Kids are Being Denied a Science Based Climate Education

US schools are not teaching kids accurate information about climate change. Climate ignorance is a serious issue that has thwarted climate action at every turn. Understanding climate change is crucial to making informed decisions at the ballot box. For many American adults, it may already be too late as some are deeply entrenched in denial. While it may be hard to enlighten an ill-informed electorate, children tend to be far more receptive to the facts.

Children are the best hope we have for responsible environmental stewardship. However, we cannot expect our kids to exhibit ecological mindfulness if they don't have a clear understanding of the evidence. Simply put, if we do not teach them the facts we cannot expect them to act.

If children receive a fact-based education they will grow up to be informed adults who will help change our perilous trajectory by demanding that we make climate action a national priority. A well-informed electorate will not stand for the lies that pass as balance. They will not allow partisan interests to muddy the waters of science.

They need to understand that climate change is real and caused by human activity. They also need to overcome the economic objections of some of their parents. This means they must understand that it will cost far less to address the crisis proactively than it will to manage the costs of a world ravaged by unchecked climate change.

Kids can change our perilous trajectory if they know the facts. Sadly we are not giving them the facts they need to engage the crisis we face.

Almost half of American adults think that climate change is not caused by human activity. This is a travesty. For some opposition to climate action has become a fanatical crusade similar to the defense of creationism.

Although it is not a panacea, many of the world's problems can be ameliorated by an educated electorate with a basic understanding of science.

Exposing kids to nature offers hope for an eco-centric future. Similarly, we have reason to believe that a sound climate education will help motivate them to act on the threat of climate change.

Both teachers and students are not aware of the scientific consensus on climate change. There are very few academics in the field who doubt the veracity of climate change. Knowing that the problem exists will also unleash innovation that will add to the range of existing solutions. First and foremost, we need to appreciate that we will not succeed in managing the climate crisis unless we wean ourselves off of fossil fuels. This is the reason why the fossil fuel industry has devoted significant resources to suppress climate science.

As reviewed in a study published in Sciencemag.org, US science teachers have an insufficient grasp of the science and this may hinder effective teaching. Some of these teachers even share unscientific commentaries from deniers alongside the facts.

This study reveals that almost one-third (30 percent) of science teachers misinform their students in middle school or high school. Almost three out of ten teachers erroneously tell students that the current observed trends in global climate change are natural phenomenon. Another 12 percent omit to attribute climate change to human activity. In addition to sometimes teaching inaccurate information, teachers are only devoting one or two hours to teaching climate change.

Part of the problem is ignorance, many teachers are unaware of the facts about climate change, a few even claim that they don't believe in the veracity of climate change. Others claim that they feel pressured to teach both sides (as if there was another side to the science of climate change). Less than one-third of teachers appear to be adequately informed about the anthropogenic origins of the climate crisis. That means that two-thirds of teachers are teaching something they don't really understand. Even those teachers who accept the veracity of climate science do not realize the extent of the scientific consensus.

A few educators said they felt pressured to teach both sides. But most simply seemed unaware of current evidence for anthropogenic climate change.

It is hard to understand how teachers could be so unaware until you appreciate the sophisticated machinery that suppresses the facts. Organizations and individuals are working very hard to keep a science-based climate curriculum out of schools. As reported by the Atlantic, one of those at the forefront of this movement to deny kids access to the facts is Roy White, the founder of Truth in Texas Textbooks. This organization calls the publishers of fact based textbooks "anti-Christian" and "anti-American."

One organization that has been trying to misinform kids and others about climate change is the fossil fuel-funded Heartland Institute.

Thankfully they failed to alter the facts in Texas schoolbooks and this spring Portland announced that it will stop teaching climate denial to kids. However, there are still some powerful opponents who continue to rail against the truth. One Fox "News" reporter used his platform to decry the decision to teach the kids the truth in Portland. Even mainstream media has failed miserably when it comes to scientifically accurate climate news. In the absence of a factual education, it is easy to see how kids could grow up to be just as ill-informed as some of their parents.

Despite the plethora of misinformation, more than three-quarters of Americans want to teach their children the facts about climate change. So no matter how deniers try to deceive our kids, most parents won't stand for it. However, that won't stop them from trying.


Make sure to see the article titled, "Comprehensive Green School Information and Resources." It contains links to over 325 articles covering everything you need to know about sustainable academics, student eco-initiatives, green school buildings, and college rankings as well as a wide range of related information and resources. 

Asahi May be the World's Greenest Brewery

The Asahi group is Japan's biggest selling beer brands and it is one of the greenest breweries in the world. The Asahi Group, is expanding around the globe and as of January 2014, Asahi had a 38 percent market share of the Japanese beer market, making it the largest of the four major beer producers in Japan. Asahi is followed by Kirin Beer with 35 percent and Suntory with 15 percent.

Asahi was founded in Osaka in 1889 as the Osaka Beer Company. In 1990, Asahi acquired a 19.9 percent stake in Australian brewery giant Elders IXL which has since become the Foster's Group, later sold to SABMiller.

Asahi's sustainability efforts include: Water, reporting, transparency, GHGs, carbon trading, green energy, energy efficiency and  environmental guidelines.

Water

There is no sustainability issue more vital to a brewery than water stewardship. Asahi's leadership in the area of responsible water management practices was recognized by the CDP. In 2015, for the first time, CDP ranked companies on their performance in dealing with water issues and only one brewer received an A ranking – Japan’s Asahi. Where it stood out in comparison to the rest of the sector was in the quality and comprehensiveness of the water risk assessment it undertook.

Reporting

Asahi also stood out in reporting. The results of its water risk assessment would be used to inform its business growth strategy and in its supply chain management, CDP says.

Transparency

Asahi makes transparent and reliable disclosure of information through third-party verification of environmental information and data from the Group overall. In 2014, they conducted an ISO14064-1 third-party verification that calculated the methods and suitability of these calculation methods for GHGs.

GHGs

While Asahi is a sustainability leader, forces beyond the company's control have caused an increase in emissions. In 2015 the ongoing suspension of nuclear power attributable to the earthquake of 2011 has meant that the Asahi Group's emissions increased by 9.4% compared to the 2008 level. Nonetheless, Asahi continues to work towards reducing their CO2 emissions by 30 percent compared to the level of 2008 by 2020.

Carbon trading

In 2014, they began working with the Green Power CO2 Reduction Certification System introdued by the Japanese government. This system allows Tradable Green Certificates (TGC) to be used in calculations, reporting and announcement of greenhouse gas emissions stipulated in the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures.

Green energy

Asahi uses green electricity to produce their beer. In 2009, Asahi entered into a contract with Japan Natural Energy Company Limited to buy 40 million kWh per year of green electricity generated by wind and biomass energy sources. This is the largest contract of its kind in Japan's food industry at the time.

Energy-efficiency

Asahi Group is introducing energy-saving equipment in an ongoing effort, such as fuel conversion equipment and anaerobic wastewater processing equipment that effectively utilizes methane contained in wastewater at its breweries and other production sites.

