CSR strategy, trends in philanthropy, employee engagement, ethics and sustainability, measurement, and communications.

Launched in 2014, the Institute for Corporate Social Responsibility was designed by—and for—those in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) field as a practical, interactive, and affordable professional development opportunity for CSR practitioners. This program is designed for CSR practitioners searching for the skills, inspiration, and expanded professional network needed to deliver increased value back to their company and the communities they serve.

The Institute currently accepts up to 25 applicants per year. This small class size ensures maximum faculty and participant interaction, allows for deep and meaningful group discussions and debates, and affords the opportunity to take classroom learnings offsite with “field trips” and networking events. This non-credit, professional certificate program is an initiative of the Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers, offered in partnership with Advanced Academic Programs at Johns Hopkins University and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation’s Corporate Citizenship Center.

“The Institute for CSR provides business professionals with the opportunity to connect with their peers in the field, learn from the most innovative thinkers in CSR, and grow their skills to make a greater impact,” said Marc DeCourcey, senior vice president of the U.S. Chamber Foundation. “By focusing on practical, real-world skills and best practices, the Institute is a valuable experience for all and I encourage those looking to enhance their work to apply to join the 2018 class.”

Now entering its fifth year, the Institute for CSR is a professional development program designed for business professionals currently working in a CSR role. Since its launch, the Institute has featured the expertise of CSR leaders from American Express, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, and other major corporations.

“When we originally designed the Institute for CSR five years ago, it was as a practical, interactive, and affordable professional development opportunity for the CSR field,” said Katy Moore, managing director of Corporate Strategy for the Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers. “What we didn’t anticipate was the invaluable personal and professional connections that participants would build with the faculty, guest speakers, and their fellow classmates. Many of these relationships have strengthened over time and our alumni networks have become trusted sources of advice and feedback for current and past participants.”

"Over the past decade, we've seen an incredible upswing in "corporate citizenship" among companies worldwide, increasing the demand for skilled experts in this burgeoning field,” said Karin Orr, program coordinator for the Graduate Certificate in Nonprofit Management at Johns Hopkins University. “The Institute for CSR capitalizes on this demand by providing a dynamic and innovative space for cross-sectoral exchange and ongoing dialogue among some of the most incredible leading professionals in the CSR field."

Click here to download the brochure
Click here to register.

Event - Responsible Business Summit New York (RBSNY)

The 6th annual RBSNY will take place on March 26 - 27, 2018 at the Marriott, Brooklyn Bridge in New York, USA. Responsible business professionals from North America’s leading brands come together to discuss the impending paradigm shift and transformational change to business, industry, and society. The Responsible Business Summit is USA's premier sustainability and Communications conference. They bring together the leading B2B and B2C companies to share their latest ideas and strategies. The 2018 sustainability conference will bring together the leading minds in responsible business to debate the key issues and opportunities in responsible and sustainable business. RBSNY is the only place in North America addressing the need to create genuine change to business, transform industries to last and create a long-term, positive impact on the environment and society.

The event calls participants to transform business and create long-term impact for industry and society. Increasingly businesses are working together to deliver the ambitious partnerships that will help deliver the SDGs and more.

The Responsible Business Summit New York is USA's must-attend event for CEOs and business professionals looking to shape the future of sustainable and responsible business. There will be more than 400 senior corporate attendees and 70+ CEO & senior-level speakers. There will also be more than 15 hours of dedicated networking time.

Key learnings include:
  • Partnerships that deliver large-scale change across your industry: Transform your industry and its supply chain through successful partnerships with NGOs, competitors, associations and investors
  • Wholesale change in practice: Hear best practice examples of pilot projects which have proved the concept and received buy-in for wholesale change
  • Transform Business to meet the Global Goals: Identify how your business can be the catalyst in driving transformational change to meet the Global Goals
  • Communications to boost trust and lead business transformation: Promote transparency with investors, build trust with your customers and define your success through impactful data
  • Use technology and AI to drive sustainable innovation at scale: Understand how technology, AI and machine learning can impact business systems and operations to create more meaningful change
2018’s top issues
  • Transformational Change Keynote: Hear from executives who have driven transformational change in their business operations with President, Ørsted North America and Chief Innovation Officer, Sierra Club
  • What progressive business leadership looks like with Vice Chairman, Keurig Green Mountain and Chairman, President and CEO, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co
  • Supply Chain Keynote: Driving large-scale change through collaboration in your value chains with Mars, Oxfam America, OECD and Shift
  • The transformational impact of Artificial Intelligence on business and society with Dell, the American Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Shopify and Datamaran
  • Financing the economy of the future: What are companies and investors doing to create a sustainable economy with BlackRock, DSM and CECP
  • Empowering diversity and inclusion for future leadership with HP, TD Bank, UN Women and Forbes
  • Climate Change and Business Keynote: Time to take the lead with LanzaTech, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Duke Energy and the UN Global Compact
  • Revolutionizing your supply chain through partnerships with Verizon, WWF and NRG Energy
  • In-depth breakout workshops: Join our 2-hour workshops tackling the clean cities of the future, the new TCFD recommendations, partnership models, circular economy, SDG integration and Science Based Targets

What sets Ethical Corporation flagship summits apart?

We’re doing things differently and we really want to move businesses towards the genuine impact you are looking for. The #RBSNY agenda will help you uncover the potential for sustainability to deliver profit, build trust, and shape strategy with empirical justification through our independently researched agenda. There’s no corporate fluff in our agenda, just practical, deep-dive examples to show how businesses can transition to a more responsible and sustainable business strategy

1Multiple tracks / Multiple disciplines: In 2018, we are doing things differently. We will create dedicated tracks and sessions that address how organizations are driving the responsible business agenda. We will bring together experts from sustainability, communications, procurement and innovation departments as well as investors, NGOs, Governmental bodies and academics to share how they’re addressing the key issues and opportunities that lie ahead.

2400+ of the most innovative, exciting brands in attendance: #RBSNY will give you the most senior networking opportunity possible. We lead our conferences with the latest ideas and case studies out there, and take pride in our in-depth research to pinpoint the brands that are doing the most impactful work to share their learnings.

3Practical learnings: We’re not afraid to talk about what doesn’t work as much as what does! Our sessions are practical with live polling and interactive questions. We guarantee you'll walk away with new ideas and contacts to help improve your strategy for 2017 and beyond.

4 NEW FOR 2018: In-depth roundtable and breakout workshops: 2 hours’ individual workshops tackling some of the critical issues. All workshops will be held in breakout rooms under Chatham-House rules ensuring issues are tackled and solutions are discussed in an open and honest environment.

Click here to see the full speakers list
Click here to see the full agenda
Click here to register. 

The Pessimal Presidency of Donald Trump

Its official, Trump is the worst US president in history. It is almost impossible to keep up with Trump's misdeeds, he is ending safeguards that protect Americans, he is dismantling government agencies and departments, and he is gutting government supported science. There are also 1001 small cuts that end government oversight and erode transparency.

Trump's presidency has been a nightmare of Orwellian proportions. We still have many months to go before he is impeached. If Democrats fail to take control in the midterm election, those months could stretch into years.

Trump has earned his place as the worst president in US history. Trump is widely seen as ignorant, corrupt, erratic and morally bankrupt and now we can add human rights violator to his list of malfeasance.

Republican insiders tried to warn us about Trump's incompetence before the election of 2016. Just in time for Presidents' Day, this warning was vindicated by the announcement that he is the worst President ever. On February 19th, a New York Times opinion piece cited a poll of political experts, that ranked Donald Trump as the worst president in 242 years of American history.

The survey was completed by 170 members of the American Political Science Association’s Presidents and Executive Politics section. It was conducted by Brandon Rottinghaus, a professor of political science at the University of Houston, and Justin S. Vaughn, an associate professor of political science and director of the Center for Idaho History and Politics at Boise State University.

With all the scorn and blame that Trump has tried to heap on his predessor President Barack Obama, it is no small irony that the experts ranked Obama as the eighth greatest president while Trump is at the very bottom of the list. What makes this even more striking is the fact that it is not just Democrats who have a dim view of the Trump presidency Republicans also rank Trump near the very bottom.

On February 22 Donald Trump earned another ignominious distinction.  As explained by the head of Amnesty International, Trump is a human rights violator. Trump's politics are "hateful", they  mark "a new era of human rights regression" and they are a threat to everyone. These comments came from Salil Sheety who was in Washington to release the human rights group's annual report. According to Amnesty's report, Trump is in league with despots like Russian president Vladimir Putin and Philipino strongman Rodrigo Duterte.

Sheety put Trump at the forefront of governments that practice the politics of hatred and fear. The report singles out Trump's track record of disrespecting women, Muslims and the LGBTQ community. It also points to his anti-immigrant legislative agenda.

Future generations will most surely despise Trump for his failure to act on climate change. To compound matters, Trump has been a forthright champion of fossil fuels while opposing renewables and efficiency.

Trump's own government scientists have put forward a slew of findings that support the veracity of climate change and expose the wrong-mindedness of his administration's climate denial.  Trump's policy positions, particularly those related to climate change, are at odds with the facts and on the wrong side of history.

It is one thing to make poor decisions it is quite another to intentionally eliminate resources that help you to make informed decisions. This is precisely what Trump is doing, he is at war with scientists in his own government.

The Trump administration is undermining or eradicating science programs at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Department of Energy, and the Department of the Interior.  This government appears particularly interested in ending science on climate change.

Any mention of the anthropogenic origins of climate change in the federal government is being scrubbed. Both the Interior Department and the EPA are reviewing and/or abolishing advisory boards. Even worse, a dozen members of one of the EPA's key scientific review boards have been replaced with industry hacks.

The evidence coming from within government squarely contradicts the Trump administration stated policy ambitions. One of the best examples is the National Climate Assessment. NCA is a group that helps American lawmakers to understand science so that they can make informed policy decisions. Successive NCA reports have concluded that the evidence for anthropogenic climate change is overwhelming.

Leaked drafts of the 2018 National Climate Assessment reiterate the conclusions of thousands of other studies include the finding that the past few decades have been the warmest in more than 1,500 ears and sea levels have risen more than 8 inches since 1880.

The release of the NCA draft report was preceded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) which found that we are seeing record levels of GHGs, heat, sea ice melt, and sea level rise.

In August 2017 the Trump administration disbanded the NCA advisory panel. This led Seattle Mayor Ed Murray to describe the move as,"an example of the president not leading, and the president stepping away from reality."

The next NCA report was due in 2018. It would appear that Trump wants to avoid the embarrassment of more policy recommendations based on yet another federal government document that flatly contradicts his administration's climate denial.

Richard Moss, an adjunct professor in the University of Maryland’s Department of Geographical Sciences, explained why this is a bad idea. "We’re going to be running huge risks here and possibly end up hurting the next generation’s economic prospects," Moss said.

Enacting policy that flouts scientific evidence has serious consequences. Trump is willfully oblivious, his most recent budget fails to invest a penny in climate resilient infrastructure. Despite the evidence, the Trump administration has consistently opposed climate mitigation and adaptation efforts including smart building. Last summer Trump signed an executive order that reverses a federal requirement that sea level rise be taken into account on coastal floodplains. This defies common-sense.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the Trump administration has been shutting down scientists and government advisory boards to conceal the facts. This makes it easier for Trump to support policy positions that are harmful to the nation. How else can you explain that Trump still does not have a science advisor, nor does he appear to want one.

Not having to contend with facts makes it easier for Trump to reverse sound policies of his predessor like the Clean Power Plan. Liz Perera, the climate policy director at the Sierra Club, claims she knows why the Trump administration is so virulently opposed to science and forward-thinking energy policies

"We already knew Donald Trump and Scott Pruitt reject science, but this smearing of the Clean Power Plan’s massive public benefits shows they reject basic math, too," Perera, told The Hill. "The Trump administration’s assault on the Clean Power Plan is about one thing and one thing only: helping corporate polluters profit."

It would be a mistake to think that by being disconnected from reality Trump can do no harm. His propensity to push back against the facts and promote fake news makes him even more dangerous. Sustainability is unstoppable but it is not impervious to Trump. Nor are the institutions of America's democracy safe from a president who is hell-bent on tearing them down.

Despite all that Trump has already done it will get worse the longer he holds on to power. US institutions including the institution of the presidency will suffer what may prove to be irreversible consequences.

"Beyond his reputation or ranking, Donald Trump’s very presidency may alter perceptions of presidential legacies as his unique approach to the office continues to surprise," Rottinghaus and Vaughn were quoted as saying.

Trump will live in infamy for systematically dismantling environmental protection and climate action. His egregious legacy will include climate denial which sentences humanity to an apocalyptic future.

Environmental Governance Primer

Environmental governance is essential to the management of the global challenges we face. This includes climate change, biodiversity loss, and ocean degradation. Here is a condensed summary of all that you need to know to be well versed on the basics of environmental governance. It includes definitions, lists, and summaries of many of the key features and issues associated with environmental governance. If you want to add something please do so in the comments section at the end. 


Basic Terms


Environmental governance: A concept in political ecology and environmental policy that advocates sustainability (sustainable development) as the supreme consideration for managing all human activities—political, social and economic. Governance includes government, business and civil society, and emphasizes whole system management. To capture this diverse range of elements, environmental governance often employs alternative systems of governance, for example watershed-based management. It views natural resources and the environment as global public goods, belonging to the category of goods that are not diminished when they are shared. This means that everyone benefits from for example, a breathable atmosphere, stable climate and stable biodiversity.

Afforestation/Deforestation/Reforestation: Reforestation refers to establishment of forest on land that had recent tree cover, whereas afforestation refers to land that has been without forest for much longer. Deforestation is the removal of forests.