10 Environmental guidelines
  1. Promote energy efficiency and work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  2. Promote the 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) principles for waste products and work toward a recycling-oriented society.
  3. Promote initiatives for protecting ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.
  4. Promote initiatives that value our precious water resources.
  5. Work for continuous improvement to reduce the environmental burden of our products throughout their entire life cycle.
  6. Conduct product development, technology development, and ingredient procurement with respect for the environment.
  7. Proactively support environmental activities while also contributing to society through employee participation in these activities.
  8. Continue to comply with environmental laws and regulations as a basis, while implementing proprietary standards for each group company.
  9. Keep a sufficient grasp of information concerning global environmental and proactively make efforts for environmental preservation.
  10. Work to communicate with society and provide appropriate disclosure related to environmental initiatives.

Related
The Beer Industry is Emerging as a Sustainability Leader
Gray Water Can Make Beer and Renewable Energy
Heineken's Sustainability Leadership
Drought Impacts California's Wine and Beer Industries

Institutions that offer Sustainability Focused Certificates and Degrees as Recommended By Linked-In Professionals

These are the schools suggested by Linked-In members in response to a request for recommendations for certification/diploma in Business Sustainability. Here is the alphabetized list of educational institutions that offer sustainability degrees including schools that offer their courses online. Institutions designated with an asterix (*) were mentiioned more than once.
________________________________________

Alison online platform, certificate and Diploma course on Sustainability.

American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists offers an exam that one can take to be certified in the category of Sustainability.

American Public University, MS in Environmental Management and Policy with a concentration in sustainability.

Antioch University, MBA in Sustainability.

* Arizona State University's on-line Master of Sustainability Leadership (MSL) program and Executive MSL program.


Bainbridge Graduate Institute, Green MBA programs including MBA in Sustainable Business.

Bradform, University, Enterprise, Innovation and the Circular Economy MBA.

Cambridge University, Institute for Sustainability Leadership, Business & Sustainability Programme Online.

Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT), options include an MSc. in Sustainability & Adaption.

Columbia University, online course includes a certificate option.

DePaul University Sustainability MBA.

Duke University Environmental Leadership Program.

Green Mountain College, MBA, PMP.

*Harvard University Extension School, Professional Graduate Certification in Sustainability. There are four-course Certificates in multiple sustainability disciplines.

IEMA sustainability certification.

Illinois, University of, Certificate Program offered through Coursera.com.

Imperial College, MSc in Environmental Technology, and there is a business and sustainability option, like a mini sustainability MBA.

International Society of Sustainability Professionals (ISSP), Sustainability Professional Certification.

Leeds, University of, Environment and Business course.

Marylhurst University, MBA in Business Sustainability online. Northeastern University, Sustainability MBA.

* Presidio Graduate School in San Francisco pursuing my MBA in Sustainable Business Management. Online MBA will be launched in January, there are also hybrid programs with various Certificate options. Ryerson University, sustainability program.

UCLA Extension's Global Sustainability certificate course

* Wisconsin, University of, online Sustainable Management program. They have undergraduate certificates, a Master's program including an MS in Sustainable Management online, Extension SMGT Program.

For a list of 150 sustainability and environmental masters degrees click here.


Make sure to see the article titled, "Comprehensive Green School Information and Resources." It contains links to over 325 articles covering everything you need to know about sustainable academics, student eco-initiatives, green school buildings, and college rankings as well as a wide range of related information and resources. 

Gray Water Can Make Beer and Renewable Energy

Some breweries are recycling waste water (gray water) as part of their responsible water management practices. Some breweries in California are taking advantage of Orange County's “toilet-to-tap” regimen which cleans up wastewater to recharge groundwater aquifers.

Firestone Brewing Company’s wastewater gets treated and put back into the groundwater.  At Bear Republic, new technology recycles wastewater for cleaning and converts it into usable energy.

Cambrian Innovation’s EcoVolt system, the offshoot of a MIT PhD project originally intended to help NASA,  take the brewery’s wastewater, extract pollutants, and turn them into “biogas” energy to be used on site. The scrubbed water could be used for cleaning and other non-brewing purposes.

Lagunitas Brewing Company is also using Cambrian’s EcoVolt system which is reducing the company's water ratio from four gallons per produced gallon of beer to about 2.5.

As reported by FoxNews, San Francisco beer maker, Half Moon Bay Brewing Company has been making beer with gray water for its Mavericks Tunnel Vision IPA.

Half Moon began experimenting with gray water in 2014 after being approached by architect Russ Drinker. As Drinker told the Guardian, "if Californians really want to have an impact on our water use, we have to recycle our fresh water ... and get over our psychological resistance to that," he added.

Using NASA water recycling technology Half Moon has created a non-commercially available brew from gray water that has a taste that is reportedly indistinguishable from traditional beer. The beer is currently being used as a tool to educate the public.

To become commercially available changes will need to be made to California law that prohibits the use of gray water.

Related
The Beer Industry is Emerging as a Sustainability Leader
Heineken's Sustainability Leadership
Asahi May be the World's Greenest Brewery
Drought Impacts California's Wine and Beer Industries

Heineken's Sustainability Leadership

The Dutch beer company Heineken is comprised of 160 breweries. The brand is committed to company-wide GHG emissions reductions of 40 percent from 2008 levels by 2020.  Heineken is third leading beer company in the world in terms of brand value. They also own the world’s first zero-carbon brewery. This carbon neutral facility is located in the small town of Göss, Austria. This brewery started in 1860 and beer has been brewed in the town since 960AD.

Heineken produces 1.4m bottles of beer a day at the Göss facility. They have managed to slash their CO2 emissions from about 3,000 tonnes a year in 2003 to zero in 2016. The entire beer industry is increasingly sustainable and Heineken is leading the way.  

The Göss plant is powered by hydro-electricity and 40 percent of heating is provided by a nearby sawmill's waste heat. Another 10 percent comes from recovering the facility’s own waste heat and 3-5 percent comes from a solar thermal plant. The rest comes from biogas generated by a newly installed anaerobic digestion plant that uses the spent grain from the brewing process. The residue of this process, the digestate, is sold as a fertiliser.

“What we have here is a great role model for how you can connect one story of best practice to many different parts of the business around the world and connect the sustainability agenda in a very effective way to the business agenda,” says Dickstein. “What’s happening at Göss is about risk mitigation, eco-efficiency and commercial opportunities.”

Other Heineken brands are getting all their energy from solar power. This includes brands such as Tiger in Singapore, Birra Moretti in Italy and the Netherlands’ Wiekse. These brands are marketed under the heading market them under the tagline “brewed by the sun”.

Heineken prides itself on its local sourcing of ingredients and Heineken’s efforts in Austria “demonstrate what is possible through working creatively with the local landscape and stakeholders,” says Jenny Lopez, sustainability adviser on food and energy at Forum for the Future.

“It is about the company thinking long-term to understand and redefine how sustainability issues are material to their business, and how this fits within the company’s long-term strategy and vision.” Lopez said.

The Paris climate agreement at “COP 21 helped because it became clear that the national plans required targets that implied an even bigger shift towards renewable energy,” Dickstein said.

Heineken has cut the amount of water per litre of beer from five litres to 3.9 litres in just two years. Their wastewater is currently treated at most sites and by 2020 all of Heineken's breweries will treat their waste water.

Dickstein acknowledges that Heineken cannot resolve water issues alone. He says: “We are trying to build water stewardship into planning how much water we take out of a watershed but we know we can’t resolve these issues on our own. We need a more comprehensive approach. We need the local authorities and the private sector to contribute to solutions.”