Business-as-usual: An unchanging state of affairs despite difficulties or disturbances

Developed vs. developing country groups: Classification of countries around the world based on their level of economic and industrial development.

Global environmental justice: The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Governance gaps: A perceived governance gap between levels of corporate influence and impact, and related levels of accountability. It is one factors driving wider current trends on responsible business conduct and its governance.

Greenhouse gases: A gas in an atmosphere that absorbs and emits radiation within the thermal infrared range. This process is the fundamental cause of the greenhouse effect causing planetary warming. Greenhouse gases include Water vapor (H. 2O), Carbon dioxide, Methane, Nitrous oxide (N. 2O), Ozone, Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (incl. HCFCs and HFCs).

Intergenerational equity: A concept that says that humans hold the natural and cultural environment of the Earth in common both with other members of the present generation and with other generations, past and future (Weiss, 1990, p. 8).

Mitigation vs. adaptation: Because we are already committed to some level of climate change, responding to climate change involves a two-pronged approach: Reducing emissions of and stabilizing the levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (mitigation); Adapting to the climate change already in the pipeline (“adaptation”).

Pollution: Any chemical, physical, or biological agent that modifies the natural characteristics of the physical environment.

Precautionary Principle: A strategy to cope with possible risks where scientific understanding is yet incomplete, such as the risks of nano technology, genetically modified organisms and systemic insecticides.  The principle that the introduction of a new product or process whose ultimate effects are disputed or unknown should be resisted. It has mainly been used to prohibit the importation of genetically modified organisms and food

Ecology and Ecosystems


Biotic / Abiotic: The living things in an ecosystem are called biotic factors. Living things include plants, animals, bacteria, fungi and more. The non living parts of an ecosystem are called abiotic factors. In an ecosystem some abiotic factors are sunlight, temperature atmospheric gases water and soil. 

Ecology: 1. the branch of biology that deals with the relations of organisms to one another and to their physical surroundings. 2. the political movement that seeks to protect the environment, especially from pollution. Levels of organization in ecology include the population, community, ecosystem, and biosphere. An ecosystem is all the living things in an area interacting with all of the abiotic parts of the environment.

Ecosystem: The interaction of living and nonliving things in an environment

Ecosystems biomes: A specific geographic area notable for the species living there. A biome can be made up of many ecosystems. For example, an aquatic biome can contain ecosystems such as coral reefs and kelp forests.

Ecosystem services: Grouped into four broad categories: provisioning, such as the production of food and water; regulating, such as the control of climate and disease; supporting, such as nutrient cycles and crop pollination; and cultural, such as spiritual and recreational benefits.

Energy Flow Through Ecosystems. Ecosystems maintain themselves by cycling energy and nutrients obtained from external sources. At the first trophic level, primary producers (plants, algae, and some bacteria) use solar energy to produce organic plant material through photosynthesis.

Introduced Species: An introduced species is a species living outside its native distributional range, which has arrived there by human activity.

Invasive Alien Species (IAS): No international convention on invasive alien species: The globalisation of trade and the power of the Internet are challenging impediments to the control the spread of IAS

Invasive Species: An invasive species is a plant, fungus, or animal species that is not native to a specific location (an introduced species), and that has a tendency to spread to a degree believed to cause damage to the environment, human economy or human health.

Native Species: Native species are either endemic or indigenous and are often considered native in multiple locations throughout the year due to migration.

Biodiversity


Biodiversity: The variety of life in the world or in a particular habitat or ecosystem.

Ecosystem Biodiversity: A type of biodiversity. It is the variation in the ecosystems found in a region or the variation in ecosystems over the whole planet. Ecological diversity includes the variation in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Extinction Rates (trends): Scientists estimate we're now losing species at 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day. In its latest four-year endangered species assessment, the IUCN reports that the world won't meet a goal of reversing the extinction trend toward species depletion by 2010.  Unsustainable exploitation, climate change, ocean acidification and other anthropogenic impacts have resulted in growing global extinction rates.

Species Richness: The number of different species represented in an ecological community, landscape or region. A count of species that does not take into account the abundances of the species or their relative abundance distributions

Climate and Environment


Anthropocene: Relating to or denoting the current geological age, viewed as the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.

Climate Change Impacts (18)
  • Rising seas and increased coastal flooding
  • Longer and more damaging wildfire seasons
  • More destructive hurricanes
  • More frequent and intense heat waves
  • Military bases at risk
  • National Landmarks at Risk
  • Widespread forest death
  • Costly and growing health impacts
  • An increase in extreme weather events
  • Heavier precipitation and flooding
  • Increase drought risk in certain regions
  • Increased pressure on groundwater supplies
  • Our aging electricity infrastructure is increasingly vulnerable
  • Changing Seasons
  • Melting ice/melting glacier
  • Disruptions to food supplies
  • Destruction of coral reefs
  • Plant and animal range shifts

Planetary Boundaries (9)
  • Stratospheric ozone depletion
  • Loss of biosphere integrity (biodiversity loss and extinctions)
  • Chemical pollution and the release of novel entities
  • Climate Change
  • Ocean acidification
  • Freshwater consumption and the global hydrological cycle
  • Land system change
  • Nitrogen and phosphorus flows to the biosphere and oceans
  • Atmospheric aerosol loading
Planetary Resilience (boundaries): A concept of nine Earth system processes which have boundaries proposed in 2009 by a group of Earth system and environmental scientists led by Johan Rockström from the Stockholm Resilience Centre and Will Steffen from the Australian National University.
    SDGs(17)
    • The 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) to transform our world: GOAL 1: No Poverty
    • GOAL 2: Zero Hunger
    • GOAL 3: Good Health and Well-being
    • GOAL 4: Quality Education
    • GOAL 5: Gender Equality
    • GOAL 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
    • GOAL 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
    • GOAL 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
    • GOAL 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
    • GOAL 10: Reduced Inequality
    • GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
    • GOAL 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
    • GOAL 13: Climate Action
    • GOAL 14: Life Below Water
    • GOAL 15: Life on Land
    • GOAL 16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions
    • GOAL 17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal 

    Economic and Social


    Benefits: In social science there is a school of thought that argues the economy benefits from moves towards environmentalism

    Common Pool Goods: A resource that benefits a group of people, but which provides diminished benefits to everyone if each individual pursues his or her own self interest.

    Costs of inaction vs. action: The benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions outweigh the costs by trillions of dollars. Combining the results of the report by the German Institute of Economic Research and Watkiss et al. (2005) studies, we find that the total cost of climate action (cost plus damages) by 2100 is approximately $12 trillion, while the cost of inaction (just damages) is approximately $20 trillion.

    Economic Globalization: One of the three main dimensions of globalization commonly found in academic literature, with the two other being political globalization and cultural globalization, as well as the general term of globalization.

    Freeganism: A practice and ideology of limited participation in the conventional economy and minimal consumption of resources, particularly through recovering wasted goods like food. The word "freegan" is a portmanteau of "free" and "vegan".

    Kuznets Curve: In economics, a Kuznets curve graphs the hypothesis that as an economy develops, market forces first increase and then decrease economic inequality. Facets Exerting Pressure: Energy, transport, urbanization and globalization 

    Market Failure: Many economists have described climate change as an example of a market failure. Policy interventions may be required to increase the price of activities that emit greenhouse gases, thereby providing a clear signal to guide economic activity.

    Public Goods: A commodity or service that is provided without profit to all members of a society, either by the government or a private individual or organization. "a conviction that library informational services are a public good, not a commercial commodity" the benefit or well-being of the public. "the public good clearly demands independent action" A public good is a product that one individual can consume without reducing its availability to another individual, and from which no one is excluded. Public goods are non-rivalrous—a natural resource enjoyed by one person can still be enjoyed by others—and non-excludable—it is impossible to prevent someone consuming the good (breathing). Public goods are recognized as beneficial and therefore have value. Global public good covers necessities that must not be destroyed by one person or state.The non-rivalrous character of such goods calls for a management approach that restricts public and private actors from damaging them.

    Stern Review:  A 700-page report released for the Government of the United Kingdom on 30 October 2006 by economist Nicholas Stern, chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics (LSE) and also chair of the Centre. The report concludes there is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now. The scientific evidence is overwhelming: climate change is a serious global threat, and it demands an urgent global response

    Tragedy of the Commons: An economic problem in which every individual tries to reap the greatest benefit from a given resource. As the demand for the resource overwhelms the supply, every individual who consumes an additional unit directly harms others who can no longer enjoy the benefits.

    Utilitarianism: The dominant approach to the environment has been utilitarian: the natural world exists for humankind's consumption; it is to be used to further the end of human needs. The fruits of nature are commodities.

    Organizations


    The UNFCCC (general history): In 1992, countries joined an international treaty, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, as a framework for international cooperation to combat climate change by limiting average global temperature increases and the resulting climate change, and coping with impacts An intergovernmental treaty developed to address the problem of climate change. The Convention, which sets out an agreed framework for dealing with the issue, was negotiated from February 1991 to May 1992 and opened for signature at the June 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) — also known as the Rio Earth Summit. The UNFCCC entered into force on 21 March 1994, ninety days after the 50th country’s ratification had been received. By December 2007, it had been ratified by 192 countries

    International Committee on the Red Cross (ICRC): Established in 1863, the ICRC operates worldwide, helping people affected by conflict and armed violence and promoting the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its mandate stems essentially from the Geneva Conventions of 1949.  They are based in Geneva, Switzerland

    International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: An international organization working in the field of nature conservation and sustainable use of natural resources.

    Youth Climate Movement: International Youth Climate Movement refers to an international network of youth organisations that collectively aims to inspire, empower and mobilise a generational movement.

    Treaties and Conventions 


    Atmospheric Test Ban Treaty (3 prohibitions): Treaty of 1963 prohibits nuclear weapons tests "or any other nuclear explosion" in the atmosphere, in outer space, and under water.

    Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: (CBDR) was enshrined as Principle 7 of the Rio Declaration at the first Rio Earth Summit in 1992. The declaration states: “In view of the different contributions to global environmental degradation, States have common but differentiated responsibilities  

    Global Environmental Facility: Established on the eve of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to help tackle our planet’s most pressing environmental problems.

    Green Climate Fund (GCF): The Green Climate Fund is a fund established within the framework of the UNFCCC to assist developing countries in adaptation and mitigation practices to counter climate change. The GCF is based in the new Songdo district of Incheon, South Korea.

    Kyoto Protocol: An international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which commits its Parties by setting internationally binding emission reduction targets.

    Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): According to Article 4 paragraph 2 of the Paris Agreement, each Party shall prepare, communicate and maintain successive nationally determined contributions (NDCs) that it intends to achieve. Parties shall pursue domestic mitigation measures, with the aim of achieving the objectives of such contributions.

    Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): The role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries REDD+ was first negotiated under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2005.

    Rio Conventions:  The convention on Biological Diversity (cBD), the United nations convention to combat Desertification (UnccD), and the United nations Framework convention on climate change (UnFccc) – address the need for adaptation to climate change through their activities.

    The Clean Development Mechanism:(CDM) is one of the Flexible Mechanisms defined in the Kyoto Protocol (IPCC, 2007) that provides for emissions reduction projects which generate Certified Emission Reduction units (CERs) which may be traded in emissions trading schemes.

    The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES):  An international agreement between governments. Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.

    The Paris Agreement: The Paris Agreement, Paris climate accord or Paris climate agreement is an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change dealing with greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in the year 2020

    Desertification


    Desertification: A type of land degradation in which a relatively dry area of land becomes increasingly arid, typically losing its bodies of water as well as vegetation and wildlife. It is caused by a variety of factors, such as through climate change and through the overexploitation of soil through human activity.

    Desertication Features: The permanent degradation of previously fertile land. Human causes of desertification include overgrazing, the buildup of salt in irrigated soils, and topsoil erosion. Permanent changes in climate, particularly rainfall, are responsible for natural desertification.

    UN Convention to Combat Desertification: Convention to combat desertification and mitigate the effects of drought through national action programs that incorporate long-term strategies. Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa (UNCCD)

    Oceans and Rivers


    Threats to oceans (12):
    • NOx and SOx
    • Ocean Acidification 3. Ozone Depleting Substances
    • Dredging
    • Sea Water Level Rising
    • Ocean Dumping
    • Pollution from Cruise Ships
    •  Marine Debris
    • Noise Pollution from Ships
    • Oil Spills
    • Plastic
    • Warming
    United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): Lays down a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world's oceans and seas establishing rules governing all uses of the oceans and their resources. The international agreement that resulted from the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III), which took place between 1973 and 1982. Beyond any one nation’s jurisdiction, shared by all. Dates to the 1970s—needs to be updated, there is no separate secretariat.