Related
The Beer Industry is Emerging as a Sustainability Leader
Gray Water Can Make Beer and Renewable Energy
Asahi May be the World's Greenest Brewery
Drought Impacts California's Wine and Beer Industries

Clinton Trounces Trump in the First Presidential Debate

With a commanding effort Hilary Clinton has decisively won the first presidential debate halting Donald Trump's momentum. He interrupted Clinton a total of 26 times and he spoke over the moderator Lester Holt. In addition to his well-known, albeit strange, speaking style, Trump punctuated his incoherent rants with snorts.

Clinton started the debate by mentioning the jobs associated with clean renewable energy and she mentioned the veracity of climate change. Here is an excerpt from her opening remarks: "First, we have to build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top. That means we need new jobs, good jobs with rising incomes. I want us to invest in you. I want us to invest in your future. That means jobs in infrastructure, in advanced manufacturing, innovation and technology, clean renewable energy and small business because most of the new jobs will come from small business."

She went on to say, "Donald was one of the people who rooted for the housing crisis. He said back in 2006, “Gee, I hope it does collapse because then I can go in and buy some and make some money.” Well, it did collapse."

Trump interrupted her saying, "That’s called business, by the way."

Soon after that Clinton mentioned that "independent experts" said Trump's economic plan would "blow up the debt by over $5 trillion and would in some instances disadvantage middle-class families compared to the wealthy...we would lose three and a half million jobs and maybe have another recession." These same experts said that Clinton's economic plan would deliver "10 million more new jobs because we will be making investments where we can grow the economy."

Clinton went on to say, "Take clean energy. Some country is going to be the clean energy superpower of the 21st century. Donald thinks that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. I think it’s real."

While Trump interrupted her again claiming he did not say that, a quick fact check reveals that he did.

Clinton went on to say, "We can deploy a half a billion more solar panels. We can have enough clean energy to power every home. We can build a new modern electric grid. That’s a lot of jobs. That’s a lot of new economic activity."

Trump said, "She talks about solar panels. We invested in a solar company, our country. That was a disaster. They lost plenty of money on that one." Presumably, he was referring to Solyndra. What Trump did not say is that solar energy has been growing at breakneck speed around the world and in the US. Nor did he mention that solar is now the least expensive form of energy in the world.

"Well, Donald, I know you live in your own reality," Clinton said. She later added, "we need to have strong growth, fair growth, sustained growth."

Trump indicated that he was opposed to doing anything to combat climate change because in his view it hurts the economy. He also said that he wants to get rid of government regulations inferring that they interfere with corporate profits.

The outcome is really no surprise. This is what you expect when you have a debate between the most and the least qualified presidential candidate in US history.

"[J]ust listen to what you heard." Clinton said. "You have to judge us. Who can shoulder the immense awesome responsibilities of the presidency? Who can put into action the plans that will make your life better? I hope that I will be able to earn your vote on November 8th."

This is but the first debate. We would do well to remember that Ronald Regan lost the first Presidential debate and so did Barack Obama. We also need to remember Trump has taken some beatings in the past but he has always returned like some immortal zombie.

Even if we can get beyond the racism, misogyny and xenophobia, Trump was anything but presidential in the first presidential debate. Trump may sound like an average man, but the question Americans need to ask themselves is, do they really want such an ill-prepared, ill-informed, individual to be commander and chief?

A Review of Trump's Positions on Climate, Energy and the Economy

What would a Trump presidency look like? This is the question that thinking people must ask. Trump is notoriously vague but he has offered some insight into his positions on the climate and energy fronts.

If Trump were to become President it would signal the end of the Paris Climate Agreement, environmental regulations would be gutted and fossil fuel extraction would multiply. This is a recipe for disaster.

Here is a review of his positions on climate change, energy, the economy, and government regulations. Included is a review of his shady business practices, and his love for Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.

Denier

Trump  has vowed to kill climate action. When asked about anthropogenic global warming he infamously said:

"Well, they're saying manmade and I say it could have a minor impact but nothing, nothing to what they are talking about. And what it is doing is putting us at a tremendous disadvantage as a country, because other counties are not adhering to the rules, we are, and it makes it impossible for our businesses to compete."

California Gov. Jerry Brown, is leading a green revolution in his state. In a recent speech Brown succinctly destroyed Trump's climate ignorance calling him a fraud and a liar.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, the liberal conscience of the Democratic Party, said at the DNC Convention. "Trump thinks he can win votes by fanning the flames of fear and hatred." As Warren pointed out his divide and conquer politics benefits no one but himself.

Energy policy

Trump’s energy agenda is largely defined by his support for fossil fuels and his commitment to rolling back clean energy initiatives.  We would see more coal and a lot less clean energy.  The Republican Platform rejects renewable energy and carbon pricing.   He has specifically promised to:

Rescind all of President Obama’s executive actions, including the Climate Action Plan, cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and stop all payments of U.S. tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs.

As reviewed in a Makovsky post, in his own words here are Trump's views opposing clean energy:

“There has been a big push to develop alternative forms of energy—so-called green energy—from renewable sources. That’s a big mistake. To begin with, the whole push for renewable energy is being driven by the wrong motivation, the mistaken belief that global climate change is being caused by carbon emissions. If you don’t buy that—and I don’t—then what we have is really just an expensive way of making the tree-huggers feel good about themselves.”

Trump dismisses solar energy as an “unproven technology” with low return on investment, despite the fact that solar is revolutionizing the energy picture in the US and around the world. Trump has also stated that wind energy is “destroying shorelines all over the world” and is a “very, very poor source of energy.”

Economic policy

Former Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat who served as Michigan’s chief executive from 2003 through 2010 quotes experts who have said that his economic policies could result in the loss of millions of jobs or that many of the products that bear his name are manufactured overseas.

A Think Progress article described Trump's economic policy as "devastating" for climate and his economic plan was referred to as a "nightmare."

For more information about the fantasy of Trump's energy and economic policy click here.

Regulations

As reported by Grist, a secret recording obtained by Reuters, suggests the if Trump becomes president the first thing he will do is get rid of the Environmental Protection Agency.  He would dismantle US environment and climate laws and effectively deregulate pollution.

Shady business practices

The Freedom Kids performed at Trump Rallies, but did not receive due compensation. The Freedom Kids story mirrors Trump's record in working with small business owners.

According to the USA Today there are hundreds of people who have failed to be paid by Trump despite providing the goods or services requested.

Russia

In August the New York Times said that a secret Ukrainian ledger lists the Trump campaign as having received payments. Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort is known to have advised a former pro-Putin Ukrainian President. Manaford was also named in Ukrainian investigation into shady payments. 

Clearly Trump likes the Russian dictator. In July Trump suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin had once called President Barack Obama the n-word then he went on to say that he hopes Putin likes him.

Donald Trump also said he hopes Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails have fallen into the hands of Russian hackers essentially sanctioning state espionage against the United States.

Trump has been all over the place regarding his ties to Putin and others in Russia. Most recently an ABC News investigation revealed that Trump was paid hundreds of millions by Russian oligarchs.

Opposition

Democrats oppose Trump, so it is no surprise that Jennifer Granholm says that “Donald Trump is just so wildly wrong for America.” However many Republicans also oppose him.

Univision published a scathing op-ed by Republican activist by Rosario Marín on August 17 under the title, “Why this Republican is endorsing Hillary Clinton.” She publicly and unequivocally pledged to vote for Hillary Clinton.  “My party and its standard bearer leave me no choice; On November 8, I will vote for Hillary Clinton.”