    Limitations/weaknesses of UNCLOS
    • Large and complex Convention
    • non-compliance with its norms and principlea
    • United States is not a party to it
    • East Asia conflicts of interest between regional countries on law of the sea issues
    • ambiguity of UNCLOS in several of its key regimes
    • Geographical complexity of the region
    • territorial sea baselines
    • navigational regimes
    • exclusive economic zones (EEZs)
    • piracy, hot pursuit and the responsibilities of flag states
    • domestic politics and regional tensions
    • Need for regional consensus on aspects of the Convention
    Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
    • Clearly defined geographical space
    • Recognized
    • Dedicated
    • Managed
    • By legal and other effective means
    • To achieve long-term conservation of nature
    * Stand apart from other measures because they protect all

    MPAs need
    • Definitions
    • Objectives
    • Criteria
    • Decision Making process
    • MPA Management Measures
    • Management Authority
    • Implementation and Monitoring
    Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas: Enhanced protection to areas of the oceans and coasts that are ecologically or biologically significant. They are not based on regulation, and are not managed in the way Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are managed.
      International Whaling Commission: Thirty years after the International Whaling Commission (IWC) implemented the moratorium on commercial whaling – an agreement that ultimately saved many great whale populations from certain extinction – cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) worldwide are facing grave and growing threats from a range of human activities

      Transboundary Threats to Rivers; Transboundary Cooperation: The ecosystem services provided by the world's transboundary river basins support the socioeconomic development and wellbeing of the world's population. These basins, which cover most of the earth's land surface, continue to be impacted and degraded by multiple and complex human-induced and natural stressors. This is nowhere more destabilizing than in river basins that cross political boundaries. But experience shows that in many situations, rather than causing open conflict, the need for water sharing can generate unexpected cooperation. Despite the complexity of the problems, records show that water disputes can be handled. Examples of transboundary cooperation for rivers:
      • Central Asia (Syr Darya River)
      • Eastern, Central and Northern Europe (Rivers Tisza, Drin, Dnister, Vuoksi)
      • Dutch river basins on the North Sea side
      World Commission on Dams: The World Commission on Dams existed between April 1997 and 2001, to research the environmental, social and economic impacts of the development of large dams globally.

      Hazardous substances


      Basel Convention on Trade in Hazardous Substances: usually known as the Basel Convention, is an international treaty that was designed to:

      1. Reduce the movements of hazardous waste between nations
      2. Specifically to prevent transfer of hazardous waste from developed to less developed countries (LDCs). It does not, however, address the movement of radioactive waste
      3. Minimize the amount and toxicity of wastes generated
      4. Ensure their environmentally sound management as closely as possible to the source of generation
      5. Assist LDCs in environmentally sound management of the hazardous and other wastes they generate

      Basel Convention Role of the United States: The United States have signed the Convention but not ratified it. US is one of ten that are not party to it. The United States is a notable non-Party to the Convention and has a number of such agreements for allowing the shipping of hazardous wastes to Basel Party countries. OECD countries to continue trading in wastes with countries like the United States that have not ratified the Basel Convention

      Basel Convention Prior Informed Consent: The original Convention did not prohibit waste exports to any location except Antarctica but merely required a notification and consent system known as "prior informed consent" or PIC. least developed countries and environmental organizations argued that it did not go far enough. Many nations and NGOs argued for a total ban on shipment of all hazardous waste to LDCs.

      Food Security


      Feeding the 5,000: A feedback global flagship campaigning event to shine a light on the global food waste scandal, champion the delicious solutions and catalyse the global movement. At each event, they serve a delicious communal feast for 5000 people made entirely out of food that would otherwise have been wasted

      Food Security: Almost two decades ago, the Food and Agriculture Organization declared food security exists “when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life”

      Global Food Waste Scandal: Food waste uses up to '1.4 billion hectares of land – 28 per cent of the world's agricultural area'. Moreover, “globally, the blue water footprint for the agricultural production of total food waste in 2007 is about 250km3, which is more than 38 times the blue water footprint of USA households


      Conflict and War


      Causes of Conflict and War: Human conflict and environmental scarcity make global security a priority issue in the in the 21st century. This is also related to economic instability, climate change, and energy scarcity. Economic inequality, antagonistic group identities, polarized ideologies, and scarcities of natural resources. In Sudan four categories of resources have been linked to conflict as contributing causes (oil and gas reserves, waters, hardwood timber, rangeland and rain-fed agricultural land). In the Middle East water shortages, desertification, urbanization and competition over scarce resources have been contributing causes of conflict.  Refugees have also increased competition with locals for scarce resources increasing security risks.
        Ecocide: destruction of the natural environment, especially when willfully done.

        Eco-violence: Violence against nature. Types of eco-violence include deliberate or neglectful harm of animals, eco-sabotage, ecocide, Maximalist vs. minimalist definitions of ecocide.

        Human Security: An emerging paradigm for understanding global vulnerabilities whose proponents challenge the traditional notion of national security by arguing that the proper referent for security should be the individual rather than the state.

        Resource Curse in Human Conflict: It is resource abundance, rather than scarcity, that is the bigger threat to create conflict. Some countries with abundant natural resources have experienced what has been coined the “resource curse”—corruption, economic stagnation, and violent conflict over access to revenues

        Structural Violence of Forced Displacement (Human Rights): Structural violence is noted through four themes: internal displacement and development, food and politics, water and sanitation, and social services

        War related environmental impacts: There are both environment and health impacts associated with war. The application of weapons, the destruction of structures and oil fields, fires, military transport movements and chemical spraying are all examples of the destructive impact war may have on the environment. Other impacts include those related to unexploded ordinace, agent orange (chemical defoliant), testing of nuclear armaments, strontium 90, depleted uranium munition, fossil fuels, and intentional flooding.
        Water Scarcity: Dives importation of food, making vulnerable more vulnerable Scarce water resources also contrtibutes to desertification, urbanization and competition over resources


        Action


        Cap and Trade: Emissions trading, or cap and trade, is a government-mandated, market-based approach to controlling pollution by providing economic incentives for achieving reductions in the emissions of pollutants

        Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): The process of examining the anticipated environmental effects of a proposed project - from consideration of environmental aspects at design stage, through consultation and preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR)

        Environmental Security Paradigm (3 key dimensions): Environmental security is environmental viability for life support, with three sub-elements:
        • preventing or repairing military damage to the environment
        • preventing or responding to environmentally caused conflicts, and
        • protecting the environment due to its inherent moral value.
        Finance Flows: Develop finance pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resiliece. Finance for developing countries for both climate change mitigation and adaptation. The financials flows can flow from developed to developing countries (North-South), from developing to developing countries (South-South), from developed to developed countries (North-North) and domestic climate finance flows in developed and developing countries.

        Food Justice and Sustainability Project Alternatives: Feeding Citizenship urban agriculture program · sustainable development (Aunio).

        Multi-level Interactions: At the local, national, international/global levels.  However, not limited to, three main actors, i.e., state, market, and civil society, which interact with one another, whether in formal and informal ways.

        Multi-scaled adaptive governance—key features: connecting actors and institutions at multiple organisational levels to enable ecosystem stewardship. A central characteristic of such adaptive governance is collaborative, flexible and learning-based issue management across different scales.

        Recommendations for key elements of international frameworks: Emissions trading, renewable energy, energy efficiency, efficient transport, carbon capture use and storage, reduction of non-CO2 greenhouse gases, improved land use, climate action, mitigation and adaptation.

        Social-ecological systems (SES):  A compelling science based approach for improved environmental management through the application of transdisciplinary and resilience concepts enabling people, organizations, and societies to better resolve their conflicts and innovate in response to complex problems. This highly interdisciplinary approach, draws on political science, economics, environmental studies, geography, cognitive science, social psychology, and complex systems theory. 


        Hope through Global Commons (Elinor Ostrom)


        Ostrom's work on the Global Commons: Shared responsibility, onditional access, and effective enforcement demonstrated in meticulous detail that people can and do work together to manage shared resources sustainably, and have been doing so for hundreds of years. Resources were developed largely by examining local commons involving natural resources.  Key characteristic distinguish such commons from more complex commons involving global resources and the risks

        Shared Responsibility: When individuals have to answer for their actions to others depending on the same resources, their approach to shared responsibility changes.

        Conditional Access: Evolutionary approaches to understand the development of norms. One of those is the indirect evolutionary approach, which posits that there are two types in a population: conditional cooperators norm users and rational egoists.

        Effective Enforcement: Property rights to forest resources must be enforced. Enforcement is a major undertaking that involves collective action.

        Trump's Failure to Invest in Climate Resilient Infrastructure has Serious Consequences

        By failing to invest in adaptation Trump has condemned future generations to unnecessary destruction. The longer we wait to invest in climate resilient infrastructure the more people will suffer and the more it will cost.  We can either pay for the losses as they occur or we can invest in the future and preempt calamity.

        The Trump presidency is accurately described as a nightmare.  When his executive actions are viewed alongside his budget a clear picture emerges of an administration that is hell-bent on eroding environmental protections and killing climate action. Trump's actions are compounded by his energy insanity which favors fossil fuels and undermines renewables. While the rest of the world is investing in the green economy Trump is cutting taxes. Trump is on the wrong side of history and at odds with other leading heads-of-state.


        Although the Trump administration ignores the dangers of climate change dozens of studies from scientists and engineers indicate that climate change related flooding and extreme weather already poses a threat to the nation's infrastructure. These studies conclude that we need infrastructure investments that are capable of withstanding the impacts from a changing climate.

        Republican legislators, Trump and EPA administrator Scott Pruitt have all denied the veracity of climate science. However, federal government reports including a 2017 study from the EPA squarely refute the position of the Trump administration and the GOP.

        Costs of climate inaction

        Regardless of your political stripes ignoring adaptation does not add up. The nation simply cannot afford to avoid the costs of climate change. The longer we wait to address it the more it will cost. An IIED study indicates that if we do not invest in climate-resilient infrastructure the cost of climate change could be $1240 trillion.  Alternatively, the same report claims we can preempt the problem by investing $890 trillion in the green economy. By 2060 the mean [annual] impacts are estimated to be between $1.5 trillion and $20 trillion.

        No matter how you look at the problem the costs of inaction are far greater thatn the costs of action. The benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions outweigh the costs by trillions of dollars. The results of the report by the German Institute of Economic Research and Watkiss et al. (2005) suggests the total cost of climate action (cost plus damages) by 2100 is approximately $12 trillion, while the cost of inaction (just damages) is approximately $20 trillion. As revealed in the Stern Review, the Risky Business report and countless other studies such investments will create jobs and generate economic opportunities.

        Trump's politically motivated decision to ignore climate change in his budget (and elsewhere) will prove expensive. As explained in the New York Times,failure to incorporate climate impacts on infrastructure has costs down the road. Climate change must be incorporated into infrastructure planning or infrastructure will be lost.  

        "The impact of not considering climate change when planning infrastructure means you end up building the wrong thing, in the wrong place, to the wrong standards," said Michael Kuby, a professor of geographical sciences and urban planning at Arizona State University and contributing author to the National Climate Assessment. "That’s a whole lot of waste." Kuby said.

        According to an EPA report published in 2017, $280 billion is needed for climate resilient infrastructure.The report states that "proactive adaptation" will save up to 70 percent of future costs. Drainage systems, roads, bridges, rail lines, airports, harbors, and tunnels are all at risk.

        "With climate change and infrastructure, it’s pay me now, or pay me later,"  said Eugene S. Takle, a co-author of that study and director of the climate science program at Iowa State University. Takle says if we fail to address the problem now we will, "pay a lot more later".

        Eroding environmental requirements 

        According to the Washington Post, critics claim Trump's plan to scale back environmental requirements for infrastructure projects could, "gut environmental protections". This includes the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. A proposal to increase the use of "categorical exclusions" would eliminate environmental reviews. Another provision would see private firms pay for federal reviews of their own projects. Congress and the EPA's power to provide oversight would be significantly reduced. As explained by Theresa Pierno, president, and CEO of the nonprofit National Parks Conservation Association, "the proposal reveals that this administration is not serious about restoring America's infrastructure." According to Keith Benes, a State Department attorney involved in the Keystone XL application, it's not about streamlining or making it more effective its more like, "Let's get rid of that".

        Bangalore Daily News reports that groups in Maine have expressed alarm regarding Trump's budget., They echo the sentiments of others all across the country. Jacqueline Guyol, campaign organizer with Environment Maine summarized Trump's attacks saying:

        "Americans deserve clean air, clean water and protections for the places we love." Guyol said. "Yet President Trump’s budget would mean more pollution in our rivers and lakes, more days when the air is unsafe to breathe and more drilling in special places. The president’s budget also would mean fewer environmental cops on the beat, less research on renewable energy and fewer protections for our public lands and coasts."

        Lisa Pohlmann, executive director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine was unequivocal about the dire consequences of Trumps failure to incorporate environmental and climate concerns into his budget.

        "This says volumes about [Trump’s] disregard for clean air and clean water, his disrespect for the bipartisan efforts that have helped to protect our environment over the past 50 years, and his lack of understanding of the irrefutable reality of climate change." Pohlmann said. "Even as we wait for more details to unfold, we can say with certainty that if these cuts are allowed to stand, then the consequences for Maine, the nation, and the world could be dire."

        Blueprint for destruction

        The president of the NRDC, Rhea Suh describes Trump's budget as a "blueprint for destruction". Suh explains the budget will, "eviscerate environmental and health protections, stifle clean energy research, raid our public waters and lands, and abandon our children to the growing dangers of climate change". She points to the fact that 85 percent of Americans want the government to maintain or improve environmental protections.

        Important institutions of government like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Energy are under siege from this administration. Trump's budget calls for massive cuts to funding and staffing at the EPA. The agency has already indicated that it is planning to substantially reduce its oversight. By Sept. 30, the EPA budget indicates that it will reduce by half the number of permitting-related decisions that exceed six months.

        Even some Republicans are taking issue with Trump's budget proposal. In a prepared statement, Republican Rep. Bruce Poliquin said,"we must make sure we maintain support for programs and agencies that serve our families and communities and help protect our environment."

        Trump's executive order in August wants to expedite the environmental approval process. As reported by Environmental Leader, law firm White & Case, suggest that this may require changes to federal environmental laws including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Clean Water Act, and the Clean Air Act.