Many leading Republicans and all living former Presidents have come forward to oppose Trump. Many Republicans opposing Trump say he is dangerously unqualified to be president.

Anti-science

One of the hallmarks of the Republican party and Donald Trump in particular is their ignorance of and opposition to science. This view was cemented by a science survey filled out by Trump which caused Think Progress to say his answers show "lack of either knowledge or policy."

“Science is science and facts are facts,” Trump writes at the end of the survey.

If this were a take-home, open-book science test, Trump would have failed.

Corruption

On September 11th the Washington Post uncovered what it described as "massive" corruption At Trump Foundation

Why Trump is the wrong person at the wrong time

In August Bernie Sanders published an OpEd In LA Times, here is an excerpt:

"Donald Trump would be a disaster and an embarrassment for our country if he were elected president. His campaign is not based on anything of substance — improving the economy, our education system, healthcare or the environment. It is based on bigotry. He is attempting to win this election by fomenting hatred against Mexicans and Muslims. He has crudely insulted women. And as a leader of the “birther movement,” he tried to undermine the legitimacy of our first African American president. That is not just my point of view. That’s the perspective of a number of conservative Republicans...Trump, on the other hand, like most Republicans, rejects science and the conclusions of almost all major researchers in the field. He believes that climate change is a “hoax,” and that there’s no need to address it...the most immediate task we face is to defeat Donald Trump."

Related
Trump Takes his First Beating with More to Come
Exposing the Fantasy of Trump's Policy Positions on Energy and the Economy
Republicans Opposing Trump Say he is Dangerously Unqualified to be President
Climate Action and the Binary Choice between Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump
The Vote Rigging Fallacy Trump Promises to Kill Climate Action in RNC Speech: The False Flags of Fear and Division
Climate Avoidance, No-shows, Discord and Nepotism Mark the Start of the Republican National Convention
Trump's Climate Ignorance Would be Laughable if the Implications weren't so Serious
GOP Platform Augurs Environmental Destruction and Runaway Climate Change
Trump's Pick for VP Fails to Secure Support from the Koch Brothers (Videos)
Climate Polls Give the GOP Cause for Concern
Climate Change and the US Presidential Election of 2016
Trump Could Win and We All Could Lose
Trump Wants to Mine Coal Frack for Gas and Drill for Oil
Climate Doomsday Clock Advances as Trump Wins the Republican Nomination
Trump is Unelectable So Say the Koch Brothers and Others

Event - Environment Analyst Business Summit 2016

The inaugural Environment Analyst (EA) Business Summit will take place on Wednesday 28th September 2016 at One America Square, London, UK. This event is subtitled, "Accelerating Growth and Adding Value to Address Environmental Market Disruptors". The EA Summit is a unique event aimed specifically at business leaders working within the environmental consultancy services sector.

This highly-focused one day event will bring together senior-level speakers from across the whole sector: consultants, contractors, regulators and clients. They will provide, first-hand, the latest thinking on a number of key issues.

Ample time has also been built into the programme for discussion and networking. Designated Q&A time after each session, interactive panel debates and roundtable discussion sessions each provide valuable opportunities for sharing opinions and valuable experiences with your peers. Extended refreshment breaks and the evening drinks reception allow for further discussion and networking, ensuring you make the most of your time out of the office.

Sessions include:
  • The current environmental consultancy market - policy drivers & constraints and growth opportunities
  • Key sector snapshots including a focus on energy, natural resources and the opportunities arising from the Paris Agreement
  • Exploring the impact and success of recent M&As and consolidation in the sector
  • Internationalisation and export opportunities for UK environmental consultancies
  • Client perspectives highlighting their future priorities and how they will look to procure and work with environmental consultants
  • Partnering & collaboration and getting the best out of the Client - Consultant- Contractor relationship
For the list of delegates, presenters, and presentations click here
Click here to see the program or to register.

Event - ASES National Solar Tour

The 21st Annual American Solar Energy Society (ASES) National Solar Tour will be held October 2016 in neighborhoods across the US. Attending the 2016 National Solar Tour will allow communities across the country the opportunity to see new and innovative technologies locally that benefit the environment on a global level. Visiting homes on the tour is a way to have a voice in how Americans get their energy, and allows attendees to learn, engage and be a part of the solution to current energy challenges.

The ASES National Solar Tour is the largest grassroots solar event in the nation, involving over 150,000 participants and 5,000 solar-energy sites nationwide. It offers the opportunity to informally tour innovative green homes and buildings, and see affordable and practical technologies in local neighborhoods.

The tour continues to inspire people across the nation to make sustainable energy choices that reduce costs, support energy independence, protect against power outages, and reduce carbon emissions.

Sponsored by Enphase Energy, a global technology company, this event is coordinated nationally by the nonprofit American Solar Energy Society in collaboration with dozens of outstanding partner organizations. It takes place annually during October in conjunction with National Energy Awareness Month.

About the American Solar Energy Society

Established in 1954, the nonprofit American Solar Energy Society (ASES) is the nation's leading association of renewable energy professionals and advocates. ASES is the United States Section of the International Solar Energy Society (ISES). Our mission is to enable a 100% renewable energy society.

To find a tour near you and to sign-in click here.

Related
Solar Innovations are Revolutionizing Energy
Solar is Now the Cheapest Form of Electricity on Earth
Pseudosynthesis - Solar Power that Mimics Photosynthesis
Solar and Storage - A Match Made in Heaven
Solar is Destined to Defeat Fossil Fuels
The Rapid Growth of On-Site Solar Energy in the US
Solar's Prodigious Growth in the US
Report - Shining Cities: At the Forefront of America's Solar Energy Revolution
Solar Power's Prodigious Global Growth

Event - IGEM: Green Business for Sustainability

Asean’s IGEM will take place on October 5, 2016, at the Kuala, Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia. This is Asean's largest green business platform. IGEM, organised by the Malaysian government, is the region’s largest green technology business and innovation platform to promote the growth of the green technology sector.Since its inception in 2010, IGEM has generated an estimated USD2.2 billion in business leads, with 2015 recording the highest at USD500 million.

This year’s IGEM, themed “Green Business for Sustainability”, will feature five key pillars namely Green Energy, Green Transport, Green Building, Waste Technology and Management as well as Clean Water Technology and Management. The event expects to draw in over 350 exhibitors from over 30 countries and targets business leads of USD380 million.

Key attractions for IGEM 2016 include:
• Minister-Industry Dialogue “Paris Agreement - A Turning Point for Low Carbon Sector”
• Solar PV Conference themed “Bridging Key Performers”
• Solar Energy Zone featuring major energy players including Huawei, JA solar, Hanwha Q Cells, Trina Solar and Jinko Solar
• Green Car Pavilion featuring leading green automotive manufacturers
• Business Consultation and One-to One Bizmatch by Malaysian Investment Development Authority
• International Business Matching by Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation
• Investor Connect by Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology, connecting exhibitors with close to 20 investors.
• The collaboration between Asia School of Business (ASB-MIT) and GreenTech Malaysia for the first GreenTech Youth Innovation Challenge 2016

Click here to register for the conference.
To pre-register as a visitor for the exhibition here.

Event - SRI Conference (Sustainable Responsible Impact Investing)

The 27th annual SRI Conference will take place on November 9-11, 2016, at The Hyatt Regency Downtown, Denver, Colorado. Together we're catalyzing the shift to a more socially equitable and environmentally sustainable economy. Plan to stay with us through the afternoon and evening program on November 11th! Action Strategy Circles: interactive, facilitated, peer-to-peer conversation circles on timely topics.

SPECIAL EVENING PROGRAM! Agenda Topics

  • The New Political Environment 
  • Fiduciary Duty 
  • Jumpstart Your Marketing 
  • Clean Energy Investing Trends 
  • Addressing Anger at Wall Street Data Driven ESG Integration 
  • Post-Election: Impacts on Public Markets 
  • Agriculture and Climate Change 
  • LGBTQ Rights and Shareowner Advocacy 
  • Investing in Water 
Click here to register.

Letterman Comes Out of Retirement to Advocate for the Health of the Planet and Solar Energy (Videos)

David Letterman returns to television this fall to proclaim his love for the planet and rant against those who are destroying it. He is coming out of retirement to share his concern about climate change and the importance of renewable energy and solar energy in particular. This is not his usual comedic shtick, instead, he will be hosting an episode of a program on ecological degradation and environmental action. The program is an Emmy-winning climate change documentary-series called, "Years of Living Dangerously".

The show chronicles life in the Anthropocene, it tells the story of those who contribute to climate change and the ways this is impacting life on Earth. In addition to exposing environmental villains who are ravaging the Earth, it also explores solutions to the mess we have made.

Letterman's environmental sensitivities were on display when the subject arose on The Late Show. The health of our planet is a cause that Letterman genuinely believes in, perhaps his views are informed in part by the fact that he is the father of a young child. He has used his celebrity to rant against oil and fracking. In the episode that he hosts Letterman travels to India to examine how that nation provides energy to its entire population.

We know that renewables can provide all of the power requirements of both India and the US and we know that it is theoretically possible to power the entire world entirely with solar energy.

Letterman says in the promo provided by Entertainment Weekly:
"I've created, excuse the expression, kind of a love affair with this. Think about the coal-fired, dangerous, smoke-belching generating plants, and then you look at this and it's friendly. There's something very appealing about this, and it's smooth. Look at it: I can touch it and it's safe. I put my head right there on it."
Although the subject matter is serious Letterman cannot help but offer a few laughs along the way.

Watch his solar panel segment called "Into the Light"



The Letterman episode also includes an interview with Indian Prime Minister Modi. In this interview Modi suggests that India may be the first nation to be powered entirely by clean energy.


 
India currently has an interesting energy mix that runs the gamut from very clean (solar) to very dirty (coal). As the world's third-largest coal consumer many are troubled by India's use of this GHG intensive and pollution causing form of energy. Environmentalists decry the fact that India is expected to import more coal than China in the near future. However, the situation is not so simple, Modi claims he is using coal to help sell solar.

As explained in a Think Progress article, India's government has ordered state-owned utility, NTPC, to sell electricity from solar power along with electricity from coal-fired power. The idea is that this bundling can help to augment solar's position in the country's energy picture and raise its profile in the nation's economy. Many see solar as the most readily available and therefore important form of renewable energy.

Modi argues that bundling energy derived from a mix of solar and coal it will expand the production of the former and reduce the cost. To help bring the government's policy to fruition NTPC will construct 15 gigawatts of solar over the next four years.

Although in India coal is still cheaper than solar, we have seen elsewhere that solar has become the cheapest form of energy on the planet. When partnered with declining battery costs, you have a looming opportunity for massive growth.

While it is easy to villainize coal in India's coal industry has actually been investing in solar for years. The largest coal company in India (Coal India) has installed solar panels at nine installations across the country.

The Indian government is committed to the ambitious target of producing 100 gigawatts of solar capacity (both local and farms) in the next seven years. The nation currently has 4.5 gigawatts of installed solar capacity.

One of the most intriguing parts of India's solar ambitions is that it would bring electricity to the 400 million people in rural villages that currently have no power or are powered by diesel generators.

This is the second season of Years of Living Dangerously and it premieres on National Geographic channel on October 30th. Other hosts this season include Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Related
Solar Innovations are Revolutionizing Energy
Solar is Now the Cheapest Form of Electricity on Earth
Pseudosynthesis - Solar Power that Mimics Photosynthesis
Solar and Storage - A Match Made in Heaven
Solar is Destined to Defeat Fossil Fuels
The Rapid Growth of On-Site Solar Energy in the US
Solar's Prodigious Growth in the US
Report - Shining Cities: At the Forefront of America's Solar Energy Revolution
Solar Power's Prodigious Global Growth

The Beer Industry is Emerging as a Sustainability Leader

Beer is a hugely popular beverage that is threatened by climate change and drought. In addition to water the beer industry is also dependent on grains and hops.

According to beer industry statistics, 1.93 billion hectoliters (100 liters) of beer are consumed globally each year. Beer is not only popular, it is also a huge industry with gross sales figures of around $20 billion per year.

Climate change is a threat to the beer industry.  As explained by Ceres the beer industry is rising to the challenge.

“leading breweries are finding innovative ways to integrate sustainability into their business practices and finding economic opportunity through investing in renewable energy, energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste recapture, and sustainable sourcing.”

The industry is acting to manage the risks associated with water scarcity and climate change and they have emerged as sustainability leaders in the process.

Hops and grains

Global warming threatens both the grains (eg barley) used to make the beer and the hops used to flavor it. The warmer temperatures and extreme weather associated with climate change pose a danger to agriculture including hops and grains.

While the logic of growing hops, barley and other grains needed for beer production makes sense from a sustainability perspective, it may not be a viable idea.  Enthusiasm for this idea is tempered by California's four-year-old drought.

The fact that hops and grain for beer are not being grown in drought plagued California may make the supply more stable. However, the fact that they are grown up north means that they must travel further disatnaces and this increases their carbon footprints. 

The water problem

Water is absolutely fundamental to beer's production model and maintaining a steady supply may be the industries single biggest vulnerability. Water is the key ingredient in beer and it is also essential to grow the grains needed for beer production. More than 95 percent of every glass of beer consists of water.  It takes five gallons of water to make one gallon of beer (double for some smaller breweries). 

Water is especially critical in places like California where four years of drought is increasing costs. There are also concerns that the government's forthcoming industry regulations will augur additional costs and diminished access to water. 

The president of the California Craft Brewers Association explained the situation well when he said, “Water is a long-term worry for any business or resident in this state.”

As reported by Maxim, American demand for Mexican beer has actually caused a drought in a town where it is brewed. American's thirst for Carona, Negra Modelo, and Pacifico beer has led to serious local water shortages in the town of Zaragoza in Neva, Coahilua

In July the Mayor of Zaragoza, wrote a letter to the state govenor explaining that there is no water left for human consumption. Mayor Leonicio Martinez Sanchez surely appreciates the jobs and the taxes paid by Constellation Brands, which operates the brewery. However he is concerned about the 1,200 liters of water per second that is drawn from the 500-meter-deep wells to make the beer. Even more problematic is Constellation's plans to increase production.
“It's contradictory that while Constellation Brands has industrial amounts of water to make beer, the municipality of Zaragoza doesn't have 100 liters [per second of water] to give people to drink or use in their homes,” Mayor Sanchez said. “We’re worried because we’re already being impacted by this extraction of 1,200 liters of water per second…there’s barely a drop of water when you open the tap.”
Innovative water solutions

Driven by concerns about current and future water issues, the beer industry has become a global leader in water management. Drought has made it necessary for California's craft breweries to adopt innovative water management solutions. These breweries actively collaborate because they know that they must work together to ensure that their industry does not dry up.  Sharing water management techniques is critical in an industry where water scarcity has already forced some beer companies to limit production.

Craft breweries have been multiplying in the state of California adding an average of two new breweries every week. There are now more than 600 craft breweries in the state. This puts tremendous stress of Californial's limited water supplies.

Efforts to manage the problem are both diverse and creative. As reported in the Beer Advocate, Santa Barbara's Telegraph Brewing Company has pioneered innovative approaches to water conservation in their sanitation practices (when it comes to beer making cleanliness is key to a good brew). It’s good for the environment, it’s good for the bottom line, and wasting any resource is just not good business,” says Telegraph’s owner Brian Thompson.

In Carlsbad and Santa Barbara, desalination plants are being used to turn ocean water into fresh water. Chico's Sierra Nevada Brewing Company has been working to reduce its water usage for years. Their efforts include automating their brewing systems,  nozzle controls on the manual hoses and “burst rinsing” in CIPs, (brief, high-pressure blasts of water rather than continual streams). They have reduced their water usage by 25 percent since 2007.

Firestone Brewing Company’s “carbon footprint karma,” ensures that 80 percent of their product is consumed within 180 miles of the production facility. Firestone is also avoiding excessive rinsing, and installing steam and condensate recovery systems as well as automating their process.

Stone Brewing Company is building a distribution hub east of the Mississippi to cut transportation time. They are also integrating innovatiive water conservation techniques like like a dewatering press (still in process), which squeezes water from the spent grain. Stone has slashed their water usage during in their cleaning cycles to about 3.5 to 4 gallons of water per gallon of beer.

While high tech solutions like burst rinsing and the dewatering press could save a lot of water there are also a number of simple low-tech solutions that can be as simple as putting a big bucket under the fermentation tank opening as it cleans.

Water GHGs and money

As reported by Ethical Corp., good water stewardship can also contribute to GHG reductions and cost savings.  SABMiller found that its efforts to reduce water intensity also reduced CO2 emissions. This is because the processing and treatment of water requires energy. This contributed to cost savings. “Within our cost savings programmes [water and CO2 combined], we saved $117m in 2014/2015 [compared with 2010] from water- and energy-related initiatives.”

Between 2008 and 2011 SABMiller reduced its energy intensity by almost 4.5 percent from 161 to 154 MJ of energy per hectoliter of beer. In 2015 the company met its 15 percent reduction and reduced its packaging weight compared to 2008. 

Sustainability initiatives in the beer industry have substantially reduced water usage and emissions while saving money. That is a formula for success if ever there was one.

Related
Gray Water Can Make Beer and Renewable Energy
Heineken's Sustainability Leadership
Asahi May be the World's Greenest Brewery
Drought Impacts California's Wine and Beer Industries

What Aspiring Sustainability Professionals Should Learn in College

Here is some advice from young professionals for college students interested in pursuing a career in sustainability. Getting ready for the workplace starts when you are in school. Learn from the experience of a group of sustainability professionals as they offer insightful advice. This advice focuses on areas of study (courses, programs) and extracurricular activities (academic and personal) .

In an article titled "Young sustainability leaders reveal their career success secrets," Emma Campher asked GreenBiz 30 under 30 honorees— about their higher-education experience, and what advice they have for rising college students who are interested in the intersection of business and sustainability.

Second only to networking and connecting with others, these young professionals stressed the importance of gaining access to practical experience that enables students to get their "hands dirty." This could involve internships, fellowships, and volunteer projects. Many expressed the importance of seeking out new experiences including travel abroad. It is also important to try to make sustainability issues tangible.

They said that students should be intellectually flexible and learn to explore issues from a variety of perspectives. It is also important to learn how to speak the languages of the civil, public and private sectors.

One of the most useful pieces of advice came from someone who said it is a good ideal to learn from working professionals who are doing what you hope to do. This individual suggested doing "informational interviews with people whose career paths you really admire." Ask them how they got there and more about their day-to-day experiences.

Above all students should build their confidence, find their own voice and learn to be tenacious problem solvers.

Study

In response to a question about the most helpful classes and topics of study these young professionals stressed to need to pursue classes that provide tangible skills. They suggested studying corporate sustainability, specifically greenhouse gas and water accounting as well as supply chain transparency. They singled out the importance of business classes but they also mentioned philosophy.

One person said that it is important to take classes that provide insights into psychology, persuasion and marketing because you will need to be able to convince people. Another suggested taking challenging courses that push students "outside of their comfort zone, knowledge and confidence."

Still another professional said that it is important to take classes that ask ultimate questions about the human condition, "where reason is beyond itself, and truths cannot be confirmed or validated." This translates to a commitment to seeking, looking and questioning or as they explained it, "live the question."

Others suggested studying sustainable development, social justice, environmental chemistry, LEED certification,  and coding for websites.

Extracurricular

In response to a question about the most helpful extracurricular activities, the green professionals counseled students to join sustainability-focused organizations, groups and clubs. Some suggested that students should get involved in environmental and climate activism. A couple even mentioned that students could start a student organization. It was recommended that students should support on-campus sustainability initiatives including things like recycling, energy, waste and water reduction, and renewable energy. 

Become active in school politics and engage in local policy or volunteer in the community. In addition to working in the field, a great way to build professional experience as a student is to become a UNEP Regional Youth Representative with the United Nations.

Skills

Beyond learning about the issues there are a number of specific skill sets referenced by these professionals This includes working as a team, strategic planning, and collaboration. Students should also learn how to forge alliances with diverse stakeholders. 

Make sure to see the article titled, "Comprehensive Green School Information and Resources." It contains links to over 325 articles covering everything you need to know about sustainable academics, student eco-initiatives, green school buildings, and college rankings as well as a wide range of related information and resources. 

Reflections on Rhino Horn Economics and the Natural Capital Movement on World Rhino Day

September 22nd is World Rhino Day, on this day and throughout the year we say "NO" to legalizing the rhino horn trade.  People all around the world are engaging in activities designed to raise awareness about this magnificent and endangered  animal. The NRDC and others are calling on world leaders to stamp out trafficking in rhino horn and elephant ivory. 

The article which follows addresses these issues and related concerns about natural capital.

_______________________________

A number of market based solutions have been advanced to address dwindling biological diversity and the loss of healthy eco-systems. Efforts to save the rhino serve as a model to explore some of these approaches. Rhinos are one of the largest living land mammals and they symbolize humans’ deleterious impacts on the natural world.

Rhinos are being hunted to extinction for their horns, which are considered to be a magical cure-all in some traditional Asian cultures. The trade in rhino horn is currently illegal, but one approach to address this problem strives to indulge the demand by farming them. The advantage to this approach is that the horn can be removed without killing the animal, thereby protecting the animal from extinction.

Skyrocketing Rhino poaching


As reported by savetherhino.org, at the beginning of the 20th century there were 500,000 rhinos across Africa and Asia. This fell to 70,000 by 1970 and further to just 29,000 in the wild today. In Asia, the Sumatran and Javan rhinos are critically endangered. There are fewer than 100 Sumatran rhinos left in the wild and only 35 – 45 Javan rhinos left.

While deforestation, displacement by human settlements and the fragmentation of their habitats are threats to the rhinos, by far the greatest threat comes from poaching. While the numbers of some populations of rhinos have seen some modest increases, efforts to save these animals are being undermined by growing numbers of poachers lured by the lucrative demand.
As explained by the New York Times,
“After two decades of gains, the world’s population of rhinoceroses is being killed off by poachers at such a high rate that conservationists fear the deaths could soon surpass the number of rhinos that are born each year.”
The International Rhino Foundation says that two rhinos a day are being poached in South Africa alone, and that number is growing. Susie Ellis, the executive director of the foundation said economics is driving the destruction of rhinos.

Rhino horn economics


Clearly, prohibitions against the legal sale of rhino horns have not worked. In fact it has driven up the price on the black market. Rhino horns are now more valuable than gold. Advocates of rhino farming say that we may be able to preserve the species by creating a legal industry.

In response to the epidemic of poaching, Bloomberg reports that South Africa is considering legalizing the sale of rhino horn and authorizing commercial farming. They even suggest that rhino horn should be traded on the Johannesburg bourse. This approach was supported in a 2013 South African Department of Environmental Affairs report. Supporters believe that this is the best way of protecting animals and conserving the natural environment.
“Some viewed the lifting of the ban on trade in rhino horn as the panacea that would end poaching and save the rhino from otherwise inevitable extinction,”  the South African Department of Environmental Affairs report stated. “This view was supported by market theorists who argued that in a market where rhino horn could be traded freely, market forces would automatically drive horn prices down, obviating the need for syndicates to face risks associated with poaching.”
Some say that there are parallels for this approach in agriculture and the farming of livestock. We already plant forests of fruit bearing trees. We remove the fruit without killing the tree. We also breed a wide range of animal species for human use. From food to clothing, animals are raised for our use. For example, sheep are sheared so that we can use their wool to make clothes and cows are raised to provide milk.

Commoditizing nature


Advocates of pricing nature argue that we can use the profit incentive to protect the natural world. The “commoditization” or “financialisation” of nature suggests that this is a way to manage our rapacious consumer appetites. In the book People and Nature: An Introduction to Human Ecological Relations, Emilio F. Moran says,
“The solution to these environmental problems lies within us is closely tied to our choices. The solution must begin with the individual and a commitment to resist the forces of global consumerism in favor of a concern with the planet as our home — now at risk due to policies that fail to give value to environmental goods and services.”
This view that we need to put a price on nature is advocated by men like the Indian banker Pavan Sukhdev. He and his colleagues explored this approach in a report on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) which argues we need to assign a value to address the “economic invisibility of nature.”

A March, 2014, article titled Putting a Price on Nature, explained how the Global Economic Symposium, has proposed the concept of a “New Economy of Nature,” which advocates valuing natural resources.

Other variations of this approach are known as payment for ecosystem services (PES), or payments for environmental services (or benefits). One of the most ubiquitous is known as natural capital accounting (NCA). This approach is supported by the World Bank and as they explained in an April 18th 2013 press release, a group of more than 60 countries have committed themselves to NCA.

Some of the countries that support NCA include Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Finland, France, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

The World Bank supports NCA through a global partnership called WAVES (Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services). The WAVES partnership includes the United Nations Environment Programme, the United Nations Development Program, and the United Nations Statistical Commission. Participating countries want NCA to be part of the discussion on Sustainable Development Goals post-2015.

These marketplace solutions to the unsustainable exploitation of the natural world have laudable objectives. The idea is to provide monetary incentives in exchange for managing aspects of the natural world. While the underlying aim of these approaches is to promote the conservation of natural resources and diminish environmental degradation, the actual impacts of such programs may not produce the ends they seek.

The problem of commoditizing nature


As explored in a Yale 360 article, titled Whats Wrong with Putting a Price on Nature, there are a number of problems associated with PES. According to Kent H. Redford, an environmental consultant, we should not assume that old-style conservation methods have failed. He points to successes like state-sponsored protected areas which now cover 25 percent of the land in Costa Rica, 27 percent in the United States (at the federal level alone), 30 percent in Tanzania and Guatemala, and 50 percent in Belize.

A study by Redford and William M. Adams, addresses the numerous difficulties associated with assigning a price to nature including what those values should be, who has the right to assign such values and who has the right to benefit.

UNEP’s support for commoditizing nature is criticized in a report by Mark Wilson at the Center for Sustainable Development, Uppsala University, Switzerland. The report is called The Green Economy: The Dangerous Path of Nature Commoditization, and it addresses UNEP’s proposal to price ecosystem services. This report cites five aspects of the green economy which could undermine the practical implementation as well as the social legitimacy of pricing nature:
  1.  Ecosystem services are inherently difficult to price.
  2. The consideration of the rebound effect is insufficient.
  3. The primacy of economics over the environment is ensured.
  4. Markets offer little protection for the poorest people.
  5. Existing market mechanisms aimed at safeguarding the environment have not succeeded. 
“The green economy relies upon the discursive power of ecological modernization and our faith in progress to uphold a failing strategy of unfettered economic growth,” Wilson says. “This discourse limits our capacity to conceive solutions outside the economic sphere. Achieving sustainable development will require a process of social change that could be facilitated by the acceptance that nature is more than just a form of capital.”

Artificial inflated value


The term, rhino horn economics encompasses maladaptive social constructs that drive insane levels of consumerism. It also deals with the psychology of assigning value to something that we really do not need. More specifically it focuses on the destructive ecological cost of unbridled demand. To bring it back to the rhino analogy, a living rhino has real value while the value of a harvested horn is entirely artificial (There is absolutely no evidence to indicate that they have any medicinal value or treat any disease or condition). While we attribute value to animal or plant byproducts that are essential for our survival, it becomes highly destructive when we attribute value to a product or service that does not meet real human needs.

Once a largely western vice, increasing standards of living in the developing world are now seeing rising rates of consumption. This type of consumption threatens the survival of a wide range of species and habitats. The growing demand for rhino horn is a case in point. It is a cancerous outgrowth of the rapidly proliferating global society of consumers. While a market for rhino horn has existed for centuries in Asia, that market is now increasing exponentially. The growing disposable incomes of people in places like China and Vietnam is driving the growing demand. As a consequence, Rhino horn is now a sought after luxury item.

Arguably our relationship to many goods and services are analogous to the demand for rhino horn. We are a global society of rapacious consumers who buy a great many things that we really need.

Addressing rampant consumerism


Consumerism is driven by a steady barrage of adverstising that creates a demand for what we do not need. Surely if a solution exists it starts with serious questions about our actual as opposed to our perceived needs. Rather than indulging our rampant consumerism we must pear down our consumption. Based on this model we have unsustainably consumed vast quantities of resources and the rarer they get the more desirable they become.

Rather than try to find ways of preserving current consumption patterns we need to question the underlying insane psychology of our unsustainable consumption patterns. This implies that we must also question the broken social constructs that feed into consumer behavior.

The path to destruction


As pointed out in the Redford and Adams study, when monetary values are assigned to nature they are likely to carry less weight when we reduce them to economics. In effect we are cheapening nature when we frame it as a service provider fit to be incorporated into the global capital markets.
As the Guardian, columnist and land rights activist George Monbiot wrote,
”When governments and PES proponents talk about employing marketplace solutions instead of traditional regulatory approaches, what they are really talking about is shrinking democracy, shrinking public involvement in decision making, shrinking transparency and accountability. By handing it over to the market you are in effect handing it over to corporations and the very rich…”
As the Yale 360 article points out, “It may be, as some argue, that we have no better way to save the world. But the danger in the process is that we may lose our souls.”

Nature cannot be reduced to a commodity. We cannot monitize nature any more than we can monitize all the things make life worth living. Anything we do that reduces the natural world to monetary values detracts from its priceless intrinsic value.

We need to understand that greed is at the crux of the environmental crises we face and we are doomed to fail if we premise our solutions on something so egregiously destructive. Now more than ever we need to rekindle our relationship to the natural world as the source of all value. Far from being our salvation, commoditizing nature is sure to divest us of the one thing that can save us from ourselves.

Source: Global Warming is Real

Related Articles
Video - Pricing Nature is Far Harder than you Think
UNEP's NCD Roadmap: Implementing the Four Commitments of the Natural Capital Declaration
UNEP's Natural Capital Declaration (NCD)
A Response to UNEP's Natural Capital Declaration
The Vital Role of Forests: Carbon, Rain and Food

Sugar Coated Lies that Undermine Science

Big sugar's lies are the latest example of greenwash. The subterfuge of industry to serve it's bottom line at the public's expense is a crime that warrants public outrage.  We have recently seen evidence of this type of reprehensible behavior from big tobacco, big oil and automakers.

In 1994, we discovered that big tobacco was lying about the health impacts of smoking when Congressman Harry Waxman held a series of Congressional hearings that subpoenaed the CEOs of the four major tobacco companies. In 2015, big tobacco's cover-up was eclipsed by the revelation that decades ago, Exxon concealed research that showed how fossil fuels are a major cause of global warming. Further examination revealed that the whole fossil fuel industry was complicit in these lies. Also in 2015, Volkswagen found itself in hot water over a scandal in which they were found to have installed devices that falsified emissions tests.  Evidence of systemic dishonesty was then shown to extend across the auto-industry.  Now we can add big sugar to the list of industries responsible for strategic subterfuge.

Sustainability and sugar

Against the backdrop of big sugar's obfuscation, sugarcane production has become increasingly sustainable in recent years. In addition to its use as a sweetener, sugar has greened its reputation through its is use in renewable ethanol production. Voluntary and mandatory sustainability initiatives are changing the way sugar is farmed and processed. Green protocols are in place in Brazil and in many of the more than 100 countries around the world that cultivate sugarcane.

Responsible labor standards are expanding and producers are getting higher yields per acre as better land management principles are being incorporated.  New efficiency measures have reduced water consumption by up to 70 percent and in some mills, up to 95 percent of the water consumed is treated and re-used. There is also less use of pesticides, fungicides, and fertilizers. Diseases that threaten sugarcane are being managed through biological controls and nutrients are provided through innovative uses of organic fertilizers created during sugarcane processing.

Some environmentally harmful sugarcane agricultural practices are being eliminated altogether like the centuries-old practice of sugarcane field burning. This significantly reduces emissions and improves local air quality.  Helped by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, reporting and transparency are another growing trend in sugarcane production, as is sustainability certification incorporating environmental, social and economic criteria.

The big lie

However, these sustainability initiatives are at odds with the rotten truth at the core of big sugar.  The industry has been shown to have manipulated scientific data and attempted to cover-up the facts to give the impression that sugar is not harmful to human health.

As Candice Choi explained in an Associated Press article, documents reveal that in the early 1960s, the industry actively hid sugar's role in heart disease. Their campaign of misinformation involved paid research and pressure exerted on media outlets.

These allegations are part of an analysis that originally broke in 2012 in a Mother Jones article titled, "Big Sugar's Sweet Little Lies." The meat of the story involved confidential Sugar Association PR strategy memos unearthed by Cristin Couzens.

This story was only recently revived by the mainstream media due to a study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Drawing on a decades-old series of correspondences between a sugar trade group and researchers at Harvard, the study unearths big sugar's efforts to manipulate public attitudes.

Big Tobacco tactics

As reported by the CBC, Couzens found "documents suggesting that the sugar industry used Big Tobacco tactics to deflect growing concern over the health effects of sugar."  These documents revealed industry lobby efforts to sponsor scientific research, silence media reports critical of sugar and block dietary guidelines to limit sugar consumption.

The documents show that in 1964, the Sugar Association actively sought to misdirect public attention away from studies that linked sugar with heart disease. In 1965, they came up with "Project 226", in which they formulated a strategy involving researchers at Harvard, MIT, and Yale. 

In 1967, an article written by Harvard researchers was published by the New England Journal of Medicine and it erroneously concluded there was "no doubt" that reducing cholesterol and saturated fat was the only dietary intervention needed to prevent heart disease. This conclusion completely ignored existing research which suggested that sugar plays a role in heart disease. Money for this research came from some big corporate users of sugar including Coca-Cola, Hershey, General Foods, General Mills, and Nabisco.

At a Board of Director's meeting in October 1976, the Sugar Association's president denied the scientific evidence linking sugar and heart disease.  The same year, Sugar Association executives received a PR award known as the Silver Anvil for their subterfuge.

"It's a little bit shocking to me that an industry would be rewarded for manipulating scientific evidence," Couzens said. "At the time the award was given in 1976, there was a controversy. Many people thought sugar was harmful, the sugar industry wanted to turn public opinion toward thinking sugar was safe so they forged public opinion on how the public viewed the effects of sugar," she said.

Undermining science

The implications of big sugar's actions extend well beyond the food industry. Pseudo-research undermines the credibility of science and has been used to draw inaccurate conclusions that serve to manipulate public perceptions.  Similar tactics are used to discredit the science of climate change.  We see this to disastrous effect in the fossil fuel industry which funds pseudo-scientific research papers that are meant to undermine the credibility of real science.

Big sugar is but the latest industry to engage in scientific subterfuge. Recently, big oil and their Republican minions in California's state legislature used these tactics in a failed attempt to turn Californians against new emissions reduction legislation. This makes it hard for the public to distinguish fact from fiction.

This is particularly harmful given that Republicans openly deride mainstream science including those who sit on important committees. Public policy positions, particularly those espoused by the GOP, appear to be completely disconnected from science.

Now more than ever we need to make policy decisions based on science, however, selectively released industry-funded research has made people skeptical about the veracity and authority of science. This allows corporate interests to bend the truth to serve their marketing agenda. 

"Food company sponsorship, whether or not intentionally manipulative, undermines public trust in nutrition science," wrote New York University professor of nutrition Marion Nestle, a longtime critic of industry funding of science.

Unrepentant

Big sugar is using the same tactics used by big tobacco,  big oil, the auto industry and climate deniers. This corporate subterfuge is harmful to public welfare. The JAMA researchers suggest that policy makers should consider giving less weight to industry-funded studies.

Although these offenses started decades ago, there is no statute of limitations for conviction in the court of public opinion. Consumers will hold accountable industries who are found to be responsible for corporate malfeasance.

When Couzens approached the sugar industry for comment, she was told the documents were ancient history. "They gave a comment like, that was in the past and does not reflect the mission of the sugar association currently." However, contrary to Big Sugar's assertions, not much has changed, their lies and cover-ups will continue to plague the industry.

The sugar industry still tries to nominate scientists who will serve their interests on the dietary guidelines advisory committee, and they are still publishing research through connections with the World Sugar Research Organization.

Disreputable corporations cannot outrun their lies forever and the public has a vested interest in holding them accountable. 

Source: Global Warming is Real