        "Trump's budget isn't a roadmap to the future. It's a blueprint for destruction that balloons the deficit, puts our environment and health at growing risk, and leaves our kids to pay the price. The country deserves better than that and so do our children," Suh said.

        Despite the scientific consensus about the need to invest in climate resilience and the overwhelming logic of environmental oversight, Trump continues to play politics with our children's future. Trump's failure to support forward-thinking infrastructure costs jobs and the hurts the economy. It also increases the number of people that will suffer and die.

        Presentation - High Efficiency TRI-ENERGY™ Home Heating Breakthrough that Slashes Costs and Reduces Emissions

        the benefis of heating your home with tri energy
        On February 27th there will be a free information session about a cost-saving technological breakthrough in home heating systems. It will take place at the Holiday Inn in Point-Claire, Quebec. The presentation will focus on TRI-ENERGY™, a new low carbon heating technology that slashes both your heating bill and your emissions footprint. The TRI-ENERGY™ system takes radical efficiency to a whole new level. This system not only offers impressive savings it also provides increased comfort.

        Cost

        When the cold weather hits exorbitant heating bills are sure to follow.The TRI-ENERGY™ system is a cost-effective heating solution particularly when compared to traditional heating systems.  TRI-ENERGY™ technology costs a fraction of the price of a conventional furnace to install. It has no maintenance costs and it significantly reduces energy consumption and monthly heating bills.

        Comfort

        The TRI-ENERGY™ system maintains a constant temperature avoiding temperature swings and dry indoor air. By keeping your home at a stable temperature TRI-ENERGY™ saves you even more  money by reducing wear and tear on your heat pump and your furnace thereby extending the service life. It also eliminates bone-chilling cold air during defrost cycles.

        Tested and proven technology

        The proven TRI-ENERGY™ system's high efficiency technology has been extensively tested in hundreds of homes in and around Montreal, one of the coldest major cities in the world. Montreal's average daily temperature in February is -9°C or 16°F. The TRI-ENERGY™ system can meet house heating demands down to – 12°C.

        How does it work

        TRI-ENERGY™ unlocks the full potential of central heating by combining a fuel furnace, heat - pump electric heater and a 3 - FLEX control unit to exert maximum efficiency and comfort at the lowest cost. TRI-ENERGY™ adds a small electric heater in the main duct to inject measured heat to help the heat pump in meeting house heat demand down to – 12°C. The 3 - FLEX control panel is added to maximize efficiency by synchronizing heating appliances. This enables the heat pump to run without interruptions resulting in lower heating and maintenance cost as well as improved home comfort and less wear and tear. Unlike a house thermostat the 3 - FLEX controller regulates heat supply based on indoor heat demand (without sensors) gently raising supply temperature during heat recovery and reducing it again at daytime setpoint for optimal efficiency and comfort at the lowest cost. A good analogy for the way TRI-ENERGY™ works would be driving from point A to B in busy city traffic versus being able to maintain a constant speed without stopping. It is obvious that the latter uses less fuel and is, therefore, more efficient. 

        Lower GHGs

        Greater efficiency lowers costs and climate change causing greenhouse gases (GHGs). Traditional home heating is not only expensive it is also a major source of GHG pollution and as such it is a significant contributor to climate change. Effective emissions reduction is largely about reducing fossil fuel use. According to EPA statistics, electricity and heat production account for one-quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions in the US. As indicated by StatCan, residential fuel use (home and motor) in Canada accounts for about one-third of household emissions. Canada has one of the highest levels of direct per capita residential greenhouse gas emissions in the world (third highest in the G8). The TRI-ENERGY™ system reduces GHG emissions by as much as 85 percent.

        Efficiency Savings

        TRI-ENERGY™ is the most efficient energy option on the market. Single stage fuel furnaces without another heat source always operate at peak capacity making it the least efficient heating system option. The 3 - FLEX controller using the downstaging capability of heating systems with heat - pump can cut your fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by up to 70 percent. Heating without a heat 
        pump (including hydronic heating systems) can cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions up to 85 percent. Heating costs are cut by up to 60 percent and fuel use is reduced by up to 70 percent.

        Tri Energy vs. Geothermal Energy


        bar graph chart showing comparative cost savings with tri energyThere are a number of options for people who seek to minimize the monthly cost and emissions. One of those options is investing in a geothermal system to heat their homes. While this is a low carbon option it comes with considerable upfront costs. A geothermal system for an averaged size home (2000 sq. ft.) would cost approximately $25,000 to install, in exchange for a monthly saving of about 50 percent on your heating bill. While geothermal may be an option for some large buildings, upfront costs mean that it is not economically viable for most home owners. Similar upfront cost issues arise with both solar and wind power.

        Tri Energy Safeguards

        TRI-ENERGY™ system has built in safeguards and LED message lights and alarms. The system automatically switches to electric heat in case of a heat pump or furnace malfunction. In the event of a blower motor failure or a very dirty air filter, the heating system will shut down. It turns off all heat when insufficient or no airflow is detected and sequentially disables electric heating stages if supply duct temperature exceeds a preset level. In addition to switching off the malfunctioning appliance the TRI-ENERGY™ system will send LED and text alarm messages.

        Hydro-Quebec

        The TRI-ENERGY™ system partners especially well with lower cost renewable sources of energy. Hydro-Quebec's abundant hydro-power is some of the most affordable electricity in the world. This has prompted an endorsement by home expert Jon Eakes who says he highly recommends TRI-ENERGY™ for home heating because it takes maximum advantage of the low Hydro residential DT rate. TRI-ENERGY's™ ability to optimize heat pump efficiency with hydroelectricity makes this the lowest cost heating system you can own in Quebec leaving all other options far behind. (On April 1, 2017, the Régie de l’énergie approved a decrease in Rate DT electricity prices. This means you’ll save even more with your dual-energy system).

        Is TRI-ENERGY™ for you?

        Almost anyone can take advantage of the TRI-ENERGY™ system. The 3 - FLEX controller can be partnered with existing fuel furnace, hydronic and dual heat systems.  Even if you do not have a heat pump you can add an electric plenum heater to a fuel furnace and still be eligible for the low Hydro DT rate.

        Testimonials

        "Very satisfied, saving 50% over dual - heat."
        - Claude H., Beaconsfield, QC.

        "Surpassed all my expectations."
        - Jean L., Brossard, QC

        "Well worth the investment."
        - John K, Chomedey, QC.

        "The system is working perfectly!"
        - Paul R, St.Lazare, QC.

        "Much more comfortable and no more oil smells."
        Helen C, Beaconsfield, QC.

        "It may seem too good to be true but it really delivers. My system paid for itself in the first winter."
        - Richard M, Pointe Claire, QC.

        Contact Energie ABC Hybride for a free consultation about TRI-ENERGY™
        Website: www.abchybrid.ca
        Email: info@abchybrid.ca
        Phone (514) 568-1996

        Trump's Budget Seeks to Erode Environmental Protections and Kill Climate Action

        On Monday, February 12th, Trump unleashed a budget that contains a barrage of environmental and climate insults.  Like his first budget, the most recent funding allocation contains another volley of assaults against environmental protection and climate action. Trump has prioritized deregulation and reducing social welfare programs that support the nation's most vulnerable citizens. He wants to end climate action by eliminating more than a dozen programs. Trump wants to slash the budgets of the State Department and the Department of the Interior which oversees national parks, wilderness areas and other public waters and lands.

        Despite massive cuts, Trump's record setting $4.4 trillion budget would add $7.1 trillion to the national debt in the coming decade. This has prompted expressions of concern from the conservative Heritage Foundation and federal intelligence services.

        EPA

        The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the prime target of Trump's budget with proposed funding cuts of 34 percent along with a 21 percent reduction in staff.  Eliminating 3,200 jobs and slashing $2.8 billion from the EPA's budget will add toxins to the air and water and increase greenhouse gas emissions. These proposed changes come at a time when the EPA's budget has already been cut in half compared to what it was forty years ago.

        Energy

        Trump's contempt for renewables is matched only by his love for fossil fuels. Through a string of executive actions and budget recommendations Trump is supporting dirty energy at the expense of clean power. If Trump has his way there will be a 65 percent decrease in support for energy efficiency and renewables at the Department of Energy. Trump wants to eliminate or severely cut funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency for energy, the Energy Departments Weatherization Assistance program, and the Global Climate Change Initiative.

        Other cuts

        Trump not only wants to kill climate action he wants to eradicate the scientific arms of agencies and specific projects that demonstrate the veracity of climate change. This includes a NASA satelite called the Orbiting Climate Observatory. Trump's budget also seeks to end monitoring efforts here on Earth. Trump wants 45 percent cuts to state and tribal assistance grants that include activities like monitoring toxic substances and inspecting brownfields. The budget also wants to cut federal funding for the ENERGY STAR program and replace it with fees levied against manufacturers and sellers.  Trump has proposed massive budget cuts to social welfare programs in part to reduce spending to pay for his tax cuts that may already be starting to overheat the economy.  Even though he promised he would not do so, the budget proposes cuts to Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. This includes $1.1 trillion in Medicare cuts over the next decade and $72 billion in cuts to Social Security over the same ten-year time frame. Trump also wants to ax Obamacare and kill funding for independent media and the arts including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts.

        Spending

        While cuts are the order of the day Trump did not forget to throw some red meat to his base. He managed to find $18 billion to build the border wall even though he emphatically promised that Mexico would pay for it. Trump also wants $782 million to hire more law enforcement officers and $2.7 billion to increase the federal government's immigrant detention capacity.

        Infrastructure

        On the campaign trail, Trump promised $1.5 trillion in infrastructure spending in his first 100 days in office. Instead, more than a year after his inauguration he is proposing a paltry $200 billion of federal money putting the onus of infrastructure improvements on states, cities and private interests.  For a more detailed review of the dire implications of Trump's failure to invest in climate resilient infrastructure click here



        Related
        A Summary of Trump's Malfeasance and his Disastrous Presidency
        Trump Undermines Renewables to Help Fossil Fuels and Take Revenge
        Climate Crisis Trumped by the Volatility of the US Commander-and-Chief
        Trump was a Nightmare in 2017 and not just for the Environment
        Trump's Budget is a Declaration of War Against Environmental Protections, Climate and Science
        Trump's First 100 Days are a Climate and Environmental Nightmare
        Trump Seeks to End Climate Action in America
        Republicans to Sell Off Public Lands and Strip Powers from Federal Agencies
        Pipelines Reborn: They're Back Thanks to Trump

        A Love Letter to Earth and its Inhabitants on Valentines Day

        The following post is an updated and reedited version of a 2014 post made all the more prescient by the Trump administration and other troubling events in the world today.
        _____________________________

        Valentines day is an opportunity to express love to people we care about, the day should also be about finding ways of communicating our love for the planet and gratitude for those who work to make a better world. While we need to come to terms with the obstacles we face we must also muster hope that we can do better. 

        The climate crisis has been trumped by a supremely dysfunctional American administration that is not only wreaking havoc with our planet but dividing us in ways that make progress seem impossible. The crisis we face today is a crisis of love. Love for each other and love for the Earth upon which we all depend for our sustenance. No matter where we are, regardless of our power or wealth, we are all dependent on the planet and each other.

        Although the malfeasance of the Trump administration is profound, this nightmare will end. We have the capacity to resist hate and ultimately triumph against the forces of darkness. Hope, love and gratitude are a bulwark against the intolerance and hate coming out of the Trump administration.

        We have many reasons to be grateful. We are crafting positive environmental narratives that are getting more people on-board. A movement is being born that is infused with what can only be described as "eco-morality".  A new religious psychology and ethics is emerging that reinforces the environmental message. The new breed of environmentally concerned citizens gives us reason to hope that we will address the difficult issues we face.

        Despite the chaos and disarray in the US and elsewhere we have made progress on some of the most serious environmental issues of our time.  Over the course of the last few decades we have witnessed some impressive environmental success stories.  It is important to know that however difficult it may seem at present, we can live in harmony with the planet.

        Much of this progress is attributable to people who work tirelessly on behalf of the planet and its inhabitants. We should be grateful to those who advocate for the Earth. These efforts reveal that there is a powerful relationship between environmental gratitude and ecological advocacy. A heartfelt and well deserved thank you goes out to all who work to help protect our environment and our climate.

        We also give thanks to indigenous people who have so much to teach us about environmental stewardship. We are increasingly understanding that indigenous ecology is essential to environmental education.

        We are seeing more cooperation in water management and a host of solutions to the world water crisis including solutions to diminishing ground water. Industries are also increasingly engaged in water management.

        We are coming to terms with the complex yet vital role of forests in the health of the planet including a number of economic and employment benefits. The business community is also beginning to appreciate that there is much they can do to protect our forests.

        The business community is coming to terms with the business case for conserving nature. A growing body of research corroborates the value of environmental sustainability and a growing number of businesses are embracing sustainability in their strategic orientation. Across the board leading businesses are engaging in more ethical approaches to commerce. We are also seeing progress in a number of other areas including a growing green building movement.

        We have reason to be grateful for the brave pioneers who have championed sustainability long before it was fashionable. This includes men like Ray Anderson, who made the business case for sustainability many years ago and companies like Patagonia that have been showing us the way for almost 50 years.

        We are seeing a wave of sustainability leadership and corporate goodness. Businesses are reducing their footprints and acting to combat climate change. In the US corporate climate efforts give us reason to believe that we can do better even in the absence of responsible political leadership.  Corporate leaders are combating Trump's ignorance and resisting this destructive administration.   Companies like Amadeus, HSBC, Mars, BMW, GlaxoSmithKline, and Unilever show that the corporate world can play a leadership role in these dark times. This gives us reason to hope